Trump has bailed out crypto. The US taxpayer risks being the biggest loser
The phrase is a common one in the volatile world of cryptocurrency, where shared momentum and optimism drive the markets. But a few days later, observers might wonder whether there was more behind the message.
On Sunday, Donald Trump announced that his administration was pressing ahead with plans to set up a US crypto reserve, identifying three digital coins – XRP, Solana and Cardano – that would be included in the fund.
The values of the three lesser-known tokens, popular in crypto circles but obscure to much of the general public, instantly surged by up to 20pc.
Trump later added that Bitcoin and Ethereum, the two biggest cryptocurrencies would 'obviously' be included, adding: 'I also love Bitcoin and Ethereum!' The two digital coins subsequently enjoyed their own price spike.
In the space of an hour, roughly $250bn (£197bn) was added to the value of the cryptocurrency market. There is no evidence that Eric Trump's advice was informed, but it was certainly profitable.
In Trump's first term, he saw the stock market as a proxy approval rating. In his second, he may prefer the price of Bitcoin.
While Wall Street has been relatively languid since his second election win, cryptocurrencies have traded at all-time highs.
Trump cheered as Bitcoin hit $100,000 for the first time in December, posting on Truth Social: 'Congratulations Bitcoiners … You're welcome!!!'
The Bitcoin price – a single, simple metric – may also appeal to the president as the wider US economy appears to struggle.
On Friday, an economic tracker from the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta suggested that the economy could shrink at an annualised rate of 1.5pc in the first quarter of the year. Inflation fears have also returned, in part owing to Trump's tariffs.
The momentum-fuelled crypto market has proven an easier beast to tame.
After a crackdown by the Biden administration, which fretted about the lack of protections around digital assets, Trump has been able to boost prices with a series of crypto-friendly appointments at key government agencies and promises to make America the world's 'crypto capital'.
Once a sceptic who criticised cryptocurrency as a scam, Trump himself has demonstrated little personal passion for the industry. Policies such as freeing Ross Ulbricht, the founder of online drug market The Silk Road, have appeared designed to win the community's support rather than demonstrate a coherent vision of what cryptocurrency means in Trump's America.
But they have endeared the president to a new legion of supporters who felt that their industry was under threat.
The crypto industry, despite being set up on libertarian principles, spent $133m to help elect Trump and dozens of other supportive candidates in last year's election, becoming a devastatingly effective new power in Washington DC.
Among Trump's big supporters were Marc Andreessen, the Silicon Valley venture capitalist whose firm has become one of the crypto industry's heaviest backers; Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the twin brothers who became billionaires through Bitcoin; and Brian Armstrong, the boss of crypto exchange Coinbase.
Most prominent has been David Sacks, the former PayPal executive and close ally of Elon Musk, who was a relatively early Trump backer in Silicon Valley and has since been appointed the president's 'crypto tsar'. He will be charged with developing plans for Trump's crypto reserve, which is likely to be outlined in more detail at a 'summit' on Friday.
Trump's announcement led to a backlash on concerns that taxpayer money would be used to prop up an asset disproportionately held by a rich clique.
'Torn as to whether this is more dumb or more corrupt,' wrote Jason Furman, a key economic adviser to Barack Obama.
Joe Lonsdale, the founder of tech firm Palantir and a major Trump supporter, wrote: 'It's wrong to steal my money for grift on the Left; it's also wrong to tax me for crypto bro schemes.'
Trump's specific shopping list of cryptocurrencies also raised eyebrows.
XRP, Ripple and Solana, whose combined value is roughly one seventh of Bitcoin's, are relatively niche even among those who have parked money in Bitcoin. One meme spreading among Bitcoin fans on Sunday called the plan a 's---coin reserve'.
Others pointed out that the list closely mirrored a cryptocurrency fund that Sacks had invested in – despite Trump's crypto tsar having denied any conflict of interest on Monday, saying he had sold all of his cryptocurrency holdings before Trump took office.
