
Will Thailand's deep south ever see lasting peace? – DW – 05/20/2025
Since January 2004, Thailand's deep south has seen ongoing conflict between separatist groups seeking greater autonomy and Thai military forces.
The violence is largely confined to the country's three southernmost provinces, Narathiwat, Pattani and Yala — home to a Muslim Malay majority in the predominantly Buddhist nation.
The region is located along the Thai-Malaysia border, and has seen over 23,000 violent incidents, leading to more than 7,000 deaths, according to Deep South Watch, a local think tank.
The Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN), the dominant separatist group, has been implicated in attacks targeting civilians, including Buddhist monks and schoolteachers, according to Human Rights Watch.
Deadly attacks escalate conflict
Between January and early May this year, 38 violent incidents were recorded — almost as many as in all of 2024. Don Pathan, a Thailand-based security analyst, points to two attacks as key escalations.
Why is Thailand expelling Uyghur asylum seekers to China now
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The first came after Thailand's National Security Council and the BRN failed to reach a Ramadan ceasefire agreement in March, after which Thai Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai insisted that all violence must stop before talks resume.
The BRN responded with a March 9 attack on Narathiwat's Sungai Kolok District Office, wounding 12 people and killing two volunteer defense officers.
The second major incident came after the April 18 killing of senior BRN member Abdulroning Lateh, which saw the insurgents escalate beyond the rules of engagement in conflict by targeting civilians.
A brutal attack came on May 2 when a gunman shot dead at least three people in a residential area of Narathiwat province, including a 9-year-old girl, a 75-year-old man and a 76-year-old blind woman.
In response, Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra deployed more troops to the region to bolster security. And last week, Deputy PM Phumtham Wechayachai said that the Thai government is willing to engage in peace talks.
Thaksin vows to achieve peace
Tita Sanglee, an associate fellow at Singapore's ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, believes both politicians' efforts are symbolic rather than practical.
"Paetongtarn and Phumtham's peace efforts are more symbolic than substantive. We all know that the situation on the ground is not really conducive to peace," she told DW.
"Phumtham's stance, at least early on, was quite tough. He was basically saying, 'we won't engage in talks unless the BRN proves its legitimacy by ending violence on the ground.'"
"I see this largely as a way to shift scrutiny onto the insurgents — and ultimately to shield the young and inexperienced prime minister," Sanglee said, suggesting that controlling the narrative seems to be the government's priority.
Thaksin Shinawatra, who was Thai PM when the insurgency renewed in 2004, has also become involved to help find a solution. He visited the region in February and said that he expects to see a complete end to the unrest by next year.
What is Malaysia's role in finding peace?
Thailand's ruling Pheu Thai party, which is strongly influenced by Thaksin, has since faced pressure to act.
Tita said the former PM's pledge has pushed the government to respond.
"In light of Thaksin's public pledge to end the Deep South's unrest by next year, there's a real need for the Pheu Thai government to demonstrate that it is taking the issue seriously and is actually doing something," she told DW.
Thaksin is an informal adviser to ASEAN chair Anwar Ibrahim, who is also the prime minister of Malaysia, which has been urged to take a greater role in peace efforts.
Thaksin Shinawatra remains a central figure in Thai politics, exerting influence despite his ousting from power 19 years ago Image: Lillian Suwanrumpha/AFP/Getty Images
The last official meeting about a peace solution between Thai government representatives and the BRN was in June 2024.
But in a post on social media this month, Paetongtarn said Malaysia is now crucial for any upcoming rounds of peace talks.
Anthony Davis, a Bangkok-based security analyst, said Malaysia could have more of an impact on reducing the hostilities.
"The Malaysians could arguably be doing more in terms of reining in BRN. Some elements almost certainly knew in advance that a Ramadan offensive was coming and apparently did nothing to head it off," he told DW, adding that Malaysia's role as "facilitator" limits its actions.
"There are also questions as to how far PM Anwar is focused on the Patani issue and whether he could afford the domestic political blowback of hard-knuckle moves against BRN leadership inside Malaysia when ultimately this is a Thai problem," he added.
Don Pathan believes Thailand should look at the BRN proposal, rather than relying on Malaysia.
"Malaysia is not exactly an honest broker; Malaysia is a stakeholder. The country shares the same border and the same religious and cultural similarities as the Malays of Patani," he told DW.
Pathan suggested that the Thai government should take seriously the BRN's counterproposal made in February, which included "setting up a negotiating team, releasing political prisoners, and allowing international observers to monitor a ceasefire."
"The BRN has said it is willing to negotiate under the Thai Constitution. BRN and the Patani Malays are willing to be part of the Thai state. But it has to be on their terms," he added.
New Thai prime minister third in family to hold office
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Edited by: Keith Walker
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Why Is Trump Lashing Out At Brazil?
