
Bombed live on air, now a hero: state TV anchor becomes a symbol of resistance in Iran
state TV anchor Sahar Emami was delivering a live broadcast in Tehran this week when she was interrupted by loud booms.
Shocked viewers – who have been closely following state media for news of
the war between Israel and Iran
– saw the room fill with smoke, dust and debris.
'The sound you just heard is the sound of the aggressor attacking our homeland, the sound of the aggressor seeking to stifle rightfulness and truth,' said Emami, wagging her index finger as the cameras kept rolling.
'What you just witnessed ... this smoke-filled studio of the news network,' she went on, before being forced to abandon her seat as a second explosion rocked the building.
READ MORE
Government figures and state media quickly seized on Emami's determination to keep broadcasting, making her an instant symbol of resistance dubbed the 'Iranian lioness'.
[
Israelis under attack from Iran shift to full war mode
Opens in new window
]
Minutes after the second blast, Emami reappeared live from another studio, even as videos posted online showed fire and smoke rising from the glass headquarters of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting group. Within hours, her image was plastered across social media and featured in a large mural in the Iranian capital.
President Masoud Pezeshkian called her a 'symbol of resilience, steadfastness and unyielding spirit'. Fatemeh Mohajerani, government spokesperson, likened the 'brave-hearted daughter of Iran' with Gordafarid, a legendary Persian heroine and one of the first female Iranian warriors, as depicted in Shahnameh, a 1,000-year-old epic poem by the Persian writer Ferdowsi.
Foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said: 'Last night, in the midst of the Zionist regime's savage attack ... a courageous Iranian woman stood before the camera – fearless, steadfast and filled with love for [her] homeland.' According to the IRNA news agency, he added: 'She was the voice of Iran.'
Less than 24 hours after the strike, a mural was unveiled in Vali-e Asr square in downtown Tehran, according to state media, depicting Emami on air with her index finger raised, clad in the black chador worn by conservative women in Iran.
The mural used a verse from Ferdowsi about 'a maiden in the battlefield', another reference to Gordafarid. The references to pre-Islamic literature, which has often been sidelined by the Islamic republic, were seen as an attempt to inspire nationalistic sentiments.
Mohajerani proposed that a courage in journalism award should be named after Emami. Sporting stars joined the rush to praise her, with karate athlete Amir Mehdizadeh and sport shooter Javad Foroughi dedicating their gold medals from international competitions to the broadcaster.
Emami (40), who has a degree in agricultural engineering, joined IRIB in 2008 and became known for the current affairs show Pishkhan Khabar.
The conservative broadcasting group has faced criticism from reformist politicians and many Iranians for serving as a mouthpiece for the autocratic state, which itself stifles freedom of expression. It is seen as highly selective in its coverage of international and domestic developments, such as protests that followed the death in 2022 of Mahsa Amini, a young woman who had been arrested by Iran's notorious morality police.
But even some Iranians critical of the regime said they were inspired by Emami's example.
Mansoureh (45), a reform-minded critic of the Islamic republic in Tehran, said: 'When I saw that woman on TV, I felt so ashamed of myself. What am I scared of? I told myself that I will have to remain where I am and defend my city.'
Others remained sceptical, however. 'To me, it looked more like a performance. There had been an evacuation order and she seemed mentally prepared,' said Sara (58), a nurse, also in the capital.
'She knew that if she could hold her composure for a few moments on live television, she would be hailed as a heroine ... And the Islamic republic is using that to serve its own propaganda purposes.'
Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has called on Iranians to 'stand up for your freedom' against the regime of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei since Israel launched its large-scale offensive against Iranian targets on Friday, prompting Iran to return missile and drone fire. But there is so far little sign of the war sparking anti-government protests, despite sporadic large-scale demonstrations in recent years.
On Tuesday, IRIB released a video showing the damage to the building, including the fourth floor – the location of the newsroom and the live studio where Emami was presenting at the time of the assault. State television showed images of the building on fire again, saying wind had reignited embers from Monday's strike.
Israel attacked the building about an hour after issuing an evacuation order for Tehran's district 3, where the IRIB headquarters is located, along with the police headquarters and three hospitals.
