
Justice Chandurkar sworn in as Supreme Court Judge
2
Nagpur: Justice Atul Chandurkar was sworn in as a judge of the Supreme Court on Friday morning, alongside Justices NV Anjaria and Vijay Bishnoi, restoring the apex court to its full sanctioned strength of 34 judges.
Chief Justice of India Bhushan Gavai administered the oath of office in a ceremony held at the Supreme Court's extension building in New Delhi.
The appointments, notified by the central govt on Thursday, were recommended by the collegium led by CJI Gavai and Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, JK Maheshwari, and BV Nagarathna on May 26. President Droupadi Murmu formally approved the appointments, clearing the way for the swearing-in ceremony.
While Justice Bishnoi took the oath in Hindi, Justices Anjaria and Chandurkar were administered oaths in English.
Justice Chandurkar's elevation fills one of the three vacancies created by the recent retirements of former Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justices Abhay S Oka and Hrishikesh Roy. In keeping with tradition, on their first working day, the newly appointed judges joined benches in order of seniority, with Justice Chandurkar sitting alongside Justice Vikram Nath.
Born on April 7, 1965, Justice Chandurkar completed his schooling at St Vincent's High School in Pune, followed by higher education at Ness Wadia College and ILS Law College, Pune. He began his legal practice in Mumbai under senior counsel BN Naik on July 21, 1988, later shifting to Nagpur in 1992, where he practised extensively across various courts. Elevated as an additional judge of the Bombay High Court on June 21, 2013, he eventually became the administrative judge of its Nagpur bench.
Justice Chandurkar has delivered several notable judgments so far in his career. In June 2024, he led a division bench that upheld a dress code enforced by a Chembur college banning hijabs and other religious identifiers, ruling it did not infringe upon fundamental rights. In September 2024, he concurred with Justice Gautam Patel in striking down the amended IT Rules that empowered the govt's Fact Check Unit, declaring them unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14 and 19.
In October 2024, he stayed the Maharashtra govt's attempt to reclaim over 116 acres of industrial land in Kandivali's Charkop area. Most recently, in March 2025, he dismissed a plea by a Dalit PhD student challenging his suspension by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) for alleged misconduct and anti-national activities.
Justice Chandurkar also questioned the Maharashtra govt in March over the pending heritage status for Veer Savarkar's residence in Shivaji Park and barred any changes to the property's status until June 13.
The same month, he led a bench that ruled compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act should not be reduced by amounts received from Mediclaim or insurance policies.
Justice Chandurkar has authored two books on municipal and rent control laws in Maharashtra, underlining his expertise in civil and administrative law. His elevation is seen as a recognition of his deep knowledge and balanced judicial approach. He will have a tenure of four years and ten months and will retire on April 6, 2030.
The swearing-in ceremony was attended by lawyers from Nagpur, marking a proud moment for the local bar, which has seen several of its members ascend to the apex court. Justice Chandurkar joins the list of eminent jurists from the Nagpur High Bar Association, including Justices Janardan Mudholkar, Ananda Sen, Vikas Sirpurkar, Sharad Bobde, and Bhushan Gavai.
