logo
China proposes setting up global AI organization

China proposes setting up global AI organization

NHKa day ago
China's government has proposed the establishment of an organization promoting global cooperation for the development of artificial intelligence.
China's Premier Li Qiang presented the proposal in a speech at an AI conference that began in Shanghai on Saturday.
The foreign ministry said Li stressed the need to strengthen coordination among countries to form a global AI governance framework and rules based on broad consensus, while maintaining the development and safety of the technology.
While short on details, the state-run Xinhua News Agency reported that the government is considering establishing the organization's headquarters in Shanghai. The report also said China welcomes the active participation of other countries in preparing for the establishment of such an organization.
Competition over AI development is heating up mainly between the United States and China. Observers suggest that Beijing aims to take the lead in laying the foundation for international rules.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China detained activist-singer, says Tibetan exile government
China detained activist-singer, says Tibetan exile government

Japan Times

time14 hours ago

  • Japan Times

China detained activist-singer, says Tibetan exile government

A young Tibetan singer and activist has been detained by Chinese authorities, the India-based Central Tibetan Administration said. Tzukte, popularly known as Asang, was taken into custody sometime in early July after he sang a song eulogizing Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, the CTA said in a statement Saturday. The CTA, which functions as a government-in-exile but is not officially recognized by any country, said the arrest was "part of Beijing's broader campaign to suppress Tibetan voices, specially Tibetan artists and writers". China considers Tibet an inalienable part of its territory and has ruled the region with an iron fist since its troops crushed an uprising for autonomy in 1959. Chinese authorities did not respond to a request for comment. "His detention, without charge or information on his whereabouts, violates international human rights norms and underscores China's ongoing assault on freedom of expression, cultural rights, and religious belief in Tibet," the CTA said. Asang, who is in his twenties, is a student of Gebe, a prominent Tibetan singer supporting the Tibetan cause through his music. Earlier this year, Asang reportedly appeared in public in the Ngawa region of Sichuan province with the word "Tibet" written on his forehead — a gesture that drew widespread praise online but also intensified scrutiny from officials. Rights activists have regularly voiced alarm at Beijing's alleged efforts to erase cultural and religious identity in Tibet.

Climate disclosure is advancing — but who's being left behind?
Climate disclosure is advancing — but who's being left behind?

Japan Times

time15 hours ago

  • Japan Times

Climate disclosure is advancing — but who's being left behind?

