logo
How Nationwide's £7m woman became Britain's most controversial banker

How Nationwide's £7m woman became Britain's most controversial banker

Yahoo25-06-2025
The great and the good of Britain's co-operative and mutual sector were at No 10 earlier this month for a summer garden party hosted by Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.
The soiree to celebrate the sector attracted executives from the likes of John Lewis and the Co-op, but arguably the biggest hitter represented was Nationwide, the 140-year-old behemoth that counts one in every two adults in Britain as a customer.
As the UK's largest mutual society, it has long been the poster-child for the sector and prides itself on being run for the benefit of its 17m members rather than profit-hungry shareholders in the City.
Yet to some, Nationwide's mutual ethos is now under threat from Dame Debbie Crosbie, its chief executive.
The 55-year-old banker has courted controversy through aggressive dealmaking that some say is at odds with the purpose of a mutual. Nationwide's £2.9bn acquisition of challenger bank Virgin Money triggered protests last year.
Concerns were heightened last week when it emerged that Nationwide was preparing to hand Dame Debbie a generous new pay package that could earn her a maximum payout of nearly £7m. Critics say the arrangement mirrors the worst of bonus culture at big banks.
'It's like Nationwide is saying we've made the society far bigger by buying a bank [Virgin Money], and now because it's bigger, we have to pay our people even more,' says James Sherwin-Smith, a Nationwide customer who has launched a campaign to join the board to provide a voice for members.
'The society is being led towards becoming a bank in everything it does.'
Nationwide's members will be given a chance to vote on Dame Debbie's pay at a crunch annual meeting on July 25. Mr Sherwin-Smith, who plans to vote against, notes that the deal would make Dame Debbie 'the most highly paid building society CEO ever'.
The vote could be seen as a referendum on the chief executive's leadership, though it is non-binding. How has the Glaswegian executive managed to become Britain's most controversial banker?
To understand why Dame Debbie's leadership has riled some people up, it's important to understand the position Nationwide plays in British life.
It is second only to Lloyds Bank as Britain's largest mortgage lender, providing nearly £16bn of loans to new homeowners alone. At the same time, it is a flag-bearer for the UK's historic mutual sector, meaning it is owned by members rather than shareholders.
Nationwide was established in the 1880s in south London as the Southern Co-operative Permanent Building Society – it became Nationwide in 1970 – to help people buy a home. It has an egalitarian spirit at its core that sees members prioritised.
The mutual has for decades been a counterpoint to the banks. Historically it has swept up small building societies when they go bust – like Portman, Cheshire, Derbyshire and Dunfermline – and offered lower-cost mortgages over generations rather than competing with banks for market share.
Nationwide survived the financial crisis unscathed and even outright rejected the banking model, with members defeating a vote to convert into a bank in 1997.
Dame Debbie was hired to run the mutual in 2021, replacing Joe Garner who had been at the helm for six years. The daughter of an engineer and social care worker, Dame Debbie had previously run TSB and was widely credited with helping stabilise the institution that had been battered by an IT meltdown leading to a £49m fine.
The new chief executive backed the society's mutual model upon joining saying it makes it 'a purposeful and unique force for good.'
Yet some say Dame Debbie's new pay deal contradicts that spirit. Under the terms of the new deal, her maximum windfall will rise by 43pc from £4.8m to £6.9m if she hits all of her financial targets – making her the best paid boss in the mutual's history.
The plan puts her well beyond her building society peers. Susan Allen, chief executive at Yorkshire Building Society, earns around £1.6m a year, while Steve Hughes, the boss of Coventry Building Society, was paid £1.2m last year.
The change in policy has been spearheaded by Tracey Graham, the chair of the Nationwide pay committee, who said Dame Debbie could be rewarded with even larger pay rises in future in order to better compete with banks.
'We remain materially behind some of our UK banking peers, and the committee recognises that future policy changes among other firms may further increase the existing gap,' she said in a pay report.
John Cronin, from SeaPoint Insights, says Nationwide needs to pay well to attract the best: 'She is in the top tier of bank leaders. The time will come where she could easily be courted by the likes of Natwest and Lloyds.'
The Nationwide Group Staff Union has cautiously backed the plan, saying the deal must be 'justifiable and proportionate'.
It said: 'Debbie Crosbie's leadership as one of the few women heading a major financial institution is significant, and we support progress toward greater diversity at the highest levels of the industry.'
But not everyone is satisfied.
Baroness Sharon Bowles, a Nationwide member, says: 'I am unhappy about it because I'd like to see that they were giving more back to their members. If they want to wear the community bank label in some way, then they should be a bit more like their customers.'
Lady Bowles says she understands the issue of having to pay well for top talent but plans to vote against the package in an effort to rein in excessive pay across finance. 'It's unpalatable, but it's the reality of the situation.'
Luke Hildyard, head of the High Pay Centre, says it is 'hypocritical' for Nationwide to set pay like a bank while also promoting itself as an alternative to profit-maximising lenders.
Nationwide has spent large sums running adverts featuring actor Dominic West as a stereotypical 'fat cat' claiming Nationwide is not like a banks, a move that has riled competitors. Santander filed a complaint with the advertising watchdog last year and one ad was banned for misleading customers over branch closures.
Hildyard says: 'One of the most egregious business practices people associate with the big banks is the high pay and bonus culture. For Nationwide to say we need to ape those pay practices is pretty hypocritical. It contradicts the purpose of mutuals, which is to ensure that everybody prospers together.'
