HDFC Mutual Fund raises stake in Glenmark Pharmaceuticals to 5.07%. Details here
According to the filing, HDFC Mutual Fund purchased an additional 3.57 lakh equity shares of Glenmark Pharma, raising its holding by 0.13 percent. Prior to the transaction, the fund house held 1.39 crore shares, or 4.94 percent of the company. Post acquisition, its total shareholding stands at 1.43 crore shares, which translates to a 5.07 percent stake in the pharmaceutical major.
The stake increase is seen as a mark of confidence in the company's fundamentals and long-term growth potential, especially amid recent regulatory developments. As per the March 2025 shareholding pattern, Glenmark's promoters continue to hold a dominant 46.65 percent stake in the company.
In parallel with the stake hike, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals also updated the stock exchanges about a recent Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) inspection conducted by the USFDA at its Monroe, North Carolina facility in the U.S. The inspection, which spanned from June 9 to June 17, 2025, culminated in the issuance of a Form 483 with five observations.
The company was quick to clarify that the observations were procedural in nature and did not pertain to data integrity—an issue that often raises red flags in the pharmaceutical industry. In its exchange communication, Glenmark stated, 'The Company will work in close collaboration with the agency to address the observations and will respond to the USFDA within the stipulated timeline.'
A Form 483 is typically issued when the FDA investigator identifies possible violations of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act, but the absence of critical concerns such as data falsification is considered a relatively positive outcome.
On the market front, Glenmark Pharma shares saw some volatility, falling by as much as 1.5 percent to touch a low of ₹ 1,634.55 on June 18. The stock is still around 11 percent below its 52-week high of ₹ 1,830.05, which it had touched in October 2025. However, it remains significantly above its 52-week low of ₹ 1,199.95, seen in June 2024.
The recent price trajectory shows renewed investor interest, with the stock gaining 12.5 percent in June so far, following a 5.5 percent rise in May. This follows a choppy start to the year where the stock fell over 10 percent in April, surged 20.5 percent in March, and posted losses of 12 percent and 9.7 percent in February and January respectively.
Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Fair compensation act restricts multi-crop land acquisition: Minister
Bathinda: Union minister of state for agriculture Ramnath Thakur has made it clear that land can be acquired for public purposes under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (RFCTLARR) Act, 2013, but its Section 10 restricts the acquisition of multi-crop irrigated land, unless in exceptional cases where no alternative land is available. The Act came into force on Jan 1, 2014. The statement was made in a written reply to a question from Bathinda MP Harsimrat Kaur Badal on Tuesday. The response comes amid a controversy in Punjab, where the state govt's land pooling policy aiming to acquire nearly 65,000 acres of fertile land, is facing opposition from farmers. The minister said that data on conversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes is maintained at the state level, as land is a state subject. However, the RFCTLARR Act strongly discourages such conversions. To mitigate the impact on farmers, the Act provides for compensatory mechanisms, including monetary compensation, rehabilitation and resettlement benefits, and in some cases, land-for-land compensation, according to the minister. Despite a marginal decline in cultivable land, Thakur provided a positive outlook on the agriculture sector's performance. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Tiny Hearing Aid is Transforming Lives Across The UK Hear True Learn More Undo Citing the "Land Use Statistics-at a Glance 2023-24" report, he stated that the net sown area has remained relatively stable. Further, the gross cropped area has expanded significantly, rising from 201.3 million hectares in 2013-14 to 217.8 million hectares in 2023-24. Implementation of various govt initiatives and technological advancements have contributed to a continuous rise in cropping intensity. Harsimrat's question sought details on whether the govt acknowledged the decline in agricultural land, the factors contributing to it, and the specific steps taken to prevent the diversion of agricultural land for non-agricultural purposes.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
RICH Alliance: Trump's Tariff War Backfires? Russia Backs India And Hints At Emerging Ties With China
While U.S. President Donald Trump has reportedly stated that he will "substantially" increase tariffs on India, New Delhi has made it clear that it will not yield to pressure. Meanwhile, Russia has also pushed back against Washington's move. Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once famously said, 'Being America's enemy may be dangerous, but being its friend is fatal.' That sentiment seems to be playing out in real time as the relationship between India and the US may be emerging into a diplomatic turning point. In today's DNA episode, Managing Editor of Zee News, Rahul Sinha, analysed a possible alliance between India, Russia, and China: Watch Full DNA Episode Here: #DNAWithRahulSinha | वर्ल्ड ऑर्डर बदला.. यूएस का 'दबदबा' गया! 'मिशन RICH'..ट्रंप के लिए कितना घातक?