ADHD drug mix-up led to my son, 6, receiving lethal dose of highly addictive meds... my warning to parents
Sarah Paquin, a mother-of-three from British Columbia in Canada, said her son Declan had been taking dextroamphetamine to treat his attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder for years.
Paquin picked up his prescription as she always did from a local Shoppers Drug Mart pharmacy, and didn't notice anything unusual.
However, when her husband David went to give Declan his daily medication the next morning, he noticed the pills were a different color.
When he checked the label on the bottle, he realized it contained a high dose of the opioid hydromorphone and the name on the prescription was of a woman the family didn't know.
Hydromorphone is around four times more potent than morphine. The medication has the possibility of causing life-threatening breathing problems.
This risk is particularly high for children due to their smaller size and weight. 'It's just terrifying. We put our trust in these local professionals to be upholding their end,' Paquin said.
She's urging people to double-check their medication labels.
She told CTV News: '[The pills] were in his hands.
'He would have had this high dosage of morphine and been sent off to school, unknowingly... I think this was entirely avoidable.'
Mr Paquin immediately returned the medication to the pharmacy, where the pharmacist gave him a refund but she was unable to find the correct prescription.
The order had to be refilled.
Commenting on the matter, a spokesperson for Shoppers Drug Mart's parent company, Loblaw PR, told DailyMail.com: 'Upon review with the store, we have learned this was a case of human error, one that never should have happened.
'We have controls in place to minimize risks like this - where the patient was handed the wrong prescription bag - and the associate will review these with employees to avoid a similar situation in the future.
'The owner of this location has reached out to the patient's parents to apologize for any undue stress this may have caused, and to outline the corrective steps.'
The Paquin family say they have also been informed the pharmacist responsible for the error has been suspended.
They now want to make their story public in a bid to warn other parents about the importance of being vigilant.
Mrs Paquin says: '[Patients and parents should] double, triple, quadruple-check every prescription you pick up, whether you've been going to that pharmacy for years, whether it's a medication you've been on for years.'
The Paquins have also filed a complaint with the College of Pharmacists of British Columbia about the incident.
The organization regulates all pharmacies in the province.
The FDA receives over 100,000 reports related to medication errors annually, with these contributing to up to 9,000 deaths.
In 2022, a former Tennessee nurse was found guilty of criminally negligent homicide in the death of a patient who was accidentally given the wrong medication.
RaDonda Vaught, 37, was also convicted of gross neglect of an impaired adult in a case that fixed the attention of patient safety advocates and nurses' organizations around the country.
Vaught injected the paralyzing drug vecuronium into 75-year-old Charlene Murphey instead of the sedative Versed on December 26, 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
New proposals to cut PIP and disability benefits ahead of full review
The Centre for Social Justice has called for emergency measures to be brought in to reduce the number of people currently on the benefit New plans to slash Personal Independence Payment (PIP) have been put forward, aligning with a forthcoming Government review of the benefit. Currently, Labour has paused any steps regarding PIP within its welfare overhaul due to a backlash from MPs and activists for disability rights. Originally, there was a move to impose a four-point rule to tighten PIP accessibility. This would've meant claimants needing at least one tally of four points in assessed daily living activities to qualify. However, modifications to PIP are now set to follow only after Sir Stephen Timms, Minister for Social Security and Disability, conducts a thorough examination. READ MORE: 'I'm a beauty writer - the new ghd curling wand gave me perfect waves in 15 mins' Slated for completion by Autumn 2026, the 'Timms Review' vows to be "co-produced with disabled people, along with the organisations that represent them, experts, MPs and other stakeholders, so a wide range of views and voices are heard." The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), a centre-right think tank, is urging for an expedited review and argues for a significant reform of PIP to "redirect funding from long-term cash payments." In the updated 'Change the Prescription' report, the CSJ outlines several proposals concerning eligibility for PIP and the health component of Universal Credit, reports Birmingham Live. Amongst their suggestions is the ceasing of PIP and Universal Credit health benefits for individuals experiencing slighter forms of anxiety, depression, and ADHD - a change that could impact over a million beneficiaries, including those currently receiving standard-rate PIP for such conditions. For those who continue to be eligible due to receiving the enhanced rate of PIP, their payments would be cut by roughly £80 a week to match the standard rate. The report estimates this would save £7.4 billion annually by 2029/2030 and suggests that £1 billion of this could be reinvested in frontline mental health services such as NHS Talking Therapies, local support groups, work coaches and community interventions. The think tank suggests that limiting eligibility for PIP and the UC health element to the most severe cases of anxiety, depression and ADHD would save approximately £8.8 billion. Joe Shalam, policy director at the CSJ, said: "Liz Kendall deserves credit for tackling the perverse incentives that have crept into the welfare system since Covid. "People who cannot work due to sickness or disability must always be protected, but as our research shows, too many people are trapped in a cycle of dependency and wasted potential. "By tightening eligibility for mental health benefits and investing in therapy and employment support, ministers can save public money and transform lives. The Timms Review must be brought forward to Autumn, there is no time to lose." Labour's welfare reforms bill was supported by MPs only after a £5 billion reduction to PIP was dropped. However, the CSJ argues that the rising number of PIP claims are contributing to a significant gap between welfare and work that needs immediate attention. The report suggests that a person who is economically inactive and on Universal Credit, including the average housing element to cover their rent, and also receiving PIP, would have a taxpayer-funded Government income of around £25,000 - this increases to £27,500 for those awarded the highest rate of PIP. However, this amount drops to £22,550 once the welfare bill's cut to the Universal Credit health element for new claimants is considered. In contrast, a full-time worker earning the National Living Wage (NLW) is projected to make £22,500 after paying income tax and National Insurance, creating a £2,500 disparity between work and welfare for existing claimants. The CSJ argues that the gap widens even further when additional benefits are factored in. For instance, an unemployed single parent, claiming PIP for anxiety and disability allowance for a child with additional needs such as ADHD, would receive £36,900, which is over £14,000 more than the net wages of a full-time worker on the National Living Wage.
