Sberbank CEO puzzled by Russia's push to create digital rouble
Russian banks will be required to offer customers the means to make payments using digital roubles from September 1, 2026, the central bank said last week, pushing the project's planned launch back by over a year.
More than 130 countries are exploring digital versions of their currencies, according to the Atlantic Council, as the world's financial authorities respond to declining cash usage and the threat to their money-printing powers from the likes of bitcoin.
Moscow hopes the digital rouble will simplify foreign trade payments that have been complicated by Western sanctions over the conflict in Ukraine.
"I don't see its advantages," Gref told reporters during a financial forum in St Petersburg. "As an individual, I don't understand why digital roubles are needed. As a bank... I don't yet understand it very well either."
Russian banks already have strong digital finance capacities, such as cashless settlements, Gref said, reiterating that he saw no possibility for the digital rouble to meaningfully transform Russia's economy.
No digital currency has become dominant within any country, he said, but there could be a future in cross-border settlements.
"Domestically, I don't see it yet," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Coin Geek
an hour ago
- Coin Geek
Blockchain: The most expensive vaporware in history?
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... When Satoshi Nakamoto released the Bitcoin white paper in 2008, he envisioned an electronic cash system for the world. Satoshi talked about micropayments, peer-to-peer transactions, and how Bitcoin 'never really hits a scaling ceiling.' He envisioned small casual transactions, making new types of commerce possible. He even included a poker client in the original Bitcoin code. Yet, in 2025, Bitcoin is nothing more than a Wall Street plaything for reckless gamblers like Michael Saylor to bet on, and the wider blockchain industry is a mess. Companies like Blackrock (NASDAQ: BLK) are in the game, and the small, casual transactions Satoshi envisioned have to go through a layer two 'solution' called the Lightning Network controlled by corporations like Blockstream and Strike. Bitcoin has become unrecognizable in almost two decades, and blockchain tech has failed to deliver on its potential. A dismal failure to deliver on the promise of blockchain tech It's not just what Bitcoin has become—Ethereum and the thousands of other chains haven't fared much better. Despite endless updates, Ethereum is still a tangled mess of side chains, layer twos, and bridges, and no single application has been a mainstream success. What about enterprise blockchain? Remember IBM's (NASDAQ: IBM) Hyperledger and Corda's R3? These days, they're hardly mentioned, and they've seen almost no adoption. Tens of billions and a decade of time have been spent, and there's no sign that any of these systems will be used seriously. Why has it gone down this way? There are a few key reasons. First, the greedfest that saw speculation replace utility and building set the industry back by a decade or more. There isn't an application anyone could have built that would have outperformed the financial returns on simply holding BTC or Ethereum for 10 years. Capital goes where it is incentivized to go, and with no killer apps, the blockchains that were supposed to host them suffer. Ironically, the technical limitations of many of these blockchains have killed the once promising apps built on them. Second, everything is fragmented. Instead of apps making each other more valuable due to interoperability and unified liquidity on one scalable chain and coin, DeFi, gaming, and other apps exist on hundreds of different blockchains, none of which can scale well enough to host the others even if they migrate. Even on Ethereum, popular apps exist on different layer twos like Polygon, so moving funds from one to another necessitates fees, bridges, and the associated security risks. That brings us nicely to the last point—the user experience on almost every blockchain sucks. Every good VC knows that the best tech doesn't necessarily win—the one with the best UX stands the greatest chance of success. Yet, even seasoned professionals struggle to understand the complex web of wallets, bridges, and different standards on this blockchain. With retail out, no mainstream apps on any chain, increasing concern about the environmental and societal costs, and dead chains that never delivered on their promises scattered all over the battlefield, it's little wonder that the blockchain economy today can best be described as a slow-motion collapse of credibility and hope. It's sad to see, but it didn't have to be this way. BSV could serve as the base layer for everything in blockchain Every blockchain proponent promises their favorite chain is the solution to all of this nonsense, but unlike the others, BSV fans like me can back it up with demonstrable proof. This blockchain, which follows Satoshi Nakamoto's original design, can already do one million transactions per second for fees of fractions of a penny. It has a growing list of applications in cybersecurity, supply chain management, Web3 gaming, and more. While BSV is by no means a boom town, it has been gaining ground steadily, and unlike Ethereum, Polkadot, or any of the others, it can scale unboundedly and is attracting interest from all over. Polkadot is $500M. Promised a No users. No devs. No future. Here's how