US job growth beats expectations in June, unemployment rate dips to 4.1%
Non-farm payrolls increased by 147,000 jobs last month after an upwardly revised 144,000 advance in May, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its closely watched employment report today.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls rising 110,000 following a previously reported 139,000 gain in May. Estimates ranged from an increase of 50,000 to 160,000 jobs.
The report was published a day early because of the Independence Day holiday tomorrow.
Despite the bigger-than-expected rise in payrolls, job growth is slowing, mostly reflecting tepid hiring. Layoffs remain fairly low, with employers generally hoarding workers following difficulties finding labor during and after the Covid-19 pandemic.
Economists say President Donald Trump's focus on what they call anti-growth policies, including sweeping tariffs on imported goods, mass deportations of migrants and sharp government spending cuts, has changed the public's perceptions of the economy.
Business and consumer sentiment surged in the wake of Trump's victory in the presidential election last November in anticipation of tax cuts and a less stringent regulatory environment before slumping about two months later.
The US unemployment rate fell from 4.2% in May. Economists had expected the jobless rate to tick up to 4.3%.
Indicators, including the number of people filing for state jobless benefits and receiving unemployment checks, have pointed to labour market fatigue after a strong performance that shielded the economy from recession as the US Fed aggressively tightened monetary policy to combat high inflation.
Most economists expect the jobless rate will rise through the second half of this year, and potentially encourage the Fed to resume its monetary policy easing cycle in September.
The Fed last month left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.5% range, where it has been since December.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week reiterated the bank's plans to "wait and learn more" about the impact of tariffs on inflation before lowering rates again.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff deadline delayed
The United States is close to finalising several trade pacts in coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9th, President Donald Trump said on Sunday, with the higher rates set to take effect on August 1st. Since taking office, Mr Trump has set off a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies, through efforts such as deals with the United States and other countries. In April, Mr Trump unveiled a base tariff rate of 10 per cent on most countries and additional duties ranging up to 50 per cent, although he later delayed the effective date for all but 10 per cent until July 9th. The new date offers countries a three-week reprieve. Mr Trump, whose remarks to reporters on Sunday came just before his return to Washington from a weekend golfing in New Jersey, had flagged the August 1st date earlier, but it was unclear if all tariffs would increase then. READ MORE Asked to clarify, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the higher tariffs would take effect on August 1st, but Mr Trump was 'setting the rates and the deals right now'. In a posting on his Truth Social website, Trump later said the US would start delivering tariff letters from noon US eastern time on Monday. In a separate post, he rolled out a new tariff policy, calling for countries 'aligning themselves with the anti-American policies' of the Brics developing nations to be charged an extra 10 per cent tariff, with no exceptions to be granted. Brics includes Brazil, China, India and Russia, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Mr Trump has close ties to leaders of some of those countries, such as Saudi Arabia and UAE, and has been touting the prospect of a trade deal with India for weeks. On Sunday, Brics leaders condemned attacks on Gaza and Iran, called for reforms to global institutions and warned that the rise in tariffs threatened global trade. It was not immediately clear if Mr Trump's latest tariff threat would derail trade talks with India, Indonesia and other Brics nations, however. Earlier on Sunday, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent told CNN's State of the Union that several big trade agreements would be announced in the next few days, adding that talks with the European Union had made good progress. Mr Trump would also send letters to 100 smaller countries with which the United States does not have much trade, notifying them of higher tariff rates, he added. 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1st you will boomerang back to your April 2nd tariff level,' Mr Bessent said. 'So I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly.' Kevin Hassett, who heads the White House National Economic Council, told CBS's Face the Nation programme there might be wiggle room for countries engaged in earnest negotiations. 'There are deadlines, and there are things that are close, and so maybe things will push back past the deadline,' Mr Hassett said, adding that Mr Trump would decide. Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told ABC News' This Week programme that countries needed to make concessions to get lower tariff rates. 'I hear good things about the talks with Europe. I hear good things about the talks with India,' Mr Miran said. 'And so I would expect that a number of countries that are in the process of making those concessions ... might see their date rolled.' Mr Bessent told CNN the Trump administration was focused on 18 important trading partners that account for 95 per cent of the US trade deficit. But he said there had been 'a lot of foot-dragging' among countries in finalising trade deals. Thailand, keen to avert a 36 per cent tariff, is now offering greater market access for US farm and industrial goods and more purchases of US energy and Boeing jets, finance minister Pichai Chunhavajira told Bloomberg News on Sunday. India and the United States are likely to make a final decision on a mini trade deal in the next 24 to 48 hours, local Indian news channel CNBC-TV18 reported on Sunday, with average tariffs of 10 per cent on Indian goods shipped to the US, it said. Mr Hassett told CBS News that framework agreements already reached with Britain and Vietnam offered guidelines for other countries. He said Mr Trump's pressure was prompting countries to move production to the United States. The Vietnam deal was 'fantastic', Mr Miran said. 'It's extremely one-sided. We get to apply a significant tariff to Vietnamese exports. They're opening their markets to ours, applying zero tariff to our exports.' – Reuters
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump calls Musk's formation of new party "ridiculous" and criticizes his own NASA pick
