logo
Why Justice must bring the hammer down on EVERY corrupt Soros prosecutor

Why Justice must bring the hammer down on EVERY corrupt Soros prosecutor

New York Post07-05-2025
Attorney General Pam Bondi and Justice Department civil-rights chief Harmeet Dhillon just put one 'Soros DA' on warning; let's hope they keep it up.
The target: Hennepin County, Minn., District Attorney Mary Moriarty's directive seemingly ordering up selective prosecutions, according to race.
Sounds too crazy to be true, but the woke warrior copped to it in (so to speak) black and white: Her so-called 'Negotiations Policy for Cases Involving Adult Defendants' says 'racial identity . . . should be part of the overall analysis,' and prosecutors 'should be identifying and addressing racial disparities at decision points, as appropriate.'
Advertisement
In other words, a literal two-tiered justice system based on skin color, with whites and Asians presumably getting the short end of the stick.
Of course, the Soros-backed Moriarty has already implemented two-tier justice.
Advertisement
Witness her letting anti-Tesla terrorist Dylan Bryan Adams walk after he vandalized Teslas all over town to the tune of $20,000 in damages, while going hard after other car vandals for doing less harm.
And her fondness for giving violent killers sweetheart deals so they can stay free to walk the streets, like one of the sociopathic teens who slew Zaria McKeever on the orders of her jealous ex.
Moriarty's obscene 'policy' generalizes the same sick principle — i.e., one rule for people dumb enough to be law-abiding, another for the politically favored and nakedly criminal.
Advertisement
Having public officials entrusted with the administration of justice give in to their hard-left ideology, as Moriarty clearly has, is ruinous to public trust.
Kudos to Bondi and Dhillon for launching a probe that could result in federal civil-rights charges: Prosecutors are not above the law.
Here's hoping the Justice Department now has its eyes on all the other Soros DAs around the country and the massive damage they've done and will go on doing to everyday Americans until they're stopped.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump CIA chief: Brennan, Comey and Hillary Clinton could face indictment
Trump CIA chief: Brennan, Comey and Hillary Clinton could face indictment

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump CIA chief: Brennan, Comey and Hillary Clinton could face indictment

CIA Director John Ratcliffe said he made referrals to the Justice Department for former Obama administration officials following the release of intelligence information about the 2016 election. Ratcliffe said that former CIA Director John Brennan, former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) James Clapper, and former FBI Director James Comey could all face charges relating to what he called a 'hoax' about the election. Tulsi Gabbard, who now leads DNI in the Trump administration, last week released two sets of documents about the 2016 election. The files reveal little new information about Russia's much-studied efforts to influence the 2016 election, but Republicans have nonetheless claimed the intelligence reviews were designed to cast doubt on Trump's victory. The documents do not undercut a central conclusion: that Russia lunched a massive campaign with the hopes of influencing the contest. 'That's why I've made the referrals that I have, DNI Gabbard has made referrals, and why we're gonna continue to share the intelligence that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to make fair and just, bring fair and justice claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this stain on our country,' Ratcliffe said during an appearance on Fox's Sunday Morning Futures. The releases from Gabbard came amid ongoing pressure on the Trump administration to release files related to the controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. They also followed a period in which Gabbard seemed to have lost some clout within the administration. While Gabbard has claimed the documents she has released show a 'treasonous conspiracy,' they largely show intelligence leaders discussing how the Russians were never able to alter vote tabulations — something that was never in dispute and that aligns with what Obama officials said publicly at the time. What intelligence did find, and which several reviews have since backed, was that Russia embarked on a massive social media campaign in the hopes of sowing division in the U.S. Last week, Gabbard released another report, this time a classified review led by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee. That report cast doubt on whether Russian President Vladimir Putin aimed to aid Trump as opposed to sowing discord within the U.S. In the process of releasing that report, Gabbard infuriated Democrats, who argued she exposed sources and methods for gathering intelligence. At the time the classified report was conducted, a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report, a panel led at the time by now-Secretary of State Marco Rubio, blacked the conclusion Russia favored Trump. Nonetheless, the Justice Department has since established a so-called Strike Force to review the information. Ratcliffe said there would also be additional information released. 'John Brennan testified to John Durham in August of 2020. He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified before the Senate committee in September, 2020. All of that's within the last five years. And much of that testimony is frankly, completely inconsistent with what our underlying intelligence that is about to be declassified in the Durham Annex — what that reflects,' he said. 'And so, you know, [Attorney General] Pam Bondi does have a strike force. It is a different Department of Justice, a different FBI, and an opportunity to look at how these people really did conspire to run a hoax, a fraud on the American people and against Donald Trump's presidency.'

