Ousted Long Island hospital CEO for breach of contract after Hochul's 'hostile takeover' booted her
Meg Ryan, the former president of the Nassau Health Care Corporation, was given the boot by Hochul and her cronies in an 'illicit scheme' to have NUMC foot the bill for Medicaid payments that the state was on the hook for, she claimed in a statement to The Post.
Ryan is alleging breach of contract and seeking damages after Hochul appointed her allies Richard Becker, Stuart Rabinowitz, Richard Kessel and others to oversee the hospital, according to a notice of claim her lawyers filed in state court Wednesday.
4 Meg Ryan, the former president of the Nassau Health Care Corporation, alleged breach of contract and is seeking damages after Hochul appointed allies to oversee the hospital.
Stefano Giovannini
'They weaponized the Department of Health and the state budget process to take over our community hospital and then leaked misinformation to the press to damage me personally,' Ryan fumed. 'It is unconscionable.
'I am eager to have my day in court and fight not only to clear my name but further expose the state's corruption.'
Becker, Rabinowitz and Kessel and 10 unidentified members of the NHCC 'acted deliberately and with malice' by denying her severance and salary payments starting June 1 after the state government had assumed control of the NUMC, Ryan's attorney Alex Hartzband wrote in the claim.
4 The Board of Directors that replaced Ryan and 9 other health care executives had voted to terminate her employment for 'cause,' claiming she made 'excessive termination payments' to herself and the other NHCC employees.
Stefano Giovannini
The board of directors that replaced Ryan and nine other health care executives had voted to terminate her employment for 'cause,' claiming she made 'excessive termination payments' to herself and the other NHCC employees after announcing she would resign.
Her resignation letter was rejected by Becker, who promptly fired her in a late June letter that was reported by Newsday shortly after.
'During my time as President and CEO of NHCC, we expanded services, improved quality of care, and reduced expenses. We demonstrated that, if not for the State's malfeasance, the hospital was financially viable,' Ryan said.
4 In May, Hochul had approved a budget bill with a provision that imposed state control of the NHCC's board with Becker, Rabinowitz and Kessel and other state appointees.
Gabriella Bass
'My top priority has always been giving people the best possible health care and protecting our dedicated employees.'
Attorneys for Ryan are prepared to argue in a forthcoming lawsuit that the payments were permissible and accrued from unused paid time off.
They also allege she's being targeted for leading an earlier lawsuit against NHCC last December that sought to recoup more than $1 billion in Medicaid funding allegedly withheld from the public hospital the corporation oversees, NUMC, over two decades.
4 Until Ryan and other executives uncovered it, NUMC, the only public hospital in the county with around 80% of its 275,000 patients uninsured, had been forced to pay New York's percentage of FMAP funding.
Stefano Giovannini
House Republicans last week launched an investigation into the purported 'fiscal coverup' by Hochul done to boost a billion-dollar budget deficit that 'has forced local governments to increase property taxes and cut local services.'
In May, Hochul had approved a budget bill with a provision that imposed state control of the NHCC's board with Becker, Rabinowitz and Kessel and other state appointees.
Kessel had previously been appointed by Hochul to serve as director and chair of the Nassau County Interim Finance Authority.
Rabinowitz was previously appointed to the state State Gaming Facility Location Board and once served as president of Hofstra University.
Becker served as deputy secretary for health and human services under former Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
NHCC has since let go attorneys representing it in the Medicaid lawsuit against the state and filed for an adjournment.
Until Ryan and other executives uncovered it, NUMC, the only public hospital in the county with around 80% of its 275,000 patients uninsured, had been forced to pay the state's percentage of Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) funding, the December lawsuit alleged.
'Ms. Ryan did absolutely nothing wrong,' Hartzband told The Post. 'The payments she authorized were permissible under hospital policy and consistent with years of established practice by the CEOs who preceded her.'
He also accused the new NHCC leadership of fomenting a 'shameless media campaign' to defame her.
