logo
‘We need help': Family pleads for release of US teenager held by Israel

‘We need help': Family pleads for release of US teenager held by Israel

Yahoo10 hours ago
Washington, DC – Israeli authorities have been detaining an American teenager for nearly six months without trial for allegedly throwing rocks at Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, a claim the 16-year-old's family denies while expressing concern for his deteriorating health.
Mohammed Ibrahim, a Palestinian-American who was born in the US state of Florida, has been completely cut off from his family since his arrest in February without visitation or telephone rights, his father and uncle said.
According to an Israeli military interrogation video obtained by the family and seen by Al Jazeera on Wednesday, Mohammed denied accusations that he was throwing rocks at Israeli vehicles near his village north of Ramallah.
Zaher Ibrahim, the jailed teenager's father, said on Wednesday that the family has received reports that Mohammed is losing weight drastically and suffering from a skin infection. Ibrahim said he is concerned about his son's wellbeing.
'Of course, we have fear,' he said. 'When you can't visit him and you can't get a phone call from him, what do you know? We don't know if he's dead … There's nothing we know.'
According to the family, United States officials visited Mohammed in detention weeks after he was arrested. But an email from a consular officer suggests that the officials were unable to gain access to him earlier in July.
'The Israel Prison Service updated us yesterday that your son suffers from scabies, and he is being treated by a doctor. We requested [an] update regarding his healing,' the email said.
Scabies, caused by an infestation of mites, causes extreme itching and rashes across the body.
'We hope to see him next week or the week after when he heals,' the email read, pledging to keep the family 'updated'.
The Israeli military, its Ministry of Defence and its Government Press Office did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for comment by the time of publication.The US State Department declined to answer Al Jazeera's questions about Mohammed's case or confirm or deny his detention, citing 'privacy considerations'.
'The Department has no higher priority than the safety and security of US citizens,' a department spokesperson wrote in a note to Al Jazeera.
'Whenever a US citizen is detained abroad, the Department works to provide consular assistance, which may include visiting detained US citizens to ensure they have access to necessary medication or medical attention and facilitating authorized communications with their family or others.'
The US provides billions of dollars in military aid to Israel annually as well as diplomatic backing at the United Nations – assistance that has increased significantly since the start of the war on Gaza.
'We get swept under the rug'
Mohammed was arrested during a raid by heavily armed Israeli troops at his family home in al-Mazraa ash-Sharqiya, north of Ramallah, at dawn on February 16, according to his family.
He is facing charges related to rock-throwing, but his relatives say they are worried that his health is deteriorating in detention as his court hearings are routinely postponed.
Ibrahim also expressed concern that Israeli prosecutors may use evidence obtained by torture to incriminate his son.
Mohammed's family is urgently calling for the US government to secure his release before it's too late. The teenager is the first cousin of Sayfollah Musallet, who was beaten to death by Israeli settlers in July in the West Bank.
Mohammed's arrest came amid escalating violence by Israeli forces and settlers in the occupied West Bank as the war on Gaza rages on.
The Israeli military has regularly carried out deadly raids and home demolitions across the West Bank. For their part, Israeli settlers often descend on Palestinian communities and ransack entire neighbourhoods.
Mohammed's relatives say his ordeal underscores the US's unwillingness to protect even its own citizens from Israeli abuses.
'It's obvious we get swept under the rug. And as far as getting help or investigations or some type of justice, we don't know,' said Zeyad Kadur, Mohammed's uncle.
'Eight Americans have been killed in the last 19 months. Where is our place in line? Are we number nine?'
According to the nonprofit Defense for Children International-Palestine (DCI-P), Israel detains as many as 700 Palestinian children annually.'Just a child'
Mohammed turned 16 in jail in March. His family said that US officials have promised to push for an improvement in his jailhouse conditions and seek his release.
Other than updates from the embassy, all the family knows about Mohammed is through reports from former child inmates who saw him in jail. They also catch glimpses of him on video feeds during his court appearances.
Kadur, Mohammed's uncle, said the family estimates that the teenager has lost 13kg (28 pounds) in detention, more than a fourth of his body weight.
At Megiddo Prison, the same facility where Mohammed is being held, 17-year-old detainee Walid Ahmad died in March due to 'prolonged malnutrition', according to DCI-P.
Walid, who had been held for six months without a charge, also suffered from scabies.
Kadur stressed that Mohammed is 'just a child' who loves life, and he was eager to get his driver's licence in order to work at the family's ice cream shop in Florida during the summer.
'There's not a law, there's not a country, there's not anywhere in the world where children are imprisoned and that country calls itself a democracy and doesn't have visitations or phone calls, or any method – even letter writing – to [contact] the parents,' Kadur told Al Jazeera.Musallet's case
While Mohammed is languishing in Israeli detention, the settlers who killed his cousin remain free.
In a separate incident, Yinon Levi, an Israeli settler who appeared to fatally shoot Palestinian activist Awdah Hathaleen on video earlier this week, was quickly released to house arrest.
Palestinians in the West Bank are tried in Israeli military courts that have a near 100-percent conviction rate. But settlers are mostly prosecuted under Israeli criminal law, and they rarely face accountability for attacks on Palestinians.
That two-tiered legal approach is a facet of what leading rights groups call a system of apartheid against Palestinians.
'Israeli settlers can come to you, shoot you in the head, and walk home to sleep,' said Ibrahim, Mohammed's father.
'The Palestinian, if he has his own plot of land in front of his house and the settlers come to burn his car and he pushes them away, he'll be charged.'
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee – a vocal supporter of illegal Israeli settlements – has described the killing of Musallet as a 'terrorist act' and called for Israel to 'aggressively investigate' the incident.
But there have been no arrests in the case 20 days after Musallet was beaten to death.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court keeps in place restrictions on immigration stops in L.A. based on language, job
Appeals court keeps in place restrictions on immigration stops in L.A. based on language, job