An attack on a Congolese church killed nearly 40 worshippers. Here's what to know
An attack on a Congolese church killed nearly 40 worshippers. Here's what to know

San Francisco Chronicle​

time38 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

An attack on a Congolese church killed nearly 40 worshippers. Here's what to know

LAGOS, Nigeria (AP) — Nearly 40 people were killed Sunday in eastern Congo's Ituri province when rebels stormed a Catholic church during a vigil and opened fire on worshippers, including many women and children. At least 38 people were confirmed dead in the church while another five were killed in a nearby village. The victims included 19 men, 15 women and nine children. The attacks in Komanda town in the conflict-battered region were carried out by the Allied Democratic Force, a rebel group backed by the Islamic State that has mostly targeted villagers in eastern Congo and across the border in Uganda, the Congolese army said. The ADF arose from tensions in neighboring Uganda The ADF has roots in Uganda in the 1990s. Following the overthrow of long-term dictator, Idi Amin, a coalition of various discontent groups saw the new government of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni as anti-Muslim. Since then, the group has grown into a potent force but has been pushed out of Uganda's territories and now operates in the borderlands between Uganda and Congo, often targeting civilians in remote villages. ADF leaders pledged allegiance in 2019 to the Islamic State and have sought to establish an Islamic caliphate in Uganda. Eastern Congo has been beleaguered by protracted conflicts for decades, dating back to the Rwanda genocide in 1994. The conflicts have involved more than a hundred armed groups, according to the United Nations. The Rwanda-backed M23 armed group is the most prominent and launched a blitz of attacks in January in a major escalation culiminating in its capture of two key cities in the region. The Congolese and Ugandan armies have targeted the ADF in a joint military effort but analysts say it has done little, even as the rebels attack civilians. 'These joint operations have only succeeded in dispersing the ADF without really protecting civilians from their wrathful reprisals,' said Onesphore Sematumba, the Congo analyst at the International Crisis Group. This presents complex headaches for the overstretched Congolese army, which is occupied with advances by M23 and other rebel groups in the mineral-rich region. 'The ADF is taking more or less the advantage of the Congolese army's and international diplomacy's focus on the M23 further south without attracting too much attention,' Sematumba said. Attack targeted worshippers at midnight The church attack Sunday was the latest in a series of deadly ADF assaults on civilians, including earlier this month when the group killed 66 people in Ituri province. The attack happened July 11 around 1 a.m. during a vigil at a Catholic church in Komanda, civil society leaders and survivors. It followed an attack a few hours earlier in the nearby village of Machongani, where five people were killed and houses razed. The attackers were believed to have come from a stronghold about 12 kilometers (7 miles) from Komanda and fled before security forces arrived. Attack expected to worsen situation The attack Sunday has sent shockwaves around the Central African country, which is currently embroiled in numerous conflicts. The Congolese government condemned it as 'horrific" while the military described it as a 'large-scale massacre' carried out in revenge for recent security operations targeting the ADF. However, M23 used the attack to accuse the governemnt of 'blatant incompetence' in attempts to protect citizens.

