Largest Martian Meteorite on Earth sold for millions at auction
Named NWA 16788, the 54-pound (25-kilogram) rock was unearthed by a meteorite hunter in Niger 's Sahara Desert in November 2023.
According to Sotheby's, this extraordinary specimen was blown off the surface of Mars by a massive asteroid strike, subsequently travelling an astonishing 140 million miles (225 million kilometres) to Earth.
The identity of the buyer was not immediately disclosed. The final bid was $4.3 million.
The final official bid price, including various fees and costs, reached approximately $5.3 million, a significant increase on the estimated sale price before the auction of $2 million to $4 million.
Before the auction, two advance bids of $1.9 million and $2 million were submitted.
The live bidding went slower than for many other objects that were sold, with the auctioneer trying to coax more offers and decreasing the $200,000 to $300,000 bid intervals to $100,000 after the proposals hit $4 million.
The red, brown and gray meteorite is about 70 per cent larger than the next largest piece of Mars found on Earth and represents nearly 7 per cent of all the Martian material currently on this planet, Sotheby's says.
It measures nearly 15 inches by 11 inches by 6 inches (375 millimeters by 279 millimeters by 152 millimeters).
It was also a rare find. There are only 400 Martian meteorites out of the more than 77,000 officially recognised meteorites found on Earth, the auction house says.
'This Martian meteorite is the largest piece of Mars we have ever found by a long shot,' Cassandra Hatton, vice chairman for science and natural history at Sotheby's, said in an interview before the auction.
'So it's more than double the size of what we previously thought was the largest piece of Mars.'
It's not clear exactly when the meteorite was blasted off the surface of Mars, but testing showed it probably happened in recent years, Sotheby's says.
Hatton said a specialised lab examined a small piece of the red planet remnant and confirmed it was from Mars. It was compared with the distinct chemical composition of Martian meteorites discovered during the Viking space probe that landed on Mars in 1976, she said.
The examination found that it is an 'olivine-microgabbroic shergottite,' a type of Martian rock formed from the slow cooling of Martian magma. It has a course-grained texture and contains the minerals pyroxene and olivine, Sotheby's says.
It also has a glassy surface, likely due to the high heat that burned it when it fell through Earth's atmosphere, Hatton said. 'So that was their first clue that this wasn't just some big rock on the ground,' she said.
The meteorite was previously on exhibit at the Italian Space Agency in Rome. Sotheby's did not disclose the owner.
Bidding for the juvenile Ceratosaurus nasicornis dinosaur skeleton started with a high advance bid of $6 million, then escalated with offers $500,000 higher than the last and later $1 million higher than the last before ending at $26 million.
The official sale price was $30.5 million with fees and costs. The original estimate was $4 million to $6 million.
Parts of the skeleton were found in 1996 near Laramie, Wyoming, at Bone Cabin Quarry, a gold mine for dinosaur bones. It's more than 6 feet (2 meters) tall and nearly 11 feet (3 meters) long.
Specialists assembled nearly 140 fossil bones with some sculpted materials to recreate the skeleton and mounted it so it's ready to exhibit, Sotheby's says.
The skeleton is believed to be from the late Jurassic period, about 150 million years ago, Sotheby's says.
Ceratosaurus dinosaurs were bipeds with short arms that appear similar to the Tyrannosaurus rex, but smaller. Ceratosaurus dinosaurs could grow up to 25 feet (7.6 meters) long, while the Tyrannosaurs rex could be 40 feet (12 meters) long.
The skeleton was acquired last year by Fossilogic, a Utah -based fossil preparation and mounting company.