Spectator
14 hours ago
- Spectator
Britain's mental health crisis isn't what you think
Britain has a widespread and collective mental health problem – but it's not what you might think. Specifically, it's that many people believe themselves to be mentally unwell when actually they are not. What's more, society and the state have been prone to taking them at their word on this matter for far too long. We've become aware of this unfolding problem recently as it's evolved into a veritable crisis. It's at once a financial crisis, one that now costs the taxpayer and the Treasury billions in welfare payments, while it's also a still-evolving human crisis. We're only now beginning to grasp the human cost of maintaining a mainly younger generation in a state of passive dependency, convinced that they are unable to deal with the necessary challenges of life – and all with the approval of those in authority. Wokery helped to popularise and cement the notion that all opinions and viewpoints are of equal worth We should then be grateful that the Conservatives have announced plans to tackle the immediate fiscal emergency at least. Helen Whately, the shadow and work and pensions secretary, says that those with common mental health conditions or some unremarkable behavioural patterns shouldn't be receiving sickness benefits. 'We cannot have a country in which one in four people believe they are disabled and believe that means that they should be receiving benefits from the state,' she told Radio 4, 'you shouldn't be receiving sickness benefits if you have a common mental health disorder, something like anxiety, mild depression and some behavioural conditions like ADHD.' She cited recent findings by the Centre for Social Justice that cuts in milder depression or anxiety could amount to £9 billion worth of savings. Whately's intervention is an audacious and wise one, but it won't be widely welcomed. This is because some still believe our mental health crisis is entirely authentic. While most rational people recognise that the benefits system in relation to mental health is dysfunctional, in that there is a large proportion of loafers and chancers gaming the system, and welfare fraud is nothing new, there is an ever-growing percentage who now resort to state support because they sincerely believe themselves to suffer from debilitating mental disorders. This latter development is genuinely new. While having or feigning physical injury or bodily impairment for financial indemnity is decades old, and one that can be subject to empirical testing or requires the application of deception, imagining yourself to be mentally unwell is often not subject to question, or even open to refutation. And it's very much a novel, 21st century problem. That we aren't witnessing the recognition of previously undiagnosed or overlooked medical conditions, but rather a change in our culture, a social contagion akin to the previous profusion of transgender ideology, is obvious by the fact our 'mental health crisis' epidemic followed in the wake of the lockdown years of 2020-21. That was a time when the development and socialisation of so many young people were devastatingly interrupted. It was also the years of furlough, when a new generation learnt that it was acceptable to subsist on state hand-outs and not have to face working with other people for a living. Yet the lockdown years were also visited on a generation fully in thrall to a therapeutic ethos of human fragility and now a burgeoning woke ideology. In drawing much of its intellectual ballast from the postmodern theory that knowledge is ineluctably relative, wokery helped to popularise and cement the notion that all opinions and viewpoints are of equal worth. The notion that 'perceived' judgements are as valid as objective assessment had already passed into law in this country with the Crime and Disorder Act of 1998, which defined a 'hate crime' as, 'Any criminal offence which is perceived by the victim or any other person, to be motivated by hostility or prejudice'. The primacy accorded to subjective perception, or 'lived experience', was subsequently elevated to new heights with the emergence of hyper-liberalism in the decades that followed, most conspicuously in the trans movement with the primacy it accorded to 'gender self-identification'. This frequently became merely a verbal event that required no physical alteration, only a performative utterance. Our 'mental health crisis' is but the latest manifestation of a society beholden to the conceit that subjective personal testimony is on a par with objective evidence. Automatically believing those who protest that they have mental health or 'neurodiversity' issues – the latest examples being the TV chef Greg Wallace and Guardian journalist Owen Jones, self-proclaimed sufferers of autism and ADHD respectively – will hardly do anyone any good. Nor will doing so benefit those who suffer from clinical medical depression or youths with actual, severe learning difficulties and educational needs. Our culture still cleaves to the notion that if someone believes something to be true, then we should accept it as true. Beyond making cuts right now, changing this mentality is the real challenge.
