Stock futures are flat after investors sell tech names to start the second half of 2025: Live updates
Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images
Stock futures were little changed on Tuesday evening, after investors began the second half with a reduced appetite for technology stocks.
Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 7 points, or 0.02%. S&P 500 futures were marginally higher, while Nasdaq 100 futures advanced 0.03%.
In regular trading, the blue-chip Dow advanced 400 points, while the S&P 500 slipped 0.1%. The Nasdaq Composite lost 0.8% as traders shunned the high-flying tech stocks that drove the market's second quarter rebound.
The information technology sector of the S&P 500 – whose constituents include Nvidia , Palantir and Advanced Micro Devices – lost more than 1% on Tuesday, as did the communications services sector. Instead, investors gravitated toward health care and materials names. Gains in Amgen , Johnson & Johnson and UnitedHealth lifted the 30-stock Dow.
Elsewhere, President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending bill narrowly passed the Senate on Tuesday. The measure will return to the House, where there are still hold-outs among GOP lawmakers.
"We expect to see more volatility in fixed income, even once they get the bill passed, whatever that looks like," said Jose Rasco, HSBC Global Private Banking and Wealth Management Americas CIO on "Closing Bell: Overtime" "That's going to bleed over into the equity markets."
Still, this turbulence is likely to be short-lived, he said. "Once these things get resolved and once the [Federal Reserve] gets back in gear, there's a lot of upside here," Rasco said.
Traders are also looking for any progress on trade deals as Trump's 90-day pause on his sharpest tariffs is set to expire next week.
On the economic front Wednesday, investors await ADP's private payrolls report due before the bell. Economists polled by Dow Jones anticipate that private employers added 120,000 jobs in June, up sharply from the gain of 37,000 in May.
The main event in this holiday-shortened week will be June's big jobs report, due Thursday morning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
23 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Speaks Out After Using Term Considered as Antisemitic
President Donald Trump has spoken out after sparking criticism for using a term widely considered to be antisemitic during a speech. Addressing a crowd in Iowa on Thursday, Trump used the term 'Shylock' when discussing his now-signed 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' When approached by a reporter on Friday about his use of the term that's 'widely viewed as an antisemitic' phrase, Trump was asked if he intended for the word 'to be used in that way.''No, I've never heard it that way. To me, 'Shylock' is somebody that's a moneylender at high rates. I've never heard it that way. You view it differently than me. I've never heard that,' he said, before opening up to other questions on the tarmac at Joint Base Andrews. Trump had used the word when discussing taxes, telling an Iowa crowd: 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing some from, in some cases, a fine banker and in some cases Shylocks and bad people.' Jewish advocacy groups came out to condemn the usage of the term, tracing its history back to the villain of William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice, which sees the dubious character demand a pound of flesh from a Christian merchant unable to pay his debt. The play has long been regarded as antisemitic and problematic. Read More: How Trump Fits Into the Long, Fraught History of the Relationship Between Israel and American Jews 'The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible,' said the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in a statement posted on social media. 'It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country.' Former President Joe Biden used the term 'Shylocks' in a speech in 2014 when he was Vice President, but said afterwards that it was a 'poor choice of words.' Trump's use of the term comes at a precarious time, as instances of antisemitism and hate crimes towards Jewish Americans have surged in recent years, especially since the start of the Israel-Hamas war. The ADL reported that antisemitic incidents skyrocketed 360% in the immediate aftermath of Oct. 7, 2023. Furthermore, according to the State of Antisemitism in America 2024 report, published in February 2025, 33% of American Jews said they have been the personal target of antisemitism, in-person or virtually, at least once over the past year. An attack in Boulder, Colorado, in June and the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy employees in Washington, D.C., in May, are two recent incidents of anti-Jewish violence that have rocked communities in the U.S. Read More: The Rise of Antisemitism and Political Violence in the U.S. Meanwhile, the Jewish Council on Public Affairs spoke out on Friday against Trump's "deeply dangerous" use of the term 'Shylocks,' calling it 'among the most quintessential antisemitic slurs in his remarks,' and claiming that the moment 'follows years in which Trump has normalized antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories.' Jewish members of Congress have also come out to condemn the use of the word. Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York, a Democrat, described the history of the term, calling it 'one of the most recognizable antisemitic slurs in the English language' that has 'fueled discrimination, hatred, and violence against Jews.' 