logo
Not even the Fed knows what's next

Not even the Fed knows what's next

Politico20-03-2025
Editor's note: Morning Money is a free version of POLITICO Pro Financial Services morning newsletter, which is delivered to our subscribers each morning at 5:15 a.m. The POLITICO Pro platform combines the news you need with tools you can use to take action on the day's biggest stories. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro.
Quick Fix
Progress on inflation has stalled. The Federal Reserve's growth expectations for 2025 have faded and fewer central bank policymakers think that they'll be able to stimulate the economy with two more interest rate cuts this year.
How much confidence does Fed Chair Jerome Powell have in those projections?
'I don't know anyone who has a lot of confidence in their forecast,' the most powerful central banker in the world told reporters on Wednesday.
Powell's comments, which followed the Fed's decision to hold short-term interest rates at their current level of 4.25 percent to 4.5 percent, underscore just how much President Donald Trump's administration has thrown central bankers, Wall Street leaders and investors into confusion.
'Forecasting is always really, really hard. And in the current situation, uncertainty is remarkably high,' Powell said, later adding that the central bank is 'well-positioned to wait for further clarity.'
To crib a phrase from investor Richard Bernstein, certainty is now a scarcity in markets. The size and scope of new 'reciprocal' tariffs set to hit major trading partners on April 2 are still basically unknown, though they may ultimately affect trillions of dollars in imports. Wall Street investors and policy analysts are parsing statements from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett for forward guidance, but their collective commentary has done little to calm the markets.
What's more, it's unclear how Trump's plans to deport millions of immigrants will impact a domestic labor market that defied gravity during the Fed's post-pandemic rate cycle. GOP leaders in Congress haven't agreed to a legislative framework for Trump's tax and spending priorities. The cuts from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency are difficult to quantify and any ongoing deregulation hasn't resonated with investors.
It's the 'net effects' of Trump's agenda that will ultimately shape the economy and interest rates, Powell said.
The danger, of course, is that Powell & Co. won't have a handle on those net effects until it's too late. Memories of Powell's claims that post-pandemic inflation would likely prove 'transitory' remain fresh. And even though the dour mood affecting traders and consumers hasn't resulted in an economic slowdown or price surges, analysts believe that both pose growing threats. (Hence the speculation that stagflation, Beelzebub for monetary policymakers, may be making a comeback.)
To be clear, stagflation is not imminent or a foregone conclusion. The economy remains on relatively stable footing, even though consumer confidence and growth projections have clearly worsened. The stock market bounced on Powell's commentary that the price effects of new trade policies may be short-lived.
The Fed now expects prices in core sectors of the economy to climb by 2.8 percent through the end of the year, a meaningful jump from the 2.5 percent estimated in December. Similarly, its growth estimate for 2025 dropped from 2.1 percent to 1.7 percent.
How much conviction should you have in that forecast? Ask Powell.
IT'S THURSDAY — Huge tip of the cap to Victoria Guida for surviving another Fed day. And as always, send econ policy thoughts, Wall Street tips, personnel moves and general thoughts to Sam at ssutton@politico.com.
Driving the Day
World Bank President Ajay Banga speaks at the Economic Club of Washington at 8 a.m. … Existing home sales data for February will be out at 10 a.m. … The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research hosts a discussion on homesteading at 10 a.m. … The Peterson Institute for International Economics hosts a virtual discussion at 10:30 a.m. on 'The EU's New Era of Trade and Geopolitical Challenges'
The day in tariffs — Trump officials are 'laying the groundwork for an escalation in global economic hostilities,' WaPo's Jeff Stein and David Lynch reported on Wednesday. 'A person familiar with internal planning, speaking on the condition of anonymity to reflect private deliberations, confirmed administration officials are preparing tariffs on 'trillions' of dollars in imports.'