Daily Mirror
19 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Doctors thought my rash was eczema - then I was told I had six months to live'
When Rachel Evans developed a rash that made her feel as though she had 'insects crawling all over her body', doctors reassured her it was just eczema. Then she received a devastating diagnosis After developing an "intense" rash across her body, Rachel Evans was told by doctors that she had eczema, but she couldn't shake the feeling that something far more serious was going on. The 46-year-old was plagued by extreme itching, dizzy spells, nosebleeds, debilitating fatigue and unexplained weight loss, and despite pushing for answers, she was repeatedly turned away. Rachel recalled: "I couldn't manage my symptoms at all. The rash was unmanageable; it felt like there were insects crawling all over my body. I couldn't cope with the intense itchiness of that rash. I couldn't sleep, and I couldn't work. It completely took over my day and night, and the fatigue I felt was intense." Her symptoms started in 2020, but it took nearly two years for doctors to send Rachel for a chest X-ray, which detected a shadow on her lungs. A CT scan and biopsy followed, and, to her horror, Rachel was diagnosed with Stage 4 Hodgkin lymphoma. Without treatment, doctors warned she may only have six months to live. READ MORE: 'I was told I had heatstroke from Turkey holiday - reality was scary' Married mum Rachel was devastated by the news, and says this was made even more difficult on account of her struggles with undiagnosed ADHD. Rachel, of Almondsbury, South Gloucestershire, shared: "Before my diagnosis, I was so burnt-out from struggling with life and undiagnosed ADHD. I have two words for how I was feeling: survival mode. "My doctors thought I would only have six months to live if I didn't have treatment. As I was emotionally dysregulated, I considered allowing my body to die from the cancer naturally. "But then I was able to consider the needs of my son, and so I decided to take the six months of ABVD chemotherapy." She added: "Everything happened really quickly. It was a very traumatic experience, more trauma on top of lifelong physical and emotional trauma caused by the ADHD. This developed into complex post-traumatic distress after chemotherapy." According to Rachel, who has a 10-year-old son and a nearly 20-year-old stepdaughter, her cancer treatment had a profound impact on her and her family. This was further compounded by the sudden illness and death of her mother-in-law. Her husband went to be with his mother in her final days, and then spent time grieving with his father and sister. Meanwhile, Rachel was left to care for her son alone for several weeks, amid a myriad of escalating challenges. Rachel explained: "Our home life was already emotionally challenged due to my undiagnosed ADHD, and our son's undiagnosed ASD and ADHD, so the cancer treatment caused a massive nosedive in the atmosphere. "In addition to the physical and emotional suffering from chemotherapy, like the pain of the picc line going in, problems with them extracting blood, panic attacks before chemo sessions, excruciatingly painful haemorrhoids, bloating, tummy pain, weight gain, loss of taste, nausea and receding gums, we had to deal with the very sudden family bereavement." In March 2023, Rachel went into remission, and while she still struggles with climbing stairs or hills, she's thankfully feeling much stronger physically. However, emotional recovery has proven to be more complicated. Rachel revealed: "My mental health has taken three years to recover. Thanks to ADHD medication, HRT for perimenopausal symptoms, psychotherapy, self-educating, and finding therapy myself, I am fully ready to engage with the world again, not just restored, but transformed." Going forward, Rachel hopes her story will help raise awareness of the more "sneaky" symptoms of Hodgkin lymphoma. She said, "I wish that more health care professionals knew more about the symptoms - blood cancer is sneaky, and it hides in the shadows. "I had a movable, painless lymph node, but not in my neck like most people get, it was in my jaw. This is uncommon, but not unknown. "My weight loss was subtle because I was already quite slender, and the weight had dropped off gradually throughout the years. "I had a history of eczema, and a history of depression and anxiety, and I think this history masked the root causes of the blood cancer and the ADHD." Rachel says her ADHD only added to the significant challenges of her diagnosis and subsequent recovery. She continued: "I don't want any other human being to struggle the way I did, either physically, emotionally, or both. "I especially have a heart for women who have undiagnosed or diagnosed ADHD, and are perimenopausal, and have had to face a cancer diagnosis on top. ADHD is subtle and not easily detected, especially in women, unless you do the detective work. "I want to raise awareness so that others are educated and have a better chance of enjoying life, in all its fullness. I believe my life was saved in many ways, for many reasons, and sharing my story is just one of them."