Three people were confirmed killed in the strike, including Nima Rajabpour, news producer, and Masoumeh Azimi, a member of the office staff. The Committee to Protect Journalists said it was 'appalled' by the attack on state television.
Emami told viewers the attack had 'targeted freedom of speech, the truth, and the voices of women, men and children who were martyred in recent days'.
- Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
34 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Ukrainian strikes kill three, Russian officials say, as Kyiv and Moscow exchange fire
Ukrainian drone attacks overnight killed three people, Russian officials said on Saturday. Russia's ministry of defence said air defences intercepted or destroyed 112 drones across eight Russian regions and the Russian-occupied Crimean Peninsula. A drone attack on the Rostov region, on the border with Ukraine, killed one person, acting governor Yuri Slyusar said. Further from the front line, a woman was killed and two other people wounded in a drone strike on business premises in the Penza region, according to regional governor Oleg Melnichenko. READ MORE In the Samara region, falling drone debris sparked a fire that killed an elderly resident, regional governor Vyacheslav Fedorishchev said. According to the Ukrainian air force, Russia launched 53 drones and decoys at Ukraine overnight into Saturday. It said that air defences shot down or jammed 45 drones. Eleven people were wounded in an overnight drone strike on the Kharkiv region, governor Oleh Syniehubov said on Saturday. The reciprocal drone strikes followed a day of mourning in the Ukrainian capital Kyiv on Friday, after a Russian drone and missile attack killed 31 people, including five children, and wounded more than 150. [ Trump orders nuclear submarines to move near Russia Opens in new window ] The continued attacks come after US president Donald Trump on Tuesday gave Russian president Vladimir Putin a shorter deadline – August 8th – for peace efforts to make progress. Mr Trump said on Thursday that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. - AP Ukraine war: Is President Zelenskiy losing his people's trust? Listen | 24:15


Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
An answer to Ireland's housing crisis is right behind us
When you are in a crisis, the choice is never between good and bad – it's always between bad and worse. Ireland has a housing crisis . We have far too many people and not enough homes for them. We can't seem to build quickly enough in the right areas at the right price. All the while, rising rent and house prices are prompting tens of thousands of young educated Irish people to emigrate . As argued here last month , our immigration policy is giving out too many work visas relative to the economy's ability to house these new migrants. There is too little supply and too much demand. The solution must include a reduction in immigration rates and a simultaneous increase in home building. In the short term, all bottlenecks to building should be removed while the number of people coming into the country needs to be capped, which means identifying a number for sustainable migration and sticking to it for a specific time period. READ MORE Facing a crisis resolutely is often described as the 'Dunkirk strategy', where you achieve your goals however you can, galvanising all your resources. At Dunkirk, rather than waiting for navy frigates to evacuate the stranded British army, the war cabinet commandeered every boat possible – fishing boats, yachts, pleasure boats, the lot. The objective in the crisis was: do whatever necessary. One housing-related idea under discussion is the notion that Irish people should be allowed (or even encouraged) to build small homes in their back gardens for the family to alleviate the pressure on the rental market. As long as the homes are within a specific size and meet some specific guidelines, families should be allowed to do what they want, right? [ We need to confront the reality that the housing shortage can't be solved Opens in new window ] This seems pretty sensible and, while it is hardly a universal solution, as an incremental move it's a start. The back gardens of many homes are potentially an amazing resource. In place of Nimbyism, living in the garden could be the start of a Yimbyism movement: yes in my back yard. Although some have voiced opposition, the international evidence is overwhelmingly positive. Allowing people to build in their back garden creates reasonably priced homes in the right areas. In North America, removing planning barriers in recent years has unleashed huge growth in small garden homes. For example, in three years Seattle tripled its permits to build what they call secondary dwelling units. In California, permits surged by 15,334 per cent. In Vancouver today, roughly 35 per cent of single-family lots host a laneway or secondary suite. These are families taking the housing crisis into their own hands and building in their gardens. Why would you stop them? In the Irish context, how big might this garden housing opportunity be? The Dublin City Council area contains about 3,305 hectares of private