Wednesday's auction was part of Sotheby's Geek Week 2025 and featured 122 items, including other meteorites, fossils and gem-quality minerals.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
I was hired by NASA to protect Earth from aliens – here's what happens when they find us… & why it may spark disaster
AN EX-NASA chief has sensationally revealed plans for intelligent alien visitors. John Rummel was twice NASA's Planetary Protection Officer - from 1987 to 1993 and 1997 to 2006. 5 5 5 His objective was to prevent the contamination of other planets during exploratory missions, and also to ensure alien samples didn't contaminate Earth. But he also contemplated what he would do if intelligent aliens were to visit. And Rummel, now retired, has even outlined what could happen if there was a full-scale alien invasion. Rummel told The Sun: 'An alien visitor would provide mutual benefit. 'We could imagine standard microbial sampling, such as swabs and wipes for our part. 'Conceptually, it could be like the Danish film, The Visit, where we have somebody who is coming here but not invading, and they're interested in finding out more. 'I would insist we sample the visitor to make sure we have no microbial hitchhikers and also that we do not introduce anything to hurt the visitor. 'As for alien invasions, you could end up with the Martians being killed off by the first pathogenic bacteria, and the other way around. 'If we go to Mars, we become the Martians. We have to be careful that when we do get there we don't bring back unknowns that might otherwise be a problem. 'A lot of people go, oh well, we haven't found life on Mars so far, so it shouldn't be a problem. 'There are a lot of people with big enough egos to say 'trust me'. 'But that's not really a good idea. Ignorance is not bliss. Let's go ahead and take some data.' He added: 'We are just getting started in looking for signs of life. I will vote for aliens finding us first. 'We are otherwise in the 'selfie' stage of understanding what to look for, and where.' Rummel said there were no official NASA plans to prepare for an invasion, insisting his views are personal. But in that scenario, he says the agency would be unlikely to have any jurisdiction for a response. Rummel spoke after his successor, Catharine Conley, exclusively told The Sun she had been fired by NASA in 2013 for claiming its plan to return Mars samples to Earth was not safe, something Rummel agrees with. Conley said her job, like Rummel's, was to protect Earth from rogue alien life entering the atmosphere. But she believes that if there was an alien invasion, the response would be led by the US Air Force. 5 Mars facts Here's what you need to know about the red planet... Mars is the fourth planet from the Sun It is named after the Roman god of war The landmass of Mars is very similar to Earth, but due to the difference in gravity, you could jump three times higher there than you can here. Mars is mountainous and hosts the tallest mountain known in the Solar System called Olympus Mons, which is three times higher than Everest Mars is considered the second most habitable planet after Earth. It takes the planet 687 Earth days to orbit the Sun The planet has a diameter of 4,212 miles, and has an average distance from Earth of 140 million miles Martian temperatures can vary wildly, reaching as high as 70F/20C or as low as -225F/-153C She told The Sun: 'They would very much more likely be tiny little aliens. 'But if there were any intelligent ones, that would be the Air Force's problem, not NASA's, at least for the US. 'But again, we don't know what we're preparing for.' Rummel continued to work for NASA as a senior scientist at the Astrobiology Program after leaving his PPO role before retiring. He added: 'If somebody were to come in and land on the Earth, it's unlikely that they're going to cause a problem in my opinion. 'But I wouldn't trust my opinion on this because I don't have data. 'I believe that there's life out there but it wouldn't consider itself alien. Because they're out there and we're the aliens if we go out there. 'They're not the aliens themselves. I hope intelligent alien life is out there, and I certainly think it could be. We have a chance of seeing them in our lifetime. 'It changes all the time, but the search for extra terrestrial intelligence or technology has the potential to reveal if there's something else going on in the galaxy that's not us. 'At one point in time, I was the SETI program person at NASA headquarters. "And some very smart people are dedicated to seeing what's out there.' 5 NASA says on its website it hopes to send humans to Mars as early as the 2030s to explore signs of alien life. It was planning to return Mars samples before then as part of its Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign. But that has been scrapped by Donald Trump's cuts, and NASA instead says it anticipates returning samples through lower-cost options. China remains on course with its own plans to return Mars samples through its Tianwen-3 Mars mission, set for launch in 2028 and bringing samples back by 2031. Rummel says he agrees with Catharine that NASA's current plans to bring samples back to Earth are not safe. But he says he'll be keeping an eager eye on the Chinese. He said: 'Mars sample return by robotic space vehicles is not currently funded by the US, so Catharine is right. 'It will be interesting to see the details of whatever the Chinese do.' He added: 'The bottom line is that we're looking for life on Mars and if we think there's a credible possibility of finding life on Mars, then it would be nice to know something about whether or not that life form was benign or whether or not it somehow might affect us.' 'You don't want it to go badly.' The Sun has approached NASA for a response to Rummel's comments. On questions surrounding the safety of samples returned to Mars, NASA previously said: "It is anticipated that future missions to Mars will return samples for study on Earth. "NASA will never compromise on safety." How long does it take to get to Mars? It's not that short of a trip... There's an immense distance between Earth and Mars, which means any trip to the red planet will take a very long time It's also made more complicated by the fact that the distance is constantly changing as the two planets rotate around the sun The closest that the Earth and Mars would ever be is a distance of 33.9million miles – that's 9,800 times the distance between London and New York That's really rare though: the more useful distance is the average, which is 140million miles Scientists on Earth have already launched a whole bunch of spacecraft to (or near) Mars, so we have a rough idea of how long it takes with current technology Historically, the trip has taken anywhere from 128 to 333 days – admittedly a huge length of time for humans to be on board a cramped spacecraft.
