
NDIS changes slammed as 'unsustainable' as clinic moves away from scheme
The National Disability Insurance Agency's (NDIA) annual pricing review of the scheme has frozen the cost for occupational therapy sessions provided to NDIS participants for a seventh year and halved travel subsidies for allied health professionals.
Price caps for other allied health therapies have also changed.
Bryony Clark, an occupational therapist and co-director of Corrimal-based Facilitate OT alongside Carla Widloecher, said that while the fee payable for OT sessions had remained unchanged, business costs had gone up about 30 per cent and wages by about 25 per cent.
"It really is virtually unsustainable to remain working in the NDIS," Ms Clark said.
Ms Clark said the travel subsidy reduction meant it was not viable for the clinic to send out allied health assistants to see NDIS participants for certain therapies, because it no longer covered the cost of the service.
Travel subsidies were also important, she said, because OTs needed to assess people in their homes, workplaces and schools - not only for the best outcomes for the participants, but because it was required for NDIS accreditation.
A person with disability approved for an NDIS plan receives funding for appropriate supports, which can include therapies and services, as well as equipment.
Each year, the NDIA conducts a pricing review and sets limits for what providers can charge for therapies and services for NDIS participants.
From July 1, the cap for occupational therapy was again set at $193.99 per hour.
The limit for physiotherapy has dropped by $10 to $183.99 per hour, and for podiatry and dietetics by $5 to $188.99 per hour.
Psychology has increased by $10 to $232.99 an hour.
Therapists are now limited to billing travel time at 50 per cent of their hourly rate.
The NDIA says the new prices better match what people without an NDIS plan pay for these therapies.
When participants get a new plan, their funding will be set according to the revised rates.
National peak bodies for allied health professionals and health advocacy groups have called on the NDIA to review its pricing decision out of concern that the changes will force providers out of the NDIS and result in less support for participants.
Facilitate OT has 260 active NDIS participants on its books, but Ms Clark and Ms Widloecher have made the difficult decision to begin transition out of the NDIS due to what they say is the uncertainty and difficulty of working in the system.
"We've really soldiered on for a very long time, hoping things will get better, and not wanting to leave out participants without support," Ms Clark said.
They have already ceased outreach driving assessments, which evaluate an NDIS participant's ability to drive and any modifications they might need, because of the travel fee changes.
An NDIA spokesperson said therapy supports represented a "significant" portion of NDIS funding, amounting to over $4 billion in payments each year.
"A comprehensive review of prices found NDIS participants were paying different prices to what other Australians pay for those therapies," the spokesperson said.
"We also heard from participants that excessive travel claims for therapy-related services drain participants' plans faster than expected and reducing the amount of support a participant could access."
The spokesperson said the new rule encouraged providers to schedule more effectively.
Ms Clark argued that there was a difference between the NDIS hourly rates and the subsidised rebate system under which Medicare and private health insurance operated, the latter of which providers could add a gap fee.
She also pointed to some government schemes (which the NDIA considered in its review) that paid higher rates than the NDIS for occupational therapy.
Ms Clark fears a loss of support for NDIS participants will cost the health system, as individuals will need more intensive care down the line, and impose a social cost as carers shoulder a heavier load in lieu of allied health therapies.
The NDIA has said it would monitor markets to ensure participants had continued access to supports.
The spokesperson said NDIS data showed the number of providers continued to grow and had increased by almost 58,000 in a year.
An occupational therapy practice has started transitioning away from the NDIS as pricing decisions make it more "unsustainable" to provide services.
The National Disability Insurance Agency's (NDIA) annual pricing review of the scheme has frozen the cost for occupational therapy sessions provided to NDIS participants for a seventh year and halved travel subsidies for allied health professionals.
Price caps for other allied health therapies have also changed.
Bryony Clark, an occupational therapist and co-director of Corrimal-based Facilitate OT alongside Carla Widloecher, said that while the fee payable for OT sessions had remained unchanged, business costs had gone up about 30 per cent and wages by about 25 per cent.
"It really is virtually unsustainable to remain working in the NDIS," Ms Clark said.
Ms Clark said the travel subsidy reduction meant it was not viable for the clinic to send out allied health assistants to see NDIS participants for certain therapies, because it no longer covered the cost of the service.
Travel subsidies were also important, she said, because OTs needed to assess people in their homes, workplaces and schools - not only for the best outcomes for the participants, but because it was required for NDIS accreditation.
