The Absolute Best Dewy Foundations You Can Get In Canada Right Now
The right foundation can give you a serious confidence boost, but finding your perfect match can be pretty challenging. The internet is full of options, but with all that competition, you could spend hours online and still not know which one to choose.
To help you out, we've scoured the web, read the reviews, and found the best of the best when it comes to giving you what you want: coverage that leaves you glowing while hiding imperfections. From inexpensive but effective to high-end and worth every penny, we've got you covered.
Here are the absolute best dewy/radiant finish foundations you can get in Canada right now:
The Absolute Best Brow Gels You Can Get In Canada Right Now
The Absolute Best Setting Sprays You Can Get In Canada Right Now
The Absolute Best Sunscreen For Oily Skin You Can Get In Canada Right Now
Disclaimer: The prices displayed are accurate at the time of publication. We'll do our best to keep them as up-to-date as possible, but you may see slight changes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
3 hours ago
- CTV News
Toronto's Rogers Stadium set to welcome Coldplay, with crowd control ‘adjustments'
A worker walks past the stage at the brand new 50000 capacity concert venue, Rogers Stadium, in Toronto, Thursday, June 26, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette TORONTO — Rogers Stadium is set to welcome tens of thousands of Coldplay fans tonight for the first of four shows by the British rock band, as organizers say they are 'making adjustments' to improve crowd control at Toronto's newest outdoor music venue. After the venue's inaugural concert last Sunday, some attendees said it took up to two hours to exit the stadium as the site and transit services seemed ill-equipped to handle the large crowds. Concertgoers also complained about limited access to water at the stadium, with some describing hour-long lineups at bottle filling stations that dispensed warm water in some cases. Live Nation Canada, which operates the stadium near Downsview Park, says it will be adding more signage, lighting, staff and water stations to improve the fan experience. It also says the stadium's exit routes will be reconfigured to disperse crowds to all three nearby subway stations in order to mitigate crowding at the Downsview Park station, which also serves GO train passengers. The Toronto Transit Commission has said it will be adding more staff to its Downsview Park and Wilson stations on concert nights, while Metrolinx only said it would 'closely monitor' GO train ridership levels for events at the stadium. Meanwhile, Ticketmaster has sent an email to Coldplay ticket holders advising them that cellular reception at Rogers Stadium gates 'will be limited as this is a large-capacity venue.' James Pasternak, a city councillor whose ward includes the Downsview Park area, said 'respectful but blunt' conversations about what needs to be improved at Rogers Stadium took place on Wednesday during a meeting with Live Nation and Northcrest Developments, which owns the property. 'With concerts scheduled all summer and shortcomings apparent from the first performance, we put pressure on all responsible parties to sort out concerns,' Pasternak said in a social media post. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 7, 2025. Natasha Baldin, The Canadian Press
CBC
3 hours ago
- CBC
Unethical or inevitable? Artists question where to draw the line on AI-generated art
A Halifax photographer using ChatGPT to transform her images into illustrations is opening up a conversation about the purpose of art in the age of artificial intelligence Lauren Thomander recently began selling a series of prints on her Etsy page inspired by the illustrated covers of The New Yorker magazine. But when they were reposted on Halifax Noise, a popular Instagram feed with more than 80,000 followers, the response was mixed. Some praised the work and eagerly followed the link to her shop to purchase a print, but others, including many illustrators themselves, were quick to criticize the idea. "People are kind of saying that AI trains itself with other people's work, and that it's not my work anymore," she said. "I don't see it that way because it is my picture that you can see there." In Thomander's view, using ChatGPT to make an illustration is no different than using software to edit photos. "Whether you're maybe changing the background of a photo, removing somebody that's in the way of your subject, or even putting a filter over it, I feel like that's all kind of in the same boat as AI," she said. 