The golden Trump Phone is almost certainly not made in the US
Not content with a real estate empire and the presidency of the United States, the Trump family is wading into the phone wars like it's 2011 with a shiny gold monstrosity called the T1, the marketing of which leans extensively on the narrowest idea of patriotism. Beyond the immediate question — why do this, like, at all? — the T1 invites a question that's perhaps easier to interrogate: How can any modern smartphone claim to be made in the US?
Over the last 40 years America has led a massive globalization effort that allows companies to pick and choose where they develop and build hardware that finds its way back to the US. The best chips to run your phone are built in Taiwan — regardless of the phone maker. The best phones are built in China, India or Vietnam. The displays are often produced in Korea. The glass is actually made in America. The sand that will eventually become the silicon wafers chips are made of is sourced here too. But most phones, and virtually all smartphones found in America, are globally produced devices. An all-American golden Trump phone is about as fantastical as the big, beautiful bill's promise to make all Americans rich.
The phone has reasonable specs for the $499 price tag. There's a 6.8-inch AMOLED display with a punch hole for the 16MP front camera, 12GB of RAM, 256GB of storage. Its rear array of cameras includes a 50MP main camera, a 2MP depth sensor and a 2MP macro lens. Notably lacking in the spec list is the processor. Perhaps that's a typo, or perhaps that's because nearly all smartphone processors are made overseas.
Multiple analysts have suggested the Trump T1 is actually a reskinned Revvl 7. That's a $200 Android phone currently offered by T-Mobile in the US and manufactured by Wingtech, a (partially) state-owned Chinese phone maker and semiconductor manufacturer. However the specs and outer appearance better align with the €180 (also about $200) Coolpad X100, which is mentioned as a 'related phone' to the T1 on the smartphone database GSMArena . Similarly, that phone has a 6.8-inch AMOLED display, 256GB of internal storage and up to 12GB of RAM, but its cameras are significantly higher resolution and it has a flash built into its camera module. It, like the Revvl 7, is manufactured in China by a Chinese company.
Don Jr and Eric Trump haven't said if the T1 is a reskin of the Revvl 7 — or any other existing phone for that matter — instead insisting their device will eventually be made in the US. (Note that word 'eventually.' It is doing a lot of work.) The Trump brothers have chosen their words like lawyers are watching, likely because the Made in America claim they're making isn't just marketing, it's enforceable by the Federal Trade Commission. You can't just slap it on a crummy Chinese phone and call it a day.
'The FTC actually has very strict regulations on how you label products and country of origin,' Todd Weaver, CEO and Founder of Purism, told me. Purism is an American company that produces its own operating system to compete with iOS and Android and is the only company in the US which can actually use any part of the 'Made in America' claim for its phones. In our call he sounded a little irritated about the T1's claims, but was eager to explain how the labeling works. The Purism Liberty Phone. (Purism)
'I don't make that claim and I manufacture all the electronics in the US,' Weaver said. Purism had to go with a non-phone processor for the Liberty phone because no company based in America makes phone processors (yet). Even with a non-standard chip, Purism's processor comes from its supplier's fabrication in South Korea. He found it financially challenging to source a chassis in the US as well. An unqualified Made in America claim would mean that a phone was not just assembled here, but every single part of the device was manufactured here as well. That's an essentially impossible task for phone makers. It's why Purism's phone has the label Made in America Electronics instead. Weaver could get a lot, but not all of the parts manufactured in the US.
While it's certainly theoretically possible the Trump brothers could take all the wealth they've been amassing since their father reentered the Oval Office to brute force a more American phone, it isn't happening any time soon. The Trump T1, which they claim will be sold in September, cannot carry that label, at least not legally. (Whether the current FTC would prosecute the president's sons for misrepresenting the T1 is another story entirely.) We've reached out to the FTC for comment and as of publishing have not heard back.
So what about other pro-American manufacturing labels? The Trump Brothers have hinted that the phones will be assembled here — even if the Revvl 7 (or Coolpad X100) is currently not. Those labels are also governed by the FTC and they're not easy to get around. A simple "screwdriver" operation (importing almost entirely foreign parts and fitting them together in the States) is even provided by the FTC as a straightforward example of consumer deception.
That's a lesson we all learned when Apple promised to start building computers domestically again. In 2019 it announced a big factory in Texas under pressure from the Trump administration to bring more manufacturing jobs to America. But even though people are putting screws into Mac Pros stateside, those can't carry the label 'Assembled in America.' Instead they're 'Designed in America' and a 'Product of Thailand' with 'Final Assembly in America.' It's a global device.
Electronics are global devices and no amount of gold gilding or misleading claims from the sons of American presidents can change that. The best estimates from manufacturing experts claim it will be half a decade, minimum, before Apple or Samsung could be building phones in the US.