— Meanwhile, in an appearance on Fox Business, Hassett signaled that many countries could emerge unscathed on April 2, per Doug Palmer.
Welcome news for the Big Banks — In an interview on the 'All In' podcast published Wednesday, Bessent suggested that U.S. government debt should be carved out of the supplementary leverage ratio, Victoria reports. The Treasury secretary touted it as a way to lower interest costs.
Big trouble for big law — Trump's sanctioning of major law firms Paul Weiss and Perkins Coie has forced Washington's white shoe firms to grapple with a major dilemma, 'keep their heads down and avoid cases that may pit them against the administration, or continue representing clients that might anger a president increasingly willing to use his power to seek vengeance,' reports Daniel Barnes.
At the regulators
If you say so — Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the Securities and Exchange Commission is backing down from its appeal of a 2023 decision in federal court that found that some sales of the company's XRP token were illegal under the securities laws while others were not. While the SEC declined to comment, the agency's decision to drop its appeal would represent a further de-escalation of its years-long legal battle against industry heavyweights, Declan Harty reports.
— The venture capital giant Sequoia Capital is closing its Washington office and policy team, Fortune's Jessica Matthews reports.
Big challenge for antitrust — Reams of consumer data held by businesses can shape corporate strategy, merger activity, pricing and — in financial services — credit decisions. But regulators that police merger activity aren't applying a uniform standard to how that data can affect market competition — potentially to the detriment of consumers, Linda Jeng, Jon Frost, Elisabeth Noble and Chris Brummer wrote in a new working paper published by the Bank for International Settlements. Critically, authorities like the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, 'may not effectively accommodate issues relating to large data sets at merging firms, particularly those that may be complementary and used for competitive advantage across multiple business and product lines.'
Very odd — From Katy O'Donnell: 'An Elon Musk ally resigned his position on Fannie Mae's board of directors on Tuesday, just one day after he was named to the board.'
— The board upheaval unleashed by newly confirmed Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte is raising doubts that the Trump's administration will move quickly with the expected privatization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Katy reports.
The Economy
First in MM: The economic outlook is grim, regardless of your media diet — New polling from the Democratic public affairs firm Global Strategy Group found that voters are increasingly bearish on how Trump's policies will affect the economy. While those results echo the pessimism reflected in other consumer surveys and nonpartisan polling, GSG also found that outlooks are fading regardless of media diet.
Trump supporters are less likely to consume news from national publications or television. But mounting concerns about personal finances and inflation are breaking through regardless of how much faith they place in traditional media, according to the survey. In other words, 'personal experiences are shaping voters' perceptions more than the media filter that they're operating in,' Katie Drapcho, a vice president for research at GSG, told MM.
'What that tells us is that the economy is unique relative to other political issues,' she said.
'That does provide an opening for Democrats to engage on these issues because, regardless of where people are getting their information, they're sharing the same experiences and concerns when it comes to the economy.'
At the border — Officials are cracking down on Americans attempting to sneak eggs across the border, CBC's Natalie Stechyson reports. Seizures are up by 116 percent compared to January and February of last year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll: Americans think Paramount is cancelling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve
Poll: Americans think Paramount is cancelling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: Americans think Paramount is cancelling 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' because of politics — and they don't approve

More favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." More Americans disapprove (40%) than approve (33%) of Paramount's controversial decision earlier this month to cancel CBS's long-running late-night program with host Stephen Colbert, according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll. And while CBS has claimed the decision was 'purely … financial' — adding that it was 'not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount' — more Americans believe that politics rather than money was the real reason behind it. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults was conducted in the immediate aftermath of Paramount's Late Show announcement, from July 24 to July 28 — a period that coincided with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally agreeing to sign off on the company's proposed $8 billion mega-merger with the Hollywood studio Skydance. Colbert is a sharp critic of President Trump, and skeptics have accused Paramount of cancelling the Late Show not because late-night talk shows are losing money but because the company wanted to appease the Trump administration and get its Skydance deal over the line. Last October, Trump sued Paramount for the way CBS's 60 Minutes program edited an interview with his Democratic rival, Kamala Harris — and earlier this month, Paramount decided to settle with Trump and pay $16 million to his future presidential library, even though several legal experts said the case was frivolous. Colbert — who is scheduled to keep hosting the Late Show until it goes dark next May — mocked the settlement on-air, calling it a 'big fat bribe.' 'As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I'm offended, and I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company,' Colbert told his audience. 'But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.' The new Yahoo/YouGov poll shows that more Americans agree with Colbert's theory of why his show was cancelled than agree with other, more 'purely financial' explanations. When asked why CBS and Paramount are canceling the Late Show — and instructed to select all the reasons that apply — the share who select 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with the Trump administration' (37%) and 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump' (36%) is greater than the share who select 'the Late Show is losing money (32%), 'the Late Show is losing viewers' (30%) and 'the late-night format is losing relevance' (26%). Partisan preferences are clearly playing a role in the reaction to the Late Show's demise. Far more Americans think Colbert is liberal (53%) than think he's moderate (10%) or conservative (3%), and Democrats (72%) are six times more likely to disapprove of the decision than Republicans (12%). Still, there is no consensus that Colbert has gone overboard politically. In fact, more Americans (35%) say he is "about right" politically than say he's "too political" (28%). And more also favor (46%) than oppose (31%) "late-night talk show hosts getting involved in politics by speaking out on political issues." That might help explain why a majority of Americans still say they watch Colbert's content — either 'always' (5%), 'occasionally' (21%) or when they 'see clips online' (27%). The rest (47%) say they never watch Colbert. Finally, when Americans are asked to select up to three of their favorite late-night talk show hosts, Colbert (25%) ties Jimmy Fallon (25%) for first place, with Jimmy Kimmel (22%), Jon Stewart (19%), John Oliver (11%) Seth Meyers (7%), Bill Maher (7%), Andy Cohen (3%) and Taylor Tomlinson (2%) trailing behind them. __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%. Solve the daily Crossword

