What Rachel Reeves' tears at PMQs say about the government and Labour
At Prime Minister's Questions yesterday afternoon, Keir Starmer may have been the main event – but many people couldn't take their eyes off Rachel Reeves.
The Chancellor was visibly distressed, wiping tears from her cheeks as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch tore into the government's climbdown over welfare the previous evening.
According to Reeves' spokesperson, the reason she was upset was a 'personal matter, which – as you would expect – we are not going to get into'.
That gap has left room for speculation, one of the favourite pastimes of politicians and journalists in Westminster.
While some have linked her emotional state to her role or relationship with colleagues, the PM has dismissed those suggestions.
But it's not possible to deny that those images had an impact. Messages of concern were posted by figures across the political spectrum, and the markets reacted badly to questions of whether Reeves was on the way out.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
Bond yields – a key measure of economic trust in the UK government – jumped up considerably during PMQs, when Starmer ignored Badenoch's questions about whether the Chancellor was going to be sacked.
They have since fallen back to where they were on Wednesday morning, after the Prime Minister told the BBC she would remain in her role 'for a very long time to come'.
This morning, Reeves joined Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting at the launch of the NHS 10-Year Plan.
In a sense, it doesn't matter why Reeves was crying at PMQs – showing a bit of emotion doesn't affect people's ability to do their job.
It's not hard to understand that politicians, particularly those at the top of government, are often under an immense amount of pressure.
That can be exacerbated if – as seems to be the case here – something has happened in their personal life that they would rather keep private.
The Chancellor appears to have had a bit of a disagreement with Speaker Lindsay Hoyle yesterday over her response to being told to keep her answers short in an earlier Parliamentary session.
Other reports of rows with Deputy PM Angela Rayner or Starmer himself have, however, been denied.
And in his interview with the BBC, the Prime Minister said: 'It's got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week.
'It was a personal matter for her. I'm not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you about that, it's a personal matter.'
Perhaps Reeves will feel comfortable telling the full story about why she felt the way she did at PMQs one day – perhaps she won't.
Either way is fine. The country doesn't necessarily need to know every detail.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
What's true, though, is that those pictures seemed to reflect a broader sense of how the government might be feeling after almost exactly a year in power. More Trending
Even if it's not the reason she was in tears yesterday, the Chancellor is likely to be deeply frustrated by the tight fiscal spot she finds herself in – a situation that wasn't helped by the chaotic welfare bill vote the day before.
Speculation is rife that she may need to resort to raising taxes in her budget later this year after the last-minute scrapping of reforms to the Pip disability benefit left her without billions in expected savings.
But if there's one reason for Reeves to be cheerful, it's those bond yields mentioned earlier.
The fact they spiked amid concerns she was leaving and fell back when it was confirmed she was staying suggests the markets – an important source of support for any Chancellor – would rather she stays in No 11.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Almost 20,000 asylum seekers in 6 months proves a crucial point
MORE: Full list of 38 New Look stores closing down in 2025
MORE: The stress caused by welfare reform flip-flopping left me feeling sick
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Labour's reform agenda is over. The rebels are in control
It is one year today since this country elected the Labour Party as the antidote to what had become a chaotic Tory term in office. The idea, which seemed fairly sound at the time, was that Ms Reeves and her Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, were so boringly competent that we could all get on with our lives and not really worry about what was going on at Westminster. Read more by Andy Maciver How wrong we were. How many people could honestly make the case for this being a more stable foundation for growth than that which was being provided by Rishi Sunak and Sir Jeremy Hunt, the Tory predecessors in these posts? The money markets certainly do not seem to be convinced of that particular case. Generally speaking, three things have conspired against Sir Keir and Ms Reeves. The first is that Labour's win 365 days ago was far more slender than its parliamentary majority would suggest. At only a little over one-third of the vote, this was no great endorsement of Labour by the British people. Indeed, fewer people turned out to vote for the party than had done so in 2019, when Jeremy Corbyn was leader. Sir Keir polled over four million votes fewer than Boris Johnson in that election. Indeed, it is fair to say that if it had not been for Nigel Farage's Reform party eating so much of the Tory party's lunch, Sir Keir may not have had a majority at all. Secondly, Mr Farage has become Sir Keir's worst nightmare. Britain is no different, really, from the other liberal democracies around the world who are being gripped, to one degree or another, by global populism. Trust in the Tories and Labour has effectively evaporated, for perfectly understandable reasons. This country has never recovered from the financial crisis of 20008/2009 in the ways that matter to real people. There has been no meaningful economic growth for over 15 years, and a very meaningful rise in the cost of living in that time. Brits are completely out of hope, and we can hardly blame them for turning to someone who – love him or hate him – talks straight. Those two characteristics are outside of the direct