California State students protest aid blockade in Gaza with hunger strike
The strikers – students from San Jose State, Sacramento State, San Francisco State and CSU Long Beach – began their fast on 5 May
'We, the students of San Francisco, Sacramento, Long Beach, and San Jose State Universities, are beginning a united hunger strike in solidarity with the two million Palestinians at risk of starvation in Gaza,' Students for Justice in Palestine wrote in a press release. They are also pushing the university system to divest from weapons manufacturers, among other stated goals.
Related: Dozens of pro-Palestinian protesters arrested after Columbia calls in police
The hunger strikes come as Israel's aid blockade in Gaza passes its second month, and is facing mounting international criticism for the millions of Palestinians pushed toward famine, as well as Israel's finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich's, recent assertion that 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed.'
Max Flynt, a hunger striker and undergraduate student at San Francisco State University, cited the aid blockade as a decisive factor for organizing the strike. Flynt sets up daily on the campus quad with other organizers and strikers under a 'Hunger Strike for Gaza' canopy. Organizers hold educational workshops and strikers have their vitals taken every few hours, but do not stay overnight.
'Many of the forms of protests that were used last year, specifically the encampments, have become effectively illegal in the United States,' Flynt said. 'If we were to put up a tent today, the police would be called on us almost immediately.'
Jaime Jackson, a professor at Sacramento State and member of Faculty for Justice in Palestine who studies non-violent protest, pointed out the hunger strike's symbolic ties with the realities in Gaza.
'The bombing, the killing, the massive violations of human rights have been an ongoing issue throughout,' Jackson said. 'But the recent, really big thing has been the blocking of humanitarian aid and the ongoing starvation of people in Gaza.'
The crackdown on college protesters from the police to policy level, began during the Biden administration last year and has only increased under Trump. International students with vocal support for Palestinians have been especially targeted.
'We know that the Trump administration is doing this because they're scared of the student movement, they're scared of what they saw last year, and they're scared that it will come back again,' Flynt said.
The divestment demands from Flynt and other protesters include the California State University system's adoption of San Francisco State University's Human Rights IPS Screening, the severance of study abroad programs with Israeli universities, and divestment from companies producing military, weapons and surveillance technology.
'We're aware of where they are sending our money, and we don't want to be used to any of these war efforts, genocide through these companies,' said Amal Dawud, and undergraduate and organizer at Sacramento State University.
Two schools in the California State University system, Sacramento State University and San Francisco State University, began some form of divestment last year after meeting with student protesters. San Francisco State University confirmed the offloading of assets in Lockheed Martin, Palantir, Leonardo and Palantir, while some questions remain surrounding the mechanics of Sacramento State's divestment.
Questions linger surrounding the mechanics and concrete implications of divestment. A recently killed congressional bill would have expanded penalties for boycotting and divestment.
Related: Palestinian student freed after Ice arrest forms group to aid other immigrants
Marcus Bode, an undergraduate and hunger striker at California State, Long Beach, cited his university's partnership with Boeing, a major supplier to the Israel Defense Forces, as something that would disappear under divestment. Bode can consume water, powder electrolytes and sports fluid under the conditions of the strike, and said that he is already feeling the physical effects of the strike, including aching joints, muscle cramps and lightheadedness.
'We don't see those increases in tuition and fees, those hikes and prices, being returned as a benefit to the student. It isn't being reinvested into our campus and into our student body,' Bode said. 'It's instead being used to fund war and genocide abroad.'
Bode and his fellow hunger strikers face an uphill battle with the university system.
Amy Bentley-Smith, CSU's director of media relations, said the system and its campuses will not alter investment policies but honor the right to protest. 'We will continue to uphold the values of free inquiry, peaceful protest and academic freedom,' Smith said to the Guardian in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump ally Jeffrey Clark should be disbarred over 2020 election effort, DC panel says
WASHINGTON (AP) — Jeffrey Clark, the former Justice Department official who aided President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election, should be stripped of his law license, a Washington disciplinary panel ruled on Thursday. Clark, who is now overseeing a federal regulatory office, played a key role in Trump's efforts to challenge his election loss to Joe Biden and clashed with Justice Department superiors who refused to back his false claims of fraud. The D.C. Board of Professional Responsibility's recommendation will now go to the D.C. Court of Appeals for a final decision. Under the second Trump administration, Clark has been serving as acting head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, a part of the Office of Management and Budget that is responsible for reviewing executive branch regulations. OMB spokesperson Rachel Cauley said in a post on X that 'this latest injustice is just another chapter in the Deep State's ongoing assault on President Trump and those who stood beside him in defense of the truth.' 'JEFF CLARK has been harassed, raided, doxed, and blacklisted simply for questioning a RIGGED election and serving President Trump,' she wrote. At issue in the D.C. bar proceedings was a letter that Clark, as an assistant attorney general in the first Trump administration, drafted that said the Justice Department was investigating 'various irregularities' and had identified 'significant concerns' that may have impacted the election in Georgia and other states. Clark wanted the letter sent to Georgia lawmakers, but Justice Department superiors refused. The board said disciplinary counsel proved that Clark made 'intentionally false statements' when he continued to push for the Justice Department to issue the letter after being told by superiors that it contained falsehoods. 'Lawyers cannot advocate for any outcome based on false statements and they certainly cannot urge others to do so,' the board's report said. 'Respondent persistently and energetically sought to do just that on an important national issue. He should be disbarred as a consequence and to send a message to the rest of the Bar and to the public that this behavior will not be tolerated.' Clark's attorney, Harry MacDougald, argued during disciplinary hearings last year that the letter was part of the debate that normally occurs between lawyers and that punishing Clark in those circumstances would have a 'chilling effect.' Clark's conflict with Justice Department superiors culminated in a contentious, hourslong meeting at the White House on Jan. 3, 2021, in which Trump openly considered installing Clark as acting attorney general, according to a Senate Judiciary report. Several officials in the Jan. 3 meeting told Trump they would resign if he put Clark in charge at the Justice Department. Another close Trump ally, Rudy Giuliani, was disbarred in Washington last year, months after he lost his law license in New York for pursuing false claims Trump made about his 2020 election loss.
