Starmer lowering the voting age to 16 'just to gain their votes'
WHAT on earth was going through the minds of Starmer and his cronies when they decided to lower the voting age to 16?
I know they are stupid, but now I realise they are totally stupid.
These are still children. They identify as cats and whatever other creature they feel like.
How are they going to vote - with a paw print?
There must also be some treats on offer because he ain't doing it for the good of the country.
He's doing it to gain their votes.
These children think they've been everywhere, seen everything and done everything.
Or should that be 'everyfink ay innit'.
A lot of them being nothing more than knife wielding, irresponsible and feral.
Thugs who refuse to answer to anyone.
I wonder just what the treats will be.
God help us....WHAT sense or logic lies behind Labour's intent to lower the voting age to 16?
There is none, other than a cynical ploy to seduce immature teenagers to vote for them.
This by a government that lacks the brains to govern but think they know best how people should conduct their lives.... I WAS brought up with the Second World War still fresh in people's memories and told it was my duty to vote as so many people had died in the fight to be masters of our own destiny.
I have always voted as my right and privilege to do so and personally think that people who "can't be bothered" have no rights to criticise.
We vote standing on the shoulders of heroes who fought for our freedom.
What advice will an 18 year old get from his parents? "Vote for the party who will give you the most, for the least amount of effort".
Ask not what England can do for me, but what can I do for England.
What do you think?
Send your views to: letters@thepress.co.uk
Write no more than 250 words and please provide your full name, address and mobile number
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
16 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Investigation finds vote discrepancies in 2024 Kauai election
A Hawaiʻi State Elections Commission investigative panel tasked with examining the 2024 general election on Kauaʻi has found inconsistencies between state and county vote totals, among other concerns. The panel is recommending that the county and state conduct audits of the vote-counting process in order to figure out why the number of ballots cast differs substantially between the two elections offices. The July 13 report from the Elections Commission investigative group found that Kauaʻi County collected 26,414 mailed-in ballot envelopes for the Nov. 4 election but the state Office of Elections says it counted 27,075 mail ballots from Kauaʻi, a difference of 661 votes. Critics of the election process — including some commission members themselves — have been raising concerns about Hawaiʻi's election process and voter fraud for years. The Hawaiʻi Elections Commission is set to discuss the group's reports and its recommendations to ensure that local election results are conducted fairly and accurately at its next meeting July 30. It's unclear whether the discrepancies, if validated, could lead to altering the outcome of individual Kauaʻi races. The official deadline to challenge results has passed, and the results have been certified. While most of the races on the Kauaʻi ballot were not close, the winning margin for at least one Kauaʻi County Council race was just 106 votes. But the committee's report along with recommendations to ensure greater accountability when it comes to voting could significantly alter how the counties and the state conduct elections to ensure voting integrity. Those suggestions include keeping more accurate official daily counts of ballot collections and the presence of official observers for ballot collection and signature verification. Michael Curtis, the Elections Commission chair, declined to comment on the report. Scott Nago, the state's chief elections officer, also declined to comment. Peter Young, the elections commissioner who chaired the group, could not be reached for comment. But during the commission's meeting last week he said, 'I think that what you're going to see is something that can be debated, but should shed light on a situation that we've heard lots of commentary from both our citizens and commission members.' Young described the report as 'not one-sided' and 'actually quite neutral in many cases.' Ralph Cushnie, one of nine elections commissioners and one of the most outspoken critics of Hawaiʻi elections, called the report 'damning.' Cushnie, who like Curtis lives on Kauaʻi, has been speaking out for many months over his concerns about the voting process, especially regarding what's known as 'chain of custody' — that is, the way ballots make it from voters to the county and to state government for tabulating. Cushnie has done his own independent analysis of election results using material obtained through public records requests, and his numbers differ from the official reports for Kauaʻi and Hawaiʻi County. Cushnie and his supporters, including dozens of members of the public who turn out in large numbers to testify at Elections Commission meetings, regularly raise their concerns at the meetings. But they have gotten little traction with the commission other than to form the permitted interaction group to look more closely at some of the issues they've raised. Cushnie also lost a case before the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court in December that challenged the Kauaʻi election. In that case Kushnie's group alleged there were 3,772 more ballots cast on Kauaʻi than the state's total. But the high court found no evidence of that. Election Complaints 'Valid' A permitted interaction group — or PIG under the Sunshine Law — allows a board to form a small group to work on specific issues and then report back in open session. The Elections Commission group was specifically charged with collecting information on complaints 'regarding chain of custody and election results discrepancies' on Kauai. The complaints, the group concluded, 'are valid.' Its report said there were no logs or records retained by Kauaʻi County that complied with Hawaiʻi Administrative Rules on the security of ballots — specifically, rules requiring the clerk to maintain a complete and current count of ballots issued, spoiled and received by the county. As well, a count of ballots based on scans of ballot envelopes into the state's voter registration system 'is not reconciled with any manual counts and is not verifiable.' Neither Nago nor the Kauaʻi county clerk, the report said, had a 'plausible explanation' for the discrepancy of 661 ballots between the county and the state. The group said it had several written exchanges with Nago, Kauaʻi County Clerk Jade Fountain-Tanigawa and Kauaʻi Deputy Clerk Lyndon Yoshioka. But their responses did not satisfy the group's concerns. 