Idaho governor signs into law child sex abuse death penalty bill, despite U.S. Supreme Court ruling
Idaho Gov. Brad Little signed into law a bill to make people who sexually abuse young children in Idaho eligible for the death penalty.
House Bill 380 will allow the death penalty in a new criminal charge the bill creates: aggravated lewd conduct with children age 12 and younger.
The bill also would add mandatory minimum prison sentences for cases of aggravated lewd conduct with minors that don't meet the bill's proposed criteria for death penalty eligibility. The new crime would only apply to abuse of children age 16 and below.
Little signed the bill Wednesday morning, according to the governor's office legislation tracker. He told the Idaho Capital Sun in a written statement that he signed the bill 'because heinous sex crimes against children destroy lives, and the perpetrators deserve the ultimate punishment.'
The Idaho Legislature widely passed the bill, with only five votes against in the Senate and none in the House.
The bill was cosponsored by Rep. Bruce Skaug, R-Nampa, House Assistant Majority Leader Josh Tanner, R-Eagle, and over a half dozen other Idaho lawmakers.
Skaug has told lawmakers Idaho has some of the nation's most lenient child rape laws.
The bill takes effect July 1.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The U.S. Supreme Court in 2008 blocked death penalties for child rape in Kennedy v. Louisiana.
Florida passed a child rape death penantly law two years ago. Last year, Tennesee passed a child rape death penalty law.
Idaho will be only state with firing squad as main execution method, after governor signs bill
Bracing for a legal challenge to the bill, Skaug told lawmakers he expects the U.S. Supreme Court would rule differently.
'You can say, 'Well, that's unconstitutional, Bruce. Why would you bring that?' Well, it was — according to a 5-4 decision in 2008. I don't think that would be the case today,' Skaug, an attorney, told lawmakers in a House committee hearing. 'That's my professional opinion. That's the opinion of many other attorneys.'
The American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho, or ACLU, strongly opposes the bill.
'Choosing to make this bill law not only demonstrates an arrogant disregard for legal precedent from our country's highest court, but it would also have devastating consequences that victims, their families, and wrongfully convicted people would be unable to reverse,' ACLU of Idaho spokesperson Rebecca De León told the Idaho Capital Sun in a prepared statement. 'This law will vastly increase death penalty prosecutions in Idaho, burdening an already flawed criminal legal system prone to wrongful convictions, inadequate public defense, and racial disparities.'
Skaug has said the death penalty would be rarely sought under his bill. Nine people are on death row in Idaho, according to the Idaho Department of Correction.
Idaho law only allows the death penalty in first-degree murder cases with aggravating circumstances.
Little also recently signed a bill into law that will make the Gem State the only state to use firing squads as its main execution method. Skaug also cosponsored that bill.
This year's child sex abuse death penalty bill is Skaug and Tanner's second attempt at such a bill. Last year, another bill they brought widely passed the House but never received a Senate committee hearing.
Their new bill that passed will establish the new crime, and mandatory minimums criminal sentences. For instance, the bill's proposed mandatory minimum sentence for aggravated lewd conduct with minors under age 16 would carry at least 25 years in prison.
Under the bill, lewd conduct with a minor would include but is not limited to 'genital-genital contact, oral-genital contact, anal-genital contact, oral-anal contact, manual-anal contact, or manual-genital contact' when such acts are meant to arouse, appeal to or gratify 'lust or passions or sexual desires.'
CONTACT US
The bill outlines more than a dozen aggravating factors under which prosecutors can seek the death penalty. Only three are required to seek the death penalty, which would only be available in cases of aggravated lewd conduct against minors age 12 and younger.
Public testimony has been largely supportive of the bill.
But in a Senate committee hearing on the bill, David Martinez of the Idaho Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers testified against the bill, saying at least three of the bill's aggravating factors were already present in almost every lewd conduct case he has handled or supervised.