Lord Sikka, emeritus professor at Essex Business School and a Labour peer, is urging Nationwide members to vote against Dame Debbie's pay and not to 're-elect any director as they all have their snouts in the trough'.
Nationwide has stressed that the payout would only be triggered if there was outstanding performance at the lender.
However, the group has not specified its chosen performance measures and targets yet, saying only that they will provide a 'clear link with customers' interests and our short and long-term financial and strategic aims'.
A spokesman said the society had become the second-largest provider of mortgages in the UK only because it can 'attract, retain and motivate talented leaders to run a business of this scale and prioritise member value'.
The pay controversy is not the first time Dame Debbie has put noses out of joint during her four-year tenure of Nationwide.
The Virgin Money deal, the biggest bank takeover since the financial crisis, also made her a target for criticism. At the time, Dame Debbie said the move was a major boost for the mutual sector because 'more people will experience the benefits of mutual ownership and the customer-focused approach of a building society.'.
Yet the takeover faced stern opposition from some Virgin shareholders, who complained the price was too low, and some Nationwide members after they were denied a vote on the deal.
While Virgin shareholders were permitted a say, mutual members were told they would be given no such chance because the lender did not need to seek permission. Fitch, the ratings agency, has warned that the Virgin deal will weigh on profitability for the next three years.
For some, the Virgin Money controversy was symptomatic of a wider shift that has seen the mutual become less democratic.
Sherwin-Smith, a former payments executive, claims the society's 'autocratic' management style is at odds with the mutual concept.
Before the pandemic, annual meetings were held every year in-person, something Sherwin-Smith says helped hold management to account and provide members with a sense of solidarity. But Nationwide now holds them online every year.
'It's a lot harder for members to express their views,' Sherwin-Smith says. 'There are fewer opportunities to do so, and increasingly the members are being treated with contempt.
'They want to run the show and the members are members in name only. That concerns me because if no one is holding management or the board to account, then they can just do whatever they want.'
Edwin Fisher, who represents the Building Societies Members Association, is also concerned about Nationwide's harder driving culture under Dame Debbie.
'Nationwide now state 'Our purpose is Banking' whereas the stated purpose and principal purpose is the provision of loans on residential property,' he says. 'Any attempt to apply accountability in some form or another is strongly resisted and suppressed by the board.'
Nationwide, which is chaired by former Schroders finance boss Kevin Parry, has rebutted the accusation, saying that since moving the AGM online there has been higher attendance from members. It also said its board had the appropriate skills and experience to hold management to account.
The mutual said it consulted members frequently through its Member Voice panel, which has about 6,500 members. It canvassed the views of more than 100,000 of its members on their attitude to its acquisition of Virgin Money, with 92pc positive or neutral.
It also said more than 645,000 votes were cast in the last election of directors and more votes were cast in favour of directors than at any point in the past seven years.
One of the most eye-catching innovations under Dame Debbie has been the payment of bonuses every year to some of its members. A so-called 'Fairer Share Payment' of £100 was made this year, alongside a 'Big Nationwide Thank You' of £50 tied to the Virgin takeover.
While warmly welcomed by those who receive the payments, Sherwin-Smith questions whether it is a good use of funds. He says the Fairer Share bonus, as well as the £2.9bn spent on Virgin, could have been recycled into better mortgage and savings rates for members.
Meanwhile, only 4m members out of Nationwide's 17m customers receive the cash, as they must have a mortgage and current account to qualify rather than just a mortgage.
The adventurous corporate actions of Dame Debbie contrast with her quiet home life. She lives in Falkirk with her husband, an automotive entrepreneur, and is said to enjoy Hello! magazine and the occasional romantic novel.
Dame Debbie, who was comprehensive school-educated and went to her local University of Strathclyde, has defended her record at Nationwide by arguing that she is creating a 'modern mutual' fit for the future.
'It's no longer enough to simply look better than a bank,' she said in 2023. 'Mutuals need to do more than just deliver a change from banking. They need to inspire a change to banking. Banking can, and should, be fairer. As mutuals we should hold a mirror up to the banks to secure change for society.'
Could Dame Debbie be tempted to have another foray into the banking market? With TSB up for sale, there is speculation that she could make another bold bid for a bank, especially given her familiarity with the business.
Nationwide has played down this prospect – a spokesman said 'we do not comment on rumour or speculation. Right now, we are focused on making the most of our acquisition of Virgin Money' – but analysts believe she may be tempted.
Few if any Labour MPs are willing to criticise Nationwide given mutuals and co-operatives are the flavour of the month for the Government, which is attempting to double the size of the sector during this parliament.
Dame Debbie was awarded her title for services to the financial sector in June as part of the King's birthday honours.
The board look likely to back her £7m pay deal in an attempt to keep her at the society. Yet if members vote against the package, it will at the very least take the shine of Dame Debbie's swashbuckling run.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One Year of Starmer as UK PM: Where Does Labour Stand?
One Year of Starmer as UK PM: Where Does Labour Stand?

