The best new cars to own ranked by drivers - is your brand on the list?
Each year Auto Express asks motorists to take part in its annual Driver Power new car customer satisfaction survey to distinguish the good from the bad.
Using data collected from owners from each manufacturer's entire line-up, Driver Power compiles the results together to get an overall perspective of the general satisfaction level for each brand.
The Driver Power scoring list is split into 10 categories. Each brand ends up with a final percentage score out of 100, with the top 10 all achieving over 85 per cent.
With a total of 31 different marques making the final list there's stiff competition as well as a few surprises thrown in.
Here is the top ten in reverse order - and the reasons they score big - along with the expert view of Auto Express's consumer editor Tom Jervis.
10. Honda – 85.77 per cent
Tom Jervis said: 'Honda, like other Japanese manufacturers, has a strong reputation for building high-quality, reliable cars that don't cost the earth to run.'
Honda was a top-five finisher in both the build quality and running costs categories with the latter helped by a first-place ranking for servicing costs.
Exterior styling and ride comfort took a hit, with the Civic suspension a little uncomfortable in particular.
Mr Jervis concluded: 'Otherwise, it's a very strong showing for a brand that is keeping somewhat of a low profile during the ongoing EV transition.'
9. Suzuki – 85.79 per cent
Suzuki just pipped its Japanese rival, with owners impressed the most by its safety systems. It came fourth in this vital category.
There weren't any other stand-out performances, but Auto Express call it a 'jack-of-all-trades'.
The worst performance came in the infotainment category, where its built-in sat-nav pulled it down the rankings.
Mr Jervis said: 'Nevertheless, strong showings in the braking, road manners and steering sections result in a respectable sixth-place overall for ride and handling.'
8. BMW – 86.00 per cent
BMW came third for the powertrain category - not surprising considering BMW is known for building 'Ultimate Driving Machines' but its poor handling made drivers mark it down to 12th in this chart, putting it in the midfield marques.
Mr Jervis said: 'Top-10 finishes for safety, practicality, interior and infotainment is nothing to sniff at.'
BMW's always been praised for its infotainment systems and survey respondents unsurprisingly said the iDrive tech was very user-friendly, with strong smartphone connectivity and decent built-in sat-nav.
But highly divisive exteriors are the downfall of the German marque, with Mr Jervis commenting: 'Really, lacklustre performances for exterior styling – likely no thanks to the controversial kidney grilles – and high running costs were the only areas that kept the German stalwart from the sharp end of this list.'
7. Peugeot – 86.12 per cent
Proving you don't have to be an expensive brand to have mass appeal, Peugeot claimed seventh place.
Mr Jervis said: 'Peugeot is on a roll at the moment – especially in the design department – so it's no wonder that the French firm scored third place in the exterior category.'
Peugeot did well in handling set-ups, coming in fourth, with a third-place finish for steering thanks to the small steering wheel set within the i-Cockpit cabin layout.
The interior design has been an equally big hit with customers, with Peugeot coming in the top 10 for interiors and also for practicality.
Unfortunately 25th place for value for money was the French brand's let down.
6. Renault – 86.29 per cent
Another French brand coming in just under halfway, Renault has been having a stellar time of late.
The only reason it missed the top five is because of its wide ranging scores - some great, some terrible.
Owners weren't thrilled by the interiors, practicality, ride or reliability of their Renault models.
And yet Renault clinched second-place finish for running costs and a third-place ranking for its Google-powered infotainment systems.
Mr Jervis said: 'Positioned within the top 10 also for safety features, exterior and value, Renault earns its place within the overall top 10 – despite its inconsistencies in some areas.'
5. Land Rover – 86.52 per cent
Land Rover are making strides - or leaps and bounds really.
Last year the British brand just squeezed into the top 10 and now its into the top five - 'impressive moment', Mr Jervis says.
Once a Land Rover buyer always a Land Rover buyer it seems with customers voting it second best for practicality and third place for its interiors - some of the most luxurious out there.
And its looks helped it get fourth place for exterior.
Mr Jervis said its 'unsurprising' that 'fuel economy, reliability and value continue to be the British maker's biggest letdowns' - scoring lacklustre 30th, 24th and 28th respectively.