gardens. To give you a sense of how big this is, consider 8,262 Croke Parks. Now you get the picture. These are already residential-zoned, serviced plots located in prime, established urban areas. By contrast, empty brownfield sites are scarce in Ireland because even though dereliction is rife, there simply isn't enough derelict land to meet targets. If we want to avoid more sprawl and longer commutes, new greenfield development should be curtailed. Ireland's national policy is already aiming for 40 per cent of new housing to be built in existing urban areas. Gardens are already inside the cities. Ireland has hundreds of thousands of square metres of ready-to-go residential land in gardens. A think tank called Progress Ireland has run some of the numbers to see how many small homes could be built in existing gardens. Obviously gardens without back lanes or side entrances aren't suitable, and they must be big enough to accommodate a basic studio or one-bedroom modular home. On top of these physical constraints, to be viable building in the garden must be cheaper than renting locally. The report concludes that, across the country, about 18 per cent of existing gardens are suitable. That's about 348,000 viable sites. [ Rise in young people's mental health difficulties partly due to housing insecurity, says charity Opens in new window ] In a crisis, surely it is worth green-lighting such an opportunity. At the very least, planning restrictions should be eased so that neighbours can't object on the basis of density or views or whatever Nimby nonsense is invented as grounds for objections. A serious problem for Ireland is that our population isn't dense enough. We have only 73 people per square kilometre, compared with 279 in the UK. Four times the density means that public infrastructure might be as much as four times more effective. The more we build outwards, the worse our infrastructure will be and the more it will cost. Speaking of cost, a basic two-bedroom log cabin for a garden is estimated to run about €30,000–€42,000, making it an attractive solution for intergenerational living or as a 'starter' home for a young person on family land. Contrast this with the cost of a two-bed apartment in Ireland or a similar starter home on a new estate. This sort of microdevelopment needs to be part of an overall housing plan. It can't hurt. I understand many people will regard commandeering back gardens as a gimmick, putting people in a glorified shed or cabin rather than fixing the housing problem permanently. I get it. But anything that reduces pressure on the rental market must be considered for the short term. Having sons and daughters living in their own place beside their parents, or vice versa, might also have dramatic family positives (although it might also have the opposite effect in some cases). The aim is to reduce the acute pressure. Many younger people might love to live, for a while at least, in the place where they grew up, with a modicum of independence and their own front door. Why should the State, which has failed to provide proper housing, object to this stopgap? Last year Ireland built only 33,500 houses, a pathetic number. Even if we were to build 50,000 a year, which would be quite an achievement, we are a long way from bringing supply and demand into alignment. On the demand side, migration must be reduced if we are to have any hope of stabilising prices. On the supply side, a Dunkirk emergency strategy must be accepted, however unpalatable to some.


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Iran says US must agree compensatation before nuclear talks resumption
The US must agree to compensate Iran for losses incurred during last month's war, the Islamic republic's foreign minister said, as Tehran hardens its position and imposes new conditions for resuming nuclear talks with the Trump administration. Abbas Araghchi told the Financial Times that Iran would not agree to 'business as usual' in the wake of the 12-day conflict with Israel, which the US briefly joined despite having been in talks with Iran. 'They should explain why they attacked us in the middle of . . . negotiations, and they have to ensure that they are not going to repeat that [during future talks],' he said in an interview in Tehran. 'And they have to compensate [Iran for] the damage that they have done.' Araghchi, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, said he and US envoy Steve Witkoff exchanged messages with each other during and since the war, with the Iranian telling the American there needed to be a 'win-win solution' to resolve the years-long stand-off over Iran's nuclear programme. READ MORE 'The road to negotiation is narrow but it's not impossible. I need to convince my hierarchy that if we go for negotiation, the other side is coming with real determination for a win-win deal,' he said. Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi. Photograph: Sergei Karpukhin/AFP/Getty Araghchi said Witkoff has tried to convince him that it is possible and has proposed resuming talks. But the veteran Iranian diplomat added: 'We need real confidence-building measures from their side.' He said this should include financial compensation, without giving details, and assurances that Iran would not be attacked during negotiations again. 