
Foreign residents closely follow Japan's election and party pledges
While foreign nationals do not have the right to vote unless they naturalize, as residents they contribute to the economy, pay taxes and raise families in Japan. As electoral results could impact their lives, The Japan Times asked several foreign residents to weigh in. Interviews have been edited for brevity and clarity.
Mark Williams (55)
United States, resident of Japan since 2006
If I could vote myself, I'd want to see stronger enforcement of labor laws. I've been lucky, but I know people in other companies who are stuck in that culture where you can't leave until your boss does. That needs to change — for both Japanese people and foreigners alike.
The cost of living is another big one. There are so many middlemen in the distribution process here that it drives up prices unnecessarily. Streamlining that could make a real difference.
I have definitely noticed a shift in attitude (regarding foreigners), especially online. However, if I'm being honest, I've experienced far worse back home in the U.S. than I ever have here.
There are people who've always held discriminatory views — now they just feel more free to voice them. It's not that there are more people who think this way, just more who are willing to say it out loud.
When people say negative things about foreigners online, my wife or daughter will sometimes point it out to me. I might not have noticed otherwise, because I'm not glued to the TV or reading comments all the time.
Day-to-day, I've only ever had positive experiences with people in Japan. My coworkers have always treated me well. I've never felt unwelcome in my workplace. I judge people based on how they treat me directly — not based on what's said online or in anonymous comments.
Alexander Howell-Jackson (27)
United Kingdom, resident of Japan for three years
Anti-foreigner sentiment has definitely been rising. You can see it with parties like Sanseito. But it mirrors what's happening in the rest of the world. When the economy's stagnant and prices go up, people look for someone to blame and often that ends up being foreigners.
Most Japanese people have never had a meaningful interaction with a foreigner. That leaves a vacuum for media narratives to shape their views. It's funny to see the 'foreigners are taking our jobs' narrative appear here too. Japan has a labor shortage and a shrinking population — there are so many unfilled jobs.
There's no way to tell a tourist apart from a foreign resident, so we all get lumped together. Even if I've lived here for years, I get judged by what a tourist did last week. It's frustrating — when tourists don't know the rules, we all pay the price. It's not like we have 'foreign resident' stamped on our forehead with a visa type.
That's not to say everyone is falling victim to this rhetoric. Online, the most racist people are the most vocal. Just because you see those kinds of comments doesn't mean everyone thinks like that.
Simon Henderson (40)
Australia, resident of Japan for three years
I've been following the election very closely. It feels like a pivotal moment for Japan. There's a very real possibility of a political shift, which makes this election particularly significant.
Foreign nationals contribute substantially to Japan's wellbeing, including through taxes. Yet we're still excluded from voting and often from political discourse entirely. Many of us have deep roots here. We work, we pay taxes, we raise families. But without the right to vote, we remain politically invisible.
It's disappointing to see major parties, including the Liberal Democratic Party, echo xenophobic rhetoric rather than challenging it. Instead of framing foreign nationals as threats, Japan's political leaders should recognize the benefits of a more diverse society.
Japan isn't alone in this shift. We're seeing nationalism rise worldwide — but that's no excuse for inaction here. Japan has internationalized a lot over the past decade, but its political institutions haven't kept pace with that change.
If I could vote, I'd want to back candidates that understand Japan's future depends on inclusion — not fear.
Climate change is also a top concern for me. I'd also support parties pushing for human rights reforms and more generous refugee policies.
Additionally, it's contradictory that 18-year-olds can vote but can't run for the Upper House until they're 30 (unlike Australia, where the minimum age to run for office is 18). That sends a clear message: young people don't belong in politics. If Japan wants to improve voter turnout and engagement, especially among youth, it needs to reform its outdated candidacy laws.
Maximo Arozarena (39)
Mexico, resident of Japan for seven years
On the surface, (the rhetoric regarding foreign nationals) doesn't always sound that bad — but for people who understand the context, it's a little bit worrying. I'm not super alarmed personally, because I've seen this kind of thing everywhere — in the U.S., even back in Mexico. But that doesn't mean it's harmless. It's part of a global trend that worries me.