one of crypto's biggest bets faded into a ghost chain 👇🧵 Once again, these aren't unfounded claims; they're provable. The Teranode update has shown that BSV can consistently process millions of transactions per second. Furthermore, fees don't increase when transaction capacity is pushed to its limits. Check out WhatsOnChain for the latest BSV stats, including daily transactions and average fees. Just like Satoshi said, it never really hits a scaling ceiling, and the fees are low all the time. Let's unite and build a blockchain-powered world together If the blockchain industry will amount to anything, we've got to set aside petty politics, tribal affiliations, and wishful thinking and embrace the solution that works today. BSV's architects have already achieved these technical milestones with only a few hundred key players; imagine what could be achieved if all the time, energy, brainpower, and money in the industry decided to circle the wagons and push the limits even further. In 2025, most blockchains are vaporware, and the industry is widely considered a joke. However, there's still time to turn the corner, and in five years, those of us who staked our names to promote blockchains' virtues can be smiling as everything we told the critics it was capable of comes true, or we can still be spinning in circles hoping for a miracle from the same teams that have consistently failed to deliver in the past. It's time to set the past aside, embrace the one scalable protocol that can serve as the backbone of everything, and build on BSV. Check out some of the developer tools and resources on the BSV Association website to get started! Watch | Decoding Prosperity: How Blockchain Drives Inclusive Growth
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
OPEC set to complete unwinding of voluntary oil output cut in Sept, sources say
LONDON, July 7 (Reuters) - OPEC+ oil producers are set to approve another big output boost for September as they complete the unwinding of voluntary output cuts by eight members and allow the United Arab Emirates to pump more to meet a larger quota, five sources said. Plans to unwind cuts of 2.17 million barrels per day (bpd) began in April with a boost of 138,000 bpd. Hike of 411,000 bpd followed for May, June and July, despite falling oil prices. On Saturday, the group approved a 548,000 bpd jump for August. Five sources familiar with the discussions said on Monday the group is likely to approve an increase of around 550,000 bpd for September when it meets on August 3. That will complete the planned return of 2.17 million bpd to the market from the eight members: Saudi Arabia, Russia, the UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Iraq, Kazakhstan and Algeria. It will also allow room for an additional 300,000 bpd in output from the UAE as it moves to a larger production quota, the sources said.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Russian potato shortage that shows Putin's economy is on the brink
When the last leader of the Soviet Union visited Chequers for lunch with prime minister Margaret Thatcher in 1984, one topic of discussion was potatoes. Raisa Gorbachev, the wife of Soviet leader Mikhail, claimed Russia had 300 ways of cooking the humble spud, prompting Michael Jopling, Britain's agriculture minister, to express disbelief. She later posted a Russian cookbook to Jopling with the clarification: 'In fact, there are 500, rather than 300, recipes to cook potatoes.' For Vladimir Putin, Russians' appetite for the vegetable has become problematic, however. Shortages have pushed up prices by 167pc over the past year, the biggest rise of any food. 'It turns out that we don't have enough potatoes,' Putin admitted during a televised meeting in May, adding: 'I spoke with [Belarusian leader] Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko. He said, 'We've already sold everything to Russia.'' Since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022 made Russia the world's most sanctioned country, eagle-eyed economists have watched closely for signs of economic damage which have proved remarkably elusive. But now surging food prices and labour shortages are keeping inflation high, driving big cracks in the economy. 'We're basically already on the brink of falling into a recession,' economy minister Maxim Reshetnikov told a conference recently. Could Russia's well-oiled war machine be running out of steam? The strain is definitely starting to show, says Alexandra Prokopenko, a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. 'Slowing economic growth coupled with high inflation leaves Russia close to stagflation,' says Prokopenko, a former adviser at Russia's central bank. It means Putin is vulnerable. Further falls in oil prices or a tightening of sanctions can now inflict far greater harm than they did previously, Prokopenko warns. 'None the less, we are not quite there yet,' she cautions. Another economist at a European bank, who didn't want to be named, said the waters were still muddied when it came to Russia's economy. 'The momentum is much slower than it used to be. If we look at the deficit, it has been widening. That suggests that despite the fiscal support, which is most likely aimed at military-related areas, the Russian economy is clearly not as robust as it used to be,' they said. In other words, Putin's war economy is likely at capacity: 'The potential to draw more people into the army and military production has been used. There is a limit to how many shifts people can work in factories, producing munitions and military uniforms.' As a result, inflation was running high at 9.9pc in May, fuelled by billions of roubles ploughed into the war effort, worker shortages and other price pressures. To quell it, interest rates are at 20pc, even after a one percentage point cut in June. 