He also argued the bill doesn't focus on 'the worst of the worst,' could potentially expose victims of decades of reliving trauma, and fails to account for Idaho's shortage of qualified death penalty defense attorneys.
Holly Rebholtz, representing the Idaho Prosecuting Attorneys Association, said she disagreed, saying the new aggravated lewd conduct crime wouldn't be charged very often.
'I don't think these crimes are going to come into play very often. But when they do, they are the most serious crimes we see. And again, the prosecutors believe that the most serious crimes against children deserve a serious punishment,' she testified.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
18 minutes ago
- Politico
GOP lawmakers start to sweat redistricting
Welcome to POLITICO's West Wing Playbook: Remaking Government, your guide to Donald Trump's unprecedented overhaul of the federal government — the key decisions, the critical characters and the power dynamics that are upending Washington and beyond. Send tips | Subscribe | Email Sophia | Email Irie | Email Ben President DONALD TRUMP's gambit to grow House Republicans' razor-thin majority through redistricting is starting to meet rare resistance from his own party. Two vulnerable GOP lawmakers — Reps. KEVIN KILEY of California and MIKE LAWLER of New York — are floating separate efforts to ban mid-decade redistricting as the Trump team's push for Texas Republicans to draw a more favorable map sets off a nationwide redistricting arms race. 'What's happening here is not popular among members in either conference,' Kiley told West Wing Playbook. 'I've talked to Republican members who are in states that could potentially benefit in the general political sense, but they don't like the idea of having their districts completely changed in the middle of the decade.' Lawler did not respond to a request for comment. Kiley filed a bill Tuesday aimed chiefly at stopping Democratic governors from retaliatory gerrymandering if Texas Republicans succeed in pushing through a new map that could net the GOP five seats in the midterms. Kiley and Lawler, both swing-district lawmakers, could feel the effects of Democratic redistricting. Lawler's seat, which has long been on Democrats' target list, would be among the districts where the party would try to stretch its advantage in the state. Kiley is also trying to prod Speaker MIKE JOHNSON and House Minority Leader HAKEEM JEFFRIES to reach an agreement to stop the redistricting tit-for-tat in its tracks, though that appears unlikely. 'The onus is on the speaker to show some leadership here,' Kiley said. GREG STEELE, spokesperson for Johnson's political arm, said 'while these efforts remain at the state level, Speaker Johnson is focused on leading the fight to defend and grow the House Republican majority in any district come 2026.' But the legislative pushback also constitutes rare GOP opposition to the president, who stoked the flames of the redistricting fight Tuesday by saying that Republicans are 'entitled' to five more seats in Texas — even as a White House official told our JAKE TRAYLOR that Trump's team is taking 'a pretty hands-off approach' to the partisan battle they set in motion. Kiley suggested that Trump 'doesn't want to see the California congressional delegation upended, or the New York delegation or some of these other states,' though he said he hasn't spoken with the president on the matter. 'It seems to me he was not given full information about how exactly these things might play out,' Kiley added. A person close to the president granted anonymity to describe internal thinking said Trump's team isn't sweating Democrats' threats of retaliation. Democrats face steep obstacles to redistricting even in their best-case-scenario state of California, where Gov. GAVIN NEWSOM plans to call a special election and potentially spend massive sums to convince voters to return mapmaking power from an independent commission to lawmakers. And Republicans are starting to push for redistricting in states beyond Texas, including Missouri. 'Republicans have more opportunity than Democrats' to redraw maps, and 'Democrats' hurdles in the opportunities they claim to have are much higher, because Democrats have extreme gerrymandered maps in their favor everywhere they can,' the person said. The White House's power-protection play carries increasing political risk. As more Democratic governors vow to retaliate, BRENDAN STEINHAUSER, a Texas-based Republican strategist, warned the GOP's redistricting effort 'could backfire if there are enough Democratic seats out there and enough Democratic governors to redraw the maps in a way that ends up hurting Republicans nationwide.' Game out the chess match further and Republicans' machinations could complicate Trump's agenda in Washington. Trump has gotten nearly everything he's wanted from this GOP House. Even if Republicans hold the House next year, they could do so at the expense of some of those Trump-loyal members. 