Donald Trump is breaking America — our children will suffer worst
Donald Trump is breaking America — our children will suffer worst

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Donald Trump is breaking America — our children will suffer worst

Last month, a Quinnipiac University poll asked voters to identify their biggest concerns six months into the second Trump presidency. The pollsters asked about nine specific issues, ranging from the health of democracy to President Trump's performance on immigration, the economy, climate change and crime. However, the most important issue wasn't on the list. It's the impact Trump is having on our children. Studies show they are more influenced by his example than we might think. We have been amply warned about Trump. His former chief of staff, retired Marine Gen. John Kelly, famously called the president 'the most flawed person' he has ever known. He correctly predicted that Trump's second term 'would be chaotic because he'd continually be trying to exceed his authority, but the sycophants would go along with it.' A month before the 2024 election, 200 mental health professionals signed an open letter published by the anti-Trump Anti-Psychopath PAC describing him as a 'malignant narcissist' with an untreatable personality disorder. They cited his 'lifetime pattern of 'failure to conform to social norms and laws,' 'repeated lying,' 'reckless disregard for the safety of others,' 'irritability,' 'impulsivity,' 'irresponsibility,' and 'lack of remorse.'' A new book by James Kimmel, a Yale psychiatrist, calls Trump a 'revenge addict' who feels victimized, nurses perceived grievances, ruminates about retaliation, and has a compulsive and potentially violent desire for retribution. We are witnessing these and other malignant behaviors. The news media have been generous in calling Trump a transactional president. He doesn't transact — he extorts. 'President Donald Trump prides himself on being a dealmaker, but his negotiating style is more ultimatum than compromise,' an AP dispatch explains. 'For Trump, a deal isn't necessarily an agreement in which two sides compromise. It's an opportunity to bend others to his will.' His punitive trade tariffs, exorbitant lawsuits and unlawful freezes on congressionally appropriated funds are all examples. And Trump explodes with juvenile insults to disparage people he doesn't like. Trump's policies and behaviors affect America's reputation at home and abroad, but they may have the most lasting effect on children. He dominates the daily news cycles with bad behavior. Our children notice. Margaret Hagerman, a sociologist at Mississippi State University, told an interviewer last year, 'It would be great to see kids motivated by the Trump presidency, to join together and create a new era of civil rights. But I'm actually more worried about the opposite being true.' At recess, she said, some children were playing ICE agents and pretending to shoot kids playing immigrants. Others were taunting Latino children with chants of 'build a wall.' 'Listening to young children, ages 11, 12, and 13, express dehumanizing, racist ideas and think it's fine and normal — that's really concerning to me,' she said. During the 2016 presidential campaign, the Southern Poverty Law Center said that Trump's platform was 'producing an alarming level of fear and anxiety among children of color and inflaming racial and ethnic tensions in the classroom. Many students worry about being deported. … Teachers have noted an increase in bullying, harassment, and intimidation of students whose races, religions, or nationalities have been the verbal targets of candidates on the campaign trail.' One in four students in America's K-12 classrooms are children of foreign-born parents. Southern Poverty Law Center education expert Marueen Costello quoted a middle-school teacher who said, 'My students are terrified of Donald Trump. They think that if he's elected, all black people will get sent back to Africa. … In North Carolina, a high school teacher says she has 'Latino students who carry their birth certificates and Social Security cards to school because they are afraid they will be deported.'' 'In state after state, teachers report similar fears among minority children,' Costello continued. 'The gains made by years of anti-bullying work in schools have been rolled back in a few short months.' Trump's policies are creating physical as well as psychological damage to children. Five years ago, the Union of Concerned Scientists warned they 'will have ramifications for the next generation, and many of these policy moves will disproportionately harm young children' — especially those in low-income families and non-white communities. Trump is setting children up for a dystopian future by allowing climate change to go unabated and allowing more pollutants that are ' particularly harmful to babies and children from before birth to age eight because their bodily systems are still developing…' Nelson Mandela said, 'There can be no keener revelation of a society's soul than the way in which it treats its children.' Today, through his pollution and psychological influence on them, we are virtually letting Trump abuse ours. William S. Becker

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store