logo
Trump's 'big beautiful bill' cuts food stamps for millions — the average family may lose $146 per month, report finds

Trump's 'big beautiful bill' cuts food stamps for millions — the average family may lose $146 per month, report finds

CNBC3 days ago
Republicans' "big beautiful" reconciliation package includes tax cuts that policy researchers have found primarily benefit the wealthy.
To help pay for that, the legislation also includes "substantial" cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, according to research from the Urban Institute.
The changes will cause 22.3 million families to lose some or all of their SNAP benefits, according to the institute, a nonpartisan provider of policy research. Its analysis is based on the legislation passed by the Senate, which the House did not change before voting for the bill, signed into law by President Donald Trump.
SNAP currently provides basic food assistance to more than 40 million people, including children, seniors and nonelderly adults with disabilities, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan research and policy institute.
More from Personal Finance:Tax changes under Trump bill — in one chartTrump bill doesn't eliminate taxes on Social Security benefitsWhat endowment tax in Trump bill may mean for your college tuition
Of the 22.3 million families who will be affected by the legislation's changes, 5.3 million would lose at least $25 per month in SNAP benefits, according to Urban Institute's analysis.
On average, those families would lose $146 per month in SNAP support, the Urban Institute found.
The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the changes in the Senate reconciliation bill would cut SNAP funding by about 20%, or $186 billion through 2034. That makes it "the largest cut to SNAP in history," according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Currently, many individuals are limited to three months of SNAP benefits every three years unless they are working for 20 hours per week or qualify for an exemption.
The new legislation will expand those requirements to individuals ages 55 through 64, parents of minor children ages 14 and up and veterans. It is unclear when those new rules go into effect.
Those new work requirements may throw even working people who qualify off benefits if they do not report their eligibility properly, according to Elaine Waxman, senior fellow at the Urban Institute.
Around 3.5 million working families, who have at least one family member working during the year, would lose at least $25 per month in benefits, or $108 per month on average, Urban Institute's research estimates.
That estimate is based on families who may not consistently meet the required work hours, according to Waxman. However, because additional households may lose eligibility if they fail to properly comply with the administrative process, the total could be higher, she said.
Additionally, the legislation requires states to pay for a portion of benefit costs, ranging from 5% to 15%, if their payment error rate is at or over 6%. The error rates measure the accuracy of states' eligibility and benefit payments. In fiscal year 2024, states had a 10.9% average payment error rate, with many states over 6%, according to the Department of Agriculture.
States that can't pay those shares may have to cut SNAP benefits or opt out of the program entirely, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
While states will have until 2028 to start helping to pay for SNAP benefits, they will likely be aggressive in getting their error rates down sooner, according to Waxman.
"I think that we will start to see SNAP declines for administrative reasons in the near future as states struggle with that," Waxman said. "I do think the effects will be felt sooner."
Even if families' eligibility for SNAP hasn't changed, they could fall off the program if they fail to get recertified for benefits, which can lead to hardship, Waxman said.
Children who are eligible for SNAP may also see cuts in school meals and in summer EBT, or electronic benefits transfer, food benefits, according to CBPP.
The law also limits SNAP eligibility to U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.
Every dollar spent on SNAP generates $1.54 in benefit for local economies, according to 2019 research from the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service.
"People do spend SNAP dollars right away," Waxman said, which helps grocery stores, producers, processors and transportation companies.
Those funds can help to support hiring even during downturns, she said.
However, following the new law, states may be more likely to cut benefits during a recession if their budgets are stretched, according to CBPP.
"Typically, in a recession, more people need SNAP and the rolls go up," Waxman said.
If the changes under the new law prompt the program's administrative capacity to become stressed, SNAP may not be as well suited to respond to people's needs as it has been in the past, she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thomas Matthew Crooks: 5 Unanswered Questions About Would-Be Trump Assassin
Thomas Matthew Crooks: 5 Unanswered Questions About Would-Be Trump Assassin

Newsweek

time30 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Thomas Matthew Crooks: 5 Unanswered Questions About Would-Be Trump Assassin

