logo
Confidence in UK hits new low while Starmer goes in wrong direction

Confidence in UK hits new low while Starmer goes in wrong direction

In the aftermath, arguments have raged both within and outwith Labour over the Government's current course. MPs in formerly Conservative-held seats and across the Red Wall have been arguing for a doubling down on anti-immigration policies and rhetoric. Others have blamed Rachel Reeves' decisions to cut the Winter Fuel Allowance and Personal Independence Payments, arguing for the Government to shift to the left.
Read more
The backdrop for this debate is the success of Reform UK last week. Nigel Farage's party won the Runcorn and Helsby by-election, two mayoralties, 677 councillors, and took control of ten councils. The BBC's projected vote share, which extrapolates from local election results to the full country, suggests Reform would win 30% of the vote in a general election, to Labour's 20%. Labour MPs in more conservative and pro-Brexit constituencies have been spooked by Reform's success, and are focused on how they triangulate against Farage's party.
Downing Street appears to agree with those MPs who want Labour to focus on Reform. In the immediate aftermath of the results the Government announced new anti-immigration measures and have stuck by their welfare cuts, signalling no intention to change course and doubling down on their existing bets.
There's a problem with this focus on Reform, though. The geography of the local elections last week has heavily influenced the narrative about the results. They took place in some of the most conservative and pro-Brexit parts of England, so a right-wing party coming first isn't a massive surprise. If elections had been held in part of England where the Liberal Democrats did well last year, or in Scotland and Wales, we would be having a very different conversation.
In national opinion polls, Labour have lost to the Greens and Liberal Democrats more than double the number of voters they've lost to Reform, whose rise is fuelled more by former Conservative voters than anyone else. In Scotland, they've lost more voters to the SNP, Greens, and Liberal Democrats than to Reform, and in Wales they've lost just 5% of their voters to Reform, but a quarter to Plaid Cymru and and eighth to the Liberal Democrats and Greens.
Nigel Farage of Reform UK (Image: free) Labour's problem isn't that they are not enough like Reform. They are bleeding votes to parties all over the political spectrum, more so to the left than to the right. Doubling down on their current direction won't win those voters back and risks alienating even more of them. More than half of Labour's 2024 voters have a favourable view of the Liberal Democrats and Greens, and in Scotland and Wales a significant minority of Labour voters have positive views of the nationalist parties. Not only have they already lost more voters on their left than their right, there's also far more scope for them to lose even more voters on their left flank.
Labour's problem isn't that they aren't tough enough on immigration. They won't hold on to power by aping Reform UK and Nigel Farage. Their problem is that, despite only having been in office for ten months, they nevertheless govern a country that most people think is going in the wrong direction.
In March, Ipsos found the lowest level of economic confidence in the UK that they have ever recorded, having started tracking in the 1970s. Britons are more negative about the state of the economy than they were in the 1980 recession, in the wake of Black Wednesday in 1992, during the Great Recession in 2008, and even at the height of the pandemic. 59% of us think Britain is going in the wrong direction; just 19% of us are happy with the way things are going.
As YouGov's Dylan Difford has put it, the mission of the Labour government should be 'deshittification', both because it's the right one from a policy perspective and because it's the agenda most likely to glue Labour's voter coalition back together. By the time of the next general election, and from the point of view of Scottish and Welsh Labour preferably by the devolved elections next year, Labour need to be able to point to ways in which life has gotten better.
Read more
Immigration crackdowns and salami-slicing the welfare state are not the path to making life better for ordinary Britons, never mind keeping Labour in power or the Union intact. Voters look at Labour's headline policy decisions since the election and see a government taking money out of ordinary people's pockets rather than those of the wealthiest. Despite the UK being a spectacularly wealthy country, most of that wealth sits in very few hands, and we simply do not tax it properly.
The British tax system is a dysfunctional mess that is incapable of mobilising the nation's resources to address the problems we face and needs thoroughly overhauled. But Labour's promises not to increase taxes, which they will ultimately be forced to do and which we knew needed to happen before last year's election, ties their hands behind their backs in this regard.
It also leaves a chasm on Labour's left that smaller parties are happily exploiting. Doubling down on their current strategy won't win their voters back because those voters are going left, not right. Only a change of course can win back the people who put Labour in power last July.
Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @markmcgeoghegan.bsky.social
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her
Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her