South Wales Argus
13 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Night Sky: There's still time to spot some noctilucent cloud activity
Nick managed to photograph the event as the Sun's rays reached out from far below the horizon, lighting up tiny frozen water droplets high up in the Earth's atmosphere. The result is this stunning image incorporating long wispy white clouds tinged with blue. Taken from the Latin for 'night-shining', the clouds can be seen a couple of hours after sunset looking to the northwest. One of the richest and most bountiful of the annual meteor displays is underway as the Perseids fire themselves up for another outburst in August. While the shower will be covered in more detail as we head toward the night when maximum activity is expected, meteors from the display have already commenced as the Earth ploughs through a field of rocky debris left by a comet. The densest part of the field will be encountered on the night of August 12 into August 13, when we could witness up to 150 meteors per hour. This is a perfect opportunity to see some celestial fireworks, all of which can be observed with the naked eye. While the position of Mars in the evening sky hasn't made for the best of viewing, there's a chance to spot both the red planet and a crescent Moon on Monday July 28, low above the western horizon at around 10pm. This will be one of the last opportunities to see Mars this year as during August it will slip into the twilight and won't be seen again until 2026. Meanwhile, the morning sky continues to be dominated by Venus. Space news, and the Hubble Space Telescope has caught the first glimpse of 3I/Atlas, just the third object humanity has witnessed entering our solar system from beyond its limits. The 12-mile-wide 'invader', larger than the asteroid that eventually led to the downfall of the dinosaurs, is due to pass Mars in October and Earth in December, both fly-bys posing no threat. Thought to have been formed seven billion years ago, 3I/Atlas is currently speeding through our solar system at 150,000 mph. Tuesday July 22 saw the Earth complete a spin on its axis at 1.34 milliseconds less than the standard 24 hours, making for the second fastest rotation since records began in 1973. For a significant part of Earth's history a day on Earth was approximately 19 hours long, but over time, the day has become constantly longer due to affects such as the relationship with the Moon and the associated tidal forces. However, just to buck the trend! Founded in 1975, Cardiff Astronomical Society currently has an exhibition running at Cardiff Museum. One of the largest and most active astronomical societies in the UK, the event, which showcases the work of the society throughout the decades and its established links to the community, is free to enter, running until October 31. Send your astrophotography pictures to: thenightsky@
Times
a day ago
- Times
The million dollar question: are diamonds losing their sparkle?
It takes three billion years, volcano-like pressure and 1000C-plus temperatures to form 'natural' diamonds that are mined and polished before being lovingly placed on the third finger of the left hand of millions of women across the world. Technological advances mean, however, that engagement ring sized-diamonds are increasingly being made in vast laboratories, predominantly in China, in as little as a week. These lab-grown diamonds, chemically and visually identical to mined diamonds, are much cheaper to produce than the cost of extracting real diamonds from deep below the earth's surface in Russia, Canada and southern Africa. Boyfriends and fiancés can now pick up lab-grown diamonds for less than a tenth of the price of similarly sized natural diamonds and their prices are falling sharply as the technology improves further and lab production increases. • Diamonds in the rough: struggling industry's fight against the lab-grown fake 'Man-made diamonds have captured about a 25 per cent share of global diamond demand by value spent,' Paul Zimnisky, founder of Diamond Analytics, said. 'This is up from nil ten years ago.' He said that although some consumers were drawn to the lower prices of lab-grown diamonds he did not expect them to replace the allure of natural diamonds. 'Lab diamonds are a manufactured product that can be produced at will so they are not rare, and this is reflected in the price,' he said. 'Natural diamonds are still one of the most valuable things you can own on a value to size and weight ratio. Humans have valued rare and precious metals and gems since the beginning of time. I don't think this will change anytime soon.' The spectacular growth of lab-grown diamonds has, however, helped to send the price of natural diamonds reeling and plunged the traditional diamond mining industry into crisis. The price of a one carat natural diamond, roughly the size of an average engagement ring, has fallen about a third from a peak of $6,819 (£5,030) in May 2022, according to the jewellery analyst firm Tenoris. The wider Bloomberg polished diamond index, which takes in prices across the '4Cs' of diamonds — cut, colour, clarity and carat weight — has fallen 53 per cent from a peak of 6,270 in March 2022. Prices had spiked after the pandemic as weddings put on hold by Covid finally took place and consumers had lockdown savings to burn. Olya Linde, a partner at Bain & Company, who specialises in natural resources, said: 'The million dollar question everyone in the diamond industry is asking is: is this bottom?' She thinks it might be, as the price of both polished and rough diamonds showed slight signs of growth in the first two quarters of this year. 