Airlines are inspecting Boeing 787 fuel switches after the first Air India crash report put them in the spotlight
On June 12, the London-bound Boeing 787 crashed 32 seconds after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport in India. All but one of the 242 people on board were killed, as well as 19 on the ground.
In a preliminary report published last Friday, India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau said that seconds after liftoff, the fuel was cut off to both engines, immediately shutting them down.
The fuel-cutoff switches have a stop-lock mechanism that requires them to be pulled outward before they can be moved up or down, preventing accidental movement. Brackets also guard them from being mistakenly knocked.
The report said cockpit audio showed one of the pilots asking the other why he had cut off the fuel, but he responded that he had not done so.
Friday's report also references a 2018 bulletin from the Federal Aviation Administration. It advised inspections on several Boeing models, including the 787, after receiving reports that some 737s had fuel control switches installed with the locking feature disengaged.
"If the locking feature is disengaged, the switch can be moved between the two positions without lifting the switch during transition," it said. "Inadvertent operation of the switch could result in an unintended consequence, such as an in-flight engine shutdown."
Air India had not carried out inspections as the bulletin was advisory and not mandatory, the preliminary report said.
Since Friday, numerous airlines have begun such inspections, but no issues have yet been found.
A source familiar with the matter told Business Insider that Air India began carrying out voluntary checks of the fuel control switches on its 787s and 737s over the weekend.
About half of the 787s and almost all of the 737s have been inspected so far, with no problems found, the person added. The checks are expected to be completed by Wednesday.
India's aviation regulator on Monday ordered the country's airlines to inspect the fuel control locking feature in accordance with the 2018 advisory.
A spokesperson for Germany's Lufthansa told BI that checks had been carried out on the fuel control switches on the Boeing 787s of Lufthansa and its subsidiary Austrian Airlines, "as a precautionary measure."
"No findings were made," they added.
United Airlines declined to comment on whether it was conducting inspections.
Singapore Airlines and Japan Airlines told Reuters that they were carrying out precautionary checks on the switches. Neither immediately responded to requests for comment sent by BI outside local working hours.
The news agency reported that South Korea's transport ministry ordered the country's airlines to inspect fuel control switches, in line with the FAA's 2018 bulletin.
"At that time (2018), it was a recommended measure and was not fully inspected," the government's statement reportedly said.
Several outlets also reported that the FAA issued a continued airworthiness notification to the international community (CANIC) late Friday, saying it does not believe its 2018 advisory means any planes are unsafe.
Friday's preliminary report only establishes the known facts rather than analysing the cause. It did not issue any recommendations to operators of Boeing 787s or GE engines.
In an internal memo obtained by several outlets, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the report "provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions."
A final report is expected within 12 months of the incident.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
14 hours ago
- Business Insider
Tesla's terrible quarter hasn't stopped analysts dreaming big about its robot future
Tesla just had its roughest quarter in at least a decade, but many investors and analysts are still dreaming big. Elon Musk's carmaker said on Wednesday that revenues plunged 12% year-over-year to $22.5 billion in the second quarter. Tesla's stock fell as much as 9% in early trading on Thursday morning on the disappointing earnings, its biggest fall since March. In a call with analysts, Elon Musk took a victory lap after Tesla finally launched its robotaxi service in Austin, predicting that the company's driverless ride-hailing service would cover half the US population by the end of the year. However, he also warned that Tesla could face "a few rough quarters," as it weathers shifting tariffs and the end of EV tax credits in the US. Despite the stock price fall, the reaction from Tesla investors and analysts suggests those who are more bullish on the automaker aren't overly concerned by these speed bumps and are looking toward Musk's promises of a trillion-dollar AI future. Nearly 45% of analysts who cover Tesla retain a buy rating for the automaker, while 31% have a neutral or hold recommendation, Bloomberg data seen by BI shows. Just under 25% have a sell rating on Tesla's stock. "The stock always remains a battle between what can be and what is," Joseph Spak, a US auto analyst for UBS, told BI via email. "Bulls will continue to look past valuation, look for evidence of AI progress and dream big," he added. Wedbush Securities analyst and longtime Tesla bull Dan Ives wrote in a Thursday note that Tesla faces headwinds and "clear growth challenges" for the rest of the year. While Ives was cautious, he also said that Musk's return to working full-time at Tesla as a "wartime CEO" after his stint in politics was the "biggest and best possible news" for investors, with the EV giant now in a prime position to seize a piece of the "$1 trillion" robotaxi market. Tesla investor and Deepwater Asset Management partner Gene Munster wrote in a Wednesday blog post that investors had been disappointed not to hear more details about Tesla's robotaxi rollout in Austin, with executives not addressing when the company will remove its human safety monitors or open the service to the public. However, he said he still believed Tesla was in pole position to win the autonomy race, even with details about the company's next steps lacking. That position was echoed by analysts at financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald, who wrote in a Thursday note that they remain "bullish" on Tesla due to the robotaxi expansion and the company's Optimus robot beginning high-volume production in 2026. 