A person with disability approved for an NDIS plan receives funding for appropriate supports, which can include therapies and services, as well as equipment.
Each year, the NDIA conducts a pricing review and sets limits for what providers can charge for therapies and services for NDIS participants.
From July 1, the cap for occupational therapy was again set at $193.99 per hour.
The limit for physiotherapy has dropped by $10 to $183.99 per hour, and for podiatry and dietetics by $5 to $188.99 per hour.
Psychology has increased by $10 to $232.99 an hour.
Therapists are now limited to billing travel time at 50 per cent of their hourly rate.
The NDIA says the new prices better match what people without an NDIS plan pay for these therapies.
When participants get a new plan, their funding will be set according to the revised rates.
National peak bodies for allied health professionals and health advocacy groups have called on the NDIA to review its pricing decision out of concern that the changes will force providers out of the NDIS and result in less support for participants.
Facilitate OT has 260 active NDIS participants on its books, but Ms Clark and Ms Widloecher have made the difficult decision to begin transition out of the NDIS due to what they say is the uncertainty and difficulty of working in the system.
"We've really soldiered on for a very long time, hoping things will get better, and not wanting to leave out participants without support," Ms Clark said.
They have already ceased outreach driving assessments, which evaluate an NDIS participant's ability to drive and any modifications they might need, because of the travel fee changes.
An NDIA spokesperson said therapy supports represented a "significant" portion of NDIS funding, amounting to over $4 billion in payments each year.
"A comprehensive review of prices found NDIS participants were paying different prices to what other Australians pay for those therapies," the spokesperson said.
"We also heard from participants that excessive travel claims for therapy-related services drain participants' plans faster than expected and reducing the amount of support a participant could access."
The spokesperson said the new rule encouraged providers to schedule more effectively.
Ms Clark argued that there was a difference between the NDIS hourly rates and the subsidised rebate system under which Medicare and private health insurance operated, the latter of which providers could add a gap fee.
She also pointed to some government schemes (which the NDIA considered in its review) that paid higher rates than the NDIS for occupational therapy.
Ms Clark fears a loss of support for NDIS participants will cost the health system, as individuals will need more intensive care down the line, and impose a social cost as carers shoulder a heavier load in lieu of allied health therapies.
The NDIA has said it would monitor markets to ensure participants had continued access to supports.
The spokesperson said NDIS data showed the number of providers continued to grow and had increased by almost 58,000 in a year.
An occupational therapy practice has started transitioning away from the NDIS as pricing decisions make it more "unsustainable" to provide services.
The National Disability Insurance Agency's (NDIA) annual pricing review of the scheme has frozen the cost for occupational therapy sessions provided to NDIS participants for a seventh year and halved travel subsidies for allied health professionals.
Price caps for other allied health therapies have also changed.
Bryony Clark, an occupational therapist and co-director of Corrimal-based Facilitate OT alongside Carla Widloecher, said that while the fee payable for OT sessions had remained unchanged, business costs had gone up about 30 per cent and wages by about 25 per cent.
"It really is virtually unsustainable to remain working in the NDIS," Ms Clark said.
Ms Clark said the travel subsidy reduction meant it was not viable for the clinic to send out allied health assistants to see NDIS participants for certain therapies, because it no longer covered the cost of the service.
Travel subsidies were also important, she said, because OTs needed to assess people in their homes, workplaces and schools - not only for the best outcomes for the participants, but because it was required for NDIS accreditation.
A person with disability approved for an NDIS plan receives funding for appropriate supports, which can include therapies and services, as well as equipment.
Each year, the NDIA conducts a pricing review and sets limits for what providers can charge for therapies and services for NDIS participants.
From July 1, the cap for occupational therapy was again set at $193.99 per hour.
The limit for physiotherapy has dropped by $10 to $183.99 per hour, and for podiatry and dietetics by $5 to $188.99 per hour.
Psychology has increased by $10 to $232.99 an hour.
Therapists are now limited to billing travel time at 50 per cent of their hourly rate.
The NDIA says the new prices better match what people without an NDIS plan pay for these therapies.
When participants get a new plan, their funding will be set according to the revised rates.
National peak bodies for allied health professionals and health advocacy groups have called on the NDIA to review its pricing decision out of concern that the changes will force providers out of the NDIS and result in less support for participants.
