logo
‘This is not a good trajectory': Juvenile detention reaches highest level since 2018, prompting warning from youth advocates

‘This is not a good trajectory': Juvenile detention reaches highest level since 2018, prompting warning from youth advocates

Boston Globe27-04-2025
Advertisement
'This is not a good trajectory,' said Leon Smith, executive director of the Boston-based advocacy group Citizens for Juvenile Justice. 'I remember growing up [at a time] when every fight on the playground was not considered a police matter.'
The harsh approach of the 1990s had a profound effect on area youth and their families, according to advocates, researchers, and personal accounts. Worcester native Jinazean Ball was in fourth grade the first time he was locked up, his mother, Alice Ball, said in an interview. Jinazean Ball, now 37 years old, spent hours in a holding cell after a scuffle with a classmate, until his mom could leave work to pick up him.
'That's something he never got over,' she told the Globe. 'It really messed up his head.'
Advertisement
The Balls told their story in a
Ball was found guilty of simple assault on his classmate and ordered to complete weekly drug tests — from ages 10 to 15.
'That was a rough moment in our life right there,' Alice Ball said.
Jinazean Ball got a hug from his mother, Alice Ball, in their home in Worcester.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
'The effects are life altering,' said chris bijoux, a deputy director at Georgetown University's Center for Juvenile Justice Reform who helped produce the film.
The increase in recent years brought detention referrals to their highest level since 2018, according to the report, despite efforts by state agencies, child advocates, and prosecutors to divert juveniles away from the criminal justice system. In 2018, the state passed a criminal justice bill barring prosecution for kids under 12 years old, decriminalized nonviolent disturbances at schools, and authorized judges to divert juvenile cases before arraignment.
The state's Department of Youth Services said in a statement that the 2018 law led to a major drop in the number of youths held for low-level offenses, and it is too early to draw conclusions from post-pandemic data showing an increase in detentions. The agency also highlighted its ongoing expansion of diversion programs.
'DYS recognizes that evidence-based, data-driven diversion programming is a proven strategy for intervention in and prevention of further justice system involvement and is committed to ensuring that all young people across the Commonwealth have equitable opportunities for access,' said DYS Commissioner Cecely Reardon.
Advertisement
Jay Blitzman, the former first justice of the Massachusetts Juvenile Court in Middlesex County, described the findings as 'disconcerting' and 'surprising.'
'If we are detaining young people, they're being disconnected from their community and the socially connective tissue they need for positive youth development,' Blitzman said.
State Senator Brendan Crighton, who co-chairs the Senate's committee on juvenile justice, said
'I was taken aback a bit that despite some really strong efforts by a lot of major stakeholders, we are still seeing these pretrial detentions,' Crighton said.
The report's findings are dispiriting and tough to understand, said Migdalia Iris Nalls, head of the Suffolk district attorney's juvenile division.
'What I've been trying to do is essentially the opposite,' Nalls said. 'Within Suffolk, we've been working to reduce the number of kids in pretrial [detention.]'
The COVID-19 pandemic sent shockwaves through the Massachusetts' juvenile justice system. Case numbers first plummeted during lockdowns, then skyrocketed as schools, courts, and other public spaces reopened throughout 2021 and 2022.
Nalls, a former juvenile public defender, joined the DA's office that year, with a mandate to stem the tide.
Yet as the office has assigned more juveniles accused of low-level crimes to diversion programs, many more are often accused of more serious crimes.
Advertisement
Before the pandemic, Suffolk usually saw around 400 juvenile gun cases per year, Nalls said. Since then, case numbers have roughly doubled and the kids involved have gotten younger, she said.
'More and more young children have access to firearms in the city,' Nalls said.
Essex County held the highest number of juvenile dangerousness hearings last year, where prosecutors ask a judge to detain defendants who are alleged threats to public safety. Essex District Attorney Paul F. Tucker attributed those numbers to a spike in young people committing serious, gang-related crimes. But he said his office does not try to lock up kids accused of minor offenses, and has embraced diversion programs for those cases.
'We try to do it outside of the system, because we know the longer we can keep somebody out of the system age-wise, the better chance of success we have,' he said.
The number of kids in detention continued to increase even as overall case numbers plateaued last year, according to data from the Juvenile Justice Policy and Data Board. Pretrial detentions jumped 17 percent last year, driven largely by misdemeanor charges — many of which were later dismissed, according to the data. Just 14 percent of pretrial detentions occurred because a child was found too dangerous to release. In a quarter of detentions, juveniles were held because they could not pay their cash bail.
And that burden is not equally distributed. Cases and arrests increased for Black and Hispanic minors last year, while decreasing for white juveniles. That trend has worsened existing disparities in the system, according to the board. Black youth were more than five times likelier to be arrested than white youth — a disparity Smith described as 'absolutely jarring.'
Advertisement
Studies have found that youth detained pretrial are less likely to graduate high school and more likely to be arrested again in the future, even when accounting for demographic differences.
Kids in detention are isolated from the people they love and the support systems they rely on, said Duci Goncalves, director of the Youth Advocacy Division at the Committee for Public Counsel Services.
'Having those supports ripped from you and being put in a detention center where they don't know anyone — that is very traumatizing for a young person," Goncalves said.
Dan Glaun can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boomer bummer: Cuomo's over-the-hill campaign strategy no match for Mamdani's fresh approach
Boomer bummer: Cuomo's over-the-hill campaign strategy no match for Mamdani's fresh approach

