Public meeting to be held Friday on future of Damen Silos on Southwest Side
Public meeting to be held discussing Damen Silos on Southwest Side
Public meeting to be held discussing Damen Silos on Southwest Side
Public meeting to be held discussing Damen Silos on Southwest Side
A public meeting to discuss the future of the Damen Silos will take place Friday evening on the city's Lower West Side.
The Illinois landmark said the grain silos were built in 1906 and are one of the last remaining monuments to Chicago's historic dominance in the national grain industry.
The city's Department of Public Health will be holding the meeting tonight at 6 p.m. at Arturo Velasquez Westside Technical Institute in Little Village.
They are set to discuss safe demolition, oversight, dust control measures, and other protections.
However, organizations, including the McKinley Park Development, want to stop the demolition.
They have a petition going to make the silos a public park and festival grounds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
36 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Carolyn Hax chat: My teen feels pressured by her boyfriend's pushy mom
More from Carolyn Hax From the archive: Her daughter acts differently around boyfriend. Cause for alarm? Wife has a bad feeling about becoming the breadwinner Newfound sobriety causes social anxiety How to tell daughter-in-law to put down her phone Irked by iTunes account with ex-husband's last name More: Sign up for Carolyn's email newsletter to get her column delivered to your inbox each morning. Carolyn has a Q&A with readers on Fridays. Read the most recent live chat here. The next chat is June 27 at 12 p.m. Resources for getting help. Frequently asked questions about the column. Chat glossary
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
14 Signs You're A 'Fixer' In Relationships
It's a pattern you've likely seen in your friendships, your family, and most acutely, your romantic entanglements. You're the one who wants to fix things, to smooth over the rough edges and turn every frown into a smile. On the surface, that sounds admirable, even noble. But dig a little deeper, and you might find that this desire to 'fix' can signal something more complex: a need for control, a discomfort with vulnerability, or an aversion to conflict. Here are 14 signs that you might be a 'fixer' in your relationships. It's as if you're equipped with X-ray vision that only sees the hidden gem beneath the rough exterior of the person you're dating. You pride yourself on your ability to spot potential where others see flaws. But there's a thin line between believing in someone's capacity for growth and ignoring their current reality. The danger lies in investing more in who they could be rather than who they are, as cautioned by psychologist Dr. John Mayer in Psychology Today. Your urge to nurture their growth often leaves you taking on the role of an unpaid life coach. While intentions are pure, it can create an imbalance where their needs eclipse yours. In this dynamic, you risk feeling unfulfilled, as your emotional energy is poured into a future that might never materialize. This potential-focused mindset can become a smokescreen for avoiding introspection on your own needs and desires. A crisis, big or small, sends you into overdrive. Your partner mentions a problem at work or a spat with a friend, and before they know it, you're armed with a plan of action. Offering solutions becomes your default setting, but it often overshadows a much-needed empathetic ear. In wanting to fix, you might inadvertently dismiss the emotional depth of the situation. This constant problem-solving can drown out the simplicity of just being present. Often, people just need to feel heard and validated, not handed a checklist of next steps. When you jump to solutions, it signals that their feelings might not be valid unless they're actionable. Remember, sometimes the most effective response is a pause, a nod, and a reassuring presence. You express affection through doing, often going above and beyond what's needed or even asked. This can feel overwhelming for partners who might interpret these gestures as controlling rather than caring. According to Dr. Gary Chapman, author of "The 5 Love Languages," your partner must understand your love language, but you must also adapt to theirs. Acts of service become problematic when an expectation of reciprocity or gratitude fuels them. If your gestures are met with indifference, it can lead to feelings of resentment. Ensure that your actions stem from genuine care, not a subconscious scorecard. Love is not a transactional affair; it thrives in mutual recognition and understanding. In your world, conflict equates to failure, so you dodge it at all costs. You smooth things over, turning disagreements into a performance of peace rather than a productive dialogue. What feels like diplomacy is often just the art of sweeping things under the rug. Avoiding conflict doesn't make it go away; it just lets it fester until it finds a more destructive outlet. Yet, growth doesn't happen in comfort