Federal judge strikes down workplace protections for transgender workers
Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on Thursday determined that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission exceeded its statutory authority when the agency issued guidance to employers against deliberately using the wrong pronouns for an employee, refusing them access to bathrooms corresponding with their gender identity, and barring employees from wearing dress code-compliant clothing according to their gender identity because they may constitute forms of workplace harassment.
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act protects employees and job applicants from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.
Advertisement
Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk struck down guidance from a government agency establishing protections against workplace harassment based on gender identity and sexual orientation.
AP
The EEOC, which enforces workplace anti-discrimination laws, had updated its guidance on workplace harassment in April of last year under President Joe Biden for the first time in 25 years.
It followed a 2020 Supreme Court ruling that gay, lesbian and transgender people are protected from employment discrimination.
Advertisement
Texas and the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank behind Project 2025, in August challenged the guidance, which the agency says serves as a tool for employers to assess compliance with anti-discrimination laws and is not legally binding.
Kacsmaryk disagreed, writing that the guidance creates 'mandatory standards … from which legal consequences will necessarily flow if an employer fails to comply.'
The decision marks the latest blow to workplace protections for transgender workers following President Donald Trump's Jan. 20 executive order declaring that the government would recognize only two 'immutable' sexes — male and female.
Kacsmaryk, a 2017 Trump nominee, invalidated all portions of the EEOC guidance that defines 'sex' to include 'sexual orientation' and 'gender identity,' along with an entire section addressing the subject.
Advertisement
This follows the 2020 Supreme Court ruling that gay, lesbian, and transgender people are protected from employment discrimination.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
'Title VII does not require employers or courts to blind themselves to the biological differences between men and women,' he wrote in the opinion.
Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts commended the decision in an emailed statement: 'The Biden EEOC tried to compel businesses — and the American people — to deny basic biological truth. Today, thanks to the great state of Texas and the work of my Heritage colleagues, a federal judge said: not so fast.'
He added: 'This ruling is more than a legal victory. It's a cultural one. It says no — you don't have to surrender common sense at the altar of leftist ideology. You don't have to pretend men are women.'
Advertisement
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton also touted the victory against 'Biden's 'Pronoun Police' Rule' in a Friday press release, saying: 'The federal government has no right to force Texans to play along with delusions or ignore biological reality in our workplaces.'
The National Women's Law Center, which filed an amicus brief in November in support of the harassment guidance, blasted the decision in an emailed statement.
'The district court's decision is an outrage and blatantly at odds with Supreme Court precedent,' said Liz Theran, senior director of litigation for education and workplace justice at NWLC.
'The EEOC's Harassment Guidance reminds employers and workers alike to do one simple thing that should cost no one anything: refrain from degrading others on the job based on their identity and who they love. This decision does not change the law, but it will make it harder for LGBTQIA+ workers to enforce their rights and experience a workplace free from harassment.'
Kacsmaryk offered a more narrow interpretation of Bostock v. Clayton County, the landmark Supreme Court case that established discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ workers, saying in his decision that the Supreme Court 'firmly refused to expand the definition of 'sex' beyond the biological binary,' and found only that employers could not fire workers for being gay or transgender.
Employment attorney Jonathan Segal, a partner at Duane Morris who advises companies on how best to comply with anti-discrimination laws, emphasized that legal minds may disagree on the scope of Bostock, and Kacsmaryk's decision is just one interpretation.
'If you assume that a transgender employee has no rights beyond not being fired for transgender status, you are likely construing their rights too narrowly under both federal and state law,' which would put employers in a risky position, Segal said.
Advertisement
And regardless of whether explicit guidance is in place, employers still need to address gender identity conflicts in the workplace, according to Tiffany Stacy, an Ogletree Deakins attorney in San Antonio who defends employers against claims of workplace discrimination.
'From a management perspective, employers should be prepared to diffuse those situations,' Stacy said.
