What's Going On With META Stock?
Meta Platforms' stock has declined approximately 13% this year, facing headwinds from potential tariff impacts that could affect the company in two significant ways:
Despite this year's setback, Meta has demonstrated remarkable resilience over a longer timeframe, with the stock gaining 56% since early 2022, substantially outperforming the broader Nasdaq index's modest 7% increase. This outperformance can be attributed to several key factors:
Meta Platforms has delivered impressive revenue growth of 39%, increasing from $118 billion in 2021 to $165 billion in the trailing twelve months. This robust performance stems from multiple growth drivers:
Meta's profitability metrics show substantial improvement, with the net income margin expanding from 33.4% in 2021 to 37.9% currently. This enhanced profitability is complemented by a strategic 9% reduction in shares outstanding, made possible by the company's substantial $122 billion investment in share repurchases.
The combination of higher revenues, expanded margins, and fewer outstanding shares has resulted in a 73% increase in earnings per share, rising from $13.77 in 2021 to $23.86 in the most recent period.
Despite Meta's impressive financial performance across revenue growth, margin expansion, and earnings improvement, its P/E ratio has declined by 10%. This valuation compression can be attributed to several factors:
Given these uncertainties, investors should ask themselves critical questions: Do you want to hold on to your META stock now? Will you panic and sell if it starts dropping further?
Holding on to a falling stock is never easy. While META remains fundamentally strong with impressive growth and improving profitability, investors seeking to preserve wealth in volatile markets might consider alternative strategies. Trefis works with Empirical Asset Management—a Boston area wealth manager—whose asset allocation strategies yielded positive returns even during the 2008-09 period when the S&P lost more than 40%. Empirical has incorporated the Trefis HQ Portfolio in this asset allocation framework to provide clients better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics..
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
28 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Meta reportedly scores two more high-profile OpenAI researchers
In Brief OpenAI researcher Jason Wei will join Meta's new Superintelligence Lab, reports Wired, citing two sources familiar with the matter. Another team member, Hyung Won Chung, may also join Meta. Sources told Wired that both the researchers' internal OpenAI Slack profiles are currently deactivated. Wei and Chung would be Meta's latest grab as CEO Mark Zuckerberg works to catch up in the race to AGI, or superintelligence, by luring top tech talent with astounding compensation packages. Wei's main focus at OpenAI was o3 and deep research models. He came to the ChatGPT-maker after working on chain-of-thought research at Google. Chung, who overlapped with Wei at Google, worked on deep research and OpenAI's o1 model. His research is focused on reasoning and agents. Sources told Wired that the two had a close working relationship, which could be why Zuckerberg scooped them both up. Like World War II drafters in the UK, he seems to have a penchant for bringing on groups who've worked together. Got a sensitive tip or confidential documents? We're reporting on the inner workings of the AI industry — from the companies shaping its future to the people impacted by their decisions. Reach out to Rebecca Bellan at and Maxwell Zeff at For secure communication, you can contact us via Signal at @rebeccabellan.491 and @mzeff.88.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Meta is trying to win the AI race. A new partnership with AWS could help
For Silicon Valley giants, getting ahead in the artificial intelligence race requires more than building the biggest, most capable models; they're also competing to get third-party developers to build new applications based on their technology. Now, Meta is teaming up with Amazon's cloud computing unit, Amazon Web Services, on an initiative designed to do just that. The program will provide six months of technical support from both companies' engineers and $200,000 in AWS cloud computing credits each to 30 US startups looking to build AI tools on Meta's Llama AI model. The partnership is set to be unveiled at AWS Summit in New York City on Wednesday. For Meta, the project could be a boost at a time when CEO Mark Zuckerberg is pouring enormous resources into his ambition to become a top player in the AI space. The company last month announced the creation of a new AI super intelligence team, after recruiting leading researchers away from competitors with massive pay packages. Meta also invested $14.3 billion into AI startup Scale, which included the hiring of its founder and CEO, Alexandr Wang, and several other top employees. And Amazon's investment, worth more than $6 million in total, could pay off if the startups continue using AWS's service to access the AI system after the six months. While Amazon has its own large language models, AWS's AI strategy has been to help companies access any model — or multiple — along with the intense computing power needed to run them. Early-stage startups can apply to the program and will be selected later this summer based on the 'potential impact of the proposed solutions and the technical ability' of their teams, AWS and Meta said in a statement. 'We have a long-standing relationship and partnership with Meta, and what we're aiming to do here with the Llama collaboration is really empower founders to build transformative AI using Llama models,' AWS Vice President and Global Head of Startups and Venture Capital Jon Jones told CNN exclusively ahead of the announcement. He added that AWS customers are already using Llama to, for example, create AI customer relationship management tools for auto dealerships or financial technology tools. At the heart of the Meta-AWS partnership is a push to support Llama, a leading open-source AI model, meaning the code behind the technology is publicly available — unlike proprietary or 'closed-source' models like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude. There's an industry debate over the benefits of open versus closed-source AI models. It goes something like this: Companies on Team Closed Source say they'll retain more control over how their technology is used, and it's a whole lot easier to build a business when your rivals don't know exactly how your systems work. Team Open Source says potentially transformative AI technology should be available for anyone to use and build on to democratize its benefits. Zuckerberg said last year that he believes 'open source is necessary for a positive AI future.' He added that his model will help open source become 'the industry standard,' since third parties have free access to build on the technology. In other words, Zuckerberg would like his technology to become the leading platform for developers building chatbots, agents and other AI apps, similar to how Apple and Google's operating systems have functioned in the mobile web era. But for startups looking to build on a large AI model, going the closed-source route can have practical benefits — when they pay to access the technology, they may also get a friendly user interface, tech support and a more personalized experience. With their partnership, AWS and Meta hope to provide some of those same benefits to startups building on Llama. And given the significant cost of computing power for AI systems, the AWS credits could be a boon to startups that don't expect to turn a profit immediately. 'We developed Llama because we believe greater access to powerful models is essential for driving progress in AI,' Ash Jhaveri, vice president of AI partnerships at Meta, said in a statement about the initiative. 'Startups are some of the most creative forces in tech, and we're looking forward to seeing how they'll use Llama to push boundaries, explore new frontiers, and shape the future of AI in bold and unexpected ways.'