control of Sir Keir and Ms Reeves, but the third characteristic is not; they have made a rotten job of government during this first year. Indeed, it is hardly a stretch to wonder whether this government is already broken beyond repair, whether Ms Reeves will last the summer, whether Sir Keir will make it to the end of year two, and whether Labour will see out a full term of office. It is important to Britain that Labour spends time in government. In particular, at times when either we need to tighten our national belt, or when we need to reform our public services, Labour is best placed to do it. The Conservative Party often has the political will to do both, but has long lacked the political permission, particularly when it comes to public service reform. The Labour party normally has the political permission to do both – with the NHS in particular generally considered to be safe in the hands of the party which invented it – but often lacks the political will. It appeared, on July 4 2024, that much like at the outset of the Blair/Brown era 30 years ago, we had a Labour leadership which had both the permission and the will to rewire the country. A year later, it is in tatters to such a degree that it can most likely never be remade. This will have consequences. The Government has spent the year proposing a series of relatively mild welfare reforms, albeit often badly targeted and always badly communicated. We can debate until the cows come home about whether or not Sir Keir emphasised the moral imperative of welfare reform more than Ms Reeves emphasised the financial imperative, but that doesn't matter now. When I was growing up, we had the working class and the middle class. I never really understood which of those baskets I fell into, and perhaps that was prescient, because they have effectively now been merged. In today's Britain, we have the working class and the welfare class. Not so much haves and have nots, but works and works not. Can Wes Streeting hold firm? (Image: PA) What Labour appeared to be attempting to do was to distinguish between those on welfare who needed it, and those who simply wanted it. There are plenty of the former category, and they are the essence of why we all pay tax. Most of us contentedly provide a safety net for those amongst us who cannot provide it for themselves, whether because of age, or illness or disability, or indeed because their genuine attempts to find work have not yet yielded success. What few, if any, of us consented to, though, was paying for a system which incentivises often young, often able people to seek benefit dependency, from which evidence shows they will likely never recover. International evidence shows us that this is a peculiarly British problem, and a very expensive one at that. That agenda is now over. What's next? Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, appeared to be the most reform-minded of the new Cabinet. Ruthlessly honest in opposition about the scale of change needed for a taxpayer-funded health service to survive, the reality of government has hit hard. There have now been two fiscal events, both of which ploughed tens of billions into the NHS black hole, and which Mr Streeting knows as well as anyone is effectively money down the drain. I would like to think that Mr Streeting will hold firm, but I doubt it. The Labour rebels are in charge now, and the same people who said no to welfare reform will also say no to healthcare reform. I am predisposed towards optimism, but the outlook for the public finances and the public services is so bleak that I can muster absolutely none. Andy Maciver is Founding Director of Message Matters, and co-host of the Holyrood Sources podcast
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Roadside litter: Power to fine registered keepers requested
At present councils can only issue fines to someone seen throwing litter from a vehicle, if they have evidence to support the accusation, but Monmouthshire councillors have backed a call to allow the registered keeper of a vehicle to be prosecuted, or fined, if anyone throws litter from it. Usk and Llanbadoc independent councillor Meirion Howells brought the suggestion to the full council's most recent meeting and said the current law means it is difficult to prove who has thrown litter, from a vehicle, and the changes he proposed have already been introduced in England. Conservative councillor for Llanfoist and Govilon, Tomos Davies, welcomed the motion and the chance it could give the authority to address the source of road side litter which many councillors said is often cleared by volunteers. 'We as councillors owe volunteers more than thanks we owe you some action,' said Cllr Davies who said the council had issued no fixed penalties for littering last year. He also suggested the Welsh Government should pilot a scheme to allow drivers to upload dashcam footage if they've captured litter being thrown from vehicles to be used as evidence which he said is already being done in neighbouring Gloucestershire. Cllr Davies also said the frequency of grass cutting on verges should be increased as a way of addressing litter and suggested applying 'subtle pressure' on community councils that could help fund additional road sweeping machines. Council deputy leader, Labour's Paul Griffiths, said he is a former board member of Keep Wales Tidy and is still a volunteer litter picker and would like the Welsh Government to address litter from takeaways, providing 'fast food on the hoof', without punishing businesses that provide dine in services. The motion was passed and as well as requiring the council's cabinet member for climate change, Catrin Maby, asks the Welsh Government to introduce legislation to prosecute registered keepers requests guidance is issued to councils on how they could use the powers and provide them with the resources to do so.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Beth Rigby looks back as Keir Starmer reaches one year as prime minister
Sky's Political Editor has followed Starmer's journey through multiple countries, and gives her take on how the PM has handled various challenges. Friday 4 July 2025 04:24, UK