'My message [to Witkoff] is not that complicated,' Araghchi said. 'I said the recent aggression proved there is no military solution for Iran's nuclear programme, but a negotiated solution can be found.' The conflict erupted on June 13th when Israel launched large-scale air strikes on Iran, 48 hours before Araghchi and Witkoff were to hold a sixth round of indirect talks. As well as hitting nuclear sites, Israel destroyed much of Iran's air defence, assassinated top military commanders and at least 13 nuclear scientists, and killed more than 1,000 people, according to Iranian authorities. Iran responded by firing barrages of missiles and drones at Israel, which Israeli authorities say killed 29 people. [ A history of Israel's conflicts with Iran, Hamas and Hizbullah Opens in new window ] Two days before brokering a ceasefire, Washington bombed Iran's two main uranium enrichment sites, Fordow and Natanz, and fired missiles at a separate plant in Isfahan, severely damaging facilities that Tehran spent billions of dollars on. Araghchi said a third, new enrichment plant near Isfahan – which Tehran had days before the conflict said would be activated in response to censure by the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) board of governors – was also attacked. It is the first time Iran has acknowledged the site was struck. 'As far as I know, the preparations were made [for enrichment], but it was not active when it was attacked,' Araghchi said. In a sign of the challenges facing the resumption of diplomacy, he said the war had fostered mounting resistance to negotiations within Iran's ruling establishment, as well as calls from some in the Islamic republic to weaponise its nuclear programme. The minister insisted the theocracy was committed to a peaceful, civilian programme, would not change its doctrine and would abide by a two-decade old fatwa issued by Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei forbidding the development of nuclear weapons. But Araghchi said the war had only deepened distrust of US president Donald Trump, who during his first term abandoned a 2015 deal Iran signed with the Obama administration and other world powers. 'Anti-negotiation feelings are very high,' Araghchi said. 'People are telling me, 'Don't waste your time any more, don't be cheated by them . . . if they come to negotiations it's only a cover-up for their other intentions'.' While both Iran and the US said before the war that talks were making progress, they were divided over Trump's demand that Iran must halt all domestic enrichment of uranium, something Tehran rejected. Iran's leaders have since doubled down on their position, arguing Tehran has a right to enrich as a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty. Though Iran suspended co-operation with the IAEA after the war, Araghchi said he expected to hold talks with the UN nuclear watchdog next month over a new 'modality of co-operation'. Western officials say that while Iran's nuclear programme was severely damaged, it has not been destroyed. They also believe that Iran has retained some, if not all, of a 408kg stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 per cent purity, close to weapons-grade. Araghchi said he did not know where the stockpile was, but added that Tehran retained the capabilities to enrich uranium. 'Buildings can be rebuilt. Machines can be replaced, because the technology is there. We have plenty of scientists and technicians who used to work in our facilities,' Araghchi said. 'But when and how we restart our enrichment depends on the circumstances.' Trump on Monday warned Iran was sending out 'nasty signals' and said the US could launch new strikes if Tehran resumes enrichment, saying 'we'll wipe [the nuclear programme] out faster than you can wave your finger at it'. Araghchi reiterated there could be no deal as long as Trump demanded Iran agree to zero enrichment, but said Washington should address its concerns through negotiations. 'We can negotiate, they can present their argument and we will present our own argument,' Araghchi said. 'But with zero enrichment, we don't have a thing.' A US official said Washington is 'ready to talk directly to the Iranians'. Trump's administration on Wednesday highlighted its determination to maintain its 'maximum pressure' campaign on Iran when it imposed new sanctions on an oil shipping network. Araghchi hit out at the UK, France and Germany, European signatories to the 2015 accord, who have warned they would trigger a 'snapback' mechanism to reinstate UN sanctions at the end of August if Tehran does not resume negotiations with Washington and co-operation with the IAEA. Araghchi said Tehran would end talks with the European powers if they did, accusing them of failing to meet their commitments under the 2015 accord. 'With the Europeans, there is no reason right now to negotiate because they cannot lift sanctions, they cannot do anything,' he said. 'If they do snap back, that means that this is the end of the road for them.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025