
How Ukrainians fleeing Kursk were hunted on the road of death
Diving, it suddenly builds up speed, chasing a vehicle packed with Ukrainian soldiers down the muddy tracks of this road of death.
As it goes in for the kill, the video feed cuts off ahead of the inevitable.
The R200 road that links Ukraine to its last remaining foothold inside Russian territory is now littered with the carcasses of vehicles like this.
Ukraine has all but completed its withdrawal seven months after its surprise incursion into Kursk, and its troops are not, as Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin suggested on Friday, surrounded.
But details are starting to emerge of a disorderly and even chaotic retreat, with soldiers forced to hike back to Ukraine on foot and only move at night due to the constant threat of drone attacks.
'We have all the logistics here on [the] highway,' one Ukrainian soldier said. 'Everyone knew that the [Russians] would try to cut it.'
Mr Trump's pause on intelligence-sharing earlier this month sped up the Russian counter-offensive to push Ukraine out of Kursk.
But the reality is that Russia first found Ukraine's weak spot on a night in late December.
It was the first time a Ukrainian vehicle was known to have been destroyed in a Russian attack on the R200.
What followed was months of intense bombardment as Russia clawed more territory around the road inch by inch, impacting Ukrainian supplies, troop rotation, and morale.
Ukraine's inability to move freely along the highway was one of the primary reasons its withdrawal was so chaotic in places, according to insiders.
Constant Russian artillery and drone attacks left dozens of burnt-out vehicles – and corpses – scattered along the highway, creating so much congestion it became near-impossible to navigate.
Some soldiers who were among the last to withdraw from the town of Sudzha, which lies at the end of R200 in Russia, were forced to flee back into Ukraine on foot.
One unit commander told The New York Times it took his unit two days to hike 12 miles from their positions in Kursk back to the Ukrainian border.
By the time they had got back to the Ukrainian border, the positions they left had been filled by the rapidly advancing Russians.
Russian forces soon closed in on the highway, attempting to cut off Ukrainian troops entirely, leaving little opportunity for an orderly withdrawal, according to some accounts.
'This again came as a surprise to our command,' one soldier said on Telegram.
Indeed, there had been warnings.
'Could turn into a disaster'
On March 8, one Ukrainian military blogger wrote: 'The situation in the Kursk region is very difficult and could turn into a disaster if we don't act urgently to clear the logistical routes.'
On March 9, a Russian FAB-3000 glide bomb was dropped on a bridge near the village of Kazachya Loknya in Kursk, which had been controlled by Ukraine, in a strike on Ukrainian supplies.
Three days later, as Ukraine tried to prevent the road from being completely shut off, the area was overwhelmed with Russian fibre optic drones.
The drones, which are flown remotely 12 miles away from their intended target, have a short range but are immune to Ukrainian jamming.
Two or three drones would pop up within a minute, one soldier said, either exploding in front of a vehicle or dropping onto the floor and acting as quasi land mines.
Eventually, Ukraine's commanders ordered their units to retreat.
'We almost died several times. Drones are in the sky all the time,' the soldier told the BBC.
Another soldier likened the withdrawal to 'a scene from a horror movie', with vehicles constantly being destroyed and some soldiers being killed in transit.
'The roads are littered with hundreds of destroyed cars, armoured vehicles and ATVs (all-terrain vehicles). There are a lot of wounded and dead,' another soldier said.
Some Ukrainian troops are angry that commanders did not order them to withdraw weeks ago, when it would have been safer.
One soldier said they were unsure how commanders were going to evacuate the region 'because all supply chains have been disrupted'.
Questions over the withdrawal raise further doubts about the rationale of the whole Kursk operation.
Russia's bombardment of the R200 highway was not the only reason for Ukraine's difficult withdrawal.
A significant factor was Mr Trump's decision to pause intelligence sharing with Ukraine, according to one soldier, who said he could no longer fire US-supplied HIMARS rockets.
'We could not allow expensive missiles to be fired at the wrong target,' he explained.