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On July 13 last year, President Donald Trump—then a presidential candidate—was shot as he spoke to supporters at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Moments after a bullet grazed his ear, he defiantly raised his fist and shouted "Fight! Fight! Fight!" The scene bolstered support for Trump—who said that God had saved him—and he went on to triumph in November's election. His would-be assassin, 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, had first caught the attention of law enforcement that day when spectators noticed him acting strangely outside the event. But couldn't be found before he climbed onto a roof near the rally and opened fire. He killed a bystander and injured two others before he was shot dead by the Secret Service. The incident revealed worrying security lapses and led to the resignation of Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle. An independent panel investigating the attempted assassination said the agency needed "fundamental reform." But a year on, many questions remain unanswered about the young man who came close to taking Trump's life. Donald Trump pumps his fist as he is rushed offstage after an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024. Donald Trump pumps his fist as he is rushed offstage after an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, Was Thomas Matthew Crooks' Motive? The FBI looked at Crooks' cellphone and his computer, and searched his home and car, yet his motive remains a mystery. He left no manifesto or explanation for his actions and his social media footprint was thin. He had no prior criminal record, and was an engineering student with a strong academic record, including a top score on the SAT, The New York Times reported. Investigators found conflicting signs about his politics—he registered as a Republican when he turned 18, though he had earlier donated $15 to a committee backing Democrats. He conducted dozens of searches related to Trump and former President Joe Biden in the month before the shooting. The Times obtained logs of Crooks' online activity, reporting that about a week before the shooting, he registered for Trump's rally and did an online search asking: "How far was Oswald from Kennedy?" Did Crooks Have Accomplices? The FBI and Secret Service have said that Crooks appeared to have acted alone, but theories about Crooks having an accomplice or accomplices have continued to swirl. Doug Hagmann, a private investigator hired to look into the case by a private client, told the New York Post in February that his team of investigators had conducted geofencing analysis of electronic devices that did not belong to Crooks but were found with him at his home and other locations he frequented, including his high school. "We don't think he acted alone," Hagmann told the newspaper. "This took a lot of coordination. In my view, Crooks was handled by more than one individual and he was used for this." Did Crooks Plan a Larger Attack? Some evidence suggests Crooks may have been planning a larger attack. A crude homemade bomb was found in Crooks' bedroom, according to the Times. Bomb-making materials were found in his home in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, as well as explosive devices in Crooks' car. Crooks also attempted to purchase more than two gallons of nitromethane—a chemical that can be used as an explosive—from an online retailer, CBS News reported earlier this year. Why Was Crooks Cremated So Soon After the Attack? The FBI's handling of the investigation has come under criticism. Representative Clay Higgins, a Louisiana Republican who investigated the assassination attempt, criticized the FBI for releasing Crooks' body for cremation just 10 days after the shooting. Higgins said the move could only be described as an "obstruction to any following investigative effort." The FBI said accusations that it was interfering with efforts to probe the attempted assassination were "inaccurate and unfounded," adding that the body was released to Crooks' family in coordination with the coroner's office and local law enforcement partners. "Nothing was rushed and everything was documented as part of the investigation," the FBI said in a statement. What Role Did His Family Play? Crooks' parents have declined all interviews. They reportedly live in seclusion, leaving many questions about his background unanswered.

New tax break for auto loans could save some buyers thousands of dollars. But will it boost sales?

time31 minutes ago

New tax break for auto loans could save some buyers thousands of dollars. But will it boost sales?