Reps for Hochul's office and NHCC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
Colorado agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law
Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says Agency that administers Medicaid will make big changes under new federal law, state official says As executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing, Kim Bimestefer oversees the state's largest health insurance program. Kim Bimestefer, executive director of the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing CBS Medicaid covers 1.2 million Coloradans, or one in five residents. Verifying the eligibility of so many people each year is already a colossal task. Bimestefer says, under President Donald Trump's new tax and spending law, it will become far more challenging. "We've got to set up an entire industry in 18 months," Bimestefer said. Bimestefer says the state has sophisticated software that can automatically check things such as age, income, address and citizenship. But the new law creates new requirements, including 80 hours of work, school or community service each month for people between the ages 19 and 64 who aren't pregnant, disabled or have kids under age 14. There is no automated system for that or a master list to know who's in school and who's volunteering to verify eligibility. And Bimestefer notes the state now must do that verification twice a year. "We have to build the entirety of the infrastructure to capture and automate and to make sure that we don't have people impeded of getting through the eligibility process and therefore losing coverage," Bimestefer said. "Because the down-streaming impacts of people losing coverage are absolutely catastrophic." Bimestefer says up to 377,000 Coloradans could be impacted by the new eligibility requirements. It's estimated about 56% of them are already working, but Bimestefer says verifying that will be the challenge. Bimestefer worries thousands of Coloradans will lose coverage. "They'll move. They'll change their email address. They won't realize have to do it," Bimestefer explained. That will lead to more uninsured patients, Bimestefer says, and more uncompensated care, which will increase costs for everyone. "The north star is to have people covered but, again, this is going to be part of many difficult decisions that this state is going to have to step up and make," Bimestefer said. While most of the changes to Medicaid -- including the new eligibility requirements -- don't take effect for at least a year and a half. Bimestefer says she needs to start preparing now, which takes money. Bimestefer says lawmakers -- who decide what services are covered -- will have to make tough decisions soon. Gov. Jared Polis is expected to call them back to work next month. The new law provides $200 million to help with implementation, but the money will be shared among all states. The state of Kentucky alone spent about $270 million on a work requirement only before a court blocked it. "Are we going to lower provider reimbursements? Are we going to change benefits? All those are very difficult decisions," Bimestefer said. "But were going to have to move some of those levers in order to deal with the fiscal realities that the costs will continue to go up, and the revenues available will continued to be strained." Bimestefer says, not only will Colorado have to spend millions of dollars on new hires and new systems to implement the law, it will have to do so as it loses millions of dollars. Starting in 2027, the law limits federal matching funds that Colorado has used to increase provider reimbursements. The state budget is already expected to take a billion-dollar hit from other provisions in the law, so the legislature won't be able to backfill the lost revenue, which Bimestefer says could be as much as $2.5 billion. She says the money has helped double the number of providers that accept Medicaid over the last 5 years. If reimbursement drops, providers may limit how many Medicaid patients they see. The law provides $50 billion to help offset the loss of funds for rural hospitals, which see the most Medicaid patients. Bimestefer says the state should know in the next few months how much of that money Colorado will receive. The original bill included a provision that cut additional federal funding to states like Colorado that pay for health care for undocumented immigrants, but that was dropped from the final bill. Bimestefer says that doesn't mean the Cover All Coloradans program won't face cuts. It was expected to serve about 3,600 people this year at a cost of $27 million, but it serves nearly six times that -- 21,000 -- at a cost of more than $50 million.