Facilitate OT has 260 active NDIS participants on its books, but Ms Clark and Ms Widloecher have made the difficult decision to begin transition out of the NDIS due to what they say is the uncertainty and difficulty of working in the system.
"We've really soldiered on for a very long time, hoping things will get better, and not wanting to leave out participants without support," Ms Clark said.
They have already ceased outreach driving assessments, which evaluate an NDIS participant's ability to drive and any modifications they might need, because of the travel fee changes.
An NDIA spokesperson said therapy supports represented a "significant" portion of NDIS funding, amounting to over $4 billion in payments each year.
"A comprehensive review of prices found NDIS participants were paying different prices to what other Australians pay for those therapies," the spokesperson said.
"We also heard from participants that excessive travel claims for therapy-related services drain participants' plans faster than expected and reducing the amount of support a participant could access."
The spokesperson said the new rule encouraged providers to schedule more effectively.
Ms Clark argued that there was a difference between the NDIS hourly rates and the subsidised rebate system under which Medicare and private health insurance operated, the latter of which providers could add a gap fee.
She also pointed to some government schemes (which the NDIA considered in its review) that paid higher rates than the NDIS for occupational therapy.
Ms Clark fears a loss of support for NDIS participants will cost the health system, as individuals will need more intensive care down the line, and impose a social cost as carers shoulder a heavier load in lieu of allied health therapies.
The NDIA has said it would monitor markets to ensure participants had continued access to supports.
The spokesperson said NDIS data showed the number of providers continued to grow and had increased by almost 58,000 in a year.
An occupational therapy practice has started transitioning away from the NDIS as pricing decisions make it more "unsustainable" to provide services.
The National Disability Insurance Agency's (NDIA) annual pricing review of the scheme has frozen the cost for occupational therapy sessions provided to NDIS participants for a seventh year and halved travel subsidies for allied health professionals.
Price caps for other allied health therapies have also changed.
Bryony Clark, an occupational therapist and co-director of Corrimal-based Facilitate OT alongside Carla Widloecher, said that while the fee payable for OT sessions had remained unchanged, business costs had gone up about 30 per cent and wages by about 25 per cent.
"It really is virtually unsustainable to remain working in the NDIS," Ms Clark said.
Ms Clark said the travel subsidy reduction meant it was not viable for the clinic to send out allied health assistants to see NDIS participants for certain therapies, because it no longer covered the cost of the service.
Travel subsidies were also important, she said, because OTs needed to assess people in their homes, workplaces and schools - not only for the best outcomes for the participants, but because it was required for NDIS accreditation.
A person with disability approved for an NDIS plan receives funding for appropriate supports, which can include therapies and services, as well as equipment.
Each year, the NDIA conducts a pricing review and sets limits for what providers can charge for therapies and services for NDIS participants.
From July 1, the cap for occupational therapy was again set at $193.99 per hour.
The limit for physiotherapy has dropped by $10 to $183.99 per hour, and for podiatry and dietetics by $5 to $188.99 per hour.
Psychology has increased by $10 to $232.99 an hour.
Therapists are now limited to billing travel time at 50 per cent of their hourly rate.
The NDIA says the new prices better match what people without an NDIS plan pay for these therapies.
When participants get a new plan, their funding will be set according to the revised rates.
National peak bodies for allied health professionals and health advocacy groups have called on the NDIA to review its pricing decision out of concern that the changes will force providers out of the NDIS and result in less support for participants.
Facilitate OT has 260 active NDIS participants on its books, but Ms Clark and Ms Widloecher have made the difficult decision to begin transition out of the NDIS due to what they say is the uncertainty and difficulty of working in the system.
"We've really soldiered on for a very long time, hoping things will get better, and not wanting to leave out participants without support," Ms Clark said.
They have already ceased outreach driving assessments, which evaluate an NDIS participant's ability to drive and any modifications they might need, because of the travel fee changes.
An NDIA spokesperson said therapy supports represented a "significant" portion of NDIS funding, amounting to over $4 billion in payments each year.
"A comprehensive review of prices found NDIS participants were paying different prices to what other Australians pay for those therapies," the spokesperson said.
"We also heard from participants that excessive travel claims for therapy-related services drain participants' plans faster than expected and reducing the amount of support a participant could access."
The spokesperson said the new rule encouraged providers to schedule more effectively.