'A battle between what can be and what is' Amid those heady dreams of a glorious robot future, Tesla's present looks decidedly less rosy, with sales of its EVs underwhelming so far this year. The company reported its second consecutive decline in year-over-year deliveries earlier this month, as it faces rising competition and brand damage from Musk's forays into US politics. As Musk warned on the earnings call, things are likely to get worse before they get better. Analysts for investment firm William Blair said that the market for zero-emission regulatory credits, which bought in $439 million for Tesla in the second quarter, is expected to be almost completely eliminated in the US by the Trump administration's One Big Beautiful Bill. "We are entering a vulnerable time for Tesla, as near-term headwinds, like auto and energy demand, subsidy cuts, and tariffs, pressure financials in the crucial transition to the long-term vision of real-world AI and higher-margin products like robotaxi and Optimus," they wrote. In a research note published on Thursday, analysts for JPMorgan cut projections for Tesla's earnings per share for 2025 and 2026. Morgan Stanley, meanwhile, lowered its estimates for Tesla's sales and now estimates the automaker will see a 14% drop this year, with analyst Adam Jonas warning that it may take years for Tesla to make money on its new initiatives as it crosses the "chasm to autonomy." Spak, the UBS analyst, said the bank had cut its estimates for Tesla vehicle deliveries and earnings per share for 2026 due to the end of EV incentives and regulatory credits in the US. He added that the reveal that Tesla's upcoming "affordable model" was a cheaper Model Y variant could limit incremental demand. "However, at the same time, the vision of Tesla as the leading player in robotaxis and humanoids is in its infancy and the ventures are progressing," he said.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Six steps firms must take to prepare for potential FCA redress
With a possible FCA-mandated redress scheme on the horizon, motor finance firms must act swiftly and strategically. From data integrity to governance frameworks, this article outlines six critical priorities to help organisations stay ahead of the curve — and avoid costly delays. As the motor finance industry awaits the Supreme Court's judgment on historic commission arrangements, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has indicated that it will confirm within six weeks if it proposes to mandate a consumer redress scheme. Drawing on the FCA's public statements and our internal industry insights, this article outlines six critical priorities motor finance Firms should focus on to ensure that they are institutionally ready for what could be one of the most significant consumer remediation exercises in recent UK financial history. The time to prepare is now. 1. Understand your data sources, gaps, and integrity At the heart of any redress scheme lies data. When a redress scheme is mandated, Firms will need to assess whether customers were harmed by commission arrangements, likely within a pre-defined 'Relevant Period' and, if so, calculate redress accordingly. This requires a deep understanding of historical data - some of which may date back to 2007. Key questions firms should be asking now include: What data points are needed to assess a claim? For example, counterfactual cashflows, commission structures, and customer disclosures Where is this data stored? Is it digital, archived, or in hard copy? Where is it located? Is the data complete and accurate? Are there gaps that need to be filled or inconsistencies that need to be resolved? Can you quickly build a contact list of in-scope customers? This includes verifying addresses and tracing customers who may have moved or passed away. Given the length of time that an FCA remediation scheme has been on the horizon, there is unlikely to be a large amount of sympathy afforded for delays due to data retrieval and cleansing. 2. Redress process design is iterative and takes time Designing a redress process is not a one-off task - it is a dynamic, evolving process. The FCA has indicated that any scheme will be principles-based rather than rooted in a basic counterfactual cashflow review. Meaning that Firms will likely need to tailor their approach to their specific commission models and customer bases. Initial frameworks will almost certainly undergo multiple iterations as Firms and the FCA build a shared understanding of what fair redress looks like. 3. Scope and eligibility: plan for multiple scenarios One of the most challenging aspects of any redress scheme is defining who is in scope and who is eligible. Scope refers to whether a complaint relates to a Relevant Commission Arrangement during the Relevant Period Eligibility considers whether the complainant is entitled to redress (for example, are they the original customer, a legal representative, or a CMC?), and if so, how the scheme might engage with them Firms should develop contingency plans for different scenarios. Also, a robust eligibility filter can help avoid double compensation and ensure consistency. 