US strikes against Iran not aimed at regime change, Pentagon chief says
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth emphasised that the recent US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites were aimed at neutralising threats, not initiating regime change.
The operation, named 'Operation Midnight,' deployed significant military resources, resulting in severe damage to Iranian nuclear sites but heightened tensions in the already volatile Middle East.
Iran responded with missile strikes on Israel, causing damage and injuries, while also threatening to close the Hormuz Strait, a critical oil shipment route, as US forces in the region remain on high alert.
The US military's strikes on Iran's nuclear sites were not a preamble to plans for regime change, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said on Sunday, adding that private messages had been sent to Tehran encouraging them to negotiate.
Still, Hegseth warned Iran against following through with past threats of retaliation against the United States, and said US forces were postured to defend themselves, and take action if needed.
"This mission was not and has not been about regime change," Hegseth told a reporters at the Pentagon. "The president authorised a precision operation to neutralize the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program."
The US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft, in an operation the top US general, General Dan Caine, said was named "Operation Midnight."
Caine said initial battle damage assessments indicated that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction, but he declined to speculate whether any Iranian nuclear capabilities might still be intact.
The operation pushes the Middle East to the brink of a major new conflagration in a region already aflame for more than 20 months with wars in Gaza and Lebanon and a toppled dictator in Syria.
Tehran has vowed to defend itself, and responded with a volley of missiles at Israel that wounded scores of people and destroyed buildings in its commercial hub Tel Aviv.
But, perhaps in an effort to avert all-out war with the superpower, it had yet to carry out its main threats of retaliation - to target US bases or choke off the quarter of the world's oil shipments that pass through its waters.
The Iranian parliament approved closing the Hormuz strait, a potential choke point for oil shipments, but the country's top security body is required to make a final decision, Iran's press TV reported.
Caine said the US military had increased protection of troops in the region, including in Iraq and Syria.
"Our forces remain on high alert and are fully postured to respond to any Iranian retaliation or proxy attacks, which would be an incredibly poor choice," Caine said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
31 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Oil Falls as Traders Wind Back Risk Premium Before OPEC+ Meeting
Oil fell after its biggest weekly loss in more than two years as hedge funds piled into bearish bets following a fragile truce between Iran and Israel, and before an OPEC+ meeting that may see another super-sized production increase. Brent for September fell as much as 0.8% to near $66 a barrel after sliding 12% last week, while West Texas Intermediate traded near $65. Iran said it remains skeptical that the US-brokered ceasefire with Israel would last, although President Donald Trump suggested he might back eventual sanctions relief for the Islamic Republic.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Iran signals openness to transfers of enriched uranium abroad
Iran could transfer its stocks of enriched uranium to another country in the event of an agreement with the United States on Tehran's nuclear programme, Iran's UN Ambassador Amir-Saeid Iravani said on Saturday, according to news site Al-Monitor. A transfer of 20% and 60% enriched uranium would not be a red line for Tehran, Iravani said, adding that the material could alternatively remain in Iran under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) supervision. However, he stressed that Iran would not renounce its right to domestic uranium production, a condition the United States firmly rejects. Iravani also ruled out any restrictions on Iran's ballistic missile programme, and reiterated that a new agreement would hinge, among other conditions, on the lifting of international sanctions. His remarks come hours after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X late Friday that Iran is fundamentally willing to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States, though he urged US President Donald Trump to moderate his tone. "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," Araghchi said. "Good will begets good will, and respect begets respect." Trump recently said that new talks with Iran would take place "next week," though he offered no further details. Several previous rounds of negotiations between Washington and Tehran have failed to yield an agreement. Earlier this month, tensions escalated sharply when Israel, accusing Iran of fast-approaching a point of no return in its goal of obtaining atomic weapons, carried out strikes on nuclear sites, defence positions, cities and energy infrastructure during a 12-day war. More than 20 high-ranking Iranian military officials were killed, some in their homes. The US also intervened with a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump later said the attacks had set back Iran's nuclear programme by years, and when asked if he would strike again should uranium enrichment continue, he replied in the affirmative, insisting Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons. In response to the attacks, the Iranian parliament passed a law this week suspending cooperation with the IAEA. However, Tehran has not formally notified the agency, and experts warn that negotiations cannot proceed without the IAEA's technical oversight. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is intended solely for civilian purposes. The IAEA believes Iran has managed to produce 400 kilograms of uranium with a purity level of 60%. Experts say this could be used to produce several nuclear weapons if the material were further enriched to 90%. It is unclear what happened to the stockpile in the wake of the attacks by Israel and the US.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Iran's nuclear enrichment ‘will never stop', nation's UN ambassador says