The EEOC in fiscal year 2024 received more than 3,000 charges alleging discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity, and 3,000-plus in 2023, according to the agency's website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SNAP Rules Tighten To Restrict Junk Food, Sodas: Advocates Praise Online Access Boost
As top federal officials gathered in the capital on Monday to promote a new push to restrict soda and junk food from SNAP purchases, a Texas food access expert was hundreds of miles away, explaining how recent changes to the same program have expanded healthy options for people experiencing poverty. U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins hosted a joint press event in Washington as part of President Donald Trump's 'Make America Healthy Again' initiative, unveiling new SNAP waivers and calling for broader federal restrictions on sugary drinks, as previously covered by The Dallas Express. 'If you want to buy a sugary soda — the U.S. taxpayer should not pay for it,' Kennedy said. 'The U.S. taxpayer should not be paying to feed kids foods, the poorest kids in the country, that will give them diabetes.' The Breakdown: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wants to ban SNAP users from buying soda nationally. New waivers approved for Florida, Texas, and four other states on Monday. Kennedy and Rollins say the goal is to improve health and reduce Medicaid costs. Meanwhile in Texas, advocates say online SNAP expansion is helping. The tension underscores a national debate on food access vs. government regulation. Speaking at the Great American Farmers Market in Washington, Kennedy said sugary drinks and candies make up nearly 17% of current SNAP expenditures and argued the government 'pays twice' — first through SNAP benefits, then through the downstream cost of chronic diseases. Rollins echoed that message. 'One way … is disallowing taxpayer-funded benefits to purchase unhealthy items like soda, candy, and other junk food,' Rollins explained. 'SNAP is a supplemental nutrition program meant to provide food benefits to low-income families … essential to health and well-being.' Rollins signed new waivers on Monday for Florida, West Virginia, Oklahoma, Texas, Louisiana, and Colorado. These come in addition to previous waivers in Arkansas, Utah, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, and Nebraska, which restrict soda and candy in various forms starting in 2026. In her remarks, Rollins framed the effort as both fiscally responsible and morally urgent, citing statistics about obesity, diabetes, and mental health challenges in children. 'Over 75% of American youth between the ages of 17 and 24 are ineligible for military service because of obesity, poor physical fitness, or mental health challenges,' explained Rollins. Yet some believe Kennedy and Rollins' work to limit soda to promote health is misguided. 'The problem with soda consumption in the U.S. is not SNAP users,' Hilary Seligman, a public health researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, previously told The New York Times. 'If you try to solve this problem using SNAP as a lever, so only SNAP people are impacted by it, what we're likely to do is just increase stigma for people who are trying to make ends meet.' Some former Obama and Biden officials agree with Seligman. 'It doesn't pay for everyone's food for the entire month,' former Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack told NYT. 'So what would prevent people from spending their own money on sugary drinks or soda? The notion of restricting it for nutritional purposes really isn't a valid reason.' While the Trump administration officials were speaking about SNAP, Celebrindal Roberts, procurement and logistics manager for Farmshare Austin, was addressing attendees at the Southern Family Farmers and Food Systems Conference, held at Texas State University. Roberts offered a more local perspective on SNAP, noting that her nonprofit has accepted SNAP since 2016 and began accepting online SNAP in October 2024. She described online payments as a 'game-changer,' explaining that they reduce delivery and administrative costs, allow for unattended home delivery, and increase access to healthy food for people in areas with limited grocery infrastructure. 'You sell more food with Double Up Food Bucks and SNAP online,' Roberts said. Double Up Food Bucks (DUFB) is a program that allows SNAP users to double the value of their benefits when buying fruits and vegetables. Roberts praised the program but noted it currently does not cover canned goods or honey, which limits its reach in some food-insecure households. Roberts also said the online system has improved safety for delivery drivers and staff by reducing the need for carrying cash. Refunds from canceled or delayed orders are now returned directly to customers' SNAP cards, making the entire process more seamless for users and vendors alike. Farmshare Austin's 13-acre certified organic farm supplies a mobile market, home delivery program, and postpartum food access initiative. The group serves 25 ZIP codes in the Eastern Crescent of Austin and Travis County. While battles continue to rage about the prudence of various changes and innovations with SNAP, Kennedy insists that change is long overdue. 'For 20 years Democrats and Republicans have been talking about this on Capitol Hill,' he said. 'We have no problem with [soda consumption] … taxpayer dollars should not be funding these injuries to our children,' Kennedy said. Despite previous legal hurdles faced by states seeking to restrict SNAP purchases, Rollins and Kennedy say the administration is now working to bypass congressional gridlock and encourage all governors to submit waivers. It remains to be seen whether the growing push for restrictions will be met with resistance from health equity advocates, grocers, or SNAP recipients themselves. But both Kennedy and Rollins framed the reforms as a defining front in Trump's broader push for 'nutrition, not just food assistance.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's firing of the labor statistics chief could lead to a financial crisis