'It could become a real headache for Johnson, building a majority by sacrificing parts of the current majority,' said California-based GOP strategist ROB STUTZMAN. He added: 'What a shock Trump didn't think it through.' MESSAGE US — West Wing Playbook is obsessively covering the Trump administration's reshaping of the federal government. Are you a federal worker? A DOGE staffer? Have you picked up on any upcoming DOGE moves? We want to hear from you on how this is playing out. Email us at westwingtips@ Did someone forward this email to you? Subscribe! POTUS PUZZLER Which president signed the nation's first federal income tax into law? (Answer at bottom.) WHO'S IN, WHO'S OUT NOT A TAR HEEL: The director of Voice of America, MICHAEL ABRAMOWITZ, has been terminated after refusing to accept a demotion in North Carolina, according to court documents released Monday. JOHN ZADROZNY, a senior adviser to the U.S. Agency for Global Media, VOA's parent company, said in a letter that Abramowitz's 'failure to accept a directed geographic reassignment warrants removal from your position for such cause as to promote the efficiency of the Federal service.' In July, acting USAGM CEO VICTOR MORALES notified Abramowitz that he was being reassigned to the VOA station in Greenville, North Carolina, and being given a new position. In his sworn declaration, Abramowitz said that the rationale for sending him to North Carolina 'does not make sense.' 'I understand that Defendants have indicated that they only plan to broadcast in four languages at VOA (Mandarin, Farsi, Pashto and Dari),' he wrote. 'But the Greenville station, which has historically provided shortwave radio broadcasts mainly to West Africa and Latin America, does not serve countries that speak any of those languages.' Abramowitz is the main plaintiff in a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the president issued an executive order dismantling USAGM. 'My efforts are not about holding onto a government job, but instead about upholding the rule of law and preserving the Voice of America, which is so important to the national security of the United States,' Abramowitz wrote in a message to VOA staff Monday. KARI LAKE, who serves as USAGM senior adviser, told West Wing Playbook that 'We're in good faith union negotiations. This is part of the process.' WE'RE HIRING: The National Weather Service has received permission to hire 450 meteorologists, hydrologists and radar technicians months after the agency faced sweeping DOGE-led cuts, CNN's ANDREW FREEDMAN reports. The new hiring number includes 126 new positions that will apply to 'front-line mission critical' personnel, a NOAA official told CNN. Musk Radar FIVE THINGS UNDONE: The White House today officially ended a program which required federal employees to summarize five weekly achievements in emails, our NICOLE MARKUS and Sophia report. The mandate was originally introduced in February by ELON MUSK as part of an effort to trim the federal workforce. Office of Personnel Management Director SCOTT KUPOR said in a statement that OPM informed agency leads that it would no longer 'manage' the process 'nor utilize it internally.' 'At OPM, we believe that managers are accountable to staying informed about what their team members are working on and have many other existing tools to do so,' Kupor said. Agenda Setting ZELDIN'S ON A HEATER: The EPA is preparing to terminate $7 billion in federal grants aimed at assisting low- and moderate-income families to install solar panels on their homes, NYT's MAXINE JOSELOW reports. The agency is drafting termination letters to 60 nonprofit groups and state agencies that received the grants under the 'Solar for All' program, with the goal of sending the letters by the end of this week. It's the latest move by the Trump administration to claw back billions of dollars in grants awarded under former President JOE BIDEN's Inflation Reduction Act. Representatives for the EPA did not immediately respond to a request for comment. REVERSING COURSE: Months after the Trump administration said it axed a multibillion-dollar grant program for disaster protection, administration officials said in a court document that it did not actually cancel the program, POLITICO's E&E News' THOMAS FRANK reports. In April, the administration canceled the grant program called Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities, and removed all $4.1 billion from the BRIC account. But in a declaration last month for a court case challenging the move, FEMA acting administrator DAVID RICHARDSON said, 'FEMA has not ended the BRIC program, contrary to publicity otherwise.' He acknowledged his agency's role in that publicity, saying, 'Despite FEMA's public announcements … FEMA/DHS has not ended BRIC.' When presented with the declaration, even BRIC supporters struggled to understand it. 