logo
Caerphilly council leader survives no-confidence vote

Caerphilly council leader survives no-confidence vote

Cllr Sean Morgan 'ignored the request of the majority of councillors' when his cabinet agreed the closures in May, Plaid Cymru group leader Cllr Lindsay Whittle alleged.
Members of a scrutiny committee had earlier recommended the closures be deferred so community groups could explore taking over the at-risk sites.
Some 13 Plaid or independent members also signed Cllr Whittle's notice of motion, which called on Cllr Morgan to resign, at a meeting held on Tuesday July 1.
But the ensuing debate became a sorry state of affairs, frequently derailed by party political squabbling and heckling.
Caerphilly woman denies sexually touching 15-year-old boy
Serial shoplifter banned from supermarket strikes again
Man banned from keeping mammals after dog lost its eye
No sooner had the signatories started to air their grievances than Labour backbenchers launched a seemingly prepared counter-attack, singling out councillors to request their views on the council's performance on a wide range of issues from brownfield site redevelopment to the Welsh language.
Cllr Colin Gordon, the presiding member, at first sympathised with the perplexed Plaid contingent, and said it was 'quite correct' these Labour questions had little to do with the matter at hand.
But he then allowed them, despite protests from those being questioned, because he said a Plaid councillor had 'opened the door' to a wider debate by first raising the council's handling of Blackwood Miners' Institute.
The descent into 'whataboutism' meant discussions of the leader's handling of the library closures were often sidetracked and, indeed, there were several periods when Cllr Morgan was hardly mentioned – during a debate which was supposedly all about his leadership.
Attempting to keep a lid on the meeting, which regularly resembled an unruly classroom, was Cllr Gordon.
But even he became embroiled in several back-and-forths, and at one point warned Cllr Whittle he would be asked to leave the council chamber if he continued 'interfering'.
Cllr Nigel Dix, who leads the independent group but did not sign the notice of motion, called the theatrical scenes 'a comedy of errors', adding: 'I've seen better acting on Crossroads.'
The chamber did fall silent to hear from Cllr Brenda Miles, whose status in the Labour group has been uncertain since she challenged the leader over the libraries in an email she sent to all councillors.
Cllr Miles, who did not sign the notice of motion, said she wanted to 'put the record straight' following several other councillors' references to her.
'My status on the council at the moment is that I am not a member of the Labour group… but I am a member of the Labour Party', she explained, adding she was facing 'disciplinary action'.
It was Cllr Miles who proposed deferring the library closures during May's scrutiny meeting.
She called the library issue a 'legitimate debate to have' but said councillors 'should be focusing on the scrutiny process' and whether it was operating correctly as a 'critical friend to cabinet'.
Other councillors on both sides of the no-confidence row did at times stay on track.
Critics who signed the notice of motion included Plaid's Cllr Gary Enright, who said the council's leadership left him 'unenthused and uninspired', and Cllr John Roberts – also Plaid – who claimed the library closures made some communities feel like 'second-division wards' of the county borough.
Defenders of the leader included Labour's Cllr Arianna Leonard – who said Cllr Morgan does the top job 'sincerely, creatively and responsibly' – and cabinet member Cllr Shayne Cook, who said he was 'proud' of the administration's record on housing.
Cllr Morgan, responding to the notice of motion, said it 'certainly feels like a personal attack from the opposition, rather than one based on reason'.
He said the consultation on libraries may have found stiff opposition to the closures from their core users, but in making decisions the council – which has to save millions of pounds over the next three years – 'must still consider the needs of the vast majority of residents who do not use a library'.
He also accused Plaid of 'hypocrisy' over the issue, and told the meeting that a previous Plaid administration closed Aberbargoed Library in 2011 despite '80% of the scrutiny committee voting to keep the library open'.
Cllr Whittle rejected the leader's claim of a personal attack, replying the no-confidence vote was 'purely on the issue of the libraries'.
He added being council leader was a 'tough job' and said he himself had faced a Labour vote of no-confidence during his own time in the position.
The council voted 37-21 against the motion of no confidence, with no abstentions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Can AI prevent prison violence?
Can AI prevent prison violence?

Spectator

time15 minutes ago

  • Spectator

Can AI prevent prison violence?

