logo
‘Taliban fighters came to my house. I escaped just in time'

‘Taliban fighters came to my house. I escaped just in time'

Telegraph3 days ago
The knock came at 3am, sharp and deliberate against the aged metal door.
But the house, in western Afghanistan, was empty – it had been for nearly two years, ever since the day everything changed for the man who once called it home.
He sits now in a cramped shelter across the border in Iran, watching his phone buzz with another frantic message from family who stayed behind in Afghanistan.
The Taliban had come again, searching, questioning, demanding answers his relatives couldn't give.
'They've been going to my relatives' homes twice a week asking about me. I'm just glad I managed to flee, otherwise they would have killed my whole family,' the former member of the Afghan special forces told The Telegraph from a small town outside Tehran.
'They came to my house a few weeks ago, which is right next to my parents', and started knocking at 3am, looking for me. They think I return home at night.'
His name had appeared on a 'kill list' of Afghans who had helped British forces before the fall of Kabul in 2021.
The list, carrying 25,000 names of soldiers and their families, was accidentally leaked online in 2022 by a Royal Marine.
The names were supposed to remain secret, protected by government security protocols. Instead, they became a Taliban hunting manual.
The man and a group of other Afghans on the list had heard rumours of compensation. One law firm – based in the UK – is suing the Ministry of Defence on behalf of at least 1,000 Afghans who claim they were affected by the breach.
However, for those on the list who never made it to the UK, compensation is the least of their priorities. 'Officially, through the case we filed, no one has communicated anything to us,' the man said.
'We are very disappointed and just waiting. The British government has not told us what to do.
'I'm not alone, there are many people like me here and in Afghanistan who have been living in fear and waiting when death would knock on the door.'
Britain has secretly offered asylum to nearly 24,000 Afghan soldiers and their families caught up in the most serious data breach in history.
The leak, involving the details of 18,800 soldiers, along with about 6,000 of their family members, was revealed on Tuesday after a two-year super-injunction was lifted by the High Court in London.
However, the former member of the Afghan special forces said many of those who were taken to Britain were neither high-ranking nor facing serious threats to their lives.
' People like base gardeners or low-ranking soldiers were taken to Britain, but many high-ranking colonels whose lives are truly at risk were left behind, just waiting for death to come,' he said.
'It's deeply disappointing. This isn't justice. I don't understand how they prioritised the evacuations – they even took the guy who used to polish shoes, or a base's barber, but left behind many colonels.'
The Home Office regularly declines to comment on the specific categories of individuals brought to the UK.
The man served with the British Army's special forces, his skills and courage earning him respect among his international colleagues.
His nephew told The Telegraph from Afghanistan: 'He was too courageous and everyone in his unit knew that, but England left him behind after their forces left.
'For months he was living in different homes of relatives and in villages and towns around Herat.'
When Western forces withdrew in 2021, the man applied for asylum in the UK, submitting documents that included his service record and his family's details. It was supposed to be his pathway to safety.
Instead, it became his death warrant.
The Taliban claims they obtained the list from the internet during the first days after it was leaked.
While the Government spent £7 billion on a covert operation to relocate thousands of affected Afghans to the UK, the man and his family remained trapped in limbo, their names circulating among Taliban units with orders to find them.
'They keep pressuring us to reveal his whereabouts,' his nephew said. 'They once arrested me and beat me for a day. My uncle served with the special forces. The Taliban keep saying he must come with them for questioning.'
Taliban fighters don't just visit once and leave. They return regularly, methodically working through extended family networks, applying pressure with each visit.
They know intimate details. Information that could only have come from the leaked asylum applications.
'It's putting everyone in the family at risk,' the nephew explains. 'Being related to someone on a Taliban kill list is a death sentence.
He added: 'They have all his details – his name, his wife's name, even his children's names. We were shocked when they listed them.'
The Taliban's message to the family is brutally clear: if they can't find the man, they'll kill another family member instead.
'The blood of a spy is in your veins,' they told his relatives, transforming his service into a hereditary crime that endangers everyone who shares his name.
Nearly two years have passed since he fled to Iran with his family, but the pursuit hasn't diminished. If anything, it has intensified.
A senior Taliban official told The Telegraph that a special unit had been launched to find those on the list, with names handed over to border forces to prevent escape.
The hunt has become institutionalised, with senior figures in Kandahar pressuring officials in Kabul to locate the targets.
'These people are seen as traitors,' a Taliban official said, 'and the plan has been to find as many of them as possible.'
For the man hiding in Iran, the news grows more desperate by the day. The Islamic Republic is now deporting hundreds of thousands of Afghans back into Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.
Iran is using espionage allegations against Afghans as a pretext for the mass arrests and deportations following the recent conflict with Israel.
The Telegraph spoke to Afghans in Iran, at the border, and in Afghanistan who said the regime in Tehran was targeting them to divert public attention from its 'humiliation' by Israel in last month's 12-day war.
During the conflict, daily deportations jumped from 2,000 to over 30,000 as Iranian authorities turned public anger toward the vulnerable minority.
Those persecuted by the regime also reported suffering widespread abuses including beatings, arbitrary detention.
Since early June, nearly 450,000 Afghan refugees, many who arrived after the Taliban returned to power in 2021, have been deported and 5,000 children separated from their parents, according to UN agencies.
'The situation in Iran isn't good,' the former special forces member said. 'I emailed them [British officials], but all I got was an automatic reply saying they'd get back to me.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel says missile launched by Yemen's Houthis was intercepted
Israel says missile launched by Yemen's Houthis was intercepted

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Israel says missile launched by Yemen's Houthis was intercepted