'The information that has been out so far seems to contradict [the declaration], and we want to make sure we're understanding FEMA's intention. This is happy news if this is the case,' said MARY JO FLYNN-NEVINS, head of governmental affairs for the International Association of Emergency Managers, which strongly supports the BRIC program. WHERE'S THE MONEY, LEBOWSKI? The investigative arm of Congress found that the National Institutes of Health illegally withheld funds lawmakers required it to spend, our ERIN SCHUMAKER reports. The Government Accountability Office today said that the Trump administration failed to follow the requirements of the Impoundment Control Act, which determines when a president can cancel funding appropriated by Congress. In implementing a communications pause earlier this year at HHS, and in complying with Trump's various executive orders, the 'NIH withheld funds from obligation and expenditure,' according to the GAO's report. The watchdog also found that HHS failed to inform Congress or the GAO of whether the money is being spent in another way. OUR LIPS ARE SEALED: Defense Secretary PETE HEGSETH has banned officials at a missile defense conference in Alabama this week from discussing the president's favorite weapon system: the multibillion-dollar Golden Dome missile shield, our JOE GOULD and JACK DETSCH report. It follows new rules from the Pentagon that ban personnel from participating in think tank and research organization events. Hegseth's public affairs office told organizers of the Space and Missile Defense Symposium to keep the Golden Dome off the agenda. The Pentagon, when asked for comment, pointed to a July announcement about the creation of an office to oversee the missile shield's development. What We're Reading A Terrible Five Days for the Truth (The Atlantic's David A. Graham) 'Unlike Anything We've Seen': The Energy Industry is Counting on the AI Boom (POLITICO's Debra Kahn) A Look Inside Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan Lair (NYT's David Enrich, Matthew Goldstein, Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Steve Eder) POTUS PUZZLER ANSWER President ABRAHAM LINCOLN signed the first federal income tax into law on this date in 1861 in a rush to finance the Civil War. Lincoln's tax imposed a 3 percent tax on annual incomes over $800.
New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Hysterical Hochul vowing to flout law to redraw voting map
Gov. Kathy Hochul is on a mission . . . to prove she can spew blarney with the best. 'Children are starving,' Hochul emoted to Rachel Maddow on Monday; that's why she'll 'fight fire with fire' by redrawing New York's House districts to counteract Texas' redistricting plan — which she calls a 'declaration of war on the American people.' Utter hogwash: The gov claims kids are 'starving' because Republicans cut SNAP (food stamp) benefits; in fact, the expanded work requirements (for some recipients) won't kick in until 2027 at the soonest — it's another phony 'famine.' The string of nonstop lies began with Hochul's pledge in a Houston Chronicle column to save 'our democracy' by gerrymandering New York's congressional map to kill Republican-leaning seats if Texas GOP lawmakers go ahead with their Democrat-reducing plan. Yet the gov can't get New York redistricted that fast: The state Constitution not only explicitly forbids (nakedly) partisan map-drawing, it also orders redistricting get done at the turn of the decade. As it is, the state just redrew its maps last year after long court battles prompted by state Democrats' 2021 drive to kill GOP districts. Even after Dems packed the state's top court, the justices will find it hard to swallow Hochul ordering up a new map just because she's changed her mind about the one she signed into law a year ago. So she'd need to get the state Constitution amended first — and that's at least a two-year process that she'd have to start by calling a special session since the Legislature finished for the year months ago. Hochul's just jumping on the Democrat outrage wagon, along with Govs. Gavin Newsom and J.B. Pritzker. Yet, unlike those two blowhards, Hochul isn't even eyeing a 2028 presidential run, so why bother with this bull? Our best guess: She figures Democrats are so deep in denial that they'll turn on her if she doesn't join in the fibbing. Which prompts the question: Who's more pathetic here — Hochul or her whole party?