Bloomberg

time24 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

One Year of Starmer as UK PM: Where Does Labour Stand?

00:00 Some degree of calm has returned, at least for the markets in Britain, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves underlining her commitment to fiscal discipline and reassurances about her position in the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer. Now the market moves have really underscored the fragility of Britain's economic position as the Labour Party marked one year in power. Let's get more now from Bloomberg opinions. Rosa Prince Good morning, Rose. We've seen the Labour Party promising to make growth its top mission. So really, as we review this first year in office for Starmer, how is the party doing so far? Yeah, not so great. As you say, I think I thought that they could put everything into growth as a way of balancing those books. But it's easier said than done. You can't just press a button and suddenly achieve growth. So there are some measures which have been successful. They've put through some planning reforms and greenlit a lot of infrastructure projects, which I think they hope will achieve growth in the longer term. Shorter term, not so much, particularly that budget that Rachel Rees herself unveiled back in the autumn, which really hit businesses hard and led to a lack of investment, a lack of job creation. And the figures speak for themselves, really. I think we're on course for growth of about an anemic 1%. And what have been the winners this year? Yeah. It's not been all bad. I think if you had asked Keir Starmer at the start of his term whether he thought he'd do better on the domestic front or the foreign well around, I think he would have said domestically. But in fact, it's he's proved rather a and adept world leader. He's handled President Trump in particular better than most other world leaders. Britain has signed three important trade deals India, the European Union, and that trade deal with America and I think has been the only country so far to manage to mitigate some of those tariffs he's been talking about this morning. So that's probably the big policy win from him. And of course, we've got to talk about the chaos this week, Rose. The drama really centering around Starmer's U-turn, forced U-turn on welfare reform. But there've been a series of walk backs recently. Looking ahead, what are the challenges that he's going to face in terms of seeing through his big agenda? I think the major challenge and the thing that everything comes back to really is that this government is so boxed in on it's room for maneuver on the economy. So as we were saying, he had wanted to get some growth going in the British economy and really be able to fund those projects that he cares about, like improving public services. The growth hasn't come. They had hoped then to make the numbers add up by doing some public sector cuts. And as the welfare reform debacle showed this week, that's proved harder than they expected as well. So that really leaves only breaking the borrowing rules, which Rachel Reeves again committed to not doing. She says that she will continue to balance the budget and that borrowing will not rise. Then we've only got tax rises left, which again is the last thing that this Labour government wanted to do. So going forward, they've got a budget coming down the track. Then again, we don't know exactly when, but it'll probably be at the end of October or early November and the difficult choices are coming. And I wonder, Rachel Reeves was finding the pressure really quite tough.

