India-Central Asia dialogue condemns terrorism, calls for cooperation
New Delhi [India], June 6 (ANI): The 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue concluded with a strong condemnation of terrorism and a commitment to enhance cooperation in the region in the backdrop of the April 22 Pahalgan terror attack, which claimed the lives of 26 tourists.
The Ministers reaffirmed their commitment to fighting terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, stressing that perpetrators, organizers, financiers, and sponsors of terrorist acts must be held accountable.
'The Ministers unequivocally condemned the terrorist attack in Pahalgham. They reaffirmed their firm commitment to fight against terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. They reiterated that providing safe haven, using terrorist proxies for cross-border terrorism, terror financing, arms and drugs trafficking, dissemination of a radical ideology and abuse of cyber space to spread disinformation and incite violence, goes against the basic principles of humanity and international relations,' read the Joint Statement of 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue.
India and the five Central Asian nations' foreign ministers--Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan--emphasised the need to strengthen UN-led global counterterrorism cooperation and fully implement relevant UNSC resolutions, the Global Counterterrorism Strategy, and FATF standards.
'They stressed that perpetrators, organizers, financiers and sponsors of terrorist acts must be held accountable and brought to justice. In this context, they called for early adoption of the UN Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism. They stressed the need to strengthen UN-led global counter-terrorism cooperation and fully implement the relevant UNSC resolutions, Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy and FATF standards,' added the statement.
The Ministers noted the importance of holding regular consultations among the National Security Councils of India and the Central Asian countries to strengthen efforts to counter terrorism and other emerging challenges in the region. They looked forward to the third edition of the Consultations to be held in the Kyrgyz Republic.
The Ministers reaffirmed their commitment to deepening and expanding collaboration in capacity building. In this regard, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of Central Asian countries appreciated the successful organisation of capacity building programmes by India for Drug Law Enforcement Officers from Central Asian countries in December 2024 and on Countering Financing of Terrorism in New Delhi in April 2025, added the statement.
They expressed strong support for a peaceful and stable Afghanistan, free from terrorism, war, and drugs, and agreed to continue close coordination and consultations on matters related to Afghanistan.
'The Ministers reiterated their strong support for a peaceful and stable Afghanistan which is free from terrorism, war and drugs. They stressed the need to stand by the people of Afghanistan. The Ministers agreed to continue close coordination and consultations on matters related to Afghanistan,' added the statement.
The Ministers appreciated the successful annual visits of youth delegations from Central Asian countries to India and emphasised the role of such visits in building strong people-to-people ties. Taking note of the large number of students from India and the Central Asian countries studying in each other's higher educational institutions, the Ministers stressed the importance of ensuring their welfare.
The Ministers also reaffirmed their commitment to work towards advancing mutual objectives and deepening collaboration across shared priorities to prepare ground for holding the second India-Central Asia Summit at a mutually convenient date in 2025.
The meeting, chaired by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, concluded with a shared commitment to bolster counter-terrorism cooperation through institutional dialogue, legal coordination, and capacity building.
