logo
Time's running out on a key cyber info-sharing law

Time's running out on a key cyber info-sharing law

Politico14 hours ago
Driving the day
— Despite widespread support from bipartisan members of Congress, the private sector and the Trump administration, the Cybersecurity and Information Sharing Act is in danger of expiring at the end of September.
HAPPY MONDAY, and welcome to MORNING CYBERSECURITY! Another week closer to Black Hat and DEF CON. I'm excited to see many of you there! Drop me a line at dnickel@politico.com if you want to connect at either conference — or if you have any Las Vegas recommendations for a first-timer like me.
Follow POLITICO's cybersecurity team on X at @RosiePerper, @johnnysaks130, @delizanickel and @magmill95, or reach out via email or text for tips. You can also follow @POLITICOPro on X.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
CYBER POLICY
EXPIRATION DATE INCOMING — Lawmakers have until Sept. 30 to reauthorize the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, a 10-year-old law that's been described as 'the most successful piece of cyber legislation' in the country.
But despite widespread support from the Trump administration, the private sector and bipartisan members of Congress, the law often referred to as 'CISA 2015' faces an uncertain future as lawmakers stare down the start of the month-long August recess. As leaders in the private sectorurge lawmakers to renew it before it's too late, the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee expressed frustration at the slow movement.
'We have known for ten years the CISA 2015 would expire this September,' Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said in a statement Sunday. 'The time to begin discussing and circulating potential changes to CISA 2015 was six months ago, if not earlier.'
— Conflicting priorities: The law, which incentivizes information-sharing on cyber threats between the private sector and the federal government through legal safeguards, saw ramped-up renewal efforts earlier this year in the private and public sectors.
But in the House, Thompson said that former Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) — the chair of the House Homeland Security Committee, who resigned from Congress earlier this month — did not prioritize renewing the cyber law.
'He held four markups and didn't see fit to include a CISA 2015 extension in any of them,' Thompson said. 'Instead, he has left us with fewer than 20 legislative days to get an extension out of Committee, through the House, and over to the Senate or, more likely, find a way to attach an extension to a [continuing resolution].'
Across chambers, Senate Homeland Security Chair Rand Paul (R-Ky.) hasn't signaled that renewal is a priority.
Maggie reported last month that Paul vowed to make sure the law's reauthorization includes a clause that would prevent disinformation work at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. But Paul — who didn't support the legislation in 2015 — isn't among the senators who sponsored legislation to renew the law earlier this year.
A spokesperson for Paul did not respond to a request for comment.
— Legislative movement: In April, Sens. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), the chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee's cyber panel, and Gary Peters (Mich.), the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, introduced a bill that would pass a clean reauthorization of the law.
'Allowing this authority to lapse would weaken our cybersecurity defenses and send the wrong message to foreign adversaries, cybercriminals, and hacktivists looking to exploit vulnerabilities,' Peters said in a statement Sunday.
A spokesperson for Rounds did not respond to a request for comment.
But momentum could pick up on the House Homeland Security Committee. With Green's resignation, cyber panel Chair Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.) threw his hat in the ring last week for full committee chairship. In a letter to colleagues laying out his priorities if selected as chair, he vowed to work with committee Democrats in the House and with his Senate counterparts to renew the law.
'This will remain a priority in the weeks and months ahead,' Garbarino said in a statement Friday, adding that he has held meetings with fellow lawmakers and industry experts to 'identify the best legislative vehicle to get it done.'
— An industry without CISA 2015? As the clock runs down, industry leaders, including trade organizations and cybersecurity companies, warned your host that crucial information-sharing could be lost if the law is allowed to lapse.
'[The law] remains one of the most effective methods for enabling real-time collaboration between the government and the private sector in the face of evolving cyber threats,' said James Hayes, senior vice president of global government affairs at cyber firm Tenable. He added that letting it lapse would be 'a step backward.'
John Miller, senior vice president of the Information Technology Industry Council, told your host that the law is 'arguably the most successful cyber law we've ever passed in this country. And so to just let it lapse for no reason would just be unfortunate, to say the least.'
On The Hill
FIRST IN MC: CYBER HEALTH — Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is urging the Trump administration to address gaps in cybersecurity in rural hospitals caused by Medicaid funding cuts in the One Big Beautiful Bill.
In a letter sent on Friday and shared exclusively with your host, Wyden asked Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Administrator Mehmet Oz about their plans to help hospitals protect themselves in cyberspace.
'As rural and small hospitals confront even lower operating margins due to Republican health care cuts, they will be less likely to prioritize spending on cybersecurity infrastructure,' Wyden wrote.
Wyden also asked Kennedy and Oz if HHS and CMS plan to provide resources, such as grant funding, to small and rural hospitals to meet Cybersecurity Performance Goals — a voluntary guideline by HHS to help the health care sector bolster cybersecurity practices.
At the Agencies
PENTAGON DEALS UNDER REVIEW — The Defense Department is looking into cloud contracts amid a report from ProPublica last week that revealed that Microsoft has bypassed a Pentagon policy that bans foreign citizens from accessing highly sensitive data.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the review on Friday in response to the investigation, which detailed Microsoft's use of Chinese engineers to work on U.S. military cloud computing systems under the supervision of American 'digital escorts' who have security clearances but often lacked the skills to determine whether the Chinese engineers' work posed a cybersecurity risk.
On Friday, Microsoft spokesperson Frank Shaw said in a post on X that 'in response to concerns raised earlier this week,' the firm 'made changes to our support for US Government customers to assure that no China-based engineering teams are providing technical assistance for DoD Government cloud and related services.'
SHAREPOINT VULNERABILITY — CISA is warning about an active exploitation of a remote code execution vulnerability impacting Microsoft's on-site SharePoint servers.
The cyber agency issued an alert on Sunday, warning that the exploitation publicly known as 'ToolShell' provides unauthorized access to systems and enables hacker access to SharePoint content, like internal configurations and file systems.
Chris Butera, CISA's acting executive assistant director for cybersecurity, said in a statement that the agency is working with Microsoft to inform potentially affected groups about mitigation efforts.
Quick Bytes
'HONKERS' — WIRED's Kim Zetter breaks down how an early wave of Chinese hackers became the backbone of Beijing's espionage apparatus.
YOU'RE BREAKING UP — Cellphone internet shutdowns — which officials say are necessary to foil Ukrainian drones — have hit dozens of Russian regions, writes Dasha Litvinova for the Associated Press.
CYBER SCHOOL IN SESSION — CYBER.ORG, a cyber workforce development group for K-12 students, is launching a new program in D.C. schools.
Chat soon.
Stay in touch with the whole team: Rosie Perper (rperper@politico.com); John Sakellariadis (jsakellariadis@politico.com); Maggie Miller (mmiller@politico.com), and Dana Nickel (dnickel@politico.com).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House speaker says there will be no votes on releasing Epstein files before August recess
House speaker says there will be no votes on releasing Epstein files before August recess