'The financial resources are not endless. The central bank, which maintains some sort of independence, has to maintain a very restrictive monetary policy. That lowers the availability of finance for the rest of the economy,' the economist adds. Still, experts caution against concluding this means all Russians must be struggling. Unemployment is hovering around record lows, high interest rates are boosting savings and mortgage borrowers are to some extent shielded. Wages have also surged. 'Yes, inflation has been high in the last three years, but nominal incomes have been growing much faster, therefore the average real wage actually increased quite substantially. I travel to Russia quite often, and there doesn't seem to be any discontent which is about to bubble to the surface,' says Tatiana Orlova, from Oxford Economics. She believes the economy minister's warning of recession was an attempt to cajole the central bank into cutting rates further – a more underhanded attempt than Donald Trump's frequent angry social media outbursts against Jerome Powell, the US Federal Reserve chief. She says that people in some sectors – teachers, doctors and others – will probably feel worse off because of high inflation. But the war has also created a big class of winners in poor towns across Russia. 'The families who are affected by the war because someone has joined the contractual army, for example, are using it as a social lift. The government is paying very high bonuses equivalent to between $20,000 [£14,600] and $35,000 just for signing up,' Orlova says. 'Those fighters are also receiving monthly wages, which are quite above average. So the families are suddenly able to afford more things. They can make a down payment for a new flat or buy a new car. It's a weird paradox that the war actually brought prosperity to families at this horrible cost,' she adds. This is echoed by the other economists who study the Russian economy. The country is experiencing the slow-burn effect of sanctions, but with very different impacts across the population. 'It's important to understand that the Russian households are not poor. The situation is far from catastrophic. The mood from now on will likely deteriorate because of the lack of new stimulus. These are the longer-term consequences of everything that the Russian government put upon itself in 2022,' said another economist. 'The politically liberal middle class that was formed in the early 2000s, which was mostly employed in the private sector, left the country in response to Putin's war. Since 2022, the new middle class has emerged among those beneficiaries [from the war], and they have been upscaling their consumption patterns,' they add. And this brings us back to potatoes. Prices of the beloved vegetable have surged because of poor harvests have reduced supply. They have only just started easing slightly. Bellwether of household finances Any sign of heightened popularity is worth watching: 'Potatoes are a Giffen good. That means if household wealth is going down, then some lower quality products such as potatoes see increasing demand,' the economist says. In other words, if people feel poorer they typically buy more potatoes, making it an unusual bellwether of household finances in a country with sparse reliable data. But says Andrey Sizov, a Russian commodity expert, other food types like butter, eggs and meat have also become much costlier after shortages. This may in fact reflect people trading up from potatoes. 'My speculation is that supply went down, and actually demand went down a little bit. Potatoes are not an expensive food. In the previous two years, it was first of all poor Russians who were making more money. So they could consume something else – less potatoes, more meat and butter, for example,' Sizov says. The humble spud's mixed signals underline that even as Russia's economy has lost momentum, some are feeling the gain and others the pain. But with the longer running toll from sanctions mounting and a costly war nearing its fourth anniversary, Putin has few options to trigger another growth spurt. 'The central bank could cut interest rates. But that would risk another surge in inflation. Another option is for the government to increase spending, but this is also more likely to increase prices than stimulate growth,' says Prokopenko, the former central bank adviser. 'Protectionism is yet another option. But this only works at the expense of consumers. In other words, it is ordinary Russians who will feel the consequences – through either increased prices, falling income, or less choice on the shelves,' she adds. Will the economic strain matter to Putin? He has been emboldened by a friendlier regime in the US under Trump administration, which has just paused some arms shipments to Kyiv. 'I do not see that the finances are at breaking point. This could go on for years,' warns Orlova. 'In Russia, people have very low expectations. They expect their life to be hard. They expect to always fight and find new ways of surviving. So it's just life as usual. When the population has very low expectations, it actually helps those who rule the country to do whatever they want,' she adds.