The sense of injustice rose when it emerged that an anonymous 'whale' had made a highly leveraged bet on Bitcoin and Ethereum on Sunday on the trading service Hyperliquid, closing the position after the cryptocurrencies' price rise and making a $7m profit.
The move led to frenzied social media speculation about the trader's identity and whether they might have an inside line to the White House.
Regardless, the Trump family itself stands to benefit from soaring crypto prices. Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr have positions at crypto company World Liberty Financial, and the technology company behind Trump's Truth Social has said it will put up to $250m into assets – including cryptocurrencies.
So far, the design of Trump's crypto reserve is unclear. Some have speculated that it could merely be funded by cryptocurrencies seized from criminals by law enforcement, a stockpile estimated to be worth almost $20bn. Meanwhile, US senator Cynthia Lummis has suggested a 1m Bitcoin reserve, which would cost $93bn at today's prices.
'Government waste and expenditures are under the microscope right now, especially with the emergence of DOGE, so I strongly doubt a majority of Americans will take kindly to the government using taxpayer dollars to accumulate Bitcoin or other crypto assets (especially more obscure coins like Cardano or XRP),' says Nic Carter, of cryptocurrency investment firm Castle Island Ventures.
'Bitcoin (and crypto) holders are still a small minority of Americans. Trump's close associates have a lot of interests in cryptocurrency, so to the broader public, and especially his critics, these moves will seem self-interested, even if they are made with sincere intentions.
'I think Bitcoiners underestimate the political backlash that they will face if the general public views the policy as a government bailout for a small set of (already affluent) Americans, at the expense of the US taxpayer.'
Sacks pushed back on the idea that any fund would be financed by new taxes, saying more details would come. But as American citizens fret about the price of eggs, any suggestion that Trump is bailing out his crypto-owning backers is unlikely to be popular.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US citizens jailed in LA Ice raids speak out: ‘They came ready to attack'
As two masked men dragged her into an unmarked SUV, Andrea Velez tried to focus on details she might later remember – one man's red shirt, the car's leather seats, a black backpack inside. At 9.20am on 24 June in downtown Los Angeles, the 32-year-old was heading into work at a footwear company when the men in gator masks jumped out of their car and started chasing vendors and other people on the street, she recalled. As people fled, Velez froze and held on to her bag. Suddenly, she recalled, one of the men slammed her to the ground and placed her into his car. The men had 'Police' vests, but otherwise were in plainclothes and didn't identify themselves. She didn't know why they had taken her. The men, it turned out, were Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) deportation officers. They were looking to question people about 'whether they were lawfully present' in the US, an agent later wrote. Velez is a US citizen who grew up in downtown, not far from the incident. 'They just came out ready to attack anyone,' said Velez, in her first interview since her arrest. 'I thought they were kidnapping me.' A day after her arrest, the Department of Justice charged Velez with assaulting an officer, which could carry a 20-year sentence. The claim was shocking to Velez, who is 4ft 11in and said she had not laid hands on anyone. She is one of many southern California residents swept up as the Trump administration has aggressively jailed and prosecuted protesters, as well as civilians who film and object to Ice arrests and bystanders caught up in haphazard raids. Ice detained more than 2,000 immigrants in the region in June. Bill Essayli, the Trump-appointed US attorney for the region, has prosecuted at least 18 people on claims they interfered with immigration arrests, with most defendants accused of assault. Prosecutors have been forced to dismiss at least five of those felony cases, including the one against Velez. The Guardian revealed last week that the justice department also dropped felony assault cases against four anti-Ice demonstrators after officers made false and misleading statements about events captured on film. Before her arrest, Velez was not protesting against Ice – she was simply in the wrong place at the wrong time, she said. The graduate of the local Cal Poly Pomona university and lifelong LA resident said her mother and sister had dropped her off by her office just as Ice officers arrived at the intersection. After she was forced into the Ice agents' car, she spotted Los Angeles police department (LAPD) officers, left the vehicle and ran toward them, she said: 'I thought they would help me.' She told an LAPD officer she thought the men were kidnapping her: 'If I did something wrong, I'd rather have you arrest me. I trust people with uniforms.' Bystander footage taken from a nearby building shows what happened next: an LAPD officer holds on to Velez as one of the