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
AI Is Changing Talent Management—Here's What To Watch For
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang believes AI will create many new job opportunities. (Photo by Patrick T. ... More Fallon / AFP via Getty Images) Whether AI will create millions of jobs or drive mass unemployment is still hotly debated—most recently by the Chief Executive Officers of two technology giants, Nvidia's Jensen Huang and Anthropic's Dario Amodei. What is not debated, however, is AI's disruptive effect on the talent landscape. Tech firms' aggressive recruiting of AI talent is perhaps best exemplified by Meta's reported $300 million pay packages. Microsoft's layoffs, which appeared to coincide with AI investments, illustrate how talent needs can shift. AI's talent impact goes way beyond tech firms. Most employers (69%) are planning to hire for skills in designing AI tools and enhancements to support business goals, especially in big data, network, cybersecurity and technological literacy, according to the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs 2025 report. Given the increasingly strategic importance of talent and talent management, here are four questions to assess your firm's understanding of AI's talent implications. What Is Our AI Readiness? People vary widely on how they perceive AI's impact on their career prospects. In turn, this may affect employees' motivation to gain AI proficiency. For example, only 36% of women (versus 45% of men) believe that AI can help their careers. Viewing AI as an obstacle, rather than an avenue, for job security and career advancement could foster resistance to developing technical literacy. Ambiguity around the rules for using AI and perceptions of AI's trustworthiness can also undermine adoption as well. People who are more likely to follow rules may hesitate to use AI absent clear guidance for when and where its use is allowed. Hesitation may also be tied to doubts about AI's capabilities—to make unbiased recommendations and assessments, for example. Understanding who sees AI as a career asset—and who doesn't—may be a good starting place to determine a talent pool's AI readiness. Assessing the clarity of AI usage rules and trust issues is another way to gain insight into employees' readiness to adopt AI. How Will Non-AI Skills Needs Change? Adopting AI tools to replace some skills may increase the demand for other, more human skills. For example, 65% of workers would prefer AI to track their performance and 55% would welcome AI's help to manage deadlines. But over 85% say they much prefer that a human manager motivates, recognizes, empathizes and validates them, according to a survey of 512 employees, conducted by Better Up Labs and Stanford's Social Media Lab. Ethics and creativity are other skills that are likely to emerge as increasingly critical, according to research from MIT, which analyzed the removal, continuation, or addition of job tasks in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' database of occupations between 2016 and 2024. Most employers expect to transform their workforce to better work alongside AI: 77% are planning to reskill or upskill their existing workforce, while 62% anticipate hiring new people for this, according to the WEF's Future of Jobs Report. How Will AI Impact Succession Planning? To be able to effectively understand, anticipate and manage AI risks, leadership teams need the appropriate talent. Over half (54%) of CEOs view AI and related technologies as threats to their business, according to a Russell Reynolds report. The risk is especially high around cybersecurity. AI's growing role in strategic planning makes it imperative to revisit leadership talent needs, identification and development. The more AI becomes central to strategic decision making, the more important it is for leadership pipelines and succession planning to reflect this shift. Your AI leadership and talent pipeline should reflect AI's centrality to your business strategy—fundamentally changing your products and services, versus supporting your operations. In this evolving environment, there is no set formula or defined role. Some firms will have chief AI officers. But other AI roles abound. They may include AI transformation leader, for enterprise-wide transformation, AI product leader, to push a specific AI offering; or AI innovation leader, to understand and develop AI possibilities across the business, according to Russell Reynolds. What Are Liabilities From AI Job Displacements? Because of disparities in gender and racial or ethnic representation across a wide range of occupations, replacing people with AI could disproportionally affect protected classes of employees in some jobs. For example, because AI is increasingly used to automate customer service jobs, retail roles, and warehouse jobs, Black and Latino workers, who tend to be overrepresented in those jobs, may be especially likely to be let go. A similar effect is expected in some of the jobs where women tend to be clustered, like cashiers, secretaries and bookkeeping clerks, which AI is poised to more readily replace. Disparate impact—when a seemingly neutral employment decision negatively affects people in a protected class category like gender, race, age, national origin—that results from AI-based employment decisions can become a liability. To minimize exposure, firms may want to ensure that introducing AI to replace employees in specific roles is a business necessity. They may also want to explore less discriminatory alternatives. How AI might affect strategy is a topic of discussion in many boardrooms. Most firms anticipate they will need AI skills to address the disruptions and opportunities it brings. But AI is likely to have broader consequences for the firm's entire talent pool, forcing hard questions about who gets reskilled, hired, or fired. Companies that ask—and effectively answer these questions—are likely to navigate these disruptions more smoothly and be best prepared for the future.