San Francisco Chronicle
8 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Police reassignment at issue in case against Virginia man charged in double-killing
FAIRFAX, Va. (AP) — A Virginia judge has ordered prosecutors to give the defense documentation about the reassignment of a digital forensic examiner who had been working on the case in which a man is accused of plotting with an au pair to kill his wife and another man. Fairfax Circuit Court Chief Judge Penney Azcarate on Thursday ordered Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney Eric Clingan to collect and distribute any documentation of the assignment change to the defense for Brendan Banfield. Banfield is charged with aggravated murder in the February 2023 deaths of his wife, Christine Banfield, and Joe Ryan. The defense had also sought information on the transfer of the lead detective on the case. But the judge declined. An attorney for Brendan Banfield alleged in court this week that Fairfax County police commanders had reassigned the two employees who disagreed with the top brass' analysis of the evidence, particularly a premise that the case involved the husband catfishing one of the victims. 'It is a theory in search of facts rather than a series of facts supporting a theory,' John Carroll, Banfield's attorney, said in court Thursday. In court, prosecutors argued officials had given over all the documentation they had in the case to the defense, objecting to notions that personnel transfers were part of criminal case evidence. Brendan Miller, a digital forensic examiner with the Fairfax County Police Department, testified Thursday that he analyzed dozens of devices and concluded Christine Banfield had connected with Ryan through a social networking platform for people interested in sexual fetishes. Miller's analysis found that the two also chatted through Telegram, an encrypted messaging app. Ryan agreed to come to the house for what appeared to be a consensual sexual encounter. But Miller's findings diverged from a theory held by other officials in the department that the messages Ryan was receiving were actually from Brendan Banfield posing as his wife in a ruse to lure Ryan to the Banfields' home as a scapegoat in a double-killing scheme. Deputy Chief Patrick Brusch, who oversaw the department's major crimes bureau at the time, confirmed in testimony that he said Miller would 'never be doing another digital forensics case in your major crimes bureau' after he analyzed the evidence. Miller was transferred out of the department's digital forensics unit in late 2024, though Brusch testified the reassignment was not punitive or disciplinary. The University of Alabama's police department peer reviewed and affirmed Miller's digital forensic findings, according to evidence submitted to the court by Carroll. In October 2023, the family's au pair, Juliana Peres Magalhães, was arrested and charged with second-degree murder. She later pleaded guilty to manslaughter in what prosecutors described as a scheme to frame Ryan, a Fairfax County native, in the stabbing of Christine Banfield, a pediatric intensive care nurse. The au pair, who authorities said had a romantic affair with Brendan Banfield, agreed to cooperate with officials in their case against him. Brendan Banfield was arrested nearly a year after Magalhães. In a proffer, the au pair backed officials' belief that the husband was behind the online account in a plot to kill his wife and stage it to look like he and the au pair shot a predator in defense. On Thursday, Clingan acknowledged there were multiple case theories among officials, but Magalhães' account narrowed them down to one. 'With 12 different homicide detectives, there were 24 different theories,' Clingan said. 'Now, one theory.' Kyle Bryant, who was the lead detective on the case and was moved off the homicide team earlier this year, testified he faced mounting pressure from higher-ups at the department to support the catfish theory. Bryant testified he followed what he believed the evidence showed. 'Were you ever confronted by command staff about the theory of the case that you disagreed with?' Carroll asked Bryant. 'Yes,' he testified. Though Judge Azcarate did not find that prosecutors intentionally withheld information about Miller's transfer, she ordered Clingan to collect and distribute any documentation of the assignment change to the defense. She did not tell prosecutors to hand over documents on Bryant's transfer. 'The transfer that gives the court pause is Miller's because it relates to the theory of this case,' the judge said. Brendan Banfield's trial is set for October.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
When will key aspects of Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' take effect?
