logo
‘Difficult' state of NHS maternity care due to Tory inaction, inquiry head says

‘Difficult' state of NHS maternity care due to Tory inaction, inquiry head says

The Guardian6 hours ago
One of the UK's most senior midwives has said inaction by the previous government over maternity care failures has led to the 'difficult' situation in wards across England and a rise in reports of birth trauma.
Donna Ockenden, who is leading the biggest inquiry in NHS history into maternity failures in Nottingham, said the Conservatives had been given a 'blueprint' for how to improve maternity services but that it had not been implemented.
'I think the current government has inherited a really, really difficult picture around perinatal care, birth care and increasing reports of birth trauma. If only the previous government had done what it said it would do, that inheritance would have been very different,' she said.
Ockenden is leading a review into maternity services at the Nottingham university hospitals NHS trust, the largest inquiry into a single service in the history of the NHS, with 2,406 affected families taking part. The findings will be published in June 2026.
She expressed frustration over the slow pace of change after her report on the Shrewsbury and Telford maternity scandal, which found that 300 babies died or were left brain-damaged as a result of inadequate care.
'We published [that report] in March 2022 and there were 22 immediately essential actions, as well as hundreds of actions for the NHS trust,' she said. 'But with the chaos that followed in the year before the general election, things got lost and we are not as far ahead with those immediately essential actions as we should be.'
Guardian analysis has found that the NHS is facing a £27bn bill for maternity failings in England since 2019, significantly more than the health service's approximately £18bn budget for newborns in that time.
Ockenden said the figures left her 'deeply concerned', and she stressed that the cost of avoidable maternity harm was felt across 'mental health, other health services, the economy, the wider community, relationships, whole families and careers'.
'This is not the way it should be. I would absolutely not say that families do not deserve compensation when they have a poor outcome, but rather that if the money was invested upfront into making the service safer, then we could make significant strides towards reducing this very significant harm,' she said.
She said maternity wards were also dealing with problems caused by high levels of poverty across the country.
'There are a number of families, mothers and children living in destitution – which sounds very Victorian, but I do see examples of that. I hear about it from across the country and I see examples of real deprivation in Nottinghamshire,' she said.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'Maternity services are not an island. What comes in the front door of a maternity unit is that which is out there on our streets, whether that's women living in refugee status, in homeless hostels, women who come to antenatal clinics hungry because it's a choice between giving their children something for breakfast or [the women] eating.'
Last month, the health secretary, Wes Streeting, criticised what he described as 'the normalisation of deaths of women and babies' and said: 'We have women who are classed as having a normal birth still leaving traumatised and scarred.'
He announced a national investigation into NHS maternity services in England, along with a national maternity and neonatal taskforce comprising a panel of experts and bereaved families.
Ockenden said the news was 'encouraging' and that 'hearing, amplifying and acting upon family voices must be the golden thread that runs through it all'.
'It is my hope that the changes outlined in these plans improve perinatal services today and in the future, and drastically reduce the risk of harm. Women and families deserve safe maternity care, always,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BREAKING NEWS Paul Gascoigne's management 'give update on England legend's condition' after he was rushed to intensive care last week following a collapse at home
BREAKING NEWS Paul Gascoigne's management 'give update on England legend's condition' after he was rushed to intensive care last week following a collapse at home

Daily Mail​

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS Paul Gascoigne's management 'give update on England legend's condition' after he was rushed to intensive care last week following a collapse at home

Paul Gascoigne is reportedly recovering at home after being discharged from hospital following his health scare on Friday. The 58-year-old was discovered semi-conscious in his bedroom by long-time friend and personal assistant Steve Foster, who immediately drove him to hospital. Gascoigne was initially admitted to the intensive care unit, sparking concern among fans for the former footballer's health, whose battles with alcohol and mental health have been well documented. His management company, The MNT agency, confirmed to The Times that Gascoigne has now returned home. A spokesperson said Gascoigne is 'doing well', with the former England star having been admitted last Friday due to a throat condition.