'Both offices have responded to our requests, furnished documents, and offered explanations,' it said. 'They have not, however, provided a clear understanding of how the checks and balances work, nor have they removed doubt about the integrity of the election procedures. The PIG did not receive documents that comply with the law cited above.' The report also suggests there is a different understanding between the Elections Commission group and election officials as to what exactly constitutes an official count. Yoshioka, in response to questions from the group, said that 'any perceived inconsistency or correction' within manual hand-counts or envelopes 'is irrelevant' to the official results, 'as they do not represent the official count.' The group's response: 'While this quote is true to fact, it does leave the PIG members trying to understand why there is a manual hand-count if it is 'irrelevant' and why this manual hand-count discrepancy is not noted throughout the County's documentation to address this confusion. The word 'irrelevant' is off-putting to the members of the PIG.' Ultimately, the group concluded, there appears to be 'no inventory control' of ballot envelopes, and the Statewide Voter Registration System logs are 'electronic and unverifiable' by the group. 'Although the law clearly makes the Counties responsible for this task and the State assures the people that there is a chain of custody in which every ballot envelope is accounted for, there remain questions,' the group wrote. The report also said there exists no reconciliation process to address differences between what the county and state respectively report. 'One would expect the number of signature-verified ballot envelopes in SVRS to equal the number delivered to the Counting Center, but neither of those numbers are provided in real time, nor are they official,' the report stated. 'Mr. Nago states that the official count begins when the ballot envelopes are scanned by the Counties and recorded in the SVRS. This, then, is where the chain of custody begins, but there are opportunities to remove or add ballot envelopes prior to scanning.' The group's report does not identify by district or precinct where the extra votes were cast. But only 3,491 people on Kauaʻi voted in person in 2024, compared with the 27,075 who voted by mail or dropped ballots off at a dropbox location. The state says total turnout on Kauaʻi was 30,566. The PIG's recommendations include requesting an audit of ballot envelopes collected by the county and transferred to a counting center. The group wants the state to do another audit to confirm the 27,075 mail-in paper ballots in the state's possession. The group also wants the Elections Commission to hold a hearing to find out more about what state and county elections officials know about the vote discrepancies. The commission has also formed a permitted interaction group to examine the results of the Hawaiʻi County general election, something that Cushnie has also raised concerns about. That PIG hasn't started work yet. ___ This story was originally published by Honolulu Civil Beat and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ex-BBC journalist says covering Bloody Sunday sparked decades-long career
A former BBC Panorama journalist has said covering Bloody Sunday in his 20s inspired his decades-long career. Peter Taylor, 82, from Henley on Thames, Oxfordshire, subsequently dedicated a large portion of his working life to documenting events in Northern Ireland. During the Troubles he interviewed republican and loyalist inmates in a notorious prison which he said had not been accessed before, or in the same way since. He also tracked down and spoke to an MI5 officer who he said was 'central to getting the IRA to commit to peace' in a secret mission. As he was made a Commander of the British Empire (CBE), Mr Taylor told the Princess Royal that his first assignment in Northern Ireland was covering Bloody Sunday for ITV's This Week. On January 30 1972, British soldiers shot dead 13 civil rights protesters on the streets of Londonderry. Speaking to the PA news agency at Windsor Castle on Tuesday, after being honoured for services to journalism and public service broadcasting, he said: 'I remember being shocked at what happened and feeling guilty that I knew nothing, or very little, about the background to the conflict. 'I remember that day thinking I better start trying to find out, so I spent the past 50 years trying to do exactly that.' It took him nearly 10 years of work to get permission to make a documentary inside the high-security Maze Prison housing paramilitaries, which is no longer in operation. It was otherwise known as Long Kesh and was the site of 1981 hunger strikes. People serving sentences for murder 'and a whole series of dreadful atrocities' were inside, Mr Taylor said, adding that he gained their trust to be interviewed. The conversations were conducted without prison officers' oversight, he added. At Windsor Castle, the former BBC journalist told PA: 'In the end, when they saw the film they were glad that they had taken part because it gave a different view of the contribution that they were potentially prepared to make towards peace. 'You know you've succeeded when you get that kind of reaction, when they're clearly expecting to take you to the cleaners for what you've done, and they say 'wasn't bad for a Brit'.' He earned the trust of major figures including former IRA commander Martin McGuinness, whose funeral he attended, and Ian Paisley, previous leader of the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), whose memorial he was invited to. The aim was 'to get behind the mask' and that 'required them trusting me, but me trusting them to be as straight as they were prepared to be'. 