Justice Chandurkar's Significant Judgments:
- Upheld dress code ban on hijabs in colleges
- Struck down amended IT Rules as unconstitutional
- Stayed state's attempt to reclaim industrial land in Mumbai
Nagpur Connection: Justice Chandurkar practised law in Nagpur from 1992
Previous Position: Senior judge, Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court seeks State's response to PIL plea seeking to initiate process for empanelment of eligible IPS officers for T.N. DGP post
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Monday sought response of the State government to a public interest litigation (PIL) petition seeking the direction to the Central and the State governments to immediately initiate the process for empanelment of eligible IPS officers for the post of Director General of Police (DGP), Tamil Nadu. A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete sought response from the State on the procedure it would be adopting. The court also sought response regarding the Supreme Court guidelines in the Prakash Singh v. Union of lndia case, Supreme Court clarifications to the directions, Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) guidelines and the Single Window System. The court was hearing the PIL petition filed by K. Yasar Arafath of Paramakudi in Ramanathapuram district who sought appropriate directions regarding appointment of the Tamil Nadu DGP in compliance with the directions of the Supreme Court in Prakash Singh v. Union of lndia judgment. The incumbent DGP Mr. Shankar Jiwal is set to retire on August 31. However, till date the State government has not taken steps to initiate the mandatory process of empaneling eligible IPS officers and forwarding the names to UPSC for preparation of a panel, as directed by the Supreme Court, he said. He claimed there were credible reports indicating the possibility of appointing an in-charge or acting DGP or seeking an extension for the current DGP without following the prescribed process. It amounts to contempt of the directions laid down by the Supreme Court in the Prakash Singh case, which require a merit based transparent selection of the DGP from a panel prepared by the UPSC in consultation with the State government, he said. The petitioner claimed in view of the upcoming Tamil Assembly Elections in 2026, the State government had planned to keep the Head of the Police Force as per their choice to get the support of the Police Department till the upcoming election. The Supreme Court has taken a serious note of the violation of its directions by several States, including the appointment of in-charge DGP and expressed grave concern over the continued non-compliance, he said. The petitioner sought a direction to restrain the State from appointing any officer as in-charge or acting DGP or granting extension to the retiring DGP, without following due process and UPSC panel recommendation pending disposal of the petition. The failure of the authorities to comply with the binding judicial directions undermines the rule of law and the independence and the professionalism of the police force, which has serious consequences for public administration and governance, he said. The court has ordered notice and posted the matter for hearing on August 11.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
Colombia's former President Uribe petitions Supreme Court to lift house arrest after conviction
Colombia's former president Álvaro Uribe has petitioned the Supreme Court to lift his house arrest while he appeals a 12-year sentence for witness tampering and obstruction of justice. read more Colombia's former president Alvaro Uribe, the country's first previous leader to be convicted of a crime, petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday for his release while appealing his sentence of 12 years house jail. Uribe's conviction and punishment last Friday marked the end of his long career as one of Colombia's most contentious politicians. The 73-year-old, who is still popular and powerful among conservatives, conducted a rigorous military battle against drug traffickers and the FARC rebel group as president from 2002 to 2010. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Uribe was found guilty of tampering with witnesses in a separate inquiry investigating his suspected involvement with right-wing paramilitaries responsible for atrocities while fighting leftist guerrillas. He was also found guilty of impeding justice. At his sentencing the trial court judge declared him to be a flight risk and ordered him to be placed under house arrest at his home in the town of Rionegro, near Colombia's second city of Medellin. Uribe's lawyers petitioned the Supreme Court on Monday to set him free, assuring he had no intention of leaving his homeland. A law-and-order hardliner, Uribe was a close ally of the United States and retains ties to the American right. He claims his conviction is a political witch hunt by the administration of left-wing President Gustavo Petro. He has until August 13 to appeal his conviction. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has decried the case against Uribe, saying it represented 'the weaponization of Colombia's judicial branch by radical judges.'


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
DMK moves SC against Madras HC order on naming of welfare schemes
Chennai: While state govt has already petitioned Madras high court to modify its order restraining govt from launching any welfare scheme in the name of a living political personality, DMK approached Supreme Court challenging the interim order. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the appeal on Wednesday, the party told high court on Monday. Recording the submissions, the first bench of Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice Sunder Mohan observed, "once our order is challenged, we will not pass any further orders. Judicial discipline requires that we do not pass any orders in the matter." The court then decided to defer the hearing of the modification petition for two days and adjourned it to Thursday. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai The issue pertains to a plea moved by former AIADMK law minister C Ve Shanmugam, who alleged that the scheme 'Nalam Kaakkum Stalin' named after chief minister M K Stalin was in violation of the guidelines set by Supreme Court and ECI. On July 31, the bench passed an interim order making it clear that all welfare schemes launched by state should be in conformity with the guidelines fixed by Supreme Court and pictures of living political leaders should not be used in such schemes. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Aggrieved, state govt submitted that the scheme was introduced in the name of the chief minister of the state, who is a constitutional authority, and it cannot be construed to have been introduced in the name of a political personality. The usage of photos of former chief ministers is also not expressly prohibited under the orders passed by Supreme Court, it added. While the bench was slated to hear the modification petition on Aug 4, state launched the scheme 'Nalam Kaakkum Stalin' on Aug 2.