Consultants demand £6,000 to provide on-call cover for striking junior doctors this weekend - and even more if they actually do any work
Consultants demand £6,000 to provide on-call cover for striking junior doctors this weekend - and even more if they actually do any work

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Consultants demand £6,000 to provide on-call cover for striking junior doctors this weekend - and even more if they actually do any work

The doctors union is demanding NHS hospitals pay consultants £6,000 to provide on-call cover for striking junior colleagues this weekend. The senior medics would pocket the money for being on standby, where they can pass their time gardening, sleeping or watching TV in the comfort of their own home. If they are required to provide advice on the phone or have to travel in to help, the rates rocket from £125 per hour to as much as £313 per hour. A consultant working an eight hour ward shift from 11pm to 7am would earn £2,504, according to the British Medical Association overtime rate card. And one working on-call for 48 hours would earn at least £6,000. Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents NHS trusts, said it is 'outrageous' for one group of doctors to profit from the strikes. He added: 'It is especially worrying to see demands for excessive rates to provide this cover. These rates are simply unaffordable and would mean cuts to services. 'The withdrawal of labour by one staff group should not be seen as a financial opportunity for another. That would be outrageous in a situation where there can be no winners.' It comes as a new report warns strikes by resident doctors could cost the NHS 250,000 appointments and £87million in staffing cover this month alone. The medics - previously known as junior doctors - will walk out for five consecutive days from Friday in pursuit of a 29 per cent pay rise. Charities have expressed their 'deep concern' at the action and warned it will cause 'significant distress, pain and worsening health for patients.' Now the Policy Exchange think tank has estimated the 'considerable' impact it is likely to have on waiting lists and health service finances. Consultants will be able to cash-in by charging hospitals inflated rates to cover for absent junior colleagues, depleting them of funds that could have been used to buy new scanners, repair buildings or deliver more procedures. But there is still unlikely to be enough doctors to provide a full service, meaning bosses will be forced to cancel some appointments. Resident doctors have crippled the NHS by taking industrial action 11 times since 2022. If strikes occur at the same rate over the next six months, Policy Exchange estimates over 2million appointments could be impacted. It also puts the cost of providing consultant cover at £17.5million a day, totalling £367.46million over the same period. CHANGE TO NHS STRIKE PLANNING 'PUTS PATIENTS AT RISK', BMA CLAIMS A change in the way NHS England is planning for upcoming resident doctors strikes will put patient safety at risk, the BMA has warned. In previous walkouts, bosses were told to cancel scheduled procedures to free-up consultants to cover for absent colleagues in emergency and urgent care. But the union says these services left being stretched 'far too thinly' after NHS England chief executive Sir Jim Mackey this time instructed hospitals to continue scheduled non-urgent care. Dr Tom Dolphin, chair of the BMA governing council, has written to Sir Jim saying: 'It is vital that hospital care must adapt on strike days to the levels of staff available, as the foundation of ensuring that strikes are safe for patients is that more senior doctors are able to cover for those residents who are on strike in all urgent care. 'Your decision to instruct hospitals to run non-urgent planned care stretches safe staffing far too thinly, and risks not only patient safety in urgent and emergency situations, but in planned care too. 'It also appears designed to lead to far more late, same-day cancellations for patients. Consultants cannot safely provide elective care and cover for residents at the same time.' The figures come just days after an investigation revealed coroners' reports had linked at least five patient deaths to junior doctor strikes in 2023/24. Resident doctors belonging to the British Medical Association have voted to walkout for up to six months despite receiving above inflation pay rises for the past three years, worth an extra 28.9 per cent in total. This includes an inflation-busting rise this year of 5.4 per cent, which is the most generous in the public sector. Health secretary Wes Streeting has described the BMA's behaviour as 'shockingly irresponsible' and 'unconscionable' and insisted he will not budge on pay. Policy Exchange estimate that strikes could reduce inpatient activity for the month of July by 4.5 per cent and outpatient activity by 8.7 per cent, threatening NHS England's ability to meet its target of treating 65 per cent of patients within 18 weeks from next Spring. The report also suggest strikes could make it 'impossible' for the Prime Minister to deliver on his pledge to reach a target of 92 per cent by the next election. The analysis assumes there will be a similar level of disruption as in previous strikes. Conservative former health secretary Victoria Atkins welcomed the Policy Exchange's 'powerful' new report, named 'Completely Unreasonable': The Possible Impact of the BMA Resident Doctor Committee's Proposed Industrial Action.' She added: 'This is in nobody's interest, particularly patients who will be the ones who bear the brunt of the disruption once more. 'The Government risks further alienating the wider NHS workforce and public sector if they cave in – on pay, on student loans or other exceptional terms. 'Nurses and other health professionals, teachers, police officers and others will ask why they're being treated differently from resident doctors.' Mr Streeting met with the leaders of the BMA's resident doctors committee last Thursday but talks ended without a breakthrough. They are expected to meet again this week. It is understood talks are examining other ways to boost doctor's financial situation, such as changes to student loans, pensions and career progression. If doctors go on strike, this would be the first national strike by a healthcare union under a Labour Government since the Winter of Discontent in 1979. The report urges the government to 'hold firm' and offer no further basic pay rises this year but suggests it accelerates plans to enable doctors to swap higher pension contributions for an uplift in salary. Fewer than half of resident doctors entitled to vote in the latest BMA ballot backed industrial action. Public support for action has also faded. The BMA says the pay of resident doctors has been cut in real terms since 2008 and it wants to achieve full pay restoration. A BMA spokesperson said: 'Doctors don't want to strike and these strikes do not have to go ahead. 'All Mr Streeting needs to do is come forward with a credible path toward paying doctors the same as they got in 2008.' The Department of Health and Social Care has been approached for comment.