The Ministers of Central Asian countries thanked the External Affairs Minister of India for the warm hospitality accorded to their delegations for the 4th meeting of the India-Central Asia Dialogue in New Delhi. The Ministers agreed to hold the next meeting of the India-Central Asia Dialogue in 2026, read the bvstatement. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
35 minutes ago
- The Print
Why India needs to play hardball on UNSC reform
Efforts have been made in the past by the G4 nations—Germany, Japan, Brazil, and India—to become permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). But why would the five powers—China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US—would want to weaken themselves by accommodating the rising powers? China got into the Security Council, thanks to the Cold War, as the US wanted to poke Russia in the eye, and Russia, being a brother Communist nation, did not protest. China got Taiwan's seat in the UNSC after the latter was formally expelled from the UN in 1971. Ideally, India should have replaced the UK, seemingly the weakest member of the post-war permanent powers, but that didn't happen. Unlike in the past, where Indian diplomacy played a very small role in shaping institutions, this time we should be among the key rule-makers, and not just in name. The world order that emerged after World War 2 was largely influenced by America, and, to some extent, by Europe and Russia. Whether it is the United Nations, World Trade Organization, World Bank, or the International Monetary Fund, India does not significantly influence decisions of any of these bodies in any way, despite being the most populous country in the world, and, by some accounts, the fourth-largest economy. It wasn't only India that lost out. The two defeated nations in that war, Germany and Japan, despite becoming major powers a few decades later, did not get their due in the power structure either. In a crumbling world order, where the so-called rules-based institutions have been mangled out of shape by recalcitrant big powers, why shouldn't India take its own little hammer and knock some portions off the edifice? When a structure is creaking, isn't it better to accelerate its fall rather than seeking temporary shelter under it? While four of the five permanent members agree that India must join the UNSC, China has been against it. The US may not formally object, but is willing to let China be the bad guy in this case. Time to gatecrash When the powerful are not willing to open the gates for the deserving, it is time to gatecrash and make oneself heard. A few things can be done, one with the partners, and the other on our own. The G4 foreign ministers meeting, held at the margins of the 79th Session of the UN General Assembly in September last year, made another pitch for changes in the UNSC, both by expanding its permanent and rotating memberships. The appeal has, as always, fallen on deaf ears, as China has no interest in allowing India or Japan to join the league of permanent members. It is now time to start forcing the issue. But the question is how? Three things can be done fairly quickly, in sequence. One, a summit of the G4 prime ministers must endorse the call for UNSC reform and set a deadline for change in its structure, failing which they will act. It must force the P5 to listen and change. Two, to signal serious intent, secretariats for the G4 outlining UN reform can be created in Delhi and Bonn (Germany), with the purpose of engaging not only among themselves, but also to consult more members who want change. Pressure must be built to create a new charter for the UNSC, where it has wider powers to stop small wars and where no single power can veto action. A graded majority of veto-wielding powers would be needed to stop (or start) action. At least two of the five current members may object to that, but we must start piling the pressure on the P5. Three, even if it is not joined by the other three in the G4, India should prepare for unilateral action by saying that it will no longer be bound by UNSC decisions unless it is part of the process. This could, in fact, lead to temporary sanctions, but merely talking and doing nothing is not an option. The US imposed sanctions on India soon after the Pokhran 2 nuclear tests in 1998. But within a few years, it was forced to change course. Today, there is even less chance that the US or China can even jointly enforce any sanctions, given how poorly sanctions have worked against Iran and even Russia. Also read: No more lip service on UNSC reforms—it's time to form an implementation roadmap 'Netaji redux' Kishore Mahbubani, a former Singapore diplomat, who is usually an expert on Chinese affairs and critical of Western policies toward China, says that India can, and should, force the issue. He pointed out, in an interview with The Times of India last year, that the UNSC was forced to back off when unfair resolutions were imposed on Libya in 1998. When the Organisation of African Unity declined to accept it, the Council backtracked. 'The UNSC will also blink if India were to defy UN resolutions,' Mahbubani said. India needs to play hardball on UN reform from now on. Thanks to Donald Trump's shenanigans, where both friends and foes have been treated badly, and China's growing military power and dominance in manufacturing and tech economy, most countries feel threatened enough to seek change. Germany and Japan are remilitarising. They are looking beyond an unpredictable US to widen military cooperation and build economic partnerships that will gradually reduce over-dependence on China. India should be offering co-development, joint ownership, and even outright purchases of military and other equipment to force change. German and Japanese investments in India must be fast-tracked. Let's call this Netaji redux. In the 1940s, when India was still under British rule, Subhas Chandra Bose struck up links with Germany and Japan to help free India. It was doomed to fail, as it happened when the war was beginning to turn in favour of the Allies, and most Indian leaders balked at the idea of supporting warmongers like Hitler and Hideki Tojo. Today, neither Germany nor Japan, both solid democracies, belong in the 'League of the Bad'. It is time to rebuild this partnership for both defence and economic development. The G4 must rise for the P5 misrule, based purely on narrow interests, to end. R Jagannathan is the former editorial director, Swarajya magazine. He tweets @TheJaggi. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Bangladesh settles $384 million payment to Adani Power amid financial struggles