Millions of people receive a federal tax deduction for the interest they pay on home loans. Under President Donald Trump's new tax-cut law, many people for the first time also could claim a tax deduction for interest on their vehicle loans. The new tax break will be available even to people who don't itemize deductions. But there are some caveats that could limit its reach. The vehicles must be new, not used. They must be assembled in the U.S. And the loans must be issued no sooner than this year, to list just a few qualifications. Here are some things to know about the new auto loan interest tax deduction: Trump pledged while campaigning last year to make interest on car loans tax-deductible. He said it would make car ownership more affordable and 'stimulate massive domestic auto production.' The idea made it into the big tax-cut bill passed by Congress, which Trump signed into law July 4. The law allows taxpayers to deduct up to $10,000 of interest payments annually on loans for new American-made vehicles from 2025 through 2028. It applies to cars, motorcycles, sport utility vehicles, minivans, vans and pickup trucks weighing less than 14,000 pounds, a threshold referred to as light vehicles. But it only applies to vehicles purchased for personal use, not for fleets or commercial purposes. The tax break can be claimed starting on 2025 income tax returns. But the deduction phases out for individuals with incomes between $100,000 and $150,000 or joint taxpayers with incomes between $200,000 and $250,000. Those earning more cannot claim the tax break. U.S. automobile dealers sold 15.9 million new light vehicles last year, a little over half of which were assembled in the U.S, according to Cox Automotive. It says around 60% of retail sales are financed with loans. After excluding fleet and commercial vehicles and customers above the income cutoff, an estimated 3.5 million new vehicle loans could be eligible for the tax break this year, if purchasing patterns stay the same, said Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive. The tax break applies to vehicles assembled in the U.S., no matter where the company making them is headquartered. All Tesla vehicles sold in the U.S. are assembled in this country. But so are all Acura brands, the luxury model of Japanese automaker Honda. Last year, 78% of Ford vehicles sold in the U.S. were assembled in this country, according to Cox Automotive. But customers wanting the tax break will need to pay attention to specific models. While the Ford Mustang is assembled in Michigan, the Mustang Mach-E is built in Mexico. General Motors assembles all of its Cadillacs in the U.S. But just 44% of its Chevrolets sold last year were assembled in the U.S., and just 14% of Buicks, according to Cox Automotive. That's a lower U.S-assembled rate than Honda (60%), Toyota (52%) and Nissan (48%), which all are headquartered in Japan. The average new vehicle loan is about $44,000 financed over six years. Interest rates vary by customer, so the savings will, too. In general, the tax deduction will decline after the initial year, because interest payments on loans are frontloaded while principal payments grow on the back end. At a 9.3% interest rate, an average new vehicle buyer could save about $2,200 on taxes over four years, Smoke said. The tax savings would be less on a loan at 6.5%, which is the rate figured into calculations by the American Financial Services Association, a consumer credit industry trade group. Whereas the tax deduction for home loan interest can be claimed only by people itemizing on their tax returns, Congress wrote the deduction for auto loan interest so that it can apply to all taxpayers, including those claiming the standard deduction. On a tax form, the auto loan deduction will come before the calculation of a taxpayer's adjusted gross income. That's an important distinction, because many states use a taxpayer's federal adjusted gross income as the starting point for figuring their state income taxes. If that income figure is lower, it could reduce the state taxes owed. At Bowen Scarff Ford in Kent, Washington, customers started asking about the auto loan tax deduction before Congress had even taken a final vote on the tax-cut bill, said General Manager Paul Ray. So he decided to promote it on the dealer's website. A website ribbon exclaims: 'CAR LOAN TAX DEDUCTION NOW AVAILABLE" while also promoting an electric vehicle tax credit that is ending soon as a result of Trump's tax-cut law. 'I think it's going to help incentivize vehicle purchases through this year," Ray said. Celia Winslow, president and CEO of the American Financial Services Association, concurred: 'For some people deciding — should I buy it, should I not — this could be something that tips the scale.' Others remain skeptical. According to Smoke's math, the average annual tax savings is smaller than a single month's loan payment for a new vehicle. 'I don't think it moves the needle on somebody on the fence of buying a new vehicle or not," Smoke said. "But I think it could influence their decision to finance that vehicle instead of paying cash or instead of leasing a vehicle.'

Bitcoin Blasts Past $118K as Wall Street and Washington Fuel the Fire
Bitcoin Blasts Past $118K as Wall Street and Washington Fuel the Fire

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bitcoin Blasts Past $118K as Wall Street and Washington Fuel the Fire

Bitcoin (BTC-USD) just smashed through the $118,000 barrier, hitting a new all-time high and reigniting investor interest across the crypto and tech complex. The timing? Spot on. Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) just crossed a $4 trillion valuation, the Nasdaq notched a fresh record, and the S&P 500 isn't far behind. This surge reinforces what many in the market have long suspected: Bitcoin is behaving more like a high-beta tech stock than a standalone alternative asset. Historically, Bitcoin has remained highly correlated with tech stocks, noted Nic Puckrin, founder of Coin Bureau, and the current rally seems to be another case in point. So far in 2025, Bitcoin is up roughly 21%, helped by pro-crypto policies from the Trump administrationmost notably, a proposed federal bitcoin reserve and broader digital asset backing. Institutional appetite appears to be doing some heavy lifting. According to Dilin Wu, strategist at Pepperstone, sustained inflows from institutions have underpinned this latest breakout. Meanwhile, corporates aren't sitting still. Strategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) and GameStop (NYSE:GME) continue to add bitcoin to their balance sheets, and this week Trump Media & Technology Group (NASDAQ:DJT) filed to launch a Crypto Blue Chip ETF that could allocate as much as 70% to bitcoin. Bitcoin has also been unusually stable over the past two monthstrading within a narrow $10,000 rangesuggesting that the market may be maturing or at least attracting more disciplined capital. The next major catalyst may come from Washington. Congress kicks off its long-anticipated Crypto Week on July 14, where lawmakers will debate a stack of bills that could reshape the industry's regulatory environment. One of them, the GENIUS Act, would establish a federal framework for stablecoins. A more defined rulebook could be just what large institutions need to scale their exposure. Circle (NYSE:CRCL), issuer of the USDC stablecoin, is already seeing a bumpits shares are up 500% since debuting on June 5, with another 2% gain Thursday. Meanwhile, trading platforms like Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) and Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) also moved higher, riding the wave of optimism that regulation could finally bring the kind of clarityand capitalthe crypto space has long been waiting for. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store