Analysis-Crunch nears for UK's Reeves, with stability elusive and markets wary
Analysis-Crunch nears for UK's Reeves, with stability elusive and markets wary

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Analysis-Crunch nears for UK's Reeves, with stability elusive and markets wary

By Andy Bruce, Kate Holton and Elizabeth Piper MANCHESTER, England (Reuters) -After a year in office, Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves faces a reckoning over unmet promises of economic stability, with a stop-start economy and restive bond markets pointing to another tax-raising budget that she had hoped to avoid. Wednesday saw the biggest collapse in British government bond prices since the ill-fated 2022 economic agenda of former prime minister Liz Truss, sparked by investor fright at a tearful appearance by Reeves in parliament. A major rebellion in Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour Party against welfare reforms - which forced him to gut key parts of the plan - also fed doubts about its ability to cut spending and raised questions about party control. Economists say events this week have increased the chance that Reeves will need to raise tens of billions of pounds in taxes later this year after the government's plan to grow the world's sixth largest economy failed to sufficiently deliver. That would further heap pressure on a party that has consistently trailed Nigel Farage's insurgent, right-wing Reform U.K. in the polls. Economists say the government is caught between unruly lawmakers, a disgruntled electorate and rising borrowing costs that risk getting higher still if investors think the government has lost control of the public finances. "The economy is still stuck with sluggish growth," Michael Saunders, senior adviser to Oxford Economics and a former member of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee, told Reuters. "That means voters are persistently disappointed because they don't feel the living standards are getting any better." While more tax hikes are likely coming, he questioned whether the government had the stomach to raise the sums needed to put the public purse back on a sustainable footing - again raising the issue of investor confidence. ECONOMIC STABILITY Reeves and Starmer came to power a year ago, vowing to deliver political and economic stability and sustainable growth after 14 often-chaotic years of Conservative government rule. To win over investors, Reeves set what she described as non-negotiable fiscal rules, and angered businesses and households by raising 40 billion pounds ($55 billion) in taxes at her first budget, the biggest tax increases for three decades. Reeves had said that would be a one-off event to fund much-needed investment in Britain's decaying infrastructure. But economists say the limited headroom she had against that fiscal target has likely been wiped out by the reversal of cuts to the ballooning welfare budget, and a warning of a growth downgrade from the official economic forecaster - requiring higher taxes to keep the fiscal plans on track. "That ballpark (of repeating her first budget) is very much within the realms of the possible," said Ben Zaranko, associate director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank. That prospect means investors are increasingly questioning the credibility of an approach that leaves the government scrambling to find ways to restore fiscal headroom whenever there is bad news on the economy. And the violent market moves on Wednesday encapsulated unease over slipping budgets and the potential for more borrowing, with public sector debt currently just below 100% of GDP. "Any tax hike needs to be big, and it needs to be clear. Then you can restore the market's confidence," said Simon Harvey, senior macroeconomist at Swiss-based hedge fund LB Macro. "What we don't need is another round of 15 different measures where you question where the accounting is coming from." Harvey said Britain's economy might require a painful reset before it can recover: higher taxes, an economic slowdown and then fast Bank of England rate cuts which will eventually boost growth and the public finances. All of that will cause alarm in Starmer's Downing Street, which has been criticised for its handling of the welfare vote, and its connection with the parliamentary party group. Some Labour lawmakers expressed frustration that his team didn't listen to their concerns on financial cuts for disabled people, and the prime minister admitted he had been distracted by international events before he focused on the welfare vote. But lawmakers, many of whom feel greater loyalty to their voters than to the government, could now lobby for other policy changes, especially an end to a two-child cap that lets parents claim financial support only for their first two children. Starmer has responded by listing his government's achievements to show it is making a difference, citing trade deals, inward investment and more money for schools and hospitals. But the polls have refused to budge and some investors are joining the fray by criticising Britain's leadership. A hedge fund manager who has supported Labour said voters and many businesses did not realise that the government had to rein in its spending, and that Starmer needed to "lead on how to get out of the predicament" because the options were likely to "feel dreadful". ($1 = 0.7322 pounds) Sign in to access your portfolio