4. Vauxhall – 86.80 per cent
Vauxhall smashed it in the Driver Power model survey, and did equally well in the brand survey.
Mr Jervis pointed to Vauxhall's 'line-up full of either fuel-sipping hybrids or zero-emissions EVs' that put the British brand in 'first-place for economy and running costs'.
As efficient as they are to run, drivers don't love spending time in a Vauxhall though because of the poor interior fit and finish inside, which left these cars with low interior scores. In fact it's worse score was for interiors.
The British brand also scored outside the top 10 for safety features and value for money, but with strong ratings everywhere else, its good work for the Coventry crew.
3. Lexus – 87.06 per cent
Lotus has been a long-time Driver Power favourite and yet again it lands itself a spot on the podium.
Toyota's premium brand finishes 11 places ahead of its cheaper sister brand, with Lexus owners happy in almost every category of marking.
Lexus finished in the top-five for value, infotainment, interior and quality and reliability.
Reliability, as ever, was Lexus' best result, finishing third because the cars feel so well built.
Mr Jervis said: 'Being a more luxurious brand, it's not shocking to see Lexus score outside of the top 10 for running costs, although one might raise an eyebrow at its 13th-place ranking for ride and handling. Otherwise, however, an impressive run for Japan's finest.'
2. Mercedes – 89.26 per cent
We're into the top two now, and this year's runner-up for the Driver Power brands ranking, is Mercedes.
Expectation is high for premium brands but Mercedes appears to deliver, reaching the podium in an impressive nine out of 10 categories.
Mercedes owners say that the German marque has the best safety systems, as well as the finest infotainment systems - its MBUX is both intuitive and sleek. Taking second place for exterior and interiors also showcases how Mercedes delivers only the finest interior comfort and style to its owners and lives up to being a luxury brand.
Mr Jervis said: 'Poor fuel economy and expensive servicing were the only real smears on what was otherwise a strong performance.'
1. Subaru – 90.30 per cent
Not a car make you see on the road everyday but Subaru continues to be a shining star for its loyal drives; Subaru has topped the Driver Power brand list for the second year in a row.
Why has it earned the top spot on the podium? Mr Jervis said it's because of its 'stellar performances in nearly every single category'.
Subaru finished first in seven out of 10 categories, 'absolutely dominating this year's list': Top scores were dolled out for ride and handling, quality and reliability - both likely due to the brand's rally heritage.
As with Mercedes the only downside for Subaru was its high running costs, with the brand taking 18th place mainly because of its lack of hybrid or electric models on offer.
Mr Jervis commented: 'Still, with this being the only finish outside the top 10, Subaru is undoubtedly a worthy winner of this year's crown.'
Best manufacturers 2025
11. Tesla
12. Skoda
13. Volvo
14. Toyota
15. Nissan
16. Citroen
17. Mazda
18. Kia
19. Audi
20. Hyundai
21. Fiat
22. Mini
23. Ford
24. Seat
25. Jaguar
26. Jeep
27. Volkswagen
28. Cupra
29. Dacia
30. BYD
31. MG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's equity benchmarks open lower on Kotak earnings, trade deal worries
July 28 (Reuters) - India's equity benchmarks opened lower on Monday, with uncertainty over trade talks with the U.S. and weaker-than-expected results from Kotak Mahindra Bank weighing on sentiment. The Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab fell 0.22% to 24,782.45 points and the BSE Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab lost 0.2% to 81,299.97 as of 9:15 a.m. IST. Negotiations between India and the United States remained deadlocked over tariff cuts on agriculture and dairy products, dimming hopes of an interim deal ahead of U.S. President Donald Trump's August 1 deadline. Nine of the 13 major sectors logged losses at the open. The broader small-caps (.NIFSMCP100), opens new tab and mid-caps (.NIFMDCP100), opens new tab lost 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively. High weight financials (.NIFTYFIN), opens new tab and private banks (.NIFPVTBNK), opens new tab lost 0.5% and 1%, respectively, dragged by a 4.7% fall in Kotak Mahindra Bank ( opens new tab after it posted a drop in quarterly profit. The Nifty 50 and 30-stock Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab have logged four consecutive weekly losses due to weak earnings, foreign outflows and uncertainty over the U.S.-India trade deal.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Musk says Tesla, Samsung Electronics sign chip supply deal
