Elon Musk Says He Will Start a New Political Party
'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Mr. Musk wrote on X, his social media website, on Saturday. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.'
Mr. Musk, once a close ally of President Trump's who in recent weeks has repeatedly bickered with him, had not filed paperwork as of Saturday evening for the new party, though he added in a separate post that the America Party would be active in elections 'next year.' Any new party would be required to be disclosed to the Federal Election Commission.
Even as Mr. Musk has proved that he is willing to use his resources to move quickly and dramatically, he also has a long history of not following through on promises.
Mr. Musk, who helped slash government programs and funding by leading the Department of Government Efficiency before publicly feuding with Mr. Trump, had grown incensed by the president's sweeping domestic policy bill. Last month, on social media, he called it a 'disgusting abomination,' adding that it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit' and that 'Congress is making America bankrupt.'
For weeks, Mr. Musk teased that he would start a new political party if the legislation passed, but he had not explicitly stated his intention to do so until Saturday.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The two-party system has been a defining feature of modern American politics, and plenty of moderate billionaires have dreamed of a successful third-party effort for decades. But the barriers to creating a new, influential political party are plentiful, including heavily gerrymandered districts, deep political polarization and onerous state laws, some of which require expensive and complicated ballot-qualification procedures that would most likely challenge even Mr. Musk.
Mr. Musk donated nearly $300 million to Republican candidates in the 2024 election, and his super PAC led Mr. Trump's get-out-the-vote operation in battleground states. But the tech billionaire failed to deliver the G.O.P. a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat this year, even after putting over $20 million into that race.
On Friday, Mr. Musk wrote on X that an initial approach could be to back America Party candidates in just two or three Senate races and between eight and 10 congressional races in next year's midterm elections.
'Given the razor-thin legislative margins,' he wrote, 'that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.'
Tyler Pager contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
10 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Stock Market News Review: SPY, QQQ Stumble as Trump Announces New Tariffs, Pressures Powell to Resign
The S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) whipsawed between positive and negative territory several times on Tuesday. SPY closed in the red while QQQ was able to pull through in the green. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. The market took a turn lower after President Trump announced that more countries would soon receive letters detailing their updated tariff rates. He also said that the August 1 tariff pause deadline would not be extended. So far, the U.S. has sent letters to 14 countries. Trump is also considering a steep tariff on copper imports. 'I believe the tariff on copper, we're going to make it 50%,' said Trump during a Cabinet meeting. Afterward, copper futures surged higher by 17%, marking the highest intraday rise in 37 years. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick added that the tariff could be implemented either later this month or on August 1. If 50% wasn't high enough, Trump announced that he may tariff pharmaceutical imports at a 200% rate. 'They're going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200%,' warned Trump. The tariffs would begin in a year to a year and a half in order to give pharmaceutical companies time to set up shop in the U.S. In addition, Trump also has plans for tariffs on semiconductors and other goods. In a Truth Social post, Trump criticized Fed Chair Jerome Powell for 'whining like a baby about non-existent Inflation for months, and refusing to do the right thing.' Trump added that import prices have fallen lower, citing a study from the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA). Earlier in the day, Trump said that Powell ' should resign immediately.' He also said that he wouldn't be opposed to Congress investigating Powell over the Fed's $2.5 billion Washington, D.C. headquarters renovation. To end on an optimistic note, Goldman Sachs (GS) raised its 2025 SPX price target to 6,600 from 6,100. Bank of America (BAC) tagged along and hiked its target to 6,300 from 5,600. The S&P 500 (SPX) closed with a 0.07% loss while the Nasdaq 100 (NDX) inched higher by 0.07%.