Buzz Feed
6 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Unhinged Reposting Spree On Truth Social
President Donald Trump hit the reshare button hard on his Truth Social platform Wednesday, flooding his profile with wild and weird posts and memes that slammed his political enemies. Among them was an image depicting former President Barack Obama, his 2016 Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, and other foes behind prison bars. One post declared, ' It's time to indict Obama the traitor. ' Another labeled former President Joe Biden's time in office ' the biggest scam in U.S. history! ' @IStandWithTrump47 / Via Trump has, in particular, ramped up his attacks on Obama in recent weeks, falsely accusing his predecessor of orchestrating a 'deep state' plot to sabotage his presidency. Earlier this month, Trump shared an AI-generated video that depicted Obama being arrested in the Oval Office and hauled off to prison. The president's latest meme spree comes amid rising anger from his MAGA base over his administration's refusal to release documents related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — who was once a close friend of Trump.
USA Today
6 minutes ago
- USA Today
Epstein accuser's family wants answers from Trump after recent comments
The family issued a lengthy statement after Trump said Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' Virginia Giuffre from his Mar-a-Lago spa, causing a rift. WASHINGTON − The family of Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent and outspoken sex trafficking accusers, demanded answers over why President Donald Trump said the disgraced financier "stole" Giuffre from his Mar-a-Lago spa – and have called for Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell to remain in prison. In a lengthy July 30 statement, the family of Giuffre, who died by suicide in April, said, 'It was shocking to hear President Trump invoke our sister and say that he was aware that Virginia had been 'stolen' from Mar-a-Lago." 'It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal actions, especially given his statement two years later that his good friend Jeffrey 'likes women on the younger side … no doubt about it,'" the family's comment, given to USA TODAY July 31, said. "We and the public are asking for answers; survivors deserve this.' Trump and Epstein were friends for more than a decade in the 1990s and early 2000s. More: She's inmate No. 02879-509 in Florida. But once again, Ghislaine Maxwell is holding court Trump made the comment July 30, telling reporters Epstein "stole her" while Giuffre was working as a spa attendant, and that he subsequently banned Epstein from his Palm Beach residence and club after he tried to poach additional employees. "I think she worked at the spa. I think so. I think that was one of the people," Trump said of Giuffre. "He stole her. And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever." Giuffre had long insisted that Maxwell − Epstein's longtime associate and former girlfriend – was the one who met her at the club and recruited her to serve as a masseuse for Epstein. That arrangement ultimately led to Epstein sexually abusing her and Maxwell trafficking Giuffre to have sex with other men, she said. More: How Trump and 'terrific guy' Jeffrey Epstein's party boy friendship ended badly Trump's comments on Air Force One appeared to be the first time he had personally confirmed aspects of Giuffre's story and suggested her employment might have been at least partially responsible for his falling out with Epstein. The Giuffre family's statement is the latest development in the growing controversy over Trump's relationship with Maxwell and Epstein, who died by suicide while in custody awaiting trial in 2019. It was issued by her surviving siblings and their spouses, Sky and Amanda Roberts and Danny and Lanette Wilson. More: Trump says he's 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell and he never went to Epstein's island In their lengthy statement, the Giuffre family rejected Trump's characterization, saying she was "stolen" by Maxwell, not Epstein. "We would like to clarify that it was convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell who targeted and preyed upon our then 16-year-old sister, Virginia, from Mar-a-Lago, where she was working in 2000, several years before Epstein and President Trump had their falling out," the family said. In a statement to USA TODAY, the White House said no leniency is being given or discussed, and that Trump himself has said that clemency for Maxwell is not something he is thinking about at this time. In its statement, the family also said, "Virginia always said that Ghislaine Maxwell was vicious and could often be more cruel than Epstein." They called on Trump to "never consider giving Ghislaine Maxwell any leniency." 'Ghislaine Maxwell is a monster who deserves to rot in prison for the rest of her life,' the family said. "She must remain in prison – anything less would go down in history as being one of the highest travesties of justice.' More: New photos confirm Epstein attended Donald Trump's wedding The family statement comes just days after Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche – Trump's former criminal defense lawyer – interviewed Maxwell in a Tallahassee, Florida, courthouse near where she is serving a 20-year sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. In a social media post, Blanche said he was interviewing the former British socialite because if 'Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' The two days of talks between the Justice Department and Maxwell have led Trump critics, including Democrats in Congress, to speculate that Trump is seeking a way to silence Maxwell while at the same time quelling the growing controversy over his administration's attempts to close the book on the long-running Epstein saga. More: Democrats hammer Epstein issue, find rare power move against Trump In recent weeks, the Trump administration has faced mounting pressure to reverse its pledge not to release any more documents related to the DOJ investigation into Epstein, a move that prompted fierce backlash from even the president's most loyal followers. Trump has said he has not considered whether to pardon Maxwell, but said on two occasions in recent days that he is 'allowed' to do so as president. Following the first of those remarks on July 29, Maxwell lawyer David Markus said, 'We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way." Maxwell has said she'll testify before Congress, as requested, if Trump grants her clemency. "If our sister could speak today, she would be most angered by the fact that the government is listening to a known perjurer," the family said, in reference to Maxwell. "A woman who repeatedly lied under oath and will continue to do so as long as it benefits her position."