Ms Clark argued that there was a difference between the NDIS hourly rates and the subsidised rebate system under which Medicare and private health insurance operated, the latter of which providers could add a gap fee.
She also pointed to some government schemes (which the NDIA considered in its review) that paid higher rates than the NDIS for occupational therapy.
Ms Clark fears a loss of support for NDIS participants will cost the health system, as individuals will need more intensive care down the line, and impose a social cost as carers shoulder a heavier load in lieu of allied health therapies.
The NDIA has said it would monitor markets to ensure participants had continued access to supports.
The spokesperson said NDIS data showed the number of providers continued to grow and had increased by almost 58,000 in a year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
3 minutes ago
- ABC News
Federal government commits $430 million to prop up Newcastle hydrogen hub
The federal government has committed more than $430 million to help bring large-scale hydrogen production to the New South Wales Hunter region despite uncertainty in the market. Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen made the funding announcement on Friday. The proposed hub would include a 50-megawatt hydrogen electrolyser to be constructed at Kooragang Island, near the Port of Newcastle, which would split water into hydrogen and oxygen. That could produce 4,700 tonnes of green hydrogen each year, much of which would be used by explosive manufacturing company Orica at its nearby site to help make its products emission-free. "Green hydrogen does have a future in Australia," Mr Bowen said. The announcement comes months after Origin Energy pulled out of the project citing high input costs and challenges regarding technological advancement. The project was to be delivered by Origin Energy in partnership with Orica and in 2023 the government awarded the joint venture $70m to help with construction costs. Orica managing director and chief executive officer Sanjeev Gandhi said the company remained committed to the project and was gauging interest from potential partners for the venture. "We will continue to invest in this site," he said. Mr Gandhi said the funding announced on Friday was an incentive to deliver the project. "It's not easy to build these kind of projects," he said. "We will need a lot of support from the local authorities, from the state government, from the federal government and, obviously, from the Orica workforce." The ABC understands the the funding will be used to subsidise every tonne of hydrogen produced from the facility. Mr Bowen's announcement comes days after the Central Queensland Hydrogen Project (CQH2) was scrapped. State-government owned energy company Stanwell withdrew its support for Gladstone project on Monday. Earlier this year the Queensland government withdrew its funding for the project on the grounds that the financial demands were too high. In May billionaire Andrew Forrest's company Fortescue abandoned both stages of its hydrogen projects in the city. Energy consultant Geoff Bongers told ABC Newcastle that the cost of production was the major barrier. "There's a gap between what [industry] would like to do and what's available and economic," he said. "Electrolysis is a relatively expensive capital project, so the the capital cost is reasonably high and the ongoing costs are relatively high. But Dr Bongers said there was "relatively high" demand for hydrogen. "[Japan and South Korea] have both expressed interest in using hydrogen as a fuel source," he said. "Japan would be keen to take as much hydrogen as we could produce, almost." Orica said it planned to scale the project in accordance with demand would consider exporting in the future. The hydrogen hub was originally set to be built in 2025 and was to be operational by 2026. It is now projected to be operational in 2028.


West Australian
6 minutes ago
- West Australian
The TAB: Papalia concedes ‘no value in purchasing it,' as government keeps door open on future sale
After multiple unsuccessful attempts, the state government has reiterated it does not currently plan to sell the TAB but is keeping the door open for future opportunities, as Minister Paul Papalia concedes that 'no one can see a value in purchasing it.' After plans to privatise the betting agency were first announced in 2015 by the former Barnett government, and legislation was passed under the McGowan government in 2019 to enable the sale, the government has spent years trying to find a suitable buyer. Multiple bids, including offers reportedly close to $1 billion, fell through, leading the government to scrap the sale in 2022. During budget estimates on Thursday, Minister Paul Papalia was asked by the opposition if the government would again pursue the privatisation of the TAB in this current term. 'In short, no,' Mr Papalia responded. 'That is not to say I am not out there or I would not be receptive to an approach for a sale, but there has been no interest and I do not anticipate there will be, not because we do not want to sell it or that we would categorically refuse, but probably because no-one can see a value in purchasing it.' Mr Papalia said the sale of the TAB would have secured the long-term future of the racing industry; however, the plan collapsed amid falling returns following the COVID pandemic. 'In our first term of government, we tried to sell the TAB. At that point, the TAB was of reasonable value,' he said. 'It was our ambition to sell the TAB and create an infrastructure fund to allow in perpetuity funding for the industry's requirements for upgrades and maintenance of facilities, and also return a relatively small profit to the state as a consequence of the sale. 'That fell through. COVID changed things. Prior to and post-COVID, there has been an enduring diminishing return from racing and gambling.' This financial year, the State Government is set to spend $57.1 million on racing and wagering in WA, including $38.6 million dedicated to improving and maintaining wagering systems. Shadow Racing and Gaming Minister Lachlan Hunter believes the government should be working harder to make the TAB more viable for a prospective buyer. 'We remain focused on what delivers the best outcomes for racing. What we won't support is letting the TAB wither on the vine through inaction,' Mr Hunter said. 'Instead of trying to justify inaction, the government should be working to strengthen the TAB's position—investing in digital platforms, offering a competitive product, and providing clarity about its future. 'The industry deserves leadership, not defeatism.' Despite not being able to find a suitable buyer over several years, the TAB still appears to be a cash cow for the state. 'The TAB generates hundreds of millions of dollars and is running efficiently, generating revenue for industry and taxpayers,' Mr Papalia told the West Australian.