#DNA #India #USA #DonaldTrump #TarrifWar@RahulSinhaTV — Zee News (@ZeeNews) August 5, 2025 In a strong statement, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova accused the U.S. of using tariffs as a tool to dominate other nations. She said countries that chose a different path from Washington were being economically pressured and that Russia supports a multipolar and equitable world order. This, she added, is why Russia stands with India—and even with China—against America's hegemonic approach. Zakharova further claimed the U.S. is reacting out of frustration as it struggles to accept its diminishing influence in the new world order. According to her, tariffs and sanctions will not stop the shift toward a new global structure. Zakharova also suggested, a new alliance could be on the brink after the US' tariffs announcement. This emerging alignment between Russia, India, and China could reshape the global balance of power. The question now being asked: Has Donald Trump's aggressive trade policy inadvertently triggered the rise of a powerful R-I-C-H bloc? What Is 'RICH'? A new alliance named 'RICH'—short for Russia, India, and China—could pose an even greater challenge to the United States than the BRICS. The acronym itself, symbolizing 'wealth and prosperity,' hints at a formidable coalition. While Russia has previously called for stronger India-Russia-China cooperation, current global tensions and Trump's policies may make this partnership more realistic than ever before. 'RICH' vs America GDP Power: America has a GDP of US Donald 28 trillion (Rs. 23 lakh crore), but the combined GDP of Russia, India, and China is close behind at Rs. 21 lakh crore. Population Power: Together, India, China, and Russia are home to nearly 3 billion people—about 37 percent of the world's population—far surpassing the U.S., which has just 330 million people or 4 percent of the global total. Military Strength: The combined military strength of the three nations is 4.8 million troops, compared to America's 1.3 million. Even when factoring in NATO allies, the numbers still tilt heavily toward the RICH bloc. Nuclear Arsenal: RICH nations possess approximately 6,300 nuclear weapons, compared to America's 5,200. Defense Capabilities, Self-Sufficiency While the U.S. remains the world's largest arms producer, Russia and China also rank among the top global arms manufacturers. India, too, is rapidly advancing toward self-reliance in defense production. Together, the three countries could pose a significant challenge to NATO on land, at sea, and in the air. However, experts caution that military confrontation between global powers could have catastrophic consequences, making economic and diplomatic battles more likely. Notably, these countries are also resource-rich and largely self-sufficient: Energy: Russia holds vast reserves of oil, gas, and coal and is a major exporter of fossil fuels. India is advancing in nuclear and solar energy, while China leads globally in the manufacture of solar panels and wind turbines. Natural Resources: Russia has significant reserves of titanium, nickel, cobalt, and uranium. China accounts for over 60 percent of global rare earth metal production. India, meanwhile, is rich in bauxite, iron ore, graphite, and manganese. Agriculture: India is the world's largest producer of milk and pulses. Russia leads in wheat exports, while China excels in agricultural machinery and food production. In short, if united, these three nations would have little need for external support in energy, food, or defense. Strategic Shifts and Diplomatic Openings While deep mistrust exists between India and China, recent developments suggest that the gap may be narrowing. India's National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval is set to visit China this month, followed by a trip by External Affairs Minister (EAM) S. Jaishankar. These diplomatic engagements, possibly accelerated by Trump's confrontational tactics, may help bridge long-standing divides.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Supreme Court order on green clearance paves way for 493 stalled real estate projects in Mumbai and Pune: CREDAI-MCHI
In a major victory for 493 stalled real estate projects across the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) and Pune, the Supreme Court (SC) on August 5 disposed of writ petition of Vanshakti NGO vs Union of India, and reaffirmed that the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) and State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) shall continue to remain the competent authorities for project-level environmental assessments. The Supreme Court judgment removes regulatory ambiguity that had severely impacted project approvals, construction timelines, and homebuyer confidence, CREDAI-MCHI said in a statement (Representational photo)(Pexels) In its ruling, the SC reaffirmed that the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) and the State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) would remain the competent authorities for conducting project-level environmental assessments, allowing state agencies to continue overseeing environmental clearances. "This landmark ruling brings long-awaited relief to over 493 projects stalled in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) and Pune, affecting more than 70,000 housing units, particularly in the affordable and mid-income segments. The judgment removes regulatory ambiguity that had severely impacted project approvals, construction timelines, and homebuyer confidence," CREDAI-MCHI said in a statement. Also Read: Over 70,000 housing units stalled across MMR amid green clearance hurdle According to the statement, the SC has also struck down key portions of the 2014 and 2016 notifications, specifically Clause 14(a) and Appendix 16, that had sought to introduce an Environmental Cell under local authorities, a move that would have led to confusion and potential overlaps in jurisdiction. Additionally, the court rejected the differential regulatory treatment for industrial sheds and educational buildings under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, underscoring the need for uniformity in environmental regulation, the statement said. Also Read: SC upholds environment ministry notification, junks exemption clause for big projects Domnic Romell, president, CREDAI-MCHI, said, 'This judgment is a direct result of CREDAI-MCHI's proactive legal intervention to protect the interests of our members and the thousands of homebuyers impacted by stalled projects. We initiated this petition to bring clarity to an increasingly complex and ambiguous environmental clearance process, and we are grateful that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has upheld the role of SEIAA and SEAC as competent authorities." Also Read: Over 25,000 buildings in Mumbai Metropolitan Region eligible for redevelopment with ₹30,000 cr value: CREDAI-MCHI According to CREDAI-MCHI's statement, the official order from the SC is awaited.
