
Genes, environment or special bond? Why some twins talk, think in unison
By Jeffrey Craig and Nancy Segal
An interview with Paula and Bridgette Powers – identical twins who witnessed their mother's carjacking – recently went viral. The way they spoke and gestured in unison has captivated global audiences.
Genetically, identical twins are clones. They result from the splitting of an early embryo, meaning they share the same genes.
In contrast, fraternal twins are the result of two eggs being fertilised by two different sperm. On average they share 50% of their genes – the same as any siblings who share both their biological mother and father.
So, when identical twins talk and gesture in unison (known as synchrony), is it down to genes? The answer can be complicated.
Genes aren't the only influence on looks, language and like-minded thinking. Let's break down the factors that might lead some twins to speak – and apparently think – in unison.
Almost all twins, even 'identical' ones, show some differences in physical, mental and emotional traits. They also regard themselves as distinct individuals and typically don't like being referred to as 'the twins'.
Yet we know most people naturally mimic the way those close to them speak and move, even without realising it. This phenomenon is called automatic mimicry and may be part of healthy social development, helping people synchronise behaviours and share emotions.
For identical twins who grow up in the same home, school and community, the effect of a shared environment and close bond may be particularly intense.
Paula and Bridgette Powers, for example, have shared an environment: not only the same parents, home and upbringing, but also the same job, running a bird rescue charity.
Twins may know each other so well they can intuitively sense what the other twin is about to say — and may feel like their brains are in sync. The Powers sisters have explained: our brains must think alike at the same time.
In contrast, twins who grow up apart share many personality traits, but without years of shared interaction they are less likely to develop synchronised speech or mirrored behaviours. However, they do display many of the same unusual habits and idiosyncrasies.
Studying identical and fraternal twins separated at birth can help us unravel how much of our behaviours – intelligence, personality and temperament – are influenced by genes and environment.
Even when identical twins grow up apart, they tend to closely resemble one another – not only physically, but in their personality, interests and behaviours. Fraternal twins, in general, are much less alike. This tells us genes matter.
One of us (Nancy) was a researcher with the Minnesota Study of Twins Raised Apart, which lasted from 1979 to 1999 and looked at more than 100 sets of twins (and triplets) separated at birth and raised apart. Twins were separated for various reasons, such as the stigma of single motherhood, inadequate family resources and maternal death.
The study comprehensively examined factors affecting a wide range of psychological, physical and medical traits. Researchers wanted to understand the impact of differences in their life histories on both identical and fraternal twins, reared apart and how they affected the current similarities and differences between them.
A striking finding was identical twins raised apart are as similar in personality as identical twins raised together. For example, the Minnesota researchers found little difference in traits such as wellbeing and aggression, whether identical twins were raised together or apart.
This shows genes play an important role in shaping our personality. Genes also affect the way we process speech and language.
Sharing identical genes may mean identical twins also respond to situations in similar ways. This is because their brains lead them to behave in comparable ways. This genetic closeness, which underlies their behavioural resemblance, explains why they may independently say or do the same thing, without any need for a mystical explanation.
The Minnesota study also found when identical twins were reunited they formed closer relationships with each other than reunited fraternal twins did. This suggests perceptions of similarity in behaviour might draw people together and help keep them connected.
We now know genes and environment each account for half the person-to-person differences in personality. However, the life events we individually experience remain the most important factor shaping how our unique traits are expressed and who we ultimately become.
Parents of identical twins may be left baffled as their children, even as toddlers, seem to communicate through babbles and gestures that no one else can understand.
Each twin pair has their own way of communicating. Twins' private speech, also called idioglossia, cryptophasia or a 'secret language', refers to verbal and nonverbal exchanges most other people don't understand. This is different to synchronised speech.
Private speech is displayed by about 40% of twins. However, estimates vary wildly – ranging from as low as 2% to as high as 47%. That's mainly because researchers define and measure it differently.
Private speech usually fades as children age, at about three years of age. But some twins continue to use it into early childhood.