New York Post

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Post

House speaker says there will be no votes on releasing Epstein files before August recess

The House of Representatives will not move forward with any legislative efforts aimed at releasing files related to notorious pedophile Jeffrey Epstein before its monthlong August recess, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Monday. 'No,' Johnson responded when asked by CNN reporter Manu Raju if lawmakers would vote on a resolution calling for the public disclosure of documents related to Epstein's case before the lower chamber takes its annual summer break. Johnson indicated that he and Trump are on the same page regarding the Epstein files. Getty Images The House speaker argued that Congress needs to give the Trump administration 'space' to handle the hot-button issue on its own for the time being. 'There is no daylight between the House Republicans, the House and the president on maximum transparency,' Johnson said. '[President Trump] has said that he wants all the credible files relating to Epstein to be released. He's asked the attorney general to request the grand jury files of the court. All of that is in process right now.' 'My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing.' Johnson indicated that 'if further congressional action is necessary or appropriate,' the House 'will look at that.' 'I don't think we're at that point right now, because we agree with the president,' he added. Last week, the Republican-controlled House Rules Committee voted to advance a nonbinding resolution calling for the release of some information related to the Epstein case. Some MAGA supporters have expressed outrage with the president's handling of files related to Epstein. REUTERS The resolution, which carries no legal weight, directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish 'all credible' documents, communications and metadata related to the federal government's investigation of Epstein and his convicted sex-trafficking accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. The resolution cleared the rules committee as part of a deal with GOP lawmakers who initially opposed Trump's rescissions bill. On the same day the resolution was approved by the panel, Trump ordered Bondi to request that the grand jury transcripts in the Epstein case be unsealed. Bondi asked the federal court in the Southern District of New York the following day to unseal the grand jury testimony related to the 2019 federal sex trafficking case against Epstein and Maxwell.