Ice agents runs up and handcuffs her. She does not appear to resist, but the Ice officer picks her up and carries her off the ground across the street. In another clip, a witness is heard saying, 'This girl was just standing there … they are causing chaos.' A third video shows LAPD shielding the Ice officers from civilians filming and protesting about her arrest. Velez is seen trying to give her mother's phone number to a bystander. She later learned her mother and 17-year-old sister had witnessed the incident, but felt powerless to intervene. Back in the Ice agents' car, Velez said the officer driving appeared furious about how the incident had played out: 'He was screaming in rage.' She overheard him on the phone discussing 'how many bodies they had gotten', she said, and referring to her as an 'alleged US citizen'. Velez and Luis Hipolito, a 23-year-old man later charged as her co-defendant, were taken to a parking structure. Video of Hipolito's arrest later published by the LA Times showed four agents had aggressively detained him by piling on top of him and using pepper spray. As the two waited to be processed, Velez said she saw his face was swollen, he was having trouble seeing, his shirt was bloody and he appeared to be convulsing and hyperventilating. His requests for medical attention were initially denied, she said: 'He was in pain, but they were like: 'It's no big deal, you will get over it.'' Even as he struggled, he tried to comfort her: 'He was making me feel safe.' Eventually, he was taken away in an ambulance, she said. Meanwhile, she saw ambulances going in and out of the federal jail nearby, which frightened her. She said officers later forced her to pose for a photo where several of them stood in a line holding her with their backs to the camera, an unusual mugshot setup that has since become commonplace for DHS press releases and posts: 'They make it seem like we're really bad criminals, the worst of the worst, when we're just regular people.' Velez was placed in the Metropolitan detention center, the downtown federal jail that has become the site of protests. There, other incarcerated women took care of her. Staff did not give her water and she learned from other residents that she had to buy a cup, but having been detained just hours before, she had no money on her account. She also couldn't buy utensils to eat. One woman on her way out donated her cup and spork to Velez. After two nights in jail, she was brought to court on assault charges. In an affidavit filed by the justice department, Joseph Arko, an agent working for a homeland security taskforce investigating 'immigration crimes', said the Ice officers had stopped in downtown to 'question two individuals about whether they were lawfully present' in the US. As one individual fled, one of the officers alleged Velez 'stepp[ed] into his path and extend[ed] one of her arms in an apparent effort to prevent him from apprehending the male', Arko summarized. The officer claimed she was so 'abrupt', 'he could not stop his momentum' and her arm 'struck' him in the face. Velez was stunned to read the allegations: 'I never hit anyone. I've never hurt anybody, ever. Everyone who knows me knows the kind of person I am. I'm quiet, reserved, always doing the right thing, always following rules.' Sixteen days after her arrest, the justice department moved to dismiss the charges against her. Velez's lawyer, Diane Bass, said she had requested body-worn footage and witness statements before the dismissal: 'I never got them. That tells me they did not have the evidence they needed and this was a false and unlawful arrest. It is a shocking and disgusting travesty of justice, and no human, never mind an American citizen, should ever be treated like that.' The justice department, US attorney's office, Ice and the DHS did not respond to detailed inquiries about Velez's case. A spokesperson for the bureau of prisons, which runs the jail, did not respond to questions about her account, saying in an email its mission is to 'operate facilities that are safe, secure, and humane'. The LAPD said in a statement after Velez's arrest that officers initially responded to the area due to 911 calls about a 'possible kidnapping' and that it was 'not involved' in her detention. The department said its role on scene was 'maintaining order', and a spokesperson last week declined to comment further on her case, pointing to an earlier statement saying the LAPD was 'not involved in civil immigration enforcement'. Other detained citizens are still fighting their charges, including Hipolito, whose attorney did not respond to requests for comment. Adrian Martinez, 20, was jailed on 17 June while immigration officers were conducting 'roving patrol duties' in Pico Rivera, a 90% Latino city in south-east LA. On break outside his job at Walmart, he saw border patrol agents moving to detain an older janitor. The agents, records showed, targeted the custodial worker after he started running away from them. Witness footage shows a masked, plainclothes officer with an assault rifle shoving Martinez, who is heard saying the man they are detaining is a 'hard worker'. At least five officers end up pushing Martinez to the ground and grabbing him by the neck as they force him into their car, the footage shows. Essayli, the US attorney, posted Martinez's photo on social media the following day, saying he was arrested for 'punching a border patrol agent in the face'. The footage does not show him punching an officer. Essayli's office did not, however, charge Martinez with assault, but rather 'conspiracy to impede a federal officer'. The justice department complaint included no reference to punching. Still, Greg Bovino, border patrol chief for parts of southern California, falsely claimed on that Martinez 'caught a federal case for assault'. Essayli's office did not respond to inquiries about Martinez's case. 