The reintroduction of North Korean troops, who had been withdrawn from the battlefield in January, also put defensive lines under intense pressure.
They were initially killed in droves, and withdrawn, before returning as a highly effective fighting force.
'Many of them executed very smart tactical manoeuvres,' Boroda, an assault platoon commander, told The New York Times.
Russia's breakthrough moment in Kursk came when troops snuck behind enemy lines and walked for miles through a disused gas pipeline, from which they launched a surprise assault.
Ukraine claimed to have struck the pipeline, causing high losses for Russia, though the attack is thought to have contributed towards Kyiv's decision to pull back its troops.
However, at no point were large numbers of Ukrainian troops encircled, according to those on the ground.
'It's a lie,' said Kriegsforscher, a Ukrainian drone operator who fought in Kursk.
'The retreat was generally organised but occasionally chaotic,' he said. 'There is no threat of encirclement, and no evidence suggests otherwise.'
Some reports suggest Ukrainian troops may have even been allowed to flee on foot.
'Basically, Sudzha's taken, the Ukrainians are retreating, and we're f------ told not to touch them. Let them carefully slip out through the fields,' one Russian soldier said in a video posted on Telegram that could not be independently verified.
Vladimir Putin had promised to spare Ukrainian forces in Kursk if they surrendered, though the Russian president has a history of making such a promise before ordering an ambush, as occurred during the invasion of Crimea in 2014.
On March 16, about two weeks after the start of Russia's counteroffensive, Ukraine's general staff finally confirmed their full withdrawal from Sudzha, days after Moscow claimed its capture.
Now Ukraine's attention has turned towards protecting Sumy after Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, said Russian troops were amassing at the border ahead of a fresh assault.
'We continue to hold positions on the Kursk front,' Boroda said. 'The only difference is that our positions have shifted significantly closer to the border.'
The threat of another invasion of Sumy, from which Russian forces retreated in 2022, has sparked fear and anxiety amongst the local population but there is no sense of an imminent evacuation.
'The situation is really tense,' Liza Sherstyuk, an aid worker in the region, told The Telegraph.
'Residents in the city are very anxious, drones are shot down every day. The enemy forces are right on the border of our region...we are constantly asking people if they want to leave, but as of now, nobody does.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
2 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Omagh bomb families call for special advocate for closed hearings at inquiry
Omagh Bombing Inquiry chairman Lord Turnbull is hearing arguments around applications during dedicated hearings this week. Counsel to the inquiry Paul Greaney KC said the inquiry, which is probing whether the 1998 dissident republican bomb attack could have been prevented, will hear some sensitive security evidence in closed hearings. Paul Greaney KC, counsel to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry (Liam McBurney/PA) The atrocity in the Co Tyrone town on August 15 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman pregnant with twins. Speaking during hearings in Belfast on Monday, Mr Greaney said the inquiry's legal team recognises that survivors and the bereaved have spent 25 years seeking the truth, and may be 'suspicious or even cynical of the UK state's willingness to engage in a way that is straightforward and wholehearted with this inquiry'. 'We acknowledge too, that the idea of evidence being heard in circumstances in which the families and survivors will be excluded is one that they will find difficult to accept, to say the least, and accordingly, we regard it as entirely understandable that some, although not all, have suggested special advocates should be appointed to represent their interests in any closed hearings, and have made applications for that to occur,' he said. Outlining the arguments that will be made, Mr Greaney said some contend special advocates cannot legally be appointed in a statutory public inquiry, while others have said if such a power does exist it should not be exercised. Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn (PA) He said others have said special advocates can legally be appointed in an inquiry, and should be in this case to ensure the interests of the bereaved and survivors are protected, meanwhile others are neutral, and one group has said they are content to leave the matters to the inquiry's legal team. Mr Greaney also revealed that both the Advocate General of Northern Ireland Lord Hermer KC and Secretary of State Hilary Benn's position is that there is no power to appoint a special advocate in a statutory public inquiry. It was also noted that special advocates were not appointed in the inquiry into the death of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko or in the Manchester Arena Inquiry. Hugh Southey KC, acting for some of the bereaved families and survivors, emphasised the importance of a process from which everyone walks away feeling confident in the outcome. He said those which he represents have been calling for the appointment of a special advocate since the early days of the inquiry. 