SEOUL, July 28 (Reuters) - Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on Monday that the U.S. automaker has signed a deal to source chips from Samsung Electronics ( opens new tab, a move expected to bolster the South Korean tech giant's loss-making contract manufacturing business. On Saturday, Samsung announced a $16.5 billion chip supply deal with a major global company, without naming the client. It said the customer had requested confidentiality about the details of the deal, which will run through the end of 2033. Three sources briefed about the matter told Reuters that Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab was the customer for the deal. The deal comes as Samsung faces mounting pressure in the race to produce artificial intelligence chips, where it trails rivals such as TSMC and SK Hynix ( opens new tab. This lag has weighed heavily on its profits and share price. Samsung, the world's top memory chip maker, also makes logic chips designed by customers through its foundry business. Pak Yuak, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities, said the latest deal would help reduce losses at Samsung's foundry business, which he estimated exceeded 5 trillion won ($3.63 billion) in the first half of the year. Analysts say Samsung has struggled with the defection of key clients to TSMC for advanced chips. TSMC counts Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and Qualcomm (QCOM.O), opens new tab among its customers. The Samsung-Tesla deal is also significant for South Korea, which is seeking U.S. partnerships in chips and shipbuilding amid last-ditch efforts to reach a trade deal to eliminate or reduce potential 25% U.S. tariffs. It is not clear how the order would affect Samsung's plan to start production at its new factory in Texas, which has been delayed as it struggles to win major customers. Samsung is grappling to boost production yields of its latest 2-nanometer technology, and the order is unlikely to involve the cutting-edge tech, Lee Min-hee, an analyst at BNK Investment & Securities, said. Samsung has been losing market share to TSMC in contract manufacturing, underscoring technological challenges the firm faces in mastering advanced chip manufacturing to attract clients like Apple and Nvidia, analysts said. ($1 = 1,378.7000 won)
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
How just 15 undersea cables could leave Australia digitally stranded if war breaks out
Australia's former Deputy Secretary of Defence Mike Pezzullo has warned that the risk of war between China and Taiwan is growing rapidly - and if it breaks out, Australia will be forced to join in. 'We don't really have a choice,' he says. 'Our military, ports, bases, intelligence systems - they're all deeply tied to Americas,' he told 7News. Pezzullo also warned that Australia's internet could be crippled if conflict breaks out. He revealed the country is dangerously exposed, with 99 per cent of internet traffic funnelled through just 15 undersea cables. If they were destroyed by enemy submarines or unmanned vessels, the nation would be digitally isolated, opening the way for targeted strikes on military infrastructure. 'You'd want to ensure those are protected,' Mr Pezzullo said. 'But we have no missile defence systems. We're completely bereft in that area.' He also warned Australia's fuel security is dangerously fragile, with 90 per cent of oil and petrol coming through the South China Sea and only 60 days of reserves in storage. Australia's big-ticket defence projects, including AUKUS nuclear submarines and new frigates, are progressing, but Mr Pezzullo says they remain years away from completion. 'That technology is improving almost monthly, but we're playing catch-up.' Opponents of a harder stance on China point to the economic risks, but Mr Pezzullo claims that's a moot point: 'In a world war, every economy would suffer together.' He warned that defence funding must increase to three or even three-and-a-half per cent of GDP if Australia is serious about deterring adversaries. 'Plan A is always peace through diplomacy. But if you want peace, prepare for war.' He said Taiwan's defence spending, a little above two per cent of GDP, is nowhere near adequate for the threats it faces. His comments come as more than 30,000 personnel from 19 countries hone their skills in the biennial military exercise Talisman Sabre, including live-fire drills and air combat operations. The exercises are being held against the backdrop of the US pressing allies such as Australia to make clear what role they would play in a real conflict, like a potential war between America and China over Taiwan. The US is also carrying out a review of the AUKUS security pact. Defence analysts say it's unlikely the review would result in the $368 billion submarine program being scrapped altogether, it may mean more demands of Australia to contribute to America's industrial base. The military drills off the coast are also expected to be monitored by China, as it has for the past four Talisman Sabre exercises.