'The process is totally unethical' says illustrator Illustrator and printmaker Alex MacAskill strongly disagrees. The print may have originated from Thomander's picture, but she's a photographer and not an illustrator, he says. "I think if you flip the situation on the other end and take illustrations you want to convert into photography, I can't help but feel that the person on the other end of the equation would feel similar to how illustrators feel in this particular situation," said MacAskill, who owns and operates Midnight Oil Print and Design House in Halifax. He said Thomander could have realized her idea instead through collaborating with another artist. "To replace that with AI … and to remove that person from the process is totally unethical," he said Large-language models, like those used to build ChatGPT or Google's Gemini or Anthropic's Claude, are trained by mining large data sets that include the creative output of many thousands of artists and writers, often without their consent. When you ask ChatGPT a question, for instance, it's using that data to answer the query, which is why it's able so quickly to translate Thomander's work into an illustration that wouldn't look out of place on the cover of The New Yorker. Photography was once seen as threat It's no secret that many previous innovations in the world of technology have been received skeptically in the art world. It wasn't that long ago that photography was viewed as an existential threat to painting, says Ray Cronin, the curator for the Beaverbrook Gallery in Fredericton. "When photography was introduced in the 19th century, people were convinced it was going to kill painting," Cronin said. Even more recently, when Mary Pratt, a renowned Canadian artist who was known for making lifelike paintings of everyday objects, began painting from photographs in the late 1960s, there were some people who thought she wasn't playing by the rules "Her parents thought she was cheating because she wasn't inventing the images herself," said Cronin, who wrote a book about Pratt's life and work. Pratt would select an image from her collection of photos, maybe one she took herself. From there, she would project the image onto a blank canvas and trace the outline before starting to paint by hand. It was all part of what Cronin says was her desire to "make the human eye look at the world the way the camera looks at the world." "The skill to do that is immense," he said " It's not something that could just be fed into some kind of algorithm." When Pratt died in 2018, this was unquestionably true. The matter has become more complicated in the age of readily available generative AI. A simple prompt on ChatGPT asking to "create a painting with apples in the style of Mary Pratt" will churn out an image that might, to a less discerning viewer, look just like the real thing. But this ignores a key quality of Pratt's work, Cronin said. Although photography played a role in the work, Pratt's paintings are special because they were made by a real person using real materials. "Everybody knows the experience of seeing something, whether it's a photograph or a painting or a sculpture, that you can't just walk by. You have to actually look at it. And the longer you look at it, the more you see," he said. Even still, Cronin is not ready to write off AI altogether. "I think AI is a tool and tools are only as good as the people who use them. And they're only as interesting as what's made with them." However, he hasn't found much art made with AI particularly interesting. "I'd rather see somebody with their mistakes and failures and experiments … than the kind of perfection AI always seems to create," he said. Imperfection makes art interesting, says Cronin Art, in his view, isn't perfection. It's the absence of it. In Pratt's 1994 painting Glassy Apples, that much is clear. The painting, based on a photograph she'd taken of a crystal bowl filled with apples that had been a wedding present, was made as her marriage to painter Christopher Pratt was falling apart. "The thing she always pointed out about that work that was most important to her is that there's a chip in the rim of the crystal bowl," said Cronin. When she took the photo in advance of the painting, she turned the bowl so that a chip was visible. "She's showing that there's a crack in everything. It's breaking," he said. "That's not something you'd get from asking AI to make a bowl of apples in Mary Pratt's style." Future unknown For both MacAskill and Thomander, how AI will affect art in the future is an open question. Beyond the ethical implications of using AI, MacAskill worries about what may happen if we lose sight of why art is valuable in the first place. "I think to value the convenience of creating something over the humanity behind it is really just doing a disservice to all of us," he said. But Thomander believes that as AI continues to develop as a technology, it will be prudent to get acquainted with how it works.
CBC
4 hours ago
- CBC
What you need to know ahead of Bluesfest 2025
News Duration 3:05 CBC's Nkele Martin has all the details on how to get there, what time the gates open and what fans can and cannot bring into the festival.