'They obviously have a degree of scepticism about the state's position in relation to this inquiry,' he said. 'There has been considerable delay in getting to this stage and also there is a history, they would argue, of the state not necessarily of being fully open, essentially about what's happened in the past, and because of that they are of the opinion that it is particularly important that any closed procedure involves the state being fully tested, and it's important also that they have confidence in the outcome of any closed procedure.' He added that special advocates played a key rule in a judicial review which was taken by Michael Gallagher, whose son Aiden was killed in the bomb, previously of the government's decision not to call a public inquiry. 'That is part of the reason why, from their point of view, it is important that special advocates continue to be involved in the process,' he said. He argued that those he represents who are excluded from the closed hearings in terms of not having a special advocate will not understand the legal basis. 'They won't understand the evidential basis, that's inevitable, but they will also not understand, be able to know whether there is any error effectively in the approach the inquiry adopt when making those findings,' he said. The hearing will continue on Tuesday.


Reuters
3 minutes ago
- Reuters
Republican lawmaker reiterates call for probe of Fed's Powell, Fox reports
WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - Republican U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna made good on her threat last week to refer Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to the Justice Department, Fox News reported on Monday, amid U.S. President Donald Trump's ongoing complaints about the Fed chair. A referral does not mean that any criminal charges will be filed against Powell.


Powys County Times
21 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Officers considering legal action against Police Scotland over Trump visit plans
Officers are weighing up legal action against Police Scotland over its plans for Donald Trump's visit to the country this month. The Scottish Police Federation (SPF), which represents 98% of all police officers in Scotland, said the force has already breached health and safety standards in the run up to the visit by the US president. Thousands of officers are expected to be involved in what Police Scotland has described as a 'significant policing operation'. The White House confirmed Mr Trump will visit his golf courses in Aberdeenshire and Ayrshire between July 25 and 29. He will meet the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and the First Minister John Swinney during his private trip. The visit is likely to result in widespread protests, following similar demonstrations during his last visit to Scotland. David Kennedy, general secretary of the SPF, suggested planning for the visit has already put officers at risk. He said: 'We currently have workforce agreements in place to protect police officers and provide minimum standards of Health and Safety at work. 'Sadly, we have seen these agreements breached in the days leading to the arrival of Potus (President of the United States) and as such we are seeking legal advice regarding potential legal action against the service.' Speaking to STV News, Mr Kennedy said he had 'major concerns' about the plans to police Mr Trump's trip. He told the broadcaster: 'We do not have enough police officers in Scotland. 'Anyone that says we do, I don't know where they get those figures from. 'We know what police officers have to do day in, day out and we need more officers in Scotland. 'When these events come along that puts those officers that are here under so much pressure.' Police Scotland said earlier this month it would seek help from the Scottish and UK Governments over the 'considerable' cost of policing the visit. It has also asked for support from Northern Ireland's police force, the PSNI. There had been speculation the King would host the American leader in Scotland after a meeting was suggested at Balmoral or Dumfries House, in a letter he wrote to Mr Trump in February inviting him to make the state visit. But it is understood that both sides will wait until the president's official state visit later this year. Police Scotland's Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond said: 'We are working closely with the Scottish Police Federation to address any concerns they may have.' A spokesperson for the PSNI said: 'There are well established processes for any UK-based police services to request support from other services at times of peak demand. 'These requests are managed via the National Police Co-ordination Centre (NPoCC) and we can confirm that PSNI have received a request to provide mutual aid to Police Scotland which we are currently assessing. 'The decision to provide officers under the mutual aid process will be considered against our own demands, ensuring that we retain the capacity to respond effectively to local issues and maintain our own operational competence.'