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Boomer bummer: Cuomo's over-the-hill campaign strategy no match for Mamdani's fresh approach

He won by playing it cool. Mayoral Dem primary winner Zohran Mamdani shot up in popularity with younger voters as comedians and influencers lambasted out-of-touch ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Democratic observers say. The winning 33-year-old socialist's online stature — bolstered by his own masterfully produced social content — tapped into the zeitgeisty humor of Millennials and Gen Z, making the 67-year-old Cuomo's social strategy look like something out of a history book, they said. 'We really need young men in their 30s and 40s who still listen to podcasts (to come out and vote),' New York City-based comedian Nick Mullen said sarcastically, ribbing Cuomo, in a video posted to Instagram alongside Madmani the day before the primaries. 5 City socialist Zohran Mamdani celebrates his mayoral Dem primary-race win In Long Island City, Queens, last month. Stephen Yang 'I cannot listen to Andrew Cuomo ever again,' added Mullen, who donated to Mamdani's campaign, to his 213,000 followers in a video that scored more than 50,000 likes. While Mamdani's primary win last month seemed to come out of nowhere to some, it didn't to 20- to 30-somethings across the five boroughs. Nearly every major poll projected a fairly easy Cuomo victory — but they clearly neglected to capture to the scope of Mamdani's digital grassroots mega-movement. 5 Mamdani joins comedian Nick Mullen in encouraging young people to vote for the 33-year-old pol. Instagram/@mulldogforever 5 On the morning of the primaries, Mamdani filmed another social video with supermodel Emily Ratajkowski. Instagram/@emrata Mullen's post was one of many reels and TikTok videos from Mamdani's base that garnered hundreds of thousands of views, reaching young voters in a way Cuomo's didn't, a review by The Post found. In exchange for $2,000 from the Mamdani campaign, comedian Jeffrey Seal wrote, directed and starred in a nearly 6-minute video that follows the 'Journalist' around the Big Apple as he tried to find the elusive Cuomo. The cheeky short — which racked up 1.2 million views — is chockful of hits to Cuomo's record and features iconic New Yorkers including comedian Ilana Glaser of 'Broad City' and musician Reggie Watts. On the morning of the primaries, Mamdani also filmed another social video with supermodel Emily Ratajkowski. The proof of Mamdani's sleeper popularity was in the primary results — with him destroying Cuomo in a historic upset, taking home a 56% to 44% victory in the third round of the city's ranked choice voting — and winning the popular vote in every round before that. While complete voter age data won't be released by election officials until July 15, polls by Emerson and Marist from May and June had shown Mamdani leading with voters under 45 by as much as a 2:1 ratio against the former governor. 5 Jeffrey Seal was paid $2,000 by the Mamdani campaign to direct a video poking fun at Cuomo. Instagram/@zohrankmamdani Zohran spent more than $85,000 on video production, not including TV Ads, while Cuomo's strategy hinged heavily on staid union endorsements along with name recognition and an older voter base. Alyssa Cass, a partner at Sling Shot Strategies who ran Scott Stringer's failed bid for mayor, gave props to Mamdani's strategy. 'It really mattered, it made it part of the culture in a way that none of us were seeing,' she said of his online, take-it-to-the-streets tactics. 'Visibly matters a lot in mayoral races, and he became the only candidate that anyone talked about. 'I even forgot Cuomo had a logo. He ran it like it was Bill Clinton, like it was 1992 race,' she said. A Post review of the ex-governor's social-media accounts found no instances of the legacy politician intentionally engaging with voters under 45. The former governor notoriously conducted most of his appearances in secure venues and used concert-style paper wrist bands to identify attendees of his events, which became a laughing matter among reporters and others attending them. 5 'He ran it like it was Bill Clinton, like it was a 1992 race,' a political operative said of Cuomo's campaign. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 'This may come as a surprise to Cuomo and his irrelevant consultant friends, but only going to protected event spaces filled with paid attendees is more outdated than a North Korean military parade,' a Dem strategist said. Rich Azzopardi, a spokesman for the Cuomo campaign, told The Post, 'There is no doubt we could have done more to reach out to younger voters, and that's one of the issues currently under review as we consider next steps.' One standout moment of Mamdani's campaign came the Friday before the primary, when the Queens state assemblyman traversed the length of Manhattan — of course capturing the 13.4 mile journey on video to share with his 1.1 million followers on TikTok. 'On Friday night, we walked the length of Manhattan, from Inwood Hill to Battery Park. Because New Yorkers deserve a Mayor they can hear, see and even yell at if they need to. We out here,' Mamdani wrote in the caption. Mamdani's rep did not respond to Post requests for comment.