Here's how my 1 year-old daughter's SIPP could be worth almost £19m in 60 years
Here's how my 1 year-old daughter's SIPP could be worth almost £19m in 60 years

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Here's how my 1 year-old daughter's SIPP could be worth almost £19m in 60 years

When it comes to building long-term wealth, few strategies are as powerful as starting early and letting compounding do the heavy lifting. This is why I started a Junior SIPP (Self-invested Personal Pension) for my daughter shortly after she was born. My daughter is currently one (p.s. that's not us in the picture) and her SIPP is already worth a little under £4,000. However, that's just the start. Let's explore how it can grow. I recently ran the numbers on my daughter's Junior SIPP, assuming £300 monthly contributions (that's £240 from us and £60 in tax relief from the government) and a 10% annualised return. I've also factored in a 2% annual increase in contributions because she'll likely contribute more when she's older. Please note that tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each client and may be subject to change in future. The content in this article is provided for information purposes only. It is not intended to be, neither does it constitute, any form of tax advice. Readers are responsible for carrying out their own due diligence and for obtaining professional advice before making any investment decisions. The results are astonishing. By her 61st birthday, her pension pot could be worth close to £19m. The magic lies in the combination of consistent investing and the exponential growth of compounding. In the first decade, the pot grows steadily, reaching around £75,000. But as the years pass, the growth accelerates dramatically. By year 30, the balance crosses £870,000, and by year 40, it's nearly £2.5m. The final two decades are where compounding truly shines. This is when her pot surges from £4.1m at age 46 to almost £19m by age 61. Starting young is the ultimate advantage. Even modest contributions, when paired with time and a sensible investment approach, can snowball into life-changing sums. While annual contribution increases aren't yet possible for a Junior SIPP, it's reasonable to expect that as she grows older, and it converts to a normal SIPP, she will contribute herself. Of course, these figures assume a steady 10% return, and there's no guaranteed return in real markets. Investors can lose money. However, this example highlights the incredible potential of long-term, disciplined investing. For parents and grandparents, opening a pension for a child is one of the most generous gifts imaginable. I use Hargreaves Lansdown for my daughter's SIPP. There are trading fees with a SIPP, unlike the Junior ISA. As such, I prefer to achieve diversification, at least for now, by investing in funds, conglomerates, and investment trusts. One of her investments is Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.B). The Warren Buffett-run conglomerate is a hugely popular investment despite the great man's impending retirement. The business owns and invests in core parts of the American economy, owning insurance groups and railways, and investing in companies like Chevron and Visa. The company has consistently outperformed the S&P 500 over several decades, thanks to Warren Buffett's disciplined, value-oriented approach and significant cash reserves, which provide resilience during market downturns. Berkshire's focus on stable, cash-generative businesses makes it attractive for conservative investors seeking steady growth. However, there is always risk. Some may talk about succession challenges while others will point to its focus on the US economy. Once a positive, this US focus may be a drag in the coming year — it's very hard to tell. Nonetheless, it's a diversified investment that I believe will outperform over the long run. Definitely worthy of consideration by all. The post Here's how my 1 year-old daughter's SIPP could be worth almost £19m in 60 years appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has positions in Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Visa. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store