The trouble with Kemi Badenoch is that if she sees someone lying on the ground, she can't resist the temptation to kick them. She lacks empathy, to put it politely. There she was at Prime Minister's Questions, facing an open goal for a change, and attacking the prime minister, who, even three days later, can look after himself. Then she spots the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, her lip quivering, seemingly on the brink of crying. Straight in goes the Badenoch boot – she said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and described her as Starmer's 'human shield'. After Starmer failed to confirm Reeves in post for the rest of the parliament – a tall order for any appointee – Badenoch piled on the punishment: 'How awful for the chancellor that he did not confirm she would be in post.' Surely it might have crossed the mind of the Tory leader that the reason the chancellor was displaying unusual emotion might not have been all to do with politics. Most of us, I'm sure, wondered if there'd been some other explanation, some other bad news of a personal nature, as No 10 later disclosed. Even if it was all about the welfare reform fiasco, is it right to treat parliamentary exchanges as blood sports? To revel in the misery of an adversary? To mock them personally for a show of emotion? In fact, it's emerged that in the post-PMQs huddle with the press, Badenoch's spokesman seemingly urged the journalists to go after Reeves. Asked, 'So no matter what is going on in your personal life, you should disclose that to the public?' he replied: 'I think we should find out what's going on'. I was going to say, 'We're all human,' but, giving as good as Badenoch does, there are times one wonders if she is. Through the debates about disability benefits – we're talking about some people in deep despair here – Badenoch sounded arrogant and dismissive. She implied they're all lazy. This was her message to disabled people last week, on X: 'The world owes no one a living. Millions of people cannot just sit on welfare and expect to be paid to do so. And if they don't like it, that's their problem, not the state's.' It was Badenoch at her very worst. Yes, it could work, politically, because there is a callous, wilfully ignorant strand of public opinion that resents any kind of social security system, full stop. Well, excluding the bits they're likely to use, such as the state retirement pension, thoroughly inflation-proofed under its 'triple lock'. Badenoch bangs on about welfare reform, but the biggest element is the old age pension, at three times the spending on sickness and disability benefits. Taming the welfare bill is practically impossible without doing something that hurts pensioners. But does she ever mention that? No, because they're the only demographic voting for her. I'm not sure that either her party or the public likes the Badenoch style. It can misfire, causing sympathy for the victim of her scorn rather than support for her argument. It's possible her aggressive approach to Tuesday's vote reminded some Labour rebels just how dangerous she is, and persuaded them to back the government after all. When she senselessly slagged off Starmer after the last Nato summit, where he had helped keep Donald Trump onside, she sounded negative and, as the PM put it, 'unserious'. One of her own MPs mildly rebuked her for putting party first. Badenoch doesn't connect with the public in the way Nigel Farage does, or Boris Johnson in his heyday. Robert Jenrick, who's continuing with his informal leadership campaign, is better at campaigning and forcing change on the government. Mel Stride is better in the Commons. She was fortunate this week that the government had been so useless that she had no alternative but to succeed. When she stumbles again, as she will, her party might start kicking her when she's down.

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor
PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

South Wales Guardian

time20 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

Speaking to the BBC in his first interview since a threatened backbench revolt forced him to strip out a major part of his welfare reform plan, he acknowledged the past few days had been 'tough'. He said: 'Labour MPs are absolutely vested in this. It matters to them to get things like this right, and we didn't get that process right. We didn't engage in the way that we should have done.' But he insisted his Government would 'come through it stronger' as he vowed to 'reflect' on what needed to be done 'to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again'. Sir Keir also gave his full support to Chancellor Rachel Reeves after she was seen crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Ms Reeves's visibly tearful appearance in the Commons came amid speculation that her job was at risk after the welfare U-turn put an almost £5 billion hole in her spending plans. But the Prime Minister insisted her appearance had 'nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week' and was 'a personal matter'. Asked if she would remain in her post, he said: 'She will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour Party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.' On Thursday morning, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said Ms Reeves would 'bounce back' as he praised her 'leadership' on the economy. He also dismissed a suggestion that Sir Keir himself could be at risk, telling Sky News: 'Keir Starmer has been consistently underestimated. 'I wonder when people will learn. They said he couldn't win the Labour leadership, but he did. They said he couldn't change the Labour Party, but he did. They said he couldn't take the Labour Party from its worst defeat since the 1930s to election victory last year, and he did. 'And now the cynics say he can't change the country, but he will.' But Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the scenes in the Commons over the past week had left bond markets 'twitchy' about the Government and 'their ability to actually grip things like spending going forward'. Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Sir Mel appeared to distance himself from Robert Jenrick, who had earlier posted a video on social media describing Ms Reeves's career as 'dead'. But he added that Mr Jenrick was making a 'valid' point that the Government had 'lost control of the economy', laying the blame with the Chancellor and Sir Keir and warning of tax rises to come.

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor
PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

PM takes blame for welfare U-turn as he gives full backing to Chancellor

Sir Keir Starmer has taken responsibility for the U-turn on welfare reforms, saying his Government did not 'get the process right' as he gave his full backing to his Chancellor. Speaking to the BBC in his first interview since a threatened backbench revolt forced him to strip out a major part of his welfare reform plan, he acknowledged the past few days had been 'tough'. He said: 'Labour MPs are absolutely vested in this. It matters to them to get things like this right, and we didn't get that process right. We didn't engage in the way that we should have done.' But he insisted his Government would 'come through it stronger' as he vowed to 'reflect' on what needed to be done 'to ensure we don't get into a situation like that again'. Sir Keir also gave his full support to Chancellor Rachel Reeves after she was seen crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Ms Reeves's visibly tearful appearance in the Commons came amid speculation that her job was at risk after the welfare U-turn put an almost £5 billion hole in her spending plans. But the Prime Minister insisted her appearance had 'nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week' and was 'a personal matter'. Asked if she would remain in her post, he said: 'She will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour Party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.' On Thursday morning, Health Secretary Wes Streeting said Ms Reeves would 'bounce back' as he praised her 'leadership' on the economy. He also dismissed a suggestion that Sir Keir himself could be at risk, telling Sky News: 'Keir Starmer has been consistently underestimated. 'I wonder when people will learn. They said he couldn't win the Labour leadership, but he did. They said he couldn't change the Labour Party, but he did. They said he couldn't take the Labour Party from its worst defeat since the 1930s to election victory last year, and he did. 'And now the cynics say he can't change the country, but he will.' But Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said the scenes in the Commons over the past week had left bond markets 'twitchy' about the Government and 'their ability to actually grip things like spending going forward'. Appearing on BBC Breakfast, Sir Mel appeared to distance himself from Robert Jenrick, who had earlier posted a video on social media describing Ms Reeves's career as 'dead'. But he added that Mr Jenrick was making a 'valid' point that the Government had 'lost control of the economy', laying the blame with the Chancellor and Sir Keir and warning of tax rises to come.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store