Dartmouth President Sian Beilock accused of cowardice for staying neutral as Trump targets elite schools
Dartmouth President Sian Beilock accused of cowardice for staying neutral as Trump targets elite schools

New York Post

time8 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Dartmouth President Sian Beilock accused of cowardice for staying neutral as Trump targets elite schools

The president of Dartmouth is winning praise from conservatives, while her critics in academia accuse her of cowardice and conformity for her stance on viewpoint diversity. A piece from the New Yorker details the embattled president, Sian Beilock, vowing to uphold institutional neutrality amid the federal government's feud with higher education and rampant antisemitism on college campuses. Advertisement Dartmouth declined to join a coalition of over 600 universities, including its Ivy League counterparts, in signing a letter in defense of Harvard University as it fights the Trump administration's attempts to freeze billions in funding. In an email to the Dartmouth community explaining her decision not to join the coalition, Beilock reportedly wrote that 'receivership, censorship, and external pressures about what can and cannot be taught or studied hamper the free exchange of ideas on our campus and across institutions. Dartmouth will never relent on these values.' 7 A piece from the New Yorker details the embattled president vowing to uphold institutional neutrality amid the federal government's feud with higher education. AFP via Getty Images Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld slammed Beilock's decision to decline to sign the letter. Advertisement 'This is a mix of cowardice, hypocrisy, and naïveté,' Sonnenfeld said. 'This is Trump's classic playbook: divide and conquer.' 'Everyone is entitled to their opinion,' Beilock told the New Yorker when asked her about the criticism she has received for her decisions. 'People ask, 'Why aren't you suing Trump like Harvard?' Well, [the Administration hasn't] made those kinds of demands.' 7 Dartmouth declined to join a coalition of over 600 universities in signing a letter in defense of Harvard University as it fights the Trump administration's attempts to freeze billions in funding. Bloomberg via Getty Images President Donald Trump has suspended federal funding to every Ivy League school, except for Penn and Dartmouth, over investigations into anti-Israel protests that have taken place on their campuses since October 2023. Advertisement Beilock maintains that the university's position is 'saving the idea of the university,' the New Yorker noted, citing a piece she wrote in the outlet last year explaining her approach. Beilock was the first female president appointed to Dartmouth in 2022. She formerly served as president of Barnard College. 7 'This is a mix of cowardice, hypocrisy, and naïveté,' Sonnenfeld said. 'This is Trump's classic playbook: divide and conquer.' AFP via Getty Images The New Yorker noted that the Dartmouth president's primary objective was to take 'aim at the perceived censoriousness of campus discourse.' Beilock created 'brave spaces,' a subversive play on the common phrase 'safe spaces.' Advertisement Building upon that sentiment, Beilock launched 'Dartmouth Dialogues' to facilitate free speech and debate. Beilock introduced a policy of 'institutional restraint,' mandating that Dartmouth officials, employees and staff refrain from issuing 'institutional statements' in order to 'provide space for diverse viewpoints to be raised and fully considered …' 7 President Donald Trump has suspended federal funding to every Ivy League school, except for Penn and Dartmouth. Bloomberg via Getty Images The New Yorker reported further that 'Beilock clashed with Wesleyan's president, Michael Roth, over her adherence to what he called 'a new form of conformism.' Roth went on, 'As a heterodox person, and as a Jew, I'm very suspicious when my compatriots find a new religion, be it viewpoint diversity or be it institutional neutrality.'' Beilock's handling of campus protests in the wake of the Gaza conflict was condemned by students and faculty members. After police clashed with Dartmouth affiliates in a protest in May 2024 where an encampment was constructed, Beilock defended the actions of the police, adding that the encampments were a violation of the school's policy and that their presence was necessary to prevent further violence. 7 Beilock maintains that the university's position is 'saving the idea of the university,' the New Yorker noted. Bloomberg via Getty Images Following the events, a motion to censure Beilock was introduced by religion professor Christopher MacEvitt and history professor Annelise Orleck who were both arrested during the protest. Advertisement Beilock was censured in a 183-163 vote. As of publication, more than 2,700 people signed an alumni petition to urge Dartmouth College to fight federal government attacks on higher education. 7 Beilock's handling of campus protests in the wake of the Gaza conflict was condemned by students and faculty members. AFP via Getty Images The petition claims that 'our institutions of higher learning face an unparalleled and thoroughgoing assault from the federal government,' without directly mentioning the Trump administration. Advertisement On the other hand, Beilock's convictions have been praised by conservatives. 'Her ideas have earned praise from free-speech advocates, conservative publications, and members of the Trump Administration, along with furious condemnation from academic leaders convinced that universities must stand united against Trump,' the New Yorker reported. 7 The petition claims that 'our institutions of higher learning face an unparalleled and thoroughgoing assault from the federal government.' AP Harmeet Dhillon, assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the US Department of Justice, whic is currently investigating most Ivy League institutions for antisemitism, was noted by the New Yorker as praising Beilock's efforts: Advertisement 'I was so impressed to learn how Dartmouth (my alma mater) is getting it right, after all these years. Kudos to Dartmouth! I heard Jewish student applications are way up!' 'I like my president,' Jeff Immelt, the former CEO of GE, reportedly wrote on LinkedIn. Beilock did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store