Bangladesh paid $384 million to Adani Power in June, significantly reducing its outstanding dues under a power supply agreement with the Indian firm, according to sources. In June (till June 27), Bangladesh has paid $384 million of the committed $437 million to be paid during the month, two sources aware of the matter said. This would clear Bangladesh's "admitted" claims till March 31. With this, Adani's "claimed" dues, while still substantial, will come down to around $500 million (assuming Bangladesh meets its month-end commitment), they said. Bangladesh has struggled to meet its payment obligations under the 2017 deal, as rising import costs following the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022 and domestic political turmoil - which led to the ouster of prime minister Sheikh Hasina - strained the country's finances. As a result, Adani had halved supply last year and full supplies were resumed in March 2025 after the country's monthly payments started covering some of the dues. With the latest payments, Bangladesh has paid nearly $1.5 billion of the roughly $2 billion total billed amount. Adani has reportedly agreed to waive late payment surcharge (LPS) for January-June period, amounting to about $20 million, if Bangladesh keeps its payment commitment. Sources said both parties are engaged in discussion to resolve some issues related to coal cost and plant capacity calculations. These are the key reasons behind the difference between "claimed" and "admitted" dues. When contacted, an Adani Power spokesperson confirmed the payments but didn't share details on "claimed" and "agreed" dues stating these discussions are private. The 2017 power supply deal between Adani Power and Bangladesh had come in for scrutiny after the ouster of the Sheikh Hasina-led government last year. Interim government, led by Nobel Peace prize laureate Muhammad Yunus, called for the formation of a high-level committee, comprising energy and legal experts, to re-examine the power purchase agreement (PPA). Under the 2017 deal, Adani Power's Godda power plant in Jharkhand was to supply 100 per cent of the electricity generated from burning coal, to Bangladesh for a period of 25 years. After payment defaults, Adani had cut supplies by half in November 2024. It restored full electricity supply, which is around 1,600 MW, in March after the country reduced liabilities. Bangladesh stepped up repayments from July last year, clearing monthly dues. This came after the country suffered from increased power shortages in rural areas. Bangladesh has been struggling to generate sufficient dollar revenues to cover the cost of essential imports such as electricity, coal, and oil. Its foreign currency reserves declined amid months of student-led protests and political unrest, which culminated in the ousting of the Sheikh Hasina government in August 2024. The interim government that succeeded her sought an additional $3 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on top of the existing $4.7 billion bailout package. Adani's power deal with Bangladesh was one of the many under Sheikh Hasina, which the current interim government has called opaque. Besides Adani Power, other Indian state-owned firms also sell power to Bangladesh, including NTPC and PTC India Ltd.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Iran Asks UN To Recognise US, Israel As Aggressors In Recent Attacks
Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi on Sunday wrote a letter addressed to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and UNSC President Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett to recognise Israel and the United States as the initiators of the "aggression" against Iran. According to the IANS citing IRNA news agency, Araghchi urged the UNSC to fulfil its responsibility in maintaining international peace and security. He also accused Israel of intentionally striking residential buildings, civilians, and essential infrastructure, calling the attacks a "clear violation" of the UN Charter and a "gross breach" of international law. Araghchi stated that Israel and the United States had also attacked Iran's nuclear facilities — which are under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) — in a "serious breach of the UN Charter, the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the IAEA's regulations and resolutions." The Iranian foreign minister also stressed that the UNSC should hold the "aggressors" accountable and act to prevent the recurrence of such "crimes." Earlier, on June 13, Israel launched major airstrikes on several areas in Iran, including nuclear and military sites, killing senior commanders, nuclear scientists, and numerous civilians. Iran also responded Israel with multiple waves of missile and drone attacks. On June 22, US forces made an entery in support of Israel an bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. In retaliation, Iran struck the US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. After 12 days of fighting, a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was reached on Tuesday. (With IANS inputs)