'It gives a lot of hope for the industry that the worst might be over and the market will stabilise,' she said. 'But there is a lot of inventory for people to work through.' The traditional diamond industry has hugely cut back production in order to try to reduce that stockpile and recreate some of diamonds' original allure: scarcity. De Beers, the diamond miner founded by Cecil Rhodes in 1888, which coined the slogan 'a diamond is forever', has cut its 2025 production expectation from 30 to 33 million carats to 20 to 23 million. Its owner, Anglo American, has put De Beers up for sale with a price tag of about $4 billion, about half its 2023 valuation. London-listed Gem Diamonds announced plans this week to cut a fifth of its workforce and temporarily cut executives' salaries to try to 'protect shareholder value'. The company's market value has collapsed to £7.9 million from £550 million when it floated in 2007. Linde is confident that natural diamond prices will not fall much lower but she warned that they were unlikely to return to anywhere near their peak. In order to achieve some price growth she said natural diamonds needed to be 'returned to their position as a luxury product' and consumers needed to have faith in a growing world economy. Ben Davis, head of European mining research at RBC Capital Markets, said it was entirely possible that natural diamond prices could return to recent highs but it 'would require significant curtailment of both mining and synthetic supply and heavy and length investment in marketing'. The tariff trade war is also distorting the market, he said, by 'incentivising destocking further' and damaging consumer confidence to buy such expensive luxury items. Davis and Linde agreed that a huge advertising campaign was needed to remind people of the luxury and scarcity of natural diamonds. 'We know it has been done before and it can be done again,' Linde said. 'There needs to be buy-in not just from the miners but throughout the value chain.' Yoram Dvash, president of the World Federation of Diamond Bourses, called for the industry to unite to protect the natural diamond industry's value from the threat of lab-grown diamonds. 'The diamond industry is currently at a critical juncture,' he said. 'The meteoric rise in the penetration of synthetic diamonds into the market, which began as a marginal phenomenon, has become an unprecedented flood that threatens the value, image and future of the natural diamond.' He warned that consumers were 'already having difficulty distinguishing between a natural diamond and a lab-grown imitation' and said a considerable marketing campaign was needed to protect natural diamonds' integrity. 'This trend is not just about sales, it demonstrates changes in values and culture,' he said. 'It is about the loss of the sense of intrinsic worth, wonder and uniqueness that have underpinned the natural diamond for generations.' Robert Wake-Walker, co-founder of WWW International Diamond Consultants, said it was not just the growth of synthetic diamonds that had hit the prices of natural diamonds. 'The primary reason for the growth of synthetic diamonds over the last three years is that people have fundamentally been hit on all sides by macroeconomic pressures: mortgages are higher, childcare costs are higher, everyone's essential outgoings have increased,' he said. 'In that context, spending £2,000 to 5,000 on a purely discretionary product becomes a huge challenge to most. There needs to be a situation where people can aspire to buy these luxury products for each other again.' Another industry analyst said lab-grown diamonds were 'an alternative that allows people to purchase something that does the same thing, but they can afford to buy. You'll have people saying to their girlfriend, 'We have this pot of money: we could buy a natural diamond or if we go for a lab-grown diamond we will have a bit left to go into the kids' college fund.' ' • Gemfields' Bruce Cleaver: 'We're like De Beers was 30 years ago' Wake-Walker added that many lab-grown diamonds were being sold to people who would not have bought natural diamonds. 'It is bringing more people into the broader jewellery market, people who would never have considered diamonds before but when you can get a pair of diamond earrings at Accessorize for £50 for a night out, why not?' He said the two industries could co-exist and warned that hostile attacks on each other damaged the public's perceptions of the whole industry. Not all agree with this approach. At the International Gold and Diamond Conference in New York last week Stuart Samuels, president of the diamond jewellery manufacturer Premier Gem Corp, described the lab-grown diamond industry as 'parasites' when asked if the two industries could work together. 'The parasite always likes to co-exist with the host,' he said. 'It's the host that doesn't want the parasite. So it's very nice to say let's co-exist but you're looking to replace me, to kill me off.'