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Appeals court keeps in place restrictions on immigration stops in L.A. based on language, job

LOS ANGELES — An appeals court on Friday kept in place a Los Angeles federal judge's ruling that bars immigration agents from using a person's spoken language or job, like day laborer, as the sole pretext to detain them. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in its ruling said that there seemed to be one issue with U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong's temporary restraining order, but it did not put it on hold as the government sought. The appeals court said that a part of the July 11 temporary restraining order referring to "except as permitted by law" was too vague. "Defendants, however, are not likely to succeed on their remaining arguments," the court ruled, referring to the U.S. government. Frimpong, a judge at the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles, issued the temporary restraining order after a lawsuit was filed by people who claimed they were detained by immigration officers without good reason. Three people were waiting at a bus stop for jobs when they were detained by immigration officials, and two others are U.S. citizens who claim they were stopped and aggressively questioned despite telling agents they were citizens. Other organizations, including the United Farm Workers, also sued. Frimpong wrote in the temporary restraining order ruling that the people suing were 'likely to succeed in proving that the federal government is indeed conducting roving patrols without reasonable suspicion and denying access to lawyers.' The July 11 restraining order bars the detention of people unless the officer or agent 'has reasonable suspicion that the person to be stopped is within the United States in violation of U.S. immigration law.' It says they may not base that suspicion solely on a person's apparent race or ethnicity; the fact that they're speaking Spanish or English with an accent; their presence at a particular location like a bus stop or a day laborer pickup site; or the type of work one does. Los Angeles has been targeted by the Trump administration for immigration raids that the city's mayor has decried as a campaign to terrorize residents. The lawsuit that led to the temporary restraining order was filed against Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others. Kyle Harvick, the deputy incident commander for the government's immigration action in Los Angeles, said that "certain types of businesses, including carwashes" were chosen by immigration agents "because past experiences have demonstrated that illegal aliens utilize and seek work at these locations," according to the appeals court ruling. The appeals court found that "the four enumerated factors at issue — apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent, particular location, and type of work, even when considered together — describe only a broad profile and 'do not demonstrate reasonable suspicion for any particular stop.'" The appeals court panel said that the government did not dispute constitutional issues when trying to get the temporary restraining order stayed. 'They did not meaningfully dispute the district court's conclusion that sole reliance on the four enumerated factors, alone or in combination, does not satisfy the constitutional requirement of reasonable suspicion,' the appeals court panel wrote. Mark Rosenbaum, senior special counsel for strategic litigation at Public Counsel, which is among the groups representing the people who sued, said Friday that the actions by immigration agents in the Los Angeles operation were unconstitutional. "Today's ruling sends a powerful message: the government cannot excuse illegal conduct by relying on racial profiling as a tool of immigration enforcement," Rosenbaum said. "These raids were unconstitutional, unsupported by evidence, and rooted in fear and harmful stereotypes, not public safety." The appeals court did find that part of Frimpong's temporary order was vague, relating to "except as permitted by law" in the clause about detaining people based on the four factors of race, speaking Spanish, a location or type of work. But it otherwise denied the government's motion for a stay. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, a Democrat, called the appeals court ruling a victory. "Today is a victory for the rule of law and for the City of Los Angeles," she said in a statement. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now." The immigration raids launched in Los Angeles in June resulted in large protests in the city, some of which turned violent. The Trump administration sent National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles in a move that was condemned by Bass, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and others. The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment late Friday about the appeals court ruling. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword

Two War Reporter Brothers, 60 Countries and Now a Pair of New Books
Two War Reporter Brothers, 60 Countries and Now a Pair of New Books

New York Times

time3 hours ago

  • New York Times

Two War Reporter Brothers, 60 Countries and Now a Pair of New Books

In 2006, the journalists Jon Lee Anderson and his brother, Scott, both happened to be reporting stories from Lebanon. Israel had invaded the country in a bid to crush Hezbollah. Jon Lee was in Beirut, trying to learn what he could about a shadowy war. Scott was doing the same in the southern city of Tyre, where the Israelis had imposed a blanket curfew, threatening to shoot anything that moved. Scott was traveling with the photographer Paolo Pellegrin to see what was happening at a hospital when a drone strike missed their vehicle by a matter of yards. The shock wave knocked all the buttons off Scott's shirt and gave him a concussion. Blood was pouring out of his ear. The frighteningly close call convinced the brothers that they needed a rule. 'We have a kind of superstition, which is that it's not good to be in the same war zone at the same time,' Jon Lee said. 'And the one time we were, Scott nearly got killed.' The Andersons were recounting this story in Scott's New Jersey living room — comfortably far from a war zone, though finding them on the same continent, let alone in the same city, was a matter of fortuitous timing. Scott, 66, who lives in Jersey City, was leaving for a monthlong trip to Turkey with his teenage daughter in a few weeks; Jon Lee, 68, who lives with his wife in Dorset, England, was passing through New York to give a talk at the Americas Society before visiting his daughter in New Hampshire, where she was about to give birth. It isn't exactly common for two people from the same family to do the uncommon work of reporting from some of the world's most dangerous hot spots — Jon Lee as a staff writer for The New Yorker, Scott as a contributing writer to The New York Times Magazine. Nor is it common for siblings to have new books coming out in the same month. In another accident of fortuitous timing, Scott's 'King of Kings' and Jon Lee's 'To Lose a War' both publish in August. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

American Victims of Hamas and Hezbollah Attacks Sue U.N. Agency
American Victims of Hamas and Hezbollah Attacks Sue U.N. Agency

New York Times

time3 hours ago

  • New York Times

American Victims of Hamas and Hezbollah Attacks Sue U.N. Agency

Victims and relatives of people killed or injured in attacks by Hamas and Hezbollah have sued the United Nations agency dedicated to Palestinians, accusing it of aiding the armed groups and fueling terrorism. The lawsuit suit was filed on Thursday in federal court in the District of Columbia by American citizens living in Israel and the United States and their family members. A similar case has been playing out since last year in federal court in Manhattan. Both suits are attempting to hold the United Nations Relief and Work Agency, known as UNRWA, responsible in some measure for violent acts by Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, groups dedicated to the destruction of Israel that have been designated terrorist organizations by the United States. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified monetary damages, both compensatory and punitive. Israel has long maintained that UNRWA has been infiltrated by militants and is biased against Israel in the war in Gaza, an accusation U.N. officials have denied. The agency has been at the center of controversy during the conflict, which was set off by the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. In the New York case, lawyers for the U.N. agency have argued it is exempt from such suits because it has diplomatic immunity. The Biden administration supported that position, but in April, lawyers in President Trump's Justice Department reversed the government's stance, paving the way for the latest lawsuit. Some analysts say the Justice Department's new position could open the door not only to more civil cases seeking damages from the agency, but also to the Treasury Department's imposing sanctions on it. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store