Proposal to re-zone land around controversial Tipperary hotel could stop IPAS centre plans
The county Tipperary hotel has been the subject of controversy since it was announced that International Protection Applicants would be housed there, despite planning and infrastructure issues at the site.
Last month, Tipperary County Council announced that they would not contest a judicial review of the Dundrum House Section 5 declaration.
A Section 5 declaration under the Planning and Development Act 2000 is a direction issued by a planning authority determining that a specific development may be considered 'exempted development' and therefore does not require certain planning permissions.
At the July plenary meeting, Cllrs Browne and Hourigan tabled the motion to extend the village boundaries to include the historic hotel, and that the land it sits on be zoned for tourism and leisure, as well as amenity and conservation.
It is believed that Government plans to use the site as a 'super IPAS centre' similar to the Citywest Hotel in Dublin are being examined, and that the proposed boundary and zoning change at Dundrum would prevent this from happening.
If the land was successfully re-zoned, it would then be illegal to house IPAS clients at Dundrum House Hotel.
31 councillors at the county council meeting voted to support the motion, which will now see a management report drawn up on how the boundary changes might be carried out.
It emerged earlier this year that a contract had been signed to house 277 IPAS clients at the hotel, prompting local protests outside the hotel's gates.
The contract had been awarded to a company called Utmasta Limited, a newly formed private company incorporated in Spain in January of this year. The company lists a single director, Ms Ana Maria Fernandez Sanchez, and had a declared capital of just €120.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
3 days ago
- Irish Independent
Councillors call for review of planning ‘loophole' after leaked file indicates IPAS development for Mayo town
The motion, tabled by Cllr Deirdre Lawless at the council's monthly meeting, was brought forward after a leaked document suggested the property, which had been promised to reopen as a four-star hotel, had been earmarked for use as an International Protection Accommodation Services (IPAS) centre. Cllr Lawless told colleagues that a time bound agreement had been in place between the building's owner and Mayo County Council to house those seeking international protection. She asked if this arrangement was now 'null and void'. Director of Services Tom Gilligan confirmed that no such agreement exists. 'I know that the owners had initially looked in relation to using the hotel for it,' he said, 'but they are committed, as far as I'm aware at this stage, to turn it into a hotel for local tourism.' Despite that assurance, councillors raised broader concerns about how developers can change a building's use, through section five of the Planning and Development Act 2000, in turn avoiding the full planning permission process. Section five allows individuals or developers to seek a formal declaration from their local planning authority to determine whether a proposed development qualifies as exempt under certain criteria. If deemed exempt, the development can proceed without requiring formal planning permission. Unlike ordinary planning applications, which involve public notices and opportunities for residents to object or appeal, section five exemptions are made internally by planning authorities and do not require full permission. Cllr Lawless criticised the system: 'The ordinary person must apply through the planning system for planning permission, it can be really lengthy and very costly on the individual, on families and on couples. Yet these property developers and business owners, many of them registered outside of the state, they're not in county Mayo, can bypass our planning laws.' She told the council about planning company Forbairt Órga Teoranta Ltd , stating that it had received €19.5 Million from the Department of Integration to house those seeking international protection since mid 2022. According to Cllr Lawless, the company has also submitted section five applications for developments in Ballina, Ballyhaunis, and is applying for another in Killala. 'These companies are making millions off the taxpayer, and the taxpayer is being treated like a mushroom, we are being kept in the dark,' she said. Cllr Marie Thérese Duffy stated that section five exemption loopholes need to be reviewed nationally: 'There's a lot of profiteering happening all over Ireland and there's a lack of information within communities around our country and there's a lot of anger too.' A motion to revoke section five was raised last year by Deputy Paul Lawless, who was a councillor in Mayo at the time. Mayo County Council wrote to the Minister for Housing but but Cllr Lawless told the Irish Independent that no reply was received. Director of Services for Planning, Catherine McConnell, clarified that a section five is a declaration, not a permission. 'We receive section five declarations for a wide variety of developments or uses. In the case we are talking about here, applications are for the use of the building. 'Could this building, if used for this purpose, be exempt' - That's what they are asking, it's not granting permission for anything, it does not confer any authority to use it. It still goes back to the department to decide its use,' she explained. If a section five is granted, the final decision on whether a property can be used for certain purposes, like an IPAS centre, remains with the International Protection Office within the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, not the local council. The Irish Independent contacted the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration in relation to the development in Knock. They responded saying: 'The Department has not received an offer of international protection accommodation at this location and is not considering it for use.' The building in Knock is confirmed for restoration as a four-star tourist hotel, but councillors want written confirmation from the Minister to prevent any future reconsideration of the site for asylum accommodation. Speaking to the Irish Independent, Cllr Lawless said there had been no response from the Minister yet, she called for an end to planning circumvention and for community engagement to be key to all planning permission applications. 'Individuals must apply through the planning system and are subject to serious scrutiny, often being rejected planning permission over small details. Meanwhile, property developers can completely change the demographic and population of a village or town overnight and do not have to notify the public. This is wrong and unjust. This government needs to close this loophole immediately and create a system that is equal and fair to all citizens of the land.'