New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats howling at Texas redistrict push should take a look in the mirror
Let's take a tour of the 13th congressional district in Illinois. It starts in East St. Louis and then moves steadily north. By the time it gets to Springfield, home of Abraham Lincoln, about 90 miles away, it takes a sharp turn to the east, reaching Decatur and finally Champaign, itself about 80 miles away from Springfield. Advertisement It's a jagged, narrow strip of territory with no obvious rhyme or reason as it traverses six counties. It's less a congressional district than a road trip, and bears a resemblance to the original gerrymander, a long, salamander-like state Senate district in Massachusetts in 1812. The only point of the new 13th district lines, fashioned in the redistricting after the 2020 census, was to gather together far-flung Democrats to create another Democratic congressional district. Advertisement Mission accomplished: The 13th went from being a competitive district long held by a Republican to flipping to the Democrats in 2022. Overall, Illinois lost one district after the 2020 census and managed to write lines that changed the congressional ratio from a 13-5 Democratic advantage to a 14-3 Democratic advantage. The political analysis website 538 called the new map 'the worst gerrymander in the country drawn by Democrats.' Advertisement This makes it especially inapt that a contingent of Texas Democrats fleeing the Lone Star state to try to stop what they consider unfair new congressional boundaries found a safe harbor in Illinois. Next time their travel agent should do a hypocrisy check before booking a destination. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker welcomed the self-exiling Democrats and hailed their courage. He told them that he and other top Democrats in the state were pleased 'to stand in solidarity with you and send a clear message to all Americans.' Advertisement His conscience showed no sign of being pricked by the fact that he signed into law the redistricting that saw Republicans in 2022 win nearly 44% of the popular vote in Illinois congressional races — and only 18% of the congressional seats. A special session of the Texas Legislature is considering new lines that could net Republicans another five House seats. Gov. Greg Abbott has cited a Department of Justice letter saying that some of the current districts need to be redrawn because they represent unconstitutional racial gerrymandering (the Biden Justice Department had been fighting Texas because, in its view, the current lines didn't reflect enough racial gerrymandering). The Supreme Court is taking up a Louisiana case that should clarify the extent to which states can consider race in drawing so-called majority-minority districts. In the meantime, the partisan effect of the new Texas lines before the 2026 mid-terms is unmistakable: If Republicans were likely to lose five seats from this redistricting, there's no doubt that the state's Republican governor and Republican legislature wouldn't be undertaking it. Drawing district lines is an inherently political enterprise, and parties tend to give themselves the best of it. When Democrats controlled the Texas Legislature, they maintained congressional lines in their favor. Advertisement It wasn't until 2002, when Republicans won the state house for the first time since Reconstruction, that the GOP could redraw the congressional map — and Republicans subsequently won a majority of Texas congressional seats in 2004, also for the first time since Reconstruction. Since Democrats gerrymander too, they have limited options for retaliating against Texas. Pritzker says he may re-draw his state's lines, but this would require gerrymandering on top of his current gerrymander. Advertisement Gavin Newsom is making similar noises, but the California map is already tilted toward Democrats: Republicans won nearly 40% of the congressional vote in the Golden State in 2024, but only about 17% of the seats. If the Texas plan goes through and all else remains equal, the Lone Star state will have about the same partisan skew as California. Less gerrymandering would be better than more, but Democrats like Pritzker, who blessed his state's meandering 13th district, have no standing to make the case. Twitter: @RichLowry