President Trump signed his sweeping tax cut and spending package known as the 'big, beautiful bill' into law during a Fourth of July celebration on Friday. The measure boosts defense and border wall funding and makes Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent, offsetting some of those costs with deep cuts to Medicaid, food assistance programs, student loans and clean energy programs. Some of the law's key pieces will take effect later this year, while others will not be implemented until well after midterm elections. Here are when the biggest parts of the new law will take effect: Among the bill's most contentious parts are its reforms to Medicaid, the joint federal and state program that provides health insurance coverage to low-income Americans. A number of Republicans were worried about the cuts to Medicaid, with some saying the party risked political backlash by adopting the cuts since many GOP voters could be affected by them. The question may be how many of those voters feel the effects before November 2026. Roughly 16 million people could lose their health insurance coverage by 2034 due to cuts to Medicaid and changes to the Affordable Care Act marketplace, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Americans could also lose their coverage due to new work requirements for the program. Under the law, adults between the ages of 19 and 64 will need to work at least 80 hours a month to qualify for Medicaid coverage unless they qualify for certain exemptions. Some adults will be exempt from the new work requirements if they have dependent children or have certain medical conditions. Medicaid's funding changes under the law are not scheduled to take effect until 2028, well past the upcoming 2026 midterm elections. Some work requirements could come earlier, however. They are to begin no later than Dec. 31, 2026. The law will change the country's largest food assistance program, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps. Like Medicaid, SNAP will also undergo funding and work requirement changes. In the past, the federal government has funded the program while states have taken on the cost of managing it. Under the bill's conditions, states will be required to partially fund SNAP if they have a payment error rate of 6 percent or higher beginning in 2028 — two years after the midterms. However, the law also allows states with payment error rates of 13.34 or higher to delay paying for the program for two additional years. Previously, most adults had to work until age 54 to qualify for SNAP unless they were a parent with dependents. Now, the working age to stay in the program has been raised to 64, and only parents with children younger than 14 are exempt from the requirement, according to the law. The law does not specifically state when the updated work requirements will begin to take effect, but a spokesperson for the Senate Republicans said there is no 'delayed implementation in the law.' A spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Agriculture has yet to respond to questions from The Hill about the new enforcement requirement. The law paves the way for numerous tax changes, with the most significant being to the cuts Trump enacted during his first term in 2017. Those expiring tax cuts are permanent, effective immediately. Under the law, Americans living in high-tax states such as New York and California will receive larger income tax deductions for state and local taxes, otherwise known as SALT, beginning this year and lasting until 2028. Republicans will be selling these tax cuts aggressively, since people who qualify for the cuts will feel them well ahead of the midterm elections. Some tax provisions will impact working-class voters. Starting this year, tip amounts of less than $25,000 will be tax-deductible through 2028. There is a cap for the deduction of a $150,000 income or $300,000 for people filing jointly, according to the law. The law also changes when overtime pay will be tax-deductible. Starting this year, up to $12,500 of extra overtime pay is tax-deductible until 2028. Again, there is an income limit of $150,000 a year for a single person or $300,000 for those filing jointly. Changes to the child tax credit will also take effect this year. Now, the child tax credit is $2,200 for every qualifying child. The amount will also be adjusted for inflation starting next year. Changes to the senior deduction also take effect this year. Beginning this year until 2028, Americans older than 65 can deduct an additional $6,000 on their tax returns. The law eliminates numerous tax incentives from the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act for clean energy and energy efficiency programs. Under the law, $7,500 tax credits for electric vehicles will be eliminated starting Sept. 30 of this year — well ahead of the midterms. It also eliminates a $3,200 tax credit for Americans making energy-improvement changes to their homes beginning in 2026 and ends tax credits for Americans who make investments in clean energy sources for their homes, including solar panels, fuel cells or battery storage technology starting next year. The law also ends the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which helps finance local emissions-reduction projects, beginning this year. Although it appears that current contracts under the program will remain in place. The bill will make some changes to how Americans finance higher education. Grad PLUS loans as well as repayment options like the SAVE Plan and Income-Contingent Repayment and Pay as You Earn plans will be scrapped and replaced with a Repayment Assistance Plan or a standard repayment plan. Grad PLUS loans will be replaced with new borrowing caps of $100,000 for many grad students and $200,000 for professional students, such as those enrolled in medical schools or law schools. For undergraduate students, Stafford loans will remain capped, and Parent PLUS loans now have a reduced lifetime cap of $65,000. All of the loan changes are set to take effect in July of 2026. The law also changes tax rates for colleges based on the size of their endowments. In 2026, schools with higher endowments per student will receive higher tax rates on their endowment. Schools with endowments between $500,000 and $750,000 will have a tax rate of 1.4 percent. Those with endowments of $750,000 to $2 million now have a tax rate of 4 percent, and those with more than $2 million will be taxed at 8 percent. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