I think the election last October, where the LDP took a big hit, felt more significant. But this one matters too, especially because of Sanseito gaining ground and how that will shift the tone going forward.
There's a lot of stress around the economy — the yen being weak, interest rates, even the ripple effects from tariffs and the U.S. elections. It's all adding to this general anxiety, and you can feel that in the conversations people are having.
If I could vote, I'd back (a candidate advocating for) more progressive social policies — equal rights, gay marriage — but also economic strategies that go beyond short-term fixes. I know it's idealistic, but that's what I'd hope for.
For example, tourism is critical for Japan's economy now, but the way it's handled isn't sustainable. Locals are frustrated with overtourism, and as someone working in the industry, I feel that frustration too. We need better planning — something that supports the economy without overwhelming communities. Right now, it just feels like we're improvising.
One good thing I've seen in recent elections is that Japanese people seem more and more politically engaged. Hopefully, that leads to something positive, and not just empty rhetoric.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
16 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Yoroku: Putting in two cents on nuclear weapons suggestions after Japan election
"May I put in my two cents?" A social media post that opens like this, responding to a controversial suggestion Japan should go nuclear has garnered attention. The post was made by Kazufumi Onishi, mayor of the city of Kumamoto in southwest Japan. Onishi tweeted on July 21, the day after the House of Councillors election, "An era has been ushered in where someone claiming 'Japan should arm itself with nuclear weapons' has been elected to the Diet. But let me clearly say this: Japan cannot possess nuclear arms either in legal, practical or humanitarian terms." He also explained the basis for his arguments. Saya, who won in the upper house poll as a newcomer backed by the minor opposition party Sanseito, spoke on Japan's security policy during the campaign period, arguing, "Nuclear armament is one of the most inexpensive and effective measures to strengthen security." Mayor Onishi is inherently conservative. When U.S. President Donald Trump justified the atomic bombings of Japanese cities during World War II, Onishi called on the Japanese government to take a resolute action as the world's only country to have suffered nuclear attacks. The mayor has since continued to post his comments by responding to criticism and questions regarding his July 21 post. He explained why nuclear armament is not "inexpensive" and refuted claims that Ukraine was invaded because it renounced nuclear armament. He also touched on security initiatives for non-nuclear nations. While Saya's remarks sparked a widespread backlash and repercussions, there appears to be a tendency online and elsewhere for people's sense of insecurity about the global situation and the Japan-U.S. alliance to boost nuclear armament theories. Onishi's posts display his attempts to deepen discussions, not just shun others' opinions. He also urged, "Please do not hesitate to express your complaints and demands about (the city's) politics." Social media is prone to emotional arguments and rejection of dialogue. His posts can be regarded as challenging this reality.


NHK
3 hours ago
- NHK
At least 19 subcontractors say they are unpaid for Expo pavilion construction
NHK has learned that at least 19 subcontractors that participated in building foreign pavilions at the 2025 World Expo in Osaka are saying they have not been paid for their work. The subcontractors claim the companies that commissioned the work failed to meet the deadline to pay them. NHK found the subcontractors engaged in constructing pavilions for seven countries -- the United States, Angola, Serbia, China, Germany, Malta, and Romania. In some cases, first-tier subcontractors claimed the primary contractors did not pay them. In other cases, the first-tier subcontractors were also unable to pay their second-tier subcontractors, causing a "chain of non-payment." The alleged non-payments range from about 1 million yen to 120 million yen, or about 6,800 dollars to 820,000 dollars, per firm. Some subcontractors said that caused severe problems for their management. Subcontractors say prime contractors cited alleged "breach of contract" and "client dissatisfaction" as reasons for non-payment. The subcontractors also say they were repeatedly told that officials in charge were not in Japan. Multiple companies that commissioned the work told NHK that the allegations are false and there are no outstanding payments. The expo's association, the central government and the Osaka prefectural government are considering launching an investigation into the situation and how to respond. Kusunoki Shigeki, a professor at the University of Tsukuba, said construction works may have been carried out without finalizing contract details amid tight time constraints, due to the effects of rising labor costs. He also said that when the client or prime contractor was an overseas company, gaps in understanding contracts may have occurred, as well as communication difficulties, which could have led to problems. One hundred and fifty-eight countries and regions are taking part in the ongoing expo in western Japan.


Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Ishiba rules out joint document on U.S. tariffs as deal's details trickle out
There is no plan to issue a joint document on the tariff agreement reached between Japan and the United States earlier this week, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has said, even as numerous details about the deal remain unclear. Ishiba made the remark Friday at a meeting among leaders of ruling and opposition parties that was held following the agreement, which included a 15% U.S. "reciprocal tariff" on imports from Japan, cut from the 25% rate announced earlier. Opposition parties criticized the Japanese government for failing to issue a joint statement on the agreement. They also urged the government to compile a supplementary budget plan, citing the need for economic measures to cushion the tariff impact. The meeting was attended by Tetsuo Saito, leader of Komeito, the coalition partner of Ishiba's ruling Liberal Democratic Party, as well as the heads of opposition parties, including Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan chief Yoshihiko Noda. "We achieved an agreement that serves both countries' national interests while protecting what we should protect," Ishiba said at the beginning of the meeting. The opposition parties urged Ishiba to offer more details of the agreement. The U.S. government has not announced a 15% tariff for Japanese vehicles. Ishiba said that the Japanese and the U.S. governments agreed on the rate, but it was a matter of interpretation, according to an attendee at the meeting. On the purchase of 100 Boeing aircraft, the prime minister said that the government took the decision after consulting with Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways. U.S. President Donald Trump has said that the U.S. side will receive 90% of profits from $550 billion in investments from Japan. He also has said that the U.S. government will examine the execution of the agreement every quarter. Ishiba confirmed that such discussions have taken place and that the Japanese side plans to examine the execution of the deal. Japan's top tariff negotiator, Ryosei Akazwa, enters the Prime Minister's Office in Tokyo on Thursday. | JIJI However, a document released by the Japanese government on Friday said that the nine-to-one profit-sharing split Trump touted will apply to only a limited set of Japanese investments in the U.S., with the split "based on each side's contribution and risk burden." A fact sheet released by the U.S. side also did not clarify when the new tariffs would go into effect, though Japan's top negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, told reporters Thursday that it would likely be the same time as the deadline Trump had set for a deal. "The 15% 'reciprocal' tariff will likely take effect Aug. 1," Akazawa said, adding that Japan is not currently considering making the deal legally binding by incorporating it into a joint document-type agreement. At the talks with Ishiba, Noda demanded the compilation of a supplementary budget for fiscal 2025, saying that the U.S. vehicle tariff rate for Japan is up sixfold from 2.5%, the rate before the tariff hike. Ishiba said that the impact on the Japanese economy is uncertain without close analysis. He also said that the 15% tariff rate is lower than that for other countries, a relative advantage for Japan. "The difference in interpretations will be a problem," Noda told reporters after the meeting, referring to the lack of a joint document. The sentiment was echoed by Seiji Maehara, co-head of Nippon Ishin no Kai. "The content (of the agreement) is not detailed, and this is very risky," he said. Meanwhile, Yuichiro Tamaki, leader of the Democratic Party for the People, said that his party's early praise of the deal required rethinking. "We want to take back the compliment to the government that we made right after the agreement," he said. Komeito's Saito urged Ishiba to hold a summit with Trump "to avoid a misunderstanding." After the talks, Ishiba stressed that the government will firmly put the agreement into practice — another signal that the prime minister will not be stepping down soon despite growing calls for him to do so. "I felt the prime minister's strong wish to remain in his post," Tamaki said. Over the U.S. tariffs, parliamentary affairs chiefs of the LDP and the CDP agreed to hold a Lower House Budget Committee meeting, possibly on Aug. 4. The populist right-wing party Sanseito, which had a strong showing in the recent Upper House election, was represented at the party leader meeting for the first time. The heads of Reiwa Shinsengumi and the Japanese Communist Party were also present.