Weaver has already mused about reporting the Trump brothers for claiming their gold-gilded T1 is Made in America, and noted that anyone (even you, dear reader) could do the same. If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn commission.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
5 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump on who should be prosecuted for Iran intel leaks
All times eastern Maria Bartiromo's Wall Street FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Senate convenes over President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'


Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump's pro-Bibi pressure campaign
President Trump is pressuring Israel to halt Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial, dangling an implicit threat to suspend military assistance if the "witch hunt" continues. Why it matters: U.S. presidents have long treated aid to Israel as a sacrosanct, bipartisan commitment. Trump's unprecedented intervention appeared to tie the security of 10 million Israelis to the criminal prosecution of one man. Trump's Truth Social post — in which he claimed the "political witch hunt" would interfere with negotiations with Iran and Hamas — was his second in three days about Netanyahu's trial. It followed a decision by Israeli judges to reject Netanyahu's request to delay the hearing by two weeks, defying his argument that foreign policy and national security demands warranted a postponement. What they're saying:"It is terrible what they are doing in Israel to Bibi Netanyahu," Trump wrote. "He is a War Hero, and a Prime Minister who did a fabulous job working with the United States to bring Great Success in getting rid of the dangerous Nuclear threat in Iran." Trump claimed Netanyahu is "in the process of negotiating a Deal with Hamas, which will include getting the Hostages back," and questioned how Israel could force its leader "to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING." He then warned: "The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this." The extraordinary statement was widely interpreted as an effort to leverage U.S. military assistance to pressure Israel to cancel the trial. Trump posted again on Truth Social at around 1 a.m. ET Sunday morning, writing "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!" Netanyahu shared Trump's Saturday post calling for canceling his trial on X: "Thank you again, @realDonaldTrump. Together, we will make the Middle East Great Again!" Reality check: The negotiations between Israel and Hamas remain stalled — in part because of Netanyahu's refusal to commit to ending the war in Gaza. Iran, meanwhile, has yet to indicate it's ready for direct talks with the U.S. It's unclear how Netanyahu's trial would meaningfully interfere with either track. Catch up quick: Netanyahu is standing trial for charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust in three separate cases. He's accused of accepting more than $200,000 in gifts from wealthy businessmen, and of granting regulatory benefits worth hundreds of millions of dollars to a telecom tycoon in exchange for favorable news coverage. The trial has stretched on for four years, in part due to Netanyahu's repeated legal delay tactics. The former head of Israel's Shin Bet has accused the prime minister of trying to use executive powers to stall the case. Driving the news: On Wednesday, Trump publicly called for Netanyahu's corruption trial to be "cancelled immediately" — or for Netanyahu to be granted a pardon. It was the first time he had made such a direct demand. Trump has rarely spoken publicly about the trial. Just one day earlier, he appeared visibly frustrated with Netanyahu after both Israel and Iran violated a ceasefire brokered by the president. But with that in the rearview mirror, the two leaders are now gearing up for a victory lap over the successful U.S.-Israeli bombing of Iran's nuclear program. Behind the scenes: A White House official told Axios that Trump's first post on Wednesday — written aboard Air Force One — was prompted by a news article he read on his way back to Washington from the NATO summit in The Hague. The official described the post as spontaneous and not coordinated with Netanyahu. "The president read in the article that Bibi has to be in court on Monday and thought it's crazy," the official said. "He identified with what Bibi is going through and decided to write something about it." But in Israel, many saw Trump's move as part of a broader strategy. Opposition leader Yair Lapid said the former president shouldn't interfere in a legal proceeding in an independent, sovereign country. "But I guess he is doing it as compensation to Bibi in return for ending the war in Gaza. It sounds like a Trump thing to do," Lapid told Israeli news site Ynet. Between the lines: Netanyahu's warm response only fueled suspicions of coordination. The prime minister — who previously accused Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden of meddling in Israeli politics — praised Trump's intervention and amplified it through official statements and social media posts. "This is Trump's emperor complex at work," former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro told Axios. "He thinks if he drops bombs on Fordow and gives aid to Israel, he gets to dictate to Israeli judges how to rule. We've probably never seen a more blatant U.S. intervention in Israel's internal affairs. It won't work," Shapiro said. What to watch: The only official with the authority to cancel Netanyahu's trial is Israel's attorney general, Gali Baharav-Miara. The odds of her doing so are virtually zero.


Axios
11 minutes ago
- Axios
Gen Z and millennials push into politics
A growing number of Gen Z and millennial Americans are seeking elected office — campaigning on the issues that matter most to them and their peers. Why it matters: The 119th Congress is the third oldest in U.S. history, and both of America's most recent presidents set records as the oldest ever inaugurated. As leadership skews older, young candidates from both parties are running to get their voices heard in local, state and federal government. The big picture: 74 millennials and one Gen Z-er were elected to the 119th Congress in November — making up 16% of the House and 8% of the Senate. Members of Gen Z also entered state and local office races. Case in point: Thousands of young progressives have expressed interest in running for office since Zohran Mamdani 's New York City mayoral primary last week. Between Tuesday's primary and Friday afternoon, about 2,700 people signed up with Run for Something, an organization that supports young Democrats running for down-ballot office. Mamdani's race modeled "what will make young people such compelling candidates in the future," says Amanda Litman, Run for Something co-founder and president. "A real fluency with the internet, a real strong-held value system, the ability to be authentically themselves." Zoom in: If elected in November, 33-year-old Mamdani would be the youngest among the mayors currently serving in the 50 largest American cities, according to an Axios analysis. He'd also be New York City's second-youngest mayor, after Hugh J. Grant in the late 19th century. His campaign — built more for TikTok than TV — resonated with young voters around the city and brought them to the polls. The other side: Run Gen Z, an organization that backs young conservatives running for office, is galvanizing the next generation of leaders on the right. The group has helped politicians like 22-year-old Wyatt Gable, who was elected to North Carolina's House of Representatives in November, and 26-year-old Amber Hulse, who just won a seat in South Dakota's senate. Gable told the Washington Post one of his priorities is implementing home economics education for high school students so they can graduate with practical skills, like financial literacy. The intrigue: Candidate age is becoming an increasingly important issue for American voters. 67% of U.S. adults in a February YouGov poll said they believed maximum age limits should be imposed on elected officials. Democratic respondents were more likely than Republicans to support age limits. Reality check: Americans 62 and older still run for office at much higher rates than 18- to 25-year-olds, Tufts' Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement notes.