Twins continue to fascinate us. That is clear in the wealth of media attention they receive, their popularity in scientific studies, and their presence in myths and legends across all continents.
Perhaps it is because when we see identical twins who look and act so much alike, it challenges our belief that we are all unique.
But even identical twins are not exact replicas of one another. Genetic changes, events in the womb, and/or life experiences can conspire to create differences between them.
Nevertheless, most identical twins are more alike and socially closer than any other pair of people on the planet.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
21 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
No more free treatment via health card
The Punjab Health Initiative Management Committee has officially ended free treatment under the health card programme across all public hospitals in the province, including Rawalpindi, effective from July 1, 2025. A formal circular notification has been issued to this effect. The provincial health department has directed medical superintendents of public hospitals, district health officers, and heads of district health authorities across Punjab not to accept any documents related to free treatment from the start of the new fiscal year. The relevant insurance company will also cease accepting any hospital documents for free medical services under the health card scheme from July 1. Ongoing treatments under the programme are considered terminated starting today. In response to the directive, all government hospitals in the Rawalpindi region have begun discharging patients who were admitted under the health card scheme. Patients have been advised to arrange funds for surgeries, dialysis, and cardiac procedures, including stent placements.


CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
Tennis ball-size hail, 70 mph wind gusts possible in Northern Colorado Sunday
Severe storms possible in Denver and Colorado Plains after sunny start Severe storms possible in Denver and Colorado Plains after sunny start Severe storms possible in Denver and Colorado Plains after sunny start A Severe Thunderstorm Watch is in effect for portions of northern Colorado until 9 p.m. Sunday. A few storms may become intense, with the potential for: Hail up to the size of a tennis ball Wind gusts up to 70 mph Frequent lightning CBS Storms are expected to develop early Sunday afternoon, gaining strength as they move east across the plains. Most storms will exit the state by around 9 p.m. Flash flooding is also a concern, especially for areas east of Denver International Airport.


Daily Mirror
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Love Island fans urge Islander to 'go home' after surprise comment
Love Island fans tell Conor to follow Megan out of the villa and 'go home' after he asked her to wait for him after she was voted as the least favourite girl and dumped Love Island fans told Conor to follow Megan home after she was dumped from the island in Friday's episode. After days of back and forth, Megan and Conor finally decided to give it a go and focus on their connection, however, this didn't last long as Megan was brutally dumped from the villa. Conor was shocked and upset as soon as Megan's name was called, and he shed a few tears as he said his goodbyes. Fans have since been left confused as Conor asked Megan to wait for him while he remained in the villa, with many fans telling him to 'go home' if he really does like her. One fan took to x, formally known as Twitter, and said: 'ffs he cared that much, he didn't go with her', while another asked: 'Why didn't Connor leave w her then??'. A third penned: 'I ain't crying. he could have gone with her', while a fourth added: 'Don't ask her to wait,..leave with her'. As the episode continued, Conor said he didn't know if he would find another connection like the one he had with Megan, which further confused fans. Conor said: 'I hand on heart do not think that anyone is going to come through that door that I fancy more than Megan… I look at her like a girlfriend on the outside.' This follows after a dramatic week in the villa which saw Remell and Megan brutally dumped after being voted as the least favourite boy and girl. Alima had already called off her connection with Remell after his actions in 'The Sleepover' where he was kissing bombshell Poppy outside of challenges. Alima said she 'was done' even though Remell decided to stay coupled up with her. Megan on the other hand had just started her connection with Conor which seemed to be going in the right direction before she was sent packing. It was an emotional goodbye for Megan and tears were shed among the girls and boys who she was leaving behind. Before she left, she sat down for a private moment with Conor where he asked her to wait for him, and she told him she would. After leaving the villa, Megan said: 'I'm gutted to have left because I was getting to a really good place with Conor and I'd tied up loose ends with Tommy and Emily. "I would've liked to have left on better terms with Tommy. We were getting there, but that comes with time and I didn't have time on my side. I made best friends there and had an absolute ball.'