July 18 (Reuters) - Yemen's Houthi militant group said late on Friday it had attacked Israel's Ben Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv with a ballistic missile, while the Israeli military said the projectile was intercepted after air raid sirens were triggered in several parts of the country. Most of the dozens of missiles and drones the Houthis have launched at Israel have been intercepted or fallen short. Israel has carried out a series of retaliatory strikes. The Iran-aligned Houthis have been firing at Israel and attacking shipping lanes. Traffic through the Red Sea, a critical waterway for the world's oil and commodities, has dropped since the militia began targeting ships in November 2023 in what the group said was solidarity with Palestinians against Israel in the Gaza war. Arab mediators Qatar and Egypt, backed by the United States, have hosted more than 10 days of talks on a U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day truce in the 21-month war that has laid waste to the Palestinian enclave. Earlier on Friday, Hamas said that while the group favours reaching an interim truce, if such an agreement is not reached in current negotiations it could revert to insisting on a full package deal to end the conflict. Israel and Hamas have repeatedly accused each other of obstructing progress towards a deal.

Starmer holds ‘constructive' call with Taoiseach on Troubles legacy plans
Starmer holds ‘constructive' call with Taoiseach on Troubles legacy plans

Powys County Times

time2 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Starmer holds ‘constructive' call with Taoiseach on Troubles legacy plans

Sir Keir Starmer stressed the importance of 'consensus' in handling the legacy of the Troubles as he spoke to his Irish counterpart on Friday. In a phone call with Taoiseach Micheal Martin, the Prime Minister had what Downing Street described as a 'constructive discussion' on dealing with the legacy of the 30-year conflict in Northern Ireland. A Number 10 spokesperson said the two men had 'underscored the importance of a way forward that built consensus', before turning to economic issues and the UK-EU relationship. Mr Martin himself echoed Downing Street's comments, tweeting that he had had a 'constructive discussion with British PM Keir Starmer today on a framework for dealing with legacy'. The call came as Sir Keir faces pressure from some of his own backbenchers over plans to repeal and replace legislation passed by the previous government that halted investigations into all but the most serious allegations involving Troubles-related cases. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act has been criticised by human rights campaigners for granting conditional immunity to suspects. That provision was ruled incompatible with human rights laws by the Northern Irish courts, prompting Labour to commit to replacing legislation it described as 'flawed and failed'. But that proposal has brought condemnation from former British soldiers who fear it will open the way to vexatious prosecutions and civil claims. Opponents are also reported to include some Labour MPs, including veterans minister Al Carns. A former Royal Marine and special forces officer, Mr Carns was reported by The Times to be considering resigning over plans to repeal the Legacy Act. But earlier in the week, Downing Street said the Government was 'working in lockstep' on the issue.

Afghan migrants bring 22 relatives to UK
Afghan migrants bring 22 relatives to UK

Telegraph

time3 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Afghan migrants bring 22 relatives to UK

Afghans have been able to bring 22 family members to the UK after relatives previously rejected for asylum were allowed in following a military data breach. The disclosure will increase fears that national security could have been compromised in the confusion that followed the most damaging data breach in British history. Government sources say Afghans who were flown to Britain brought an average of eight family members with them, leaving officials scrambling to find accommodation for them. Ministers were even forced to consider 'knocking two houses into one' on military bases to accommodate individual families. But the public was kept in the dark because of a super-injunction that was extended at Sir Grant Shapps's direction shortly before last year's general election. Sir Grant has now been accused of 'trying to rewrite history' after he claimed on Friday he was 'surprised' that the super-injunction stayed in place for so long after it was granted in September 2023, when in truth he successfully appealed against a judge's decision to lift it in May 2024. The Conservative government took action in 2023 when it learnt that a list of nearly 19,000 Afghans who had applied to come to Britain was wrongly shared by a defence official in 2022. The Afghans, who included special forces soldiers, had applied through a scheme for those who had worked with or alongside the British Armed Forces during the war in Afghanistan, making them potential targets of the Taliban. In March last year, the Government set up an emergency scheme, called the Afghanistan Response Route, to airlift people named in the data breach to the UK. Whitehall sources have told The Telegraph that one person who came to the UK was allowed to bring 22 family members, while others were in the 'high teens'. Defence ministers had wanted to restrict arrivals to married couples and their children, but UK courts repeatedly expanded the eligibility criteria, citing the European Convention on Human Rights. There was a dramatic change in the criteria last November, when High Court judge Mrs Justice Yip ruled in a case brought against the Foreign Office by an Afghan already living here that family members did not have to have a blood or legal connection to the applicant. Her ruling stated: 'The term 'family member' does not have any fixed meaning in law or in common usage. Indeed, the word 'family' may mean different things to different people and in different contexts. There may be cultural considerations … there is no requirement for a blood or legal connection.' Court documents previously kept secret by the super-injunction – which was finally lifted earlier this week – show that only 10 per cent of the extended family members that applicants wanted to bring to the UK had been deemed eligible under previously existing routes. The document states: 'Given the increased risk to some AFM [additional family members] as a result of the data incident, officials expect the number of applications and success rate to increase… 'Officials estimate that upwards of 55% of AFM will be eligible in light of the incident – up to approximately 12,500 AFM across all eligible cohorts.' Only 2,200 of those people were deemed eligible previously, meaning Sir Grant was prepared to accept more than 10,000 who had been deemed ineligible. Sources in Afghanistan have told The Telegraph that in the 'chaos' that followed the data breach, criminals, including junior staff who had stolen from British bases and sold weapons to the Taliban, had come to the UK with large numbers of family members, while military commanders who served alongside the Army had been left behind. The resettlement of Afghans in the UK led to major rows in Government, it emerged this week, as Cabinet ministers expressed concerns about the number of bogus claimants who could end up coming to the UK and the implications for national security.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store