'They knew I had a job to do, so when I asked really difficult questions – which in most cases they tried to answer, they knew that was part of my job – they didn't take it personally, but they knew what I was trying to do.' Another major scoop was accessing the 'back channel between MI5 and the IRA' leadership. The security service ran a secret mission designed to 'encourage the IRA to stop killing people and engage in the political process', he said. The MI5 officer, unearthed by Mr Taylor and his team, was 'part and parcel' of that process. He 'flatly denied' working for MI5 when Mr Taylor first approached, but the journalist left his calling card and a book he had written titled The Provos: The IRA And Sinn Fein. Around 20 years after Mr Taylor first started working on the story, the officer wrote to him and said he had watched his documentary My Journey Through the Troubles. 'He said, if there are any gaps in your knowledge that you would like to sort out, I'm now prepared to talk to you.' Mr Taylor travelled to interview him on the condition of anonymity. Fewer programmes like Mr Taylor's are now made because of lack of funding, he said, adding that his did not attract 'huge viewing figures'. 'My worry is that public service broadcasting and the climate in which I grew up and learned my trade is under threat,' he told PA. 'It needs finances. What we do, people like me try and do, is to help people understand and make political choices and pass judgments on these extremely difficult, complex issues.' The public's appetite is changing too, he said, adding: 'People just grow weary of bombs, mayhem, murder, bad news.' Young people need to 'carry the torch onwards', which is 'a hard ask' because getting jobs and story commissions is increasingly difficult, he said.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: Should anyone pay attention to Hunter Biden?
Aggravated and unleashed, former first son Hunter Biden is on something of a grudge tour, lashing out at those who pressured his father to sub out of the presidential race in the fourth quarter of the 2024 presidential election. 'I don't give a shit what George Clooney thinks,' Biden told former DNC chair Jaime Harrison in a podcast. Clooney's New York Times op-ed about President Joe Biden's decline may have energized pressure for him to step down as the Democratic nominee in 2024, but it was fed by the conventional wisdom, obvious to anyone who watched Biden's fumbling performance in CNN's 2024 presidential debate that he was going to lose the election. Biden's decision to step down after a disastrous debate performance came after the primary process — too late for Democratic voters to pick his replacement, but soon enough for Vice President Kamala Harris to launch a last-minute and ultimately unsuccessful attempt to keep the White House for Democrats. Now Democrats are contending with a lurch to the right engineered by the Trump administration, which has initiated mass deportation efforts; downsized the federal government; directed the Justice Department to investigate the president's political enemies; all but ended foreign aid programs; clamped down on diversity efforts; cut taxes mostly for the wealthy; and engineered cuts to Medicaid spending that will kick millions of Americans off their health insurance in the years to come. In the aftermath of the Democrats' disaster, Hunter Biden has it in for Clooney, James Carville and other Democratic luminaries, all of who he thinks undercut his dad, who got a lot done and is now watching much of it be undone by Trump. He has also been dismissive of former President Barack Obama. And Hunter has an excuse for his dad's bad debate performance: Joe Biden was tired and on the sleep aid Ambien, Hunter Biden said during a three-hour interview about politics and his recovery from addiction on Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan. That may be true, but there are also no excuses if your one job — as Joe Biden's was for Democrats — is to stand in the way of Trump's resurgence. And so most Democrats probably, to borrow Hunter Biden's words, don't give a $!@# what he says. Controversy around Hunter Biden, who has been accused of trading on his last name to secure work for foreign companies, allowed Trump and Republicans to impugn Joe Biden. There was never proof that Joe Biden abused his position, but after years of investigations, there didn't need to be. The special counsel investigation into Hunter Biden's illegal ownership of a firearm while addicted to drugs and his tax evasion were sideshows that also probably damaged Joe Biden's presidency. Joe Biden's decision to pardon his son and others on his way out of the White House door will tarnish his presidential legacy, even as it accurately predicted the Trump administration's use of the Department of Justice. All of that makes it easy to pile on Hunter Biden for not seeing that his father's flagging approval rating and the perception that his decline was being hidden from Americans made his reelection extremely unlikely. Hunter Biden is sticking up for his dad's legacy. Clooney's op-ed, on the other hand, seemed to come from a place of genuine concern both for Biden and for the country. An autopsy the party is preparing to assess why it lost the 2024 election will sidestep Biden's decision to bow out, as well as Harris' campaign, according to a report in the New York Times — which almost sounds like the punchline of a joke. 'An autopsy should address the actual cause of death,' Rep. Ritchie Torres of Texas said Sunday on CNN's 'State of the Union.' Torres argued a Democratic nominee would have benefited from a primary process and exposure to voters, which is Politics 101. Another Democrat, Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, told CNN's Kasie Hunt that he's looking forward to the next election, not back at the last one. 'You can't go back in time and change that decision, which, of course, was consequential to the outcome. So why don't we focus on what people expect from us right now,' Swalwell said Monday.