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Supreme Court Clears The Way For Mass Federal Layoffs. What It Means For Workers Now
Protesting federal layoffs Today the U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned order that allows the Trump administration to resume large-scale layoffs of federal workers. This action lifts a lower court injunction that had temporarily blocked the administration's plan. While the Court did not rule on the legality of the layoffs, the decision allows the administration to move forward while litigation continues. The executive order, issued in February 2025, directs federal agencies to prepare for 'large-scale reductions in force,' or RIFs. It is part of a broader effort to eliminate what the administration describes as wasteful and unnecessary federal programs. A companion memo outlined a 4-to-1 attrition policy, allowing only one hire for every four employee departures. Tens of thousands of federal workers have already lost their jobs or taken deferred resignation packages. Although the White House has not confirmed a specific figure, estimates from watchdog organizations suggest that more than 75,000 federal employees have been affected. Agencies impacted include the Departments of Agriculture, Veterans Affairs, Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency. In May, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston blocked the administration from continuing the layoffs without congressional approval. She cited significant risks to critical government services, including food safety and healthcare for veterans. A panel from the Ninth Circuit affirmed that injunction, describing the administration's approach as sweeping and legally questionable. The Supreme Court's latest decision lifts that block, at least temporarily. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the majority. She argued that the Court was acting too early in the legal process and warned of lasting consequences. 'This executive action promises mass employee terminations, widespread cancellation of federal programs and services, and the dismantling of much of the Federal Government as Congress has created it,' Jackson wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor concurred with the majority but noted that the lower courts are still responsible for determining whether the layoffs comply with the law. 'The plans themselves are not before this Court,' she wrote. 'We thus have no occasion to consider whether they can and will be carried out consistent with the constraints of law.' The decision has introduced uncertainty into the lives of federal workers. Tom Spiggle, founder of The Spiggle Law Firm and author of Fired? Afraid You Might Be?, said the ruling could have significant consequences for individual careers and livelihoods. 'This isn't just about policy debates in Washington,' Spiggle said. 'It's about people losing access to steady work, benefits, and a career they've built. Many federal employees are asking whether they have any rights in this process.' Spiggle emphasized that not all layoffs are legally permissible, even during a broad reorganization. 'If someone was targeted for dismissal because of a protected characteristic such as age, disability, or past whistleblowing activity, then that may be illegal,' he said. He advised affected workers to document events carefully and consider speaking with an employment attorney if they suspect unfair treatment. 'In some cases, reductions in force can be used to disguise unlawful discrimination,' Spiggle explained. The administration argues that the president does not need additional authorization from Congress to conduct agency-wide layoffs. Attorney General Pam Bondi praised the Supreme Court's order, saying it 'stopped lawless lower courts from restricting President Trump's authority over federal personnel.' Critics, including labor unions and several local governments, argue the opposite. In a joint statement, a coalition of plaintiffs said, 'This decision has dealt a serious blow to our democracy and puts services that the American people rely on in grave jeopardy.' The administration's actions now return to Judge Illston's courtroom, where constitutional and statutory questions about executive authority will continue to be litigated. Spiggle said employees should act quickly if they believe they have been targeted unfairly. 'You only have a limited window to file claims with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Sometimes you have as short as 180 days from the date of the adverse action,' he noted. Tom Spiggle noted that resources are available to help workers estimate the value of potential employment claims. 'Even if you aren't ready to file a case, understanding what your claim might be worth can help you make smart decisions,' he said. For now, federal employees across the country are left waiting, unsure of when or if the next round of cuts will come.
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
President Trump says he'll attend Club World Cup final at MetLife Stadium
United States President Donald Trump will be at the Club World Cup final on Sunday. Speaking with reporters at a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Trump confirmed his plans to attend the 3 p.m. final at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. The match will pit Chelsea, 2-0 winners over Fluminense on Tuesday, against either Real Madrid or Paris Saint-Germain. Advertisement 'I'll be going the game,' he told reporters at the White House, after his nearly two-hour meeting. The confirmation comes a day after FIFA revealed that the organization opened a New York office at Trump Tower ahead of the men's World Cup next summer. Trump and FIFA president Gianni Infantino have forged a closed relationship that has become more visible following's Trump re-election. Infantino was there for Trump's victory rally in Washington, D.C., and also at his inauguration. He has described the two as having a 'great friendship.' Trump was president when FIFA awarded the 2026 World Cup to the United States, Mexico and Canada back in 2018. He resumed power in time to be at the helm of the co-host nation next year. Infantino was at an event at Trump Tower on Monday to launch a five-day exhibition of the Club World Cup trophy when he announced that FIFA would be moving in. 'We have to be in New York – not just for the FIFA Club World Cup this year and the FIFA World Cup next year – we have to be in New York as well when it comes to where our offices are based,' Infantino said at the event, as Trump's son, Eric, stood beside him. He made sure to thank President Trump, 'who is a big fan of soccer.' Infantino has praised Trump as a staunch supporter of FIFA and its many events taking place in the United States. Last week, Trump's 'big, beautiful' budget bill included a $625 million line item for security funding for next summer's World Cup. The FIFA head has spent the last year visiting the White House and the president's Florida base Mar-a-Lago on numerous occasions. He accompanied Trump on a recent tour of the Gulf, a trip Infantino prioritized over FIFA's annual congress in Paraguay in May. The decision drew sharp criticism from European football chiefs, who staged a dramatic walkout. Advertisement So, it's not surprising that Trump would be present at the Club World Cup final, given his close ties to Infantino. Last month, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy told reporters that he also invited Trump to the tournament's championship match. '(I) invited him to the Club World Cup final,' Murphy said during a brief press availability at Liberty State Park, exactly one year before the start of the 2026 World Cup. He joked, 'I'm not sure he could come.' Turns out, Trump would. Before Trump's press availability ended on Tuesday, a reporter asked if he'd be bringing the trophy to the game on Sunday. The president quipped: 'Yeah, I'm going to deliver it. I have it in my office.' He then smiled. While it seems fair to assume that Trump was referring to the Club World Cup trophy on display at Trump Tower, he could have been making a joking reference to the replica World Cup trophy he's displayed previously in the White House.