'I just wanted to speak up for that guy, it was not right, it was like they were kidnapping him,' Martinez told the Guardian. 'What they were doing was wrong. They were bothering a poor old man who was just working … I was just using words and they started attacking me.' Martinez was taken to a parking structure by the federal jail where, he said, he was held for hours. Officers would not let him call his mother, he said. 'They were not believing me when I said I was a US citizen.' He said he was most worried about his family not knowing his whereabouts and anxious about his father's car, which he left at work. When officers interrogated him at the parking structure, they tried to get him to admit to assault, he said. 'I never put my hands on anybody. Why is my own government lying saying I tried to assault someone? It's scary.' Martinez's knee, shoulders and back were injured and bruised from the arrest, made worse by sleeping on a metal bed in jail for three days, he added. Weeks after the incident, KCAL News reported that one of the border patrol agents involved in Martinez's arrest, Isaiah Hodgson, had himself been arrested. The LA district attorney said on 7 July that Hodgson, 29, was off-duty and intoxicated at a restaurant when he entered a woman's bathroom and then refused to leave the business when security told him guns were not allowed on the property. He was charged with several crimes, including resisting arrest, felony battery of an officer and exhibiting a firearm in public. Martinez's attorneys said they were still investigating Hodgson's exact involvement in Martinez's arrest. 'I don't wish bad on him and I pray for his family,' Martinez said of the border patrol agent's arrest. 'But it just shows their abuse of power. He felt like he had a right to have his firearm in a restaurant while he's not even on duty.' Jaime Ruiz, a border patrol spokesperson, said the agency does not comment on pending litigation. Hodgson's attorneys did not respond to inquiries. Ciaran McEvoy, a US attorney's office spokesperson, pointed to an post from Essayli defending the 'great work being done by our amazing federal prosecutors'. His office has filed more than 50 criminal complaints since early June against people accused of assaulting or interfering with immigration officers, and nine of those people have since been indicted by grand juries, Essayli wrote. McEvoy declined to provide a full list of the cases. Essayli's post added: 'When there are reactive arrests, like we had during the riots, it's not uncommon for a complaint to be dismissed so that law enforcement can conduct additional investigation and collect more evidence.' The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, defended Essayli in a statement, calling him a 'friend' and 'champion for law and order who has done superlative work to prosecute rioters' in LA. And Tricia McLaughlin, DHS assistant secretary, added in an email: 'Our agents, officers, and prosecutors will continue to work together to keep Americans safe, and we will follow the facts, evidence, and law.' Even though Martinez never faced assault charges, Walmart terminated him after his arrest, citing 'gross misconduct', records show. He has remained out of work and anxious about his future while the charges loom. Walmart declined to comment. He had hoped to get his truck driving license, but now is unsure if he can. Garrett Miller, one of his attorneys, condemned the US attorney and border patrol officials for making false punching allegations about Martinez and never correcting them: 'They used their platforms for political gain, at Adrian's expense, and he lost his job because of it.' Injuries sustained during his arrest forced Martinez to wear a leg brace for weeks after and he still has pain when he walks, he says. Despite the government crackdown, he said he hoped people continue to 'speak out when something is not right'. After her charges were dismissed, Velez felt some relief, but she said she was still riddled with fear that Ice could target her. She was also shaken by images of the vendors and workers who she saw being detained for deportation: 'These were people just heading into work, going about their days. We don't know where they were being taken, and it just broke my heart that they may never see their families again.' Velez has been working remotely since her arrest, terrified of returning to downtown. She does virtual therapy, no longer goes on morning runs and never leaves home by herself: 'I don't feel safe knowing they can randomly attack and take you.'