'I condemn Donald Trump's dangerous use of this blatantly antisemitic slur and his long history of trafficking in antisemitic tropes," Nadler said. "I have often said that if Donald Trump was serious about fighting antisemitism, he could start with the antisemites in his own Administration... If Donald Trump were serious about fighting antisemitism, he could start with himself." This is far from the first incident that has prompted concern in regards to Trump's use of antisemitic tropes. Trump previously appeared to indulge an antisemitic trope of Jewish people controlling things behind the scenes. In 2015, at an event with Jewish donors, he told the crowd, 'I don't want your money. You want to control your own politician.' Prominent Jewish voices also raised concerns about Trump's rhetoric in 2019, when he told reporters: "In my opinion, you vote for a Democrat, you're being very disloyal to Jewish people, and you're being very disloyal to Israel… and only weak people would say anything other than that." His comment came shortly after he had said: "I think any Jewish people that vote for a Democrat, I think it shows either a total lack of knowledge or great disloyalty.' Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL responded to Trump's comments of 'disloyalty,' saying the President had "made it clear he thinks Jews have a dual loyalty to Israel. This antisemitic trope has been used to persecute Jews for centuries and it's unacceptable to promote it.' In 2021, Trump revisited that line of rhetoric, saying in an interview that 'people in this country that are Jewish no longer love Israel. I'll tell you the evangelical Christians love Israel more than the Jews in this country.'
New York Times
34 minutes ago
- New York Times
OPEC Plus Agrees to Pump More Oil in August
Eight members of the OPEC Plus oil producers group said Saturday that they would pump an additional 548,000 barrels a day starting in August, an increase that was higher than some analysts expected and could contribute to lowering prices. The increase, which is equivalent to roughly half a percent of global production, is a step up from recent months when the group announced increases of 411,000 barrels a day. The group, which includes Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates and Iraq, said it was taking action based on what it called 'a steady global economic outlook and current healthy market fundamentals.' Analysts say that these production increases are likely to contribute to a market in which supply outstrips demand in the second half of the year, potentially lowering prices. S&P Global Commodity Insights, a research firm, said recently that it expected supply to outpace demand by 1.25 million barrels a day in the second half of 2025. The price of Brent crude, the international benchmark, was about $68 a barrel on Friday, and S&P said that prices could fall to a range of $50 to $60 a barrel later this year and into 2026. S&P also said that West Texas Intermediate, the standard for American crude oil, could fall below $50 a barrel from its current level of about $66 a barrel. The oil producers said in a news release that the increases could be 'paused or reversed,' depending on market conditions. The group of eight, which is being coordinated by Saudi Arabia rather than OPEC, is moving to quickly unwind 2.2 million barrels a day in cuts that these countries agreed to two years ago. Analysts say the Saudis appear to be responding to pressure from other members including the United Arab Emirates, for higher output. They also appear to be trying to please President Trump, who has made courting Saudi Arabia and regional allies like the United Arab Emirates a priority of his foreign policy. Analysts say the Saudis are also introducing more crude at what may be an opportune time as the summer driving season and the burning of crude oil to generate electric power for air conditioning in countries like Saudi Arabia can be expected to briefly increase demand. Markets appear to be shrugging off the recent conflict between Israel and Iran, which spurred a brief rise in prices but had little impact on supply.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Investors in Baxter International (NYSE:BAX) have unfortunately lost 60% over the last five years
Statistically speaking, long term investing is a profitable endeavour. But that doesn't mean long term investors can avoid big losses. For example the Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX) share price dropped 64% over five years. That's an unpleasant experience for long term holders. Since shareholders are down over the longer term, lets look at the underlying fundamentals over the that time and see if they've been consistent with returns. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. Over five years Baxter International's earnings per share dropped significantly, falling to a loss, with the share price also lower. This was, in part, due to extraordinary items impacting earnings. At present it's hard to make valid comparisons between EPS and the share price. But we would generally expect a lower price, given the situation. The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Baxter International's earnings, revenue and cash flow. As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. We note that for Baxter International the TSR over the last 5 years was -60%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely a result of its dividend payments! Baxter International shareholders are down 9.1% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 15%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. However, the loss over the last year isn't as bad as the 10% per annum loss investors have suffered over the last half decade. We'd need to see some sustained improvements in the key metrics before we could muster much enthusiasm. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks, for example - Baxter International has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of companies we expect will grow earnings. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $359.72 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