US President Donald Trump has announced a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian imports as he accused the country's leftist leadership of orchestrating a "witch hunt" against his right-wing ally, former leader Jair Bolsonaro. In a letter Wednesday to counterpart Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Trump insisted that Bolsonaro's trial -- for allegedly plotting a coup to hold on to power after 2022 elections he lost -- "should not be taking place." Trump has historically reserved his tariff ire for countries with which the United States runs a negative trade balance. Brazil is not one. Analysts say ideological considerations, not economics, are behind the US president's actions in defense of Bolsonaro, dubbed the "Trump of the Tropics." "Brazil came up on Trump's radar now because Bolsonaro's trial is advancing and there are Republican lawmakers who brought the issue to the White House," Leonardo Paz, a political scientist at Brazil's Getulio Vargas Foundation, told AFP. Eduardo Bolsonaro, the former president's son and a Brazilian congressman, recently moved to the United States where he lobbies for pressure on Brasilia and the judges presiding over his father's coup trial. Lula blames Bolsonaro's son for troubling the bilateral waters, and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has ordered an investigation into whether the US-based campaign constitutes obstruction of justice. Moraes is an arch foe of Bolsonaro, who has labeled the justice a "dictator." US Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke in May of a "great possibility" of sanctions against Moraes, who has clashed repeatedly with rightwingers and former Trump ally Elon Musk in a quest to stamp out online disinformation. Bolsonaro calls Trump a "friend" and says they are both victims of "persecution." In his missive to Lula, Trump complained of "a very unfair trade relationship" with Brazil. But official Brazilian figures show a near two-decade sustained surplus in favor of the United States. Last year, it was almost $284 million. The United States is Brazil's third-largest trading partner after China and the European Union. It imports mainly crude oil and semi-finished iron and steel products from the South American powerhouse. Brazil in turn primarily imports non-electric engines and machines, and fuel from up north. In a sign of Brazilian business jitters, the Sao Paulo Federation of Industries called Thursday for a "calm" response to the "non-economic reasons" for Trump's tariffs. Lula has said Brazil would be willing to reciprocate, in spite of Trump's warning of further escalation if it did so. Trump also complained of Brazilian "attacks" on free speech and "hundreds of SECRET and UNLAWFUL censorship orders to US media platforms" issued by Brazil's Supreme Court. Last month, the court toughened social media regulation, upping the accountability of platforms for user content in a groundbreaking case for Latin America on the spread of fake news and hate speech. Last year, Moraes blocked Musk's X platform for 40 days for failing to comply with a series of court orders against online disinformation. He had also ordered the suspension in Brazil of Rumble, a video-sharing platform popular with conservative and far-right voices -- including Trump's son Don Jr. -- over its refusal to block a user accused of spreading disinformation. Detractors accuse the judge of running a campaign to stifle free speech. "It didn't help that the BRICS summit was held in Brazil at a time a narrative exists in the United States portraying the bloc as anti-Western," said Paz. Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, the group on Sunday spoke out against Trump's "indiscriminate" tariff hikes, prompting the president to threaten further trade penalties. Members China, Russia and India refrained from hitting back, but Lula took it upon himself to defend the "sovereign" nature of BRICS governments, insisting: "We don't want an emperor." Behind the scenes, Brasilia has been negotiating with Washington for months to try and avoid the worst of Trump's tariff war. A member of Lula's entourage told AFP that Trump's attack on Brazil was partly inspired by "discomfort caused by the strength of the BRICS," whose members account for about half the world's population and 40 percent of global economic output.


Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Iran Threats In UK 'Significantly Increased': Intel Watchdog
A UK parliamentary committee on Thursday blamed Iran for at least 15 attempts to kill or kidnap British-based individuals since 2022, saying the threat from Iran had "significantly increased". London's response has been too focused on "crisis management", said parliament's intelligence and security committee, with concerns over Iran's nuclear programme dominating their attention too much. Tehran swiftly issued a "categorical rejection of the unfounded, politically motivated and hostile allegations". The committee's claims were "baseless, irresponsible, and reflective of a broader pattern of distortion intended to malign Iran's legitimate regional and national interests", said its London embassy. The report comes after growing alarm in Britain at alleged Iranian targeting of dissidents, media organisations and journalists in the UK, including accusations of physical attacks. Iran in March became the first country to be placed on an enhanced tier of the Foreign Influence Registration Scheme, which aims to boost Britain's national security against covert foreign influences. It requires all persons working inside the country for Iran, its intelligence services or the Revolutionary Guard to register on a new list or face jail. "Iran poses a wide-ranging, persistent and unpredictable threat to the UK, UK nationals, and UK interests," Kevan Jones, chairman of the watchdog committee, said in the report's conclusions. "Iran has a high appetite for risk when conducting offensive activity and its intelligence services are ferociously well-resourced with significant areas of asymmetric strength." Jones said it bolstered this through proxy groups, "including criminal networks, militant and terrorist organisations, and private cyber actors" to allow for deniability. His committee's report said that while Iran's UK activity "appears to be less strategic and on a smaller scale than Russia and China", it "should not be underestimated". The physical threat posed had "significantly increased" in pace and volume, and was "focused acutely on dissidents and other opponents of the regime" as well as Jewish and Israeli interests in the UK, it said. "The Iranian Intelligence Services have shown that they are willing and able -- often through third-party agents -- to attempt assassination within the UK, and kidnap from the UK," the report said. "There have been at least 15 attempts at murder or kidnap against British nationals or UK-based individuals since the beginning of 2022." Similarly, security minister Dan Jarvis said in March Britain's MI5 domestic intelligence service had tallied 20 Iran-backed plots "presenting potentially lethal threats to British citizens and UK residents". The watchdog committee took evidence for two years from August 2021 for its report, a period which saw Tehran implicated in a plot to kill two London-based Iran International television anchors. In March last year one of the Persian-language outlet's journalists was stabbed outside his London home. Two Romanian men have been charged in relation to the attack and face extradition to the UK to stand trial. The counter-terrorism unit of London's Metropolitan Police led the investigation. Iran's charge d'affaires in the UK has said that the Tehran authorities "deny any link" to the incident.