The global push for climate action is becoming increasingly fragmented. While some countries move forward, others are falling behind — widening a gap that could undermine our collective ability to confront the climate crisis. Under the Trump administration, the United States has seen a clear rollback of climate policy, with many disclosure and regulatory measures reversed or abandoned. The European Union, while sticking to its climate goals, has taken steps to ease compliance burdens for smaller businesses by effectively exempting them. Despite these shifts, global momentum for standardized climate-related disclosure remains strong, reflecting a desire to balance regulatory ambition with economic competitiveness, rather than an abandonment of progress on climate. The International Sustainability Standards Board continues to play a central role. Many countries are considering adopting ISSB's climate disclosure standards mainly for listed companies, which aim to bring consistency and comparability to corporate climate data. In the banking sector, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision has also recently taken steps. In June, it finalized a voluntary climate risk disclosure framework for large banks. But progress depends on one critical factor: the quality of data that banks receive from the companies that they finance. As momentum builds to tackle climate change, a quieter but no less urgent problem is emerging: While many advanced economies and large corporations press forward with ambitious climate action and disclosure frameworks, others face serious capacity constraints. The divide is no longer just about emissions — it's about awareness, resources and fairness in the transition itself. A key driver of this imbalance is 'transition risk' — the financial exposure that companies face as economies move toward decarbonization. These risks stem directly from climate mitigation efforts such as carbon pricing, emissions targets and the transition to renewable energy. While essential, these policies carry economic consequences, especially for companies in carbon-intensive sectors. As investors and regulators increasingly demand transparency, transition risk has become central to financial reporting. The good news is that these risks are becoming easier to quantify. Widely adopted standards like the Greenhouse Gas Protocol allow companies to track their emissions. Climate scenario models from the International Energy Agency, along with carbon price estimates aligned with the 1.5 degrees Celsius target, offer tools to assess financial exposure. These same tools help banks evaluate climate risk within their lending and investment portfolios. The landscape of climate disclosure is expanding rapidly, with various sector-based frameworks, taxonomies, environmental and social governance scoring systems and certification schemes emerging worldwide. But growing sophistication comes with its own challenge. While these tools aim to enhance transparency and combat greenwashing, they risk overwhelming smaller firms and developing countries that lack the institutional or technical capacity to comply. Many companies are being left behind — for lack of means. This is where a global minimum standard becomes essential. Instead of continually raising the bar, we need to develop a baseline that any company or country can realistically meet. Such a standard wouldn't replace more advanced frameworks — it would complement them, creating a more inclusive and equitable foundation for climate accountability. After all, progress that only includes the well-resourced isn't real progress. More importantly, climate risk isn't just about mitigation and transition risk. The other half of the equation — physical risk — is becoming more urgent by the day. Around the world, extreme weather events such as floods, droughts, wildfires and heatwaves are growing more frequent and more severe. These risks are already inflicting major economic and social losses. Yet efforts to adapt — by building resilience to climate impacts — remain underdeveloped, even in advanced economies. Most companies and financial institutions have yet to meaningfully integrate physical risk into their strategies or disclosures. Unlike transition risk, which is concentrated in carbon-intensive sectors, physical risk affects all countries, industries and communities — often in highly localized and variable ways. This makes it harder to define, quantify and standardize adaptation activities. In many vulnerable regions, disaster insurance coverage is shrinking or becoming unaffordable. Insurance markets alone cannot bear the burden. Governments and businesses must work together to build policy and financing frameworks that proactively address physical risk. In the end, climate risk is not just about emissions. It's about exposure, resilience and the ability to act. If we fail to close the capacity gap — on both mitigation and adaptation — we risk building a climate transition that is exclusive, fragmented and ultimately ineffective. Sayuri Shirai is a professor at Keio University and an adviser on sustainable policies at the Asian Development Bank Institute. She was a former policy board member at the Bank of Japan.

Use of deceased's person's savings for cremation allowed without heirs' consent
Use of deceased's person's savings for cremation allowed without heirs' consent

Japan Times

time17 hours ago

  • Japan Times

Use of deceased's person's savings for cremation allowed without heirs' consent

The government has notified municipalities and financial institutions that they are now allowed to use the savings of deceased people to cover burial or cremation fees without their heirs' consent, sources said. This is aimed at reducing the financial burden on municipalities, which have shouldered burial or cremation costs when a deceased person's savings deposits could not be used. The measure comes as the number of people dying alone increases. Reflecting lifestyle changes and other circumstances, the proportion of single-person households in Japan rose from 25.6% in 1995 to 38.0% in 2020. Among elderly people age 65 and over, the share of such households jumped from 5.0% to 12.1%. Over 105,000 people died with no one to take care of their remains between April 2018 and October 2021, according to the internal affairs ministry. Under the current law, burial or cremation costs for people who die alone will be paid using their savings deposits, and any shortfalls will be covered by municipalities. However, whether the deceased person's deposits could be used has depended on coordination between municipalities and financial institutions. Municipalities have been denied access to savings accounts in some cases because there were no heirs, and they were required to submit various documents in other cases. In light of this situation, the welfare ministry has revised the guidelines for handling money left by people who died alone, including a new document format for municipalities to submit to financial institutions. The revised guidelines also state that the heirs' consent is not necessary to withdraw the deceased's deposits to pay burial or cremation fees. The central government has been considering this issue since 34 local governments asked for a clarification of related rules in 2024 as part of decentralization reform.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store