Supreme Court puts voting rights on the menu
Supreme Court puts voting rights on the menu

Boston Globe

time7 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Supreme Court puts voting rights on the menu

The Louisiana case is The new map also drew a legal challenge based on the claim that it, too, was a racial gerrymander that disadvantaged ' Advertisement After hearing arguments in the case in March, rather than issuing an opinion, the justices decided they had more questions, kicking the case to next term in order to hold another round of arguments. But Advertisement But that decision left in place Section 2 of the act, which gives citizens the right to challenge racially discriminatory voter laws or mapmaking after they go into effect. That could soon change, especially if Justice Clarence Thomas can find four other justices who support his view, expressed in a dissent. Thomas believes that Section 2 violates the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause. In essence, he said the Constitution prohibits the consideration of race at all in redistricting, turning the seminal civil rights legislation that aimed to address the nation's long history of racial voter suppression on its head. If four other justices join him in this view, the Voting Rights Act will, for all intents and purposes, be struck down. So the rescheduled arguments will be among the most pivotal of the next term. If that weren't enough, the court also announced Monday that it will Advertisement Another case to keep an eye on: The court Transgender women have been used as red herrings by conservative activists who claim them to be a dangerous threat, despite the fact that trans women are grossly underrepresented in sports at the grade school, college, and professional level. Bans are literally solutions in search of a problem. But the scare tactics have been so successful that even some Democrats, A Supreme Court ruling upholding such bans — and eroding the constitutional protections for LGBTQ people in the process — would be a profound sea change from 10 years ago, when the court underscored that all people have a fundamental right to marry, regardless of gender. This is an excerpt from , a newsletter about the Supreme Court from columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Kimberly Atkins Stohr is a columnist for the Globe. She may be reached at

Fresh Push to Add Donald Trump to Mount Rushmore: 'Essential'
Fresh Push to Add Donald Trump to Mount Rushmore: 'Essential'

Newsweek

time9 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Fresh Push to Add Donald Trump to Mount Rushmore: 'Essential'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Republican Andy Ogles of Tennessee has asked Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to "put Trump on Mt. Rushmore," the South Dakota-based national memorial celebrating four iconic presidents, to mark his "recent achievements," and it's not the first time someone has suggested the addition. Newsweek contacted Representative Ogles and the Department of the Interior for comment on Friday via email outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Ogles' proposal indicates the strength of grassroots Republican loyalty to President Trump, with a survey conducted between June 23 and 26 finding 79 percent of registered GOP voters approve of his performance. However, this was down from 86 percent in March. The National Park Service has previously said that any fresh carvings on Mount Rushmore would be impractical, and any official move to add Trump would almost certainly spark serious opposition. What To Know Ogles sent a letter to Burgum, a copy of which was seen by The Hill, on Thursday, urging him to "explore the addition" of Trump's sculpture to Mount Rushmore to recognize the president's "accomplishments in restoring American greatness." The Tennessee Republican added that such a move would have the "benefits of elevating the dignity and relevance of the site, thus increasing both its grandeur and its visitor traffic, will accrue to South Dakota, the Lakota Sioux, and the broader area." In an X post also made on Thursday, Ogles said: "I'm asking Secretary Burgum to put Trump on Mt. Rushmore. "Given the scale and scope of President Trump's recent achievements—especially the impending enactment of the Big Beautiful Bill, the historic act that will ignite America's Golden Age—it is essential that we immortalize President Trump's likeness on Mount Rushmore." A mock-up depicting President Trump on Mount Rushmore released by GOP Representative Andy Ogles. A mock-up depicting President Trump on Mount Rushmore released by GOP Representative Andy Ogles. Rep. Andy Ogles/X Thursday saw the House approve Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' in a 218 vs 214 vote, meaning the president will now be able to sign it into law as it narrowly passed the Senate earlier this week. The package includes tax cuts, additional funding for border security and the military, cuts to Medicaid and food stamps and a $5 trillion increase in the U.S. debt ceiling. Mount Rushmore was constructed in South Dakota's Black Hills between 1927 and 1941 and features head sculptures of iconic presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. The site is controversial as it was taken from the Sioux Nation illegally, and in the 1980s, the Supreme Court ordered the federal government to pay $105 million in compensation. In January, Florida House Republican Anna Paulina Luna announced a bill calling for Trump to be added to Mount Rushmore, though it didn't proceed to a hearing. What People Are Saying In his X post, Ogles added: "Like Washington, Trump did not seek his position for glory but out of love for his country, championing American independence and reshaping the presidency with dynamism, clarity, and purpose. "Like Jefferson, he expanded America's horizons by pursuing new frontiers and breaking away from deep state tyrants. "Like Teddy Roosevelt, Trump took on entrenched interests, reinvigorated American industry, and avenged the working class against bureaucratic bloat and corporate corruption. "The legacy of Mount Rushmore cannot remain frozen in stone; it must evolve to reflect the full arc of American history, including its most recent and transformative chapter." Speaking to the Black Hill Pioneer newspaper in 2020, Mount Rushmore National Memorial Chief of Interpretation and Education Maureen McGee-Ballinger said: "The rock that surrounds the sculpted faces is not suitable for additional carving." What Happens Next There is no indication that the federal government has any immediate plans to add Trump to Mount Rushmore, and any such move would almost certainly spark controversy and legal challenges.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store