4. Prepare to design a process map that accommodates split complaints Split complaints - where a single customer has submitted a complaint concerning both in-scope and out-of-scope acts or omissions - pose a unique challenge. Firms should: Define what constitutes a split complaint Design a process map that clearly delineates how such cases will be handled Ensure compliance with DISP (Dispute Resolution: Complaints) rules for regulated products, while developing DISP-adjacent processes for in-scope complaints. 5. Consider a strong project governance framework No redress scheme can succeed without robust governance. This includes: A dedicated Project Management Office to track progress, manage risks, coordinate across functions, and manage resources in a lean and agile way A project board to provide strategic oversight and challenge A complex case committee to handle nuanced or precedent-setting complaints Legal and risk teams experienced in overseeing FCA mandated redress schemes to provide second and third lines of defence Firms should take care in engaging consulting firms to design and deliver a redress scheme. Firms should instead consider the benefit of engaging a law firm to support them in designing, delivering, and risk assure a redress scheme, which will provide all the specialist capabilities required, with the addition of providing an appropriate veil of legal privilege over aspects of the investigation of the complainants, programme design and decision making. 6. Remember, a redress programme is not a change programme A redress scheme is a unique type of programme. The one thing to fix at the forefront of your thinking is that a redress programme is not a change programme. When redress programmes are designed and delivered by change managers, there are three certain risks - the programme will: Overrun Overspend Be overly complicated This approach would be wholly at odds with the FCA published principles of timeliness, simplicity and cost effectiveness. When engaging external expertise, firms should satisfy themselves that they are engaging firms with demonstrated experience in designing and delivering large-scale remediation programmes. Conclusion: readiness is a strategic advantage The FCA has made it clear that it wants to move quickly once the Supreme Court delivers its judgment. Firms that wait for certainty before acting risk being left behind. By focusing now on locating data, data integrity, process design, eligibility criteria, complaint mapping, and governance, motor finance Firms can position themselves not only to comply with a future redress scheme, but to lead it. The road ahead may be uncertain, but the direction is clear. Readiness is no longer optional - it is a strategic imperative. Wayne Gibbard is a Partner at Shoosmiths. Peter Richards-Gaskin leads on Financial Services Disputes, Remediation, and Investigations as a Partner at the firm. "Six steps firms must take to prepare for potential FCA redress" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
char.gy advances EV charging expansion with Sitetracker partnership
UK-based electric vehicle (EV) charging company, has teamed up with Sitetracker to bolster EV charging network expansion across the UK. This partnership will support plan to install over 30,000 public charging points by 2030 leveraging Sitetracker's digital foundation to standardise and expedite countrywide deployment process. The Sitetracker platform will enable to implement automated workflows for high-volume deployments, gain visibility into project progress, and enhance field productivity with mobile tools. This collaboration is set to accelerate the development of urban EV infrastructure in the UK, supporting the country's decarbonisation objectives and the global movement towards sustainable transportation. noted that Sitetracker emerged as the preferred choice after a thorough competitive evaluation, offering digital management of the entire asset lifecycle, from initial planning to maintenance. Sitetracker CEO Giuseppe Incitti said: 'We're thrilled to support their bold vision of transforming how people charge their vehicles in cities. This partnership demonstrates how Sitetracker's technology helps ambitious companies scale clean energy infrastructure with speed and confidence.' is said to offer EV charging solutions that utilise lampposts, simplifying the process for drivers who lack private parking to charge their vehicles close to their residences. This approach minimises the need for new infrastructure by utilising current street fixtures, thereby facilitating the creation of charging networks that are available in densely populated city areas. With an existing network of more than 3,600 charging points, is poised for rapid expansion and sought a platform to support large-scale deployments. chief operating officer Alastair Woods said: ' was built to make EV charging simple and accessible for everyone. As we scale from thousands to tens of thousands of charging points, Sitetracker is the operational backbone we need. Their platform provides the visibility and control required to deliver fast, efficient rollouts while maintaining the quality our communities depend on.' " advances EV charging expansion with Sitetracker partnership" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