Concerns raised about patient safety ahead of resident doctor walkouts
Concerns raised about patient safety ahead of resident doctor walkouts

The Independent

time42 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Concerns raised about patient safety ahead of resident doctor walkouts

Changes to the way hospitals will work during resident doctor strikes could 'risk patient safety', the British Medical Association (BMA) has said. A five-day walkout is scheduled to start on Friday and could cause significant upheaval to the NHS in England. It is hoped the strikes could be averted by ongoing talks between the Government and the Resident Doctors Committee (RDC) of the BMA. But with just days before the strikes are due to start, the union has criticised the way the health service is preparing. In previous walkouts, urgent and emergency services have been staffed by senior hospital doctors, including consultants, and pre-planned work was largely postponed. But the BMA said that hospital leaders have been told to continue with scheduled non-urgent care during the fresh bout of strike action. The union said this approach would put patients at risk. Speaking earlier this month, NHS England boss Sir Jim Mackey said 'we can't allow this to play out in a way that it did last time'. The last round of strikes, which also included walkouts by other health workers, came at an estimated cost of £1.5 billion to the NHS in England. Some 1.5 million appointments, procedures and operations were postponed as a result of the stoppages. In a letter to Sir Jim, BMA council chairman Dr Tom Dolphin and deputy council chairwoman Dr Emma Runswick wrote: 'Your decision to instruct hospitals to run non-urgent planned care stretches safe staffing far too thinly, and risks not only patient safety in urgent and emergency situations, but in planned care too. ' Consultants cannot safely provide elective care and cover for residents at the same time. 'We therefore strongly urge you to reconsider your instructions to hospitals, which should be preparing now to postpone non-urgent planned activity in order to provide a safe urgent and emergency service in keeping with the levels of staff available.' In previous strikes, there was a so-called 'derogation' process where hospitals can request striking doctors return to work if there is risk to patient safety. The BMA said that it is 'committed' to the process but not to facilitating non-urgent work. The previous strikes ended last September when resident doctor members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3% on average over two years. The 2025/26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4% increase plus £750 'on a consolidated basis', working out as an average rise of 5.4%. Government officials said these two increases equate to a 28.9% pay rise. But the BMA said resident doctors need 29.2% to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008/09. The strikes are due to begin at 7am on Friday and last for five days. NHS England has been approached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store