Notorious thief, on the run since 2001, nabbed
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
38 minutes ago
- The Print
Parliament security breach: Delhi HC grants bail to Neelam Azad, Mahesh Kumawat
'We are granting bail… They shall not give interviews, or make any statement regarding the case before the press or social media. They shall not leave Delhi and appear before investigating agency every Monday Wednesday and Friday,' the court said. A bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar granted the reprieve to Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat on a personal bond of Rs 50,000 each and two sureties. New Delhi, Jul 2 (PTI) The Delhi High Court on Wednesday granted bail to two accused in the 2023 Parliament security breach case, forbidding them from talking about the incident to the press or on social media. The accused challenged a trial court's order rejecting their bail plea in the December 2023 incident. In a major security breach on the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror attack, accused Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D allegedly jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the public gallery during Zero Hour, released yellow gas from canisters and sloganeered before they were overpowered by some MPs. Around the same time, two other accused — Amol Shinde and Azad — allegedly sprayed coloured gas from canisters while shouting 'tanashahi nahi chalegi (dictatorship won't work)' outside Parliament premises. Delhi police had opposed the applications, alleging that the accused intended to bring back 'haunted memories' of the 2001 Parliament attack. It said the preliminary inquiry revealed that Azad and Shinde were associates of Sharma and Manoranjan D and they together carried out the terror act. The court had previously asked the accused the reason for choosing the specific date of December 13, which marked the infamous 2001 Parliament attack aside from the place for protest being aware of designated spots for protests in the capital. It also asked the police to explain whether carrying or using a smoke canister, inside and outside Parliament attracted UAPA and if it fell under the definition of terrorist activities. The trial court rejected Azad's bail plea, saying there was sufficient evidence to believe that allegations against her were 'prima facie' true. All the accused persons — Azad, Manoranjan D, Sagar Sharma, Amol Dhanraj Shinde, Lalit Jha and Mahesh Kumawat — already had the knowledge about the threat given by designated terrorist Gurpatwant Singh Pannu for targeting Parliament on December 13, 2023, it added. While four accused were taken into custody from the spot, Jha and Kumawat were arrested later. PTI UK UK AMK AMK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘In a position to pay more': Calcutta HC orders Mohammed Shami to pay Rs 4 lakh a month as interim maintenance to wife, daughter
Cricketer Mohammed Shami has been ordered by the Calcutta High Court to pay an interim amount of Rs 4 lakh per month as alimony to his estranged wife Hasin Jahan and their daughter. On Tuesday, Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee directed that Rs 1,50,000 be paid to the wife and Rs 2,50,000 to the daughter until the disposal of a case of alleged domestic violence against Shami. The court said that the amounts would 'be fair and reasonable to ensure financial stability for both the petitioners until the disposal of the main application'. '(The) amount is to be paid by the husband from the date of filing of the application under section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence (PWDV) Act,' the court said. In 2023, a district sessions court had ordered that Shami pay Rs 1.30 lakh a month in total to his wife and daughter. This order had been challenged by Shami's wife in the Calcutta High Court. The Calcutta HC Justice said in his order, 'It is not clear what was the basis of fixing the interim maintenance amounts (of) Rs 50,000 and Rs 80,000 in the context of the affidavit of assets and liabilities and other materials placed on record in support of (Shami's) income,' while also noting that the question of granting an 'excessive' amount of alimony and maintenance does not arise. Stating that Shami 'is in a position to pay a higher amount', the High Court said, 'The petitioner wife, who has remained unmarried and is living independently with the child, is entitled to a levelled maintenance that she enjoyed during her marriage which reasonably secures her future as well as the future of the child.' Speaking to The Indian Express, Hasin Jahan said, 'We are relieved at the order. As a father, if he gave the alimony before, it would have benefitted the child. Now, I can send her to a good school and give her all that she has been deprived of. He has never tried to communicate with his own daughter.' In her plea to the district sessions court in 2023, Jahan had sought Rs 10 lakh in total — Rs 7 lakh for herself and Rs 3 lakh for her daughter. Shami married Hasin Jahan in 2014. In 2018, Jahan had lodged an FIR at the Jadavpur police station against him and his family alleging 'physical and mental torture' under Section 12 of the PWDV Act and 'sustained indifference and neglect' of her minor daughter. She had also accused Shami of harassment for dowry, match fixing and avoiding 'responsibility' for her family's expenses.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
BJP infighting exposes illegal dairy operations, corruption in Gujarat
AHMEDABAD: A storm is brewing across Gujarat's powerful cooperative dairy sector, as internal rifts within the BJP have begun spilling out in the form of infighting, corruption, and violent altercations at top dairies. From Baroda to Mehsana to Surat, one scandal after another is laying bare the deep-rooted political and financial rot within the state's milk cooperatives. The latest flashpoint is Surat's Sumul Dairy, where a fierce power tussle between Chairman Mansingh Patel and Vice Chairman Raju Pathak has exploded over allegations that milk from Maharashtra was being illegally sourced, mixed, and sold through local co-operative societies. According to dairy sources, the issue, which started over fines imposed on milk importers, escalated when Pathak allegedly tried to assault the MD during a heated board discussion. Sumul Dairy Director Jayesh Patel (Delad) told The New Indian Express, 'Investigations revealed that 25 co-operative societies across Surat and Tapi districts were caught red-handed sourcing milk from Maharashtra, storing it in chilling plants, and funneling it into Sumul Dairy through unregistered centres. Sumul had imposed a fine of Rs 3.25 crore on these milk firms.' Now, with the Congress entering the battlefield, the issue has snowballed into a full-blown political controversy. Surat Congress leader Darshan Nayak has accused the Sumul board of corruption, written to the Chief Minister, and demanded action against notified societies involved in mixing cold, imported milk with local warm supplies. He's also called for an immediate quality audit and board dismissal, citing earlier allegations of crores-worth corruption in Sumul Dairy. When The New Indian Express reached out to Sumul Vice Chairman Raju Pathak for a comment, he curtly replied, 'I am busy,' and declined to say anything further.