zones. Productive conflict can be a catalyst for change, deepening intimacy and understanding. Facing issues head-on, rather than smoothing them over, builds a resilient foundation. Embrace the discomfort; it's where the real work—and the real connection—begins. If your partner is upset, you feel it's your duty to fix it, as if their emotions are a direct reflection of your care. This hyper-responsibility often leads to emotional burnout, enveloping you in a cloud of anxiety. According to a study in the Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, taking on emotional responsibility can breed codependency, stifling personal growth. Your partner is not a problem to be solved, and emotional states are not puzzles to be pieced together. By taking on their emotional burden, you inadvertently steal their chance to navigate and learn from their emotional landscape. Trust that they can handle their feelings; it's not your job to be their emotional janitor. It's okay to offer support without taking ownership. There's a pattern in your romantic history, a string of partners who need a boost, a guide, a rescuer. They come to you with their broken hearts, their untapped potential, and you happily take on the task. But this savior complex can create an unhealthy dynamic where you always play the hero. The allure of saving someone can distract you from your own needs and growth. This tendency can foster dependency, where your partner relies on you more than they should. Over time, this can stunt their personal development, creating a cycle where neither of you truly flourishes. Relationships are partnerships, not rescue missions. When both parties are equally strong, the relationship is more stable and fulfilling. Your fixer mentality often leads you into murky waters where boundaries blur. You find yourself over-committing, driven by an irresistible pull to save the day. Dr. Terri Orbuch, a relationship expert, highlights in her research that maintaining boundaries is crucial for healthy relationships. Overstepping these boundaries can leave you drained and, paradoxically, create distance rather than closeness. When your life becomes intertwined with solving your partner's issues, it obliterates the space needed for individual growth. You risk erasing your own identity, morphing into their shadow rather than standing alongside them as an equal. Healthy relationships flourish when both partners retain their individuality. Remember, you're not their lifeline; you're their partner. Friends, family, even acquaintances, flock to you when they're in need of counsel. You pride yourself on being the wise one, the problem solver, the oracle of guidance. While it feels good to be needed, this constant role can be exhausting and can overshadow your own needs. You might find yourself giving more than you're getting, leaving little room for your own emotional expression. There's a risk that your identity becomes entangled with being the solver rather than simply being. When you're always the go-to, you can become isolated, missing out on the reciprocal aspect of relationships. It's okay to step back and let others hold space for you. Remember, even the wise need wisdom and support sometimes. You're drawn to partners who seem to need coaxing out of their emotional shells. Their aloofness is a challenge, a puzzle to be solved, and you relish the task of drawing them out. But emotional unavailability is not simply a barrier to be broken down. It often masks deeper issues that require self-exploration rather than external intervention. This dynamic can leave you feeling perpetually unsatisfied, as your emotional needs remain unmet. The thrill of the chase can distract from the absence of true intimacy. Relationships should be reciprocal, where emotional availability flows both ways. Seek partners who are present and willing to engage in emotional depth from the beginning. You wear your resilience like a badge, often positioning yourself as the strong, unwavering pillar in your relationship. This self-imposed role can become a burden, as it leaves little room for vulnerability or asking for help. Being strong doesn't mean being invincible; it's about knowing when to lean on others. Constantly being the strong one can create a relational imbalance, where your needs are perpetually on the back burner. It can also distance you from your partner, who might feel excluded from your internal world. Embrace strength in vulnerability; it can foster deeper connection and create space for mutual support. Ending relationships feels like admitting defeat, so you hold on tightly, believing that with enough time, things will improve. This clinging is rooted in a belief that change is always possible, that love can redeem all flaws. Yet, holding on can sometimes cause more harm than good, trapping both partners in a cycle of unhappiness. Letting go doesn't mean giving up; it means recognizing when a relationship has run its course. It takes courage to acknowledge that not every connection is meant to last. By releasing what no longer serves you, you open up space for healthier, more