Irish Independent
25-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Over 2,000 people submit ideas for long-derelict Tipperary site
The Goldcrop site in Carrick-on-Suir has been derelict for a number of years, and was bought by Tipperary County Council in 2022. Last month, a public consultation opened on plans for the 2.7 acre Goldcrop site in Carrick-on-Suir, with officials in the Carrick-on-Suir Municipal District (MD) and Tipperary County Council seeking opinions from the public on what the future of the site should be. At the July meeting of the Carrick-on-Suir MD, councillors were told by the district administrator that there had been over 2,000 responses to the public consultation online and in hard copy. "On the Goldcrop feasibility and concept design, the survey closed on June 30 and we had 1,976 online responses, and 84 hard copy surveys which were an exact copy of the online,' councillors at the meeting were told. Consultants on the project will now review all the data on the site over the years, and will present a plan to councillors in September, it is hoped. "The consultants now are taking all that information, they ran that survey where they hold all the data, and they're working on a report taking account of that survey, all the previous public consultations, all of the statutory reports, the local area plans, the flooding and environmental reports and they will bring all of this together and it will be presented to the elected members in a workshop along with draft concept designs and then that will go out for further public consultation,' the district administrator said. Reddy Architecture + Urbanism were appointed by Tipperary County Council to carry out the feasibility study as part of the Carrick-on-Suir Riverside Regeneration project. Carrick-on-Suir's regeneration project is co funded by the Government of Ireland and the European Union through the EU Just Transition Fund, which aims to transform tourism across eight counties in Ireland's Hidden Heartlands and Ireland's Ancient East by diversifying the local economy and providing new employment opportunities for workers and communities.
Irish Independent
25-07-2025
- Irish Independent
‘Miniscule' funding allocated to help brighten up one Tipperary town
At the July meeting of the Carrick-on-Suir Municipal District, councillors were told that just €2,124 has been allocated under the Painting Enhancement Scheme. The Painting Enhancement Scheme aims to support property owners in the primary retail areas of towns to improve and enhance their properties and public areas. Grants of up to 50 per cent of the total cost of painting, up to a maximum of €500 are available to property owners to brighten up their properties under the scheme. However, the allocation for Carrick-on-Suir has been criticised as being very limited. Cllr Kieran Bourke said that the funding amount is 'miniscule' and said that painting can be an expensive job. "It seems a miniscule amount of money for a painting enhancement scheme, to get a door painted it could cost you a couple of hundred euro,' he said. The district administrator explained that funding is allocated from Tipperary County Council. "This funding is coming from the economic section and we would say that it's a maximum of €500 or 50 per cent of what you've spent, so in order to get €500, you need to have spent €1,000, if you spend less you can get up to 50 per cent,' the district administrator explained. "But you're essentially only supporting four to five people maximum in the district,' she added. Other districts across Tipperary sometimes chose to match the funding allocation in order to support more people, the meeting was told, but this hasn't been the case in Carrick-on-Suir so far. "My thoughts were to come back to you if we had a huge uptake, and say this is the uptake we have, and do we want to allocate some funds from GMA (General Municipal Allocation) if we didn't get some of the bigger projects that we needed matched funding for perhaps,' the administrator told councillors. The GMA is discretionary funding allocated to municipal district members within a local authority's draft budget. Cathaoirleach of the district David Dunne said that the issue of matched funding could be looked at if there is money remaining in the GMA, but that any funding to help towards the cost of paint is a help to property owners. "If you could get €100 or €200 worth of paint, at least it goes a little bit towards trying to do something, I know it's not a whole lot but that's what we have to deal with unfortunately,' Cllr Dunne said.