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pfizer CEO says pharmaceutical companies want to work with Trump to make medicine more affordable
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla announced that major pharmaceutical companies are ready to work with the Trump administration to make medicines more affordable and directly available to consumers. This move comes after Trump demanded that 17 drugmakers expand direct-to-consumer options and lower prices to match those in other industrialized countries, threatening to use 'every tool' if they did not comply. Pfizer and Bristol Myers Squibb have already revealed plans to offer their blood thinner Eliquis at a lower price online, building on Pfizer's existing direct-to-consumer telehealth and prescription services. Other companies, such as Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, are also exploring direct access for their obesity drugs, aiming to bypass pharmacy benefit managers. Despite potential sector-specific tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, which could escalate to 250 percent, Pfizer expects to meet its financial forecasts, though experts have refuted Trump's claims of significant drug price reductions.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stanford University laying off hundreds due to Trump cuts
Stanford University is set to lay off hundreds of employees, citing 'changes in federal policy' under the Trump administration. The elite California private school laid off 363 employees last week, a university spokesperson told The Independent. The move affected roles across departments, including those working in administration, research, alumni relations and campus operations, according to the San Francisco Chronicle. 'The university is providing support resources as well as layoff benefits to eligible employees,' school officials said in a July 31 statement. 'Nonetheless, these are difficult actions that affect valued colleagues and friends who have made important contributions to Stanford.' The layoffs are the result of 'ongoing economic uncertainty' and 'anticipated changes in federal policy — such as reductions in federal research funding and an increase in the excise tax on investment income,' according to a letter from Stanford Vice President for Human Resources Elizabeth Zacharias reviewed by the Chronicle. President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' — which he signed into law last month — increased Stanford's endowment tax from 1.4 percent to 21 percent, the Chronicle reports. Stanford's $37.6 billion endowment is among the largest in the country. Stanford also lost a significant amount of federal research funding as agencies like the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation are impacted by ongoing funding freezes, the Chronicle reports. Stanford has also been forced to make a $140 million reduction in its general budget for the upcoming year, according to a June statement from the school's president and provost. The school officials cited 'significant budget consequences from federal policy changes.' 'These changes include reductions in federal research support and an increase in the endowment tax,' the statement reads. The Trump administration has taken aim at higher education this year, and some schools have made deals with the administration to ensure federal funding isn't withheld. For instance, Columbia University in New York City agreed to pay the Trump administration a $200 million settlement last month to prevent funding cuts over claims that the elite school failed to combat antisemitism. Columbia University has not admitted wrongdoing and 'does not agree with the government's conclusion that it violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act,' according to a July 23 statement from the school. 'We are not, however, denying the very serious and painful challenges our institution has faced with antisemitism,' the statement continues. 'For these reasons, we took several important corrective steps in March, many of which are in this agreement, including a new provision for a liaison to the Jewish community, situated in University Life.'