DW
3 days ago
- DW
Malawi's largest refugee camp in crisis – DW – 07/09/2025
A humanitarian crisis is looming at Malawi's largest refugee camp. The UNHCR says it can no longer fund the camp that houses some 57,000 people from DR Congo, Rwanda, Somalia, Burundi and Ethiopia. In June, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) said a funding shortfall has compelled it to scale down its operations worldwide. The measure includes some 3,500 staff cuts. In Malawi, where the UNHCR has been active since 1994, refugee camp supervisors and security personnel have since been laid off and the agency is selling off its vehicles, equipment and other assets. The situation is dire at the country's largest camp for refugees and asylum seekers – Dzaleka. According to the UNHCR, several other NGOs involved in the overcrowded camp are also scaling down operations and halting community-based training and sensitization programs. Dzaleka houses mostly people from Africa's Great Lakes region and the Horn of Africa. Civil society groups and activists are concerned for their welfare of those at Dzaleka and asking how the women and children among them especially will access the basic services. "I think it is very disturbing, especially where women are particularly disadvantaged and you look at the services that are supposed to be provided which fulfill human rights and issues of gender. You look at health care services for example, and the fact that there are job cuts," said Jessie Chingoma, a gender and labor activist. "It means now that the basic public services are not adequate, they have already been inadequate but now the situation becomes much worse." "It was reported that the government has started communication with countries where refugees in Dzaleka are from to talk about possible repatriation," Innocent Magambi, a Lilongwe-based refugee rights advocate who was himself once housed at the camp, told DW. "The refugees are worried, because most of them fear they will lose the little security they have." The closure of Dzaleka without a sustainable alternative would be "a very big disaster," Undule Mwakasungula, a human rights activist, told DW. It "could expose refugees to severe human rights violations which might include some refugees being forced to return to their countries," Mwakasungula added. As of March 31, UNHCR said, it had received only 12% of the $26 million (€22 million) required to adequately support refugees and asylum-seekers in Malawi this year, which hampers its operations. Dzaleka was built to accommodate 10,000 to 12,000 people. By the end of 2024, it housed 56,779 refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Rwanda, Somalia, Burundi and Ethiopia. Conflicts and political unrest around Africa have driven many to Dzaleka since 1994. In February 2025 alone,thousands of Mozambicans sought refuge in Malawi. UNHCR data shows a monthly intake of nearly 300 people, with women and children making up 93% of the camp's population. "Dzaleka refugee camp remains highly congested resulting in poor living conditions and poor infrastructure being constructed due to limited space and resources," a 2024 UNHCR factsheet on Malawi said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video NGOs like the Malawi Network Against Trafficking are calling on civil society and the private sector can help address the situaion. "I think several players will have to come in, we have already seen or heard the government efforts, but the UN also should not abandon the whole situation," Chingoma told DW. It is also being suggested that the UNHCR and the Malawi government works closely on the voluntary repatriation program that was started in 2023. So far, 310 refugees from Burundi and Somalia primarily have returned home under the initiative. But not everyone agrees with voluntary repatriation. "When you say there is a funding gap and then you say the solution is to close the refugee camp or to seek for repatriation, that is not the context of repatriation," Magambi told DW. "Repatriation should be something that people voluntarily assess the situation back home and they decide to go. It should not be caused by any other external situation like in this case, lack of funding and inability of government to care for refugees." To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio Human rights advocates are meanwhile warning the government to avoid forced repatriations. DW reached out to the government through the office of Homeland Security but received no response. DW asked Innocent Magambi what he, as someone who was sheltered at Dzaleka, thinks is needed in the face of the UNHCR funding shortfall. "Planning for the future is to plan on how we reduce the burden of donor dependency among refugees who have been there for 31 years, some of them," Magambi said. "We need to meet the donors, I believe that the fact that refugees in Dzaleka have been treated as emergency for over 30 years, does not give confidence to donors to continually give money that does not have an end plan." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video