The government desperately needs to save the justice system, and it believes that technology might be part of the solution. The Ministry of Justice has announced that it will be using AI to 'stop prison violence before it happens'. The need is urgent. There were over 30,000 assaults in prisons during the 12 months to the end of March 2025, a 9 per cent increase on the previous year. This is now Labour's problem. As Andrew Neilson, Director of Campaigns at the Howard League said yesterday, 'these statistics cover most of the government's first year in power. While action is being taken to reduce pressure on the prison population and stabilise regimes, far more must be done, and urgently, to save lives and ensure prisons work to cut crime, rather than create it.' So how will AI help? Describing a system more like that seen in Minority Report than our crumbling Victorian jails, the government says AI will 'identify dangerous prisoners and bring them under tight supervision'. AI will analyse data on individual prisoners, including their offending history and behaviour in custody in order to allow staff to prevent violence before it happens. Technology has already been deployed to rapidly scan prisoners' seized mobile phones to produce intelligence on crime within jails, including the drugs trade. This is very timely, as this week the government has announced that drone incidents over our prisons are up by 43 per cent. That's the idea anyway. The reality of course is that this will all rely on the data provided by prison staff, which is often of very low quality. This week I attended the ongoing inquest into the death of Rajwinder Singh, a man who died at Wandsworth in 2023. During testimony I heard on Wednesday, it became apparent that the contact logs were not reflective of the visits to Rajwinder's cell shown by the prison's CCTV. This is an extreme example, but anyone who has spent much time in prisons knows that they are often chaotic, badly-organised environments which rely on a huge amount of paperwork. If AI is fed garbage, it will be worse than useless. The government has great hopes for technology in prisons, something which I know is driven by Lord Timpson's personal enthusiasm for it. There are already some excellent examples of Large language models (LLMs) being deployed across the justice system. Probation have been piloting three different systems which take audio recordings of meetings between offenders and probation officers and produce transcripts, saving many hours of work. Even within the probation profession there are doubts about this. Tania Bassett, National Official of NAPO, the probation union, told me that there were concerns about whether LLMs could cope with some regional accents (with Geordie identified as being particularly challenging), and that they are 'approaching it with caution because of the MoJ's history of being bad with technology, and we are concerned that this doesn't become an excuse to replace people and relationships.' All this investment in technology will come at a high price, something NAPO are also concerned about, particularly as they are currently balloting for industrial action. Bassett said 'they're spending all this money on technology but we're in a strike ballot for pay – we're concerned that this £700 million for probation will end up being squandered on technology which doesn't solve the underlying problems' Broadly, this kind of investment in technology is a good thing. The justice system in general, and our prison system in particular, are incredibly backward, with a huge amount of staff time spent manually completing forms and documents. If technology can free staff up to spend time working with inmates, engaging in purposeful activity and making prison actually work, then it could be a huge benefit. There are likely to be challenges though. In particular, if there are perceived racial inequalities in who the systems identify as being likely to commit violence in jail, it is possible that legal challenges may be forthcoming. In the end, a safer prison system will benefit staff, inmates and the public. Jails which are awash with violence can do almost nothing to help people reform. Most prisoners do not want violence on their 'landings'. It might not quite be Minority Report, but if this halts the rising tide of violence in our prisons it will absolutely be worth it.

PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'
PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'

Western Telegraph

time23 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

PM urged to review oil policy after Trump labels North Sea ‘a treasure chest'

Andrew Bowie called for a review of policies affecting the oil and gas industry. The US president was in Scotland earlier this week and during his visit he described the North Sea as 'a treasure chest for the United Kingdom', and warned fossil fuel taxes make 'no sense'. He also took aim at 'some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen', referring to wind turbines off the coast near Aberdeen. Mr Bowie has written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer calling for a meeting in London to explore the effects of oil and gas policies. Following his flying visit to Aberdeenshire with President Trump earlier this week, I've written to the Prime Minister urging him to heed the calls of all those he met on the EPL, overturn ban on licenses, ensure a future for our region & secure Britain's energy 👇 — Andrew Bowie (@AndrewBowie_MP) August 1, 2025 He referred to the windfall tax on the profits made from extracting UK oil and gas, introduced by the previous Conservative government in 2022 and retained until 2030 by Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves. In his letter to Sir Keir, Mr Bowie wrote: 'As president Trump has said, the UK's 'very high' tax on oil and gas companies is a deterrent to investment. 'The extension of the energy profits levy (EPL), coupled with uncertainty around future licensing and investment signals, has created a climate of instability that threatens jobs, innovation and the region's economic resilience. 'President Donald Trump's remarks during your visit – calling Aberdeen the 'oil capital of Europe' and urging the UK to 'bring it back' – reflect a sentiment shared by many in the region. 'May I urge you to consider the president's call to 'incentivise' domestic production of hydrocarbons? 'Oil and gas still have a vital role to play in our energy mix and economic future; British people would rather see the UK benefit from domestic exploration and drilling than import more from Norway and Qatar.' US President Donald Trump was in Scotland this week to open a new course at his Aberdeenshire golf resort (Jane Barlow/PA) Mr Bowie, who is the Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, added: 'Will you urgently call a meeting in Downing Street to conduct the review in partnership with industry leaders, our world-leading supply chain business, and the local workforce to ensure a coherent and sustainable path forward?' During his visit with Sir Keir, Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social website: 'North Sea Oil is a treasure chest for the United Kingdom. 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. 'They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'we don't want you'. 'Incentivise the drillers, fast. A vast fortune to be made for the UK, and far lower energy costs for the people.' Speaking at his Turnberry golf resort in South Ayrshire, Mr Trump said: 'When we go to Aberdeen, you'll see some of the ugliest windmills you've ever seen, the height of a 50-storey building.' Gesturing with his hands, he added: 'You can take 1,000 times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big.' Sir Keir at the time said oil and gas are 'going to be with us for a very long time, and that'll be part of the mix, but also wind, solar, increasingly nuclear'. Aberdeen has been chosen by the Government to host the headquarters of GB Energy, a state-owned company set up to accelerate the rollout of renewables.

Britain's summer of discontent
Britain's summer of discontent

New Statesman​

timean hour ago

  • New Statesman​

Britain's summer of discontent

Asylum protests. NHS strikes. A faltering economy. Is the Labour government facing a summer of discontent? Last year, riots sparked by the brutal murder of three young girls at a dance class in Southport rocked the UK. Rioters targeted hotels housing asylum seekers, wrongly connecting the murders to Muslim immigration. Now, asylum protests persist. At the same time, the government faces strike action from NHS doctors, a struggling economy and political threats from both left and right. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Rachel Cunliffe is joined by Anoosh Chakelian and George Eaton. Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store