Amir-Saeid Iravani, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, said on Sunday that the Islamic republic's nuclear enrichment 'will never stop' because it is permitted for 'peaceful energy' purposes under the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. 'The enrichment is our right, an inalienable right, and we want to implement this right,' Iravani told CBS News, adding that Iran was ready for negotiations but 'unconditional surrender is not negotiation. It is dictating the policy toward us.' But Iravani said Tehran is 'ready for the negotiation, but after this aggression, it is not proper condition for a new round of the negotiation, and there is no request for negotiation and meeting with the president'. The Iranian UN envoy also denied that there are any threats from his government to the safety of Rafael Grossi, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, or against the agency's inspectors, who are accused by some Iranian officials of helping Israel justify its attacks. IAEA inspectors are currently in Iran but do not have access to Iran's nuclear facilities. Pressed by the CBS News anchor Margaret Brennan on whether he would condemn calls for the arrest and execution of the IAEA head, which Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state said a newspaper close to Iran's leader had made, Iravani said that he would. 'There is no any threat,' Irvani said, but acknowledged that Iran's parliament had suspended cooperation with IAEA. The inspectors, he said, 'are in Iran, they are in safe conditions, but the activity has been suspended. They cannot have access to our site … our assessment is that they have not done their jobs.' Iravani also responded to questions on why Tehran has not accepted proposals for a diplomatic solution. Referring to Trump's 'unconditional surrender' demand, Irvani said that the US 'is dictating the policy towards us. If they are ready for negotiation, they will find us ready for that. But if they want to dictate us, it is impossible for any negotiation with them.' Iravani said on Saturday that Iran could transfer its stocks of enriched uranium to another country in the event of an agreement with the United States on Tehran's nuclear program, according to news site Al-Monitor. The transfer of 20% and 60% enriched uranium would not be a red line for Tehran, Iravani said, adding that the material could alternatively remain in Iran under IAEA supervision. But as he said again on Sunday, Iravani stressed that Iran would not renounce its right to domestic uranium production, a condition the US rejects. Irvani's comments comes as western nations, including the US, are pushing for Iran to resume negotiations over its nuclear program a week after the US launched strikes on three facilities, setting off days of heated dispute over whether the facilities has been 'totally obliterated', as Donald Trump initially claimed, or if they had delayed but not destroyed the program. Grossi told CBS that there is 'agreement in describing this as a very serious level of damage' but went on to say that Iran will likely will be able to begin to produce enriched uranium within months. 'The capacities they have are there,' he said. 'They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there.' On Sunday, President Trump again dismissed reports that Iran had moved 400kg (880lb) on 60% enriched uranium ahead of the strikes on Fordow, regarded as the center of Iran's enrichment program. 'It's very hard to do, dangerous to do, it's very heavy, plus we didn't give them much notice because they didn't know they we were coming,' Trump told the Fox News host Maria Bartiromo. Trump speculated that vehicles seen near the entrances to Fordow before the strikes were likely masons brought in to seal up the facility. 'There are thousands of tons of rock in that room right now,' Trump said. 'They whole place was just destroyed.' However, the Washington Post reported on Sunday that the US obtained intercepted Iranian communications in which senior Iran officials remarked that damage from the attack was not as destructive and extensive as they anticipated. The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, scoffed at the Iranian claims in a comment to the Post in which she did not dispute that such communications had been intercepted. 'The notion that unnamed Iranian officials know what happened under hundreds of feet of rubble is nonsense,' Leavitt said. Separately on Sunday, Abdolrahim Mousavi, Iran's armed forces chief of staff, reportedly told the Saudi defense minister during a call that Tehran is not convinced Israel will honour the ceasefire that ended their 12-day war announced by Trump. 'Since we are completely doubtful about the enemy honoring its commitments, including the ceasefire, we are prepared to give it a tough response in case of recurrence of an act of aggression', Mousavi said, according to Turkey's state-run news agency Anadolu. Israel and the US, 'have shown that they do not adhere to any international rules and norms' the Iranian general added. 'We did not initiate war, but we responded with all our power to the aggressor.'