Perth Now
9 minutes ago
- Perth Now
2028 Polestar 7 small SUV teased, will share a lot with Volvo
Polestar is working closely with fellow Geely-owned brand Volvo when it comes to its upcoming Polestar 7, which will be built at a Volvo plant and will use Volvo technology. The all-new small electric SUV will be launched in 2028 and produced at a new Volvo Cars factory in Kosice, Slovakia. Volvo has also confirmed the new Polestar 7 will be followed by an as-yet unnamed next-generation model of its own, which will also be produced in the same plant. While all Polestars sold in Australia are produced in China, the EV brand has been diversifying its manufacturing operations, with the Polestar 3 large SUV entering production in the US and the Polestar 4 mid-size SUV soon to be produced in Korea. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Despite the name, the Polestar 7 will be the brand's smallest model as Polestar persists with a naming system based on the order in which it launches its models – even though the Polestar 6 convertible's launch has been pushed back to after the 7's. Confused? Basically, don't expect a BMW 7 Series limousine rival, but rather a compact electric SUV and therefore likely a corporate cousin to models like the Volvo EX30, Smart #3 and Zeekr X from elsewhere within the Geely empire. A single teaser image of the Polestar 7 released this week doesn't reveal much, other than bold daytime running lights that fit in neatly with those employed by other Polestar products. Polestar says the new SUV will 'utilise a technology base from Volvo Cars, benefiting from group component sharing, cell-to-body technology with next-generation battery density and performance, as well as the next generation of in-house developed e-motors'. Supplied Credit: CarExpert That indicates a shared platform, rather than a Polestar-specific platform like that used by the Polestar 5 grand tourer due later this year, though the brand promises 'adaptations will be made to create the driving experience and performance characteristics that Polestar is known for'. Volvo has confirmed the Polestar 7 will share a 'common technology base' with the upcoming Volvo EX60, which will be based on the new SPA3 platform, as well as an unspecified Volvo. Existing Polestar vehicles already share their platforms with other Geely-owned brands. Slovakia is becoming an increasingly popular production location, with Jaguar Land Rover also manufacturing its Land Rover Defender and Discovery there, and the Volkswagen Group manufacturing the Audi Q7, Porsche Cayenne and Volkswagen Touareg there. Kia and Stellantis also produce vehicles there for the European market. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Above: Polestar 3 production Polestar notes the location of the Kosice factory 'offers good logistical connections to European markets and a developed supplier base', while Volvo has confirmed the plant – which is costing 1.2 billion euros (A$2.15bn) to develop – will be able to produce up to 250,000 cars per year. But producing the vehicle in Europe also means it won't be subject to tariffs imposed by the European Union on Chinese vehicle imports. 'Our strategy of utilising Group architectures as the base for our future model line-up gives us access to the best, latest technologies, in a cost-efficient manner,' said Polestar CEO Michael Lohscheller. 'With a design and sporty driving characteristics that are instantly recognisable, Polestar 7 will set new standards in the premium compact SUV segment.' The Polestar 7 will slot in towards the bottom of the Polestar lineup, alongside the Polestar 2 fastback that's set to receive a second generation. MORE: Everything Polestar