Donald Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer for releasing truthful employment figures showing a faltering U.S. economy is clearly not good news. But the consequences might be even worse than you think. Trump's actions weren't based on a methodological disagreement. He fired McEntarfer because he doesn't like the U.S. government releasing accurate numbers about the state of our economy — at least not when they make him look bad. In the short run, with luck, the impacts could be relatively modest. In the long run, without reforms to ensure quality data, this will lead to significantly slower economic growth than in other countries, and perhaps even a financial crisis. After McEntarfer's firing, government economic data can no longer be trusted or relied upon under this administration. Trump will not be able to appoint anyone with credibility to take over as BLS commissioner when it's already clear that person could be fired for releasing accurate data. The same goes for other statistical agencies, too. This doesn't mean all government data will be fraudulent going forward, but it does mean it will be less trustworthy. Government data analysts will do their best to produce credible reports, and much of what they publish will be accurate, but these workers will be increasingly subject to political pressures, or outright meddling. Reputational damage has already been done — and the decline in trust carries real consequences. The free availability of high-quality economic data from the government is an important part of how our economy operates. Businesses, entrepreneurs and families can't make good plans based on untrustworthy information. In practice, politicized data means the economic advantages Americans have long enjoyed — such as lower borrowing costs than the rest of the world — will begin to erode. Indeed, some experts and investors are already questioning whether higher interest rates will be necessary to compensate for the increased risks in the American economy brought about by Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner. This could lead to higher costs for both the U.S. government's debt payments and Americans' mortgages. Data reliability problems also create an uneven playing field for data, subtly undermining economic competition and growth. There will still be plenty of economic information available—it's just that the best data available won't be as good, and it won't be available to as many people. Private data companies will produce their own reports, but they simply aren't capable of the same scale as the government's current data collection efforts, and some of their reports will only be available to those who can pay. Established corporations that can afford alternative data sources will have a greater economic edge. Entrepreneurs won't have the same level of information to help them challenge more established players, so they'll do so less frequently and with less success. Worse, only Trump and his cronies will know whether, and how, government data has been juiced. This will give their companies a competitive economic advantage, further stifling competition. It also creates an additional incentive for corruption — and there is overwhelming evidence that corruption hinders growth in the long-run. Most troublingly, bad data can lead to financial crises because it allows political leaders to steer their countries into worse economic trouble than they would otherwise be able to. It's harder for investors, political opponents and anyone else outside the executive branch to warn about an inflationary or debt crisis if they don't know about it. Bad data can also exacerbate crises, as people are more likely to panic based solely on rumor. More and more, the United States looks like the countries we don't want to emulate. Firing the BLS commissioner echoes early warning signs from Argentina and China where gutting independent economic institutions paved the way for major economic collapse. Reliable data is but one of the many reasons democracies are generally rich and autocracies often are not. Autocrats try to erase facts that don't fit their preferred narrative. They get rid of people who tell the truth, including government experts, and use fear to stop dissent. Unsurprisingly, then, autocracies also frequently suffer deep economic crises. Firing the BLS commissioner may seem like a modest change in all the chaos the Trump administration has created, but it is not. Real damage has already been done. Still, most of the harmful economic consequences will be felt in the long term. This means there's still time for Americans to push back, and ensure the next administration can't cook the books. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Finally Gets His Glitzy White House Ballroom After Obama Rejected His Idea
The president's announcement of a massive White House ballroom comes 15 years after the Obama administration scorned his offer to build them a lavish new event space. Way back in 2011, Donald Trump told ABC News in an interview with George Stephanopoulos that the previous year, he'd spoken with President Barack Obama's office to propose replacing the 'old broken canvas tent' they were then using to entertain dignitaries with a glitzy new hall. In early 2015, former Obama adviser David Axelrod confirmed in his memoir, Believer, that Trump had indeed called him up to dunk on the existing space. 'Let me build you a ballroom you can assemble and take apart,' the reality TV star told him, according to the book. 'Trust me, it'll look great.' Former White House press secretary Josh Earnest later also confirmed Trump's offer, saying the administration had not taken it seriously because it would not have been 'appropriate to have a shiny gold Trump sign on any part of the White House.' While Trump's proposals might have initially gotten the cold shoulder, colder still has been his revenge. On Thursday his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, announced plans for a $200 million ballroom in the the East Wing of the White House. At an anticipated 90,000 total square feet—almost double the existing square footage of the White House, with more than triple the capacity of the the East Room, currently largest room in the White House—the designs bear uncanny resemblance to Trump's event hall at Mar-a-Lago, even as they also look to dwarf that hall by more than 70,000 square feet. 'They've wanted a ballroom at the White House for more than 150 years, but there's never been a president that was good at ballrooms—really good, in fact,' Trump told reporters Thursday. 'When they have big events, you entertain the president of China, the president of any place, and you have big crowds, they've always had a tent.' It's not the only change to White House architecture and design the president has made since assuming office for the second time in January. His administration has already liberally added gold accents to the Oval Office; paved over the lawn of the historic Rose Garden; ripped up the Palm Room; launched plans to replace the 'terrible' bathroom in Abraham Lincoln's former bedroom; and installed two 88-foot flagpoles flying enormous American flags outside the front of the building. The Daily Beast has reached out to the White House and President Barack Obama's representatives for comment on this story.