Market sluggishness, dollar & yields, oil: Market takeaways
Market sluggishness, dollar & yields, oil: Market takeaways

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Market sluggishness, dollar & yields, oil: Market takeaways

After Tuesday's closing bell, Yahoo Finance Markets and Data Editor and Stocks in Translation host Jared Blikre shares three takeaways from the trading session: summertime slowness, divergence between the US dollar (DX=F) and Treasury yields (^TNX, ^TYX, ^FVX), and oil prices (CL=F) rising. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. The S&P 500 snaps a six-day record streak as earnings flood in, the Fed decision looms. Here with more on the trading day takeaways, we got Yahoo Finances very own, Jared Blikre. Jared. Hey Josh, we were talking with Amy Silverman before and she called it out, the summer doldrums and I'm going to stick with that because even though we saw a little bit of a loss today in the S&P 500, it was a whopping one-third of one, not even one-third of 1%, and if I show you a two-month chart, it's going to be a whole lot of nothing here. We have not seen a 1% move the entire month of July. If we look to the downside, we had a 1% move way back in the middle of June. So really not a lot has happened each day in the indices. You have to go under the hood to find the action and we have found that from time to time, but I've also been looking at some of the other things uh that we look at when we talk about volatility and that is the VIX itself. The VIX was up almost one point today, but that was the most in weeks. So even the VIX has been quiet lately and at not even 16, that is historically low. So that's nothing to be concerned about or write home about. And we can also see this playing out in the MAG 7. The MAG 7 index hasn't moved 1% in a few weeks. And then finally, crypto, even crypto is quieted down, not to the same degree, it's still more volatile than the others, but here's a Bitcoin down 7/10 of 1% today. I'll just show you over the last five days, it's been moving less than 1% these last few days and so that even that's unusual for a Bitcoin. So the bottom line is we do have some other things like the calendars about to heat up tomorrow. No joke there and we can get into that later. But for today, yesterday and for most of the month, it's been kind of summer doldrums. Summer doldrums broadly subdued. But what were the what were the market moves you were watching today? Two things, rates in the dollar and they were diverging. So we had rates dropping pretty strongly to the downside, both the 10-year yield, both and the 30-year yield, those dropped by about nine basis points and part of the catalyst has been these surprisingly good uh treasury auctions. So we had a seven-year auction today. Here's a 10-year, we had the seven-year auction, but here's a 10-year down nine basis points to the downside and we can see it went down in a few different strokes. Here's the intraday and there we go. 1:00 p.m. was the auction time, but we also had some other auctions over the last two days, the two-year and the five-year. And then we have the three, 10 and 30-year, those are the big ones next week. But surprisingly high demand on the seven-year. This led to a re uh a lower a much lower rate and then meanwhile, and here's the divergence I'm talking about, up in the US dollar index and I find this to be good. You want to see this divergence when the dollar is moving to the upside. If it had happened the other way around, if the dollar had been going down, but rates had been going up, which meant people were selling bonds, that would be more like around liberation day and that would give me some cause for concern. This is not concerning to me, uh just a little bit of an anomaly there and we'll have to see what happens tomorrow, but again, those big auctions that we were going to be watching for are next week. Does that demand continue? There was record low primary dealer uptake on those auctions today. They're supposed to fill in the void, they didn't have to do that, so that's good news for America, I guess. What about commodities, my friend? All right, let's check that out too because we did see a spike in crude oil today and this was despite that stronger, slightly stronger dollar. Now the news was actually pretty big. This was a surprise announcement from Trump that Russia only has 10 days to negotiate a final ceasefire with Ukraine and we saw this play out in crude oil. I think it moved, yes, seven and a half percent. This is crude oil volatility. Let me get to crude oil itself. There we go. This is about 4% to the upside. Here is the announcement time and yes, that is a pretty dramatic uh move for crude oil. If I show you the year to date, you're going to see this was the biggest spike. Here was the Israeli strike on Iran that we saw. So not nearly that big, but again, notable and uh anytime crude oil moves big, you want to take notice, but since this is in the classification, what I would call a geopolitical shock and not even as big as this and this was immediately given back. Those gains were given back pretty close uh to the time at which they were forged. Um I'm not too worried about this either, but something to look, you know, into the future. Quickly, what what is on the Jared Blikre radar? Oh well, tomorrow we got Fed day. We got some MAG 7. We got four MAG 7 reports into and these are earnings reports into uh what is it? Thursday, culminating with Apple at 4:30 on Thursday. Um we got those big treasury auctions next week. So I think there's a lot to really Oh, and the Fed meeting. Did I say the Fed meeting? Anyway, we got a big Fed meeting tomorrow. So plenty of stuff to cover your calendar and to move the markets. Maybe we'll see a 1% day in the S&P. We shall see. Thank you, buddy. Related Videos Visa, Booking, Mondelez all beat on earnings: After-hours movers Freshworks CEO talks Q2 earnings, AI, and taking on the software giants eToro launches 24/5 trading. What will take to get to 24/7? Lucid teams up with Timothée Chalamet Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Asian Stocks Set for Subdued Open Ahead of Fed: Markets Wrap
Asian Stocks Set for Subdued Open Ahead of Fed: Markets Wrap

Bloomberg

time27 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Asian Stocks Set for Subdued Open Ahead of Fed: Markets Wrap

Asian equities are set for a lackluster start ahead of the Federal Reserve's policy decision, with investors showing little enthusiasm for progress in US-China trade talks. Futures for Tokyo and Hong Kong equities pointed lower, while Sydney contracts were flat after the S&P 500 snapped a six-day rally, slipping 0.3%. Treasuries climbed, led by longer-dated notes, following a solid $44 billion sale. Oil held gains early Wednesday after President Donald Trump's reiteration that further levies on Russia remained on the table without a Ukraine truce.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store