fulfilling partnerships. Remember, sometimes the greatest act of love is knowing when to walk away. Your optimism often blinds you to glaring issues, as you focus instead on potential and possibilities. You rationalize red flags with endless justifications, convinced that love will conquer all. But ignoring these signals can lead to a toxic environment, where problems are swept under the rug until they can no longer be ignored. Acknowledging red flags is not cynicism; it's self-preservation. It's about knowing your worth and setting standards for how you deserve to be treated. Relationships should enhance your life, not complicate it. Trust your intuition; it's often more perceptive than your hopeful heart. The fixer in you equates being alone with being unfulfilled, and so you leap from one relationship to the next. This perpetual search for companionship can mask deeper insecurities about self-worth. Being single is not a flaw to be fixed; it's an opportunity for self-discovery and growth. Rushing into relationships can hinder personal development, as you prioritize others' needs over your own self-exploration. True fulfillment comes from within, not from another person. Embrace solitude as a space to understand yourself better. A relationship should complement, not complete, your life. As someone who relishes solving problems, asking for help feels like admitting weakness. You've built an identity around being the reliable one, the problem solver, the fixer. But carrying the weight of the world alone is neither sustainable nor healthy. There's strength in vulnerability, in admitting that you can't do it all. By reaching out for help, you allow others the opportunity to support you, deepening the bonds of your relationships. It's a reminder that you're human, deserving of the same care and attention you so freely give. Let others in, and discover the beauty of shared burdens and mutual support.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
As Wirecutter's Mattress Reviewer, I Sleep for a Living. It's Harder Than It Sounds.
Before we call in mattresses to test in person, we narrow down a list of hundreds of potential contenders. To do this, we build massive spreadsheets and sort them for about a dozen key specifications depending on the kind of mattress we're testing, such as memory-foam densities, polyfoam densities, coil counts, coil gauge, height, weight, materials, and price, to name just a few. Foam density is one of the most important factors we consider before we start testing, and it's a good example of how these specs help us focus our testing. This metric, expressed in pounds per cubic foot, or PCF, can apply to two kinds of foam used in mattresses. Memory foam is the dense, body-contouring foam that lets you sink into the mattress. Non-memory-foam polyfoam, which is lighter, springier, and less body-contouring than memory foam, is usually used in the mattress's topmost layer or in a transition layer between the top comfort layer and the firmer, more supportive core at the bottom. For both of these foam types, we typically look for denser foams, with a minimum memory-foam density of 3 PCF and a minimum non-memory-foam polyfoam density of 1.8 PCF. Wirecutter journalists visit mattress factories and showrooms. Caira Blackwell, Lisa Fischer, and Hali Potters/ NYT Wirecutter We consider only those mattresses with denser foams for a couple of reasons. First, as we've learned from foam engineers, denser foams are more durable. That means they can withstand years of use without forming those uncomfortable permanent indents and impressions of your body over time. Second, many people who shop for foam mattresses want a certain sensation. The denser the foam, the more you feel like the mattress is hugging you — it melts slowly like butter under your body's weight, and it takes more time to recover when you move. In contrast, a mattress with light-density foams is bouncier and recovers faster than a mattress with denser foams. Other factors that help us narrow the testing field include company return policies and warranties. We don't recommend any mattresses that can't be returned or exchanged. Even though we highly recommend trying a mattress before you buy it, we also understand that doing so isn't always a possibility. (Mattresses all too often end up in landfills because they're difficult to donate or recycle, which is why we hope our vetting helps you avoid a return in the first place.) So we look for manufacturers with return or exchange policies that allow you to try a mattress for at least a month and have warranty coverage for at least 10 years. Last, we consider customer service and online reviews. We don't move forward with testing mattresses that have consistently bad reviews. Some mattress companies have reviews only on their own websites, which makes it hard for us to determine how authentic their online feedback is; when that happens, we also look for any reports to the Better Business Bureau. In going through all of that, we narrow our list of hundreds of mattresses to about half a dozen newcomers to test against our favorites.