President Donald Trump on Sunday called Elon Musk's plans to form a new political party "ridiculous," launching new barbs at the tech billionaire and saying the Musk ally he once named to lead NASA would have presented a conflict of interest given Musk's business interests in space. A day after Musk escalated his feud with Trump and announced the formation of a new US political party, the Republican president was asked about it before boarding Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, as he returned to Washington upon visiting his nearby golf club. "I think it's ridiculous to start a third party. We have a tremendous success with the Republican Party. The Democrats have lost their way, but it's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion," Trump told reporters. "It really seems to have been developed for two parties. Third parties have never worked, so he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous." Shortly after speaking about Musk, Trump posted further comments on his Truth Social platform, saying, "I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks." Musk announced on Saturday that he is establishing the "America Party" in response to Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which Musk said would bankrupt the country. "What the heck was the point of @DOGE if he's just going to increase the debt by $5 trillion??" Musk wrote on X on Sunday, referring to the government downsizing agency he briefly led. Critics have said the bill will damage the US economy by significantly adding to the federal budget deficit. Musk said his new party would in next year's midterm elections look to unseat Republican lawmakers in Congress who backed the sweeping measure known as the "big, beautiful bill." Musk spent millions of dollars underwriting Trump's 2024 re-election effort and, for a time, regularly showed up at the president's side in the White House Oval Office and elsewhere. Their disagreement over the spending bill led to a falling out that Musk briefly tried unsuccessfully to repair. Trump has said Musk is unhappy because the measure, which Trump signed into law on Friday, takes away green-energy credits for Tesla's electric vehicles. The president has threatened to pull billions of dollars in government contracts and subsidies that Tesla and SpaceX receive in response to Musk's criticism. NASA APPOINTMENT 'INAPPROPRIATE' Trump, in his social media comments, also said it was "inappropriate" to have named Musk ally Jared Isaacman as NASA administrator, considering Musk's business with the space agency. In December, Trump named Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut, to lead NASA but withdrew the nomination on May 31, before his Senate confirmation vote and without explanation. Trump, who has yet to announce a new NASA nominee, on Sunday confirmed media reports he disapproved of Isaacman's previous support for Democratic politicians. "I also thought it inappropriate that a very close friend of Elon, who was in the Space Business, run NASA, when NASA is such a big part of Elon's corporate life," Trump said on Truth Social. "My Number One charge is to protect the American Public!" Musk's announcement of a new party immediately brought a rebuke from Azoria Partners, which said on Saturday it would postpone the listing of its Azoria Tesla Convexity exchange-traded fund because the party's creation posed "a conflict with his full-time responsibilities as CEO." Azoria was set to launch the Tesla ETF this week. Azoria CEO James Fishback posted on X several critical comments about the new party and reiterated his support for Trump. "I encourage the Board to meet immediately and ask Elon to clarify his political ambitions and evaluate whether they are compatible with his full-time obligations to Tesla as CEO," Fishback said. - Reuters Read More Risk of further floods in Texas as death toll rises to 82
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump's big, beautiful Bill means massive, ugly tax cuts for American aristocrats
On July 4th, in a mockery of the best American democratic traditions, Donald Trump signed into law his signature piece of domestic legislation. His so-called 'big, beautiful Bill' offers massive tax cuts, mostly to the benefit of the very rich: today's American aristocrats. Yet, while it might be good news for the luxury yacht industry, it will leave an estimated 12 million without health insurance through cuts to the Medicaid programme. Trump's ability to pass such ugly legislation through a tightly divided Congress reflects his political power, and yet it could well lead to his undoing in the 2026 mid-term elections. The more the Republican Party changes, the more it stays the same. For all the talk about the party appealing to the working class, it remains fundamentally committed to a regressive agenda that puts the interests of the very rich above those of ordinary Americans and future generations. This legislation is ripped straight from the playbook of Ronald Reagan. Reagan reduced the tax rate on the highest earners from 70 per cent to 28 per cent, inaugurating a new era of massive upward redistribution of wealth. He did so by slashing programmes benefiting the poorest Americans: child nutrition, housing assistance and payments to single mothers. READ MORE Trump's Bill also resembles Reagan's agenda in another respect: it is as irresponsible as it is cruel. The most expensive social welfare programmes in the US – social security (old age pensions) and Medicare (health insurance for those over the age of 65) – are too popular to cut. Trump, like Reagan has also increased the budget for the major area of American spending: the military. Reagan justified his cuts with the fantasy of supply-side economics, claiming that slashing taxes would generate so much economic growth that it would actually result in increased government revenue. Republicans today justify their irresponsible spending with the accounting trick that, because they only extended tax cuts due to expire, they aren't really adding to the deficit. When Reagan left office, the federal debt had tripled. Trump's Bill is set to increase the federal deficit by more than $3 trillion. Trump's Bill was not much loved by many of the Republicans who voted for it. Deficit hawks worried about adding to the national debt; they like the tax cuts, but would have preferred more social spending cuts to finance them. Elon Musk's criticism of the Bill on these grounds led to his public falling out with Trump. Moderate Republicans, meanwhile, worried that cuts to Medicaid would hurt the party's chances in 2026. Thom Tillis, one of only three Republican Senators to vote against the bill , wondered how he could face his voters 'when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there anymore'. Trump's ability to pass such legislation reflected his considerable political muscle. He could only afford to lose three out of 53 Republican votes in the Senate (he lost three, with vice-president Vance breaking a 50-50 tie) and, even more challenging, only three of 219 Republican votes in the House of Representatives (he lost only two). Trump held his party together by threatening Republicans who voted against the Bill that he would support primary challengers against them. For decades, the Republican Party has been distorted by the fact that most of its politicians are elected from heavily Republican districts or states. As a result, the threat to their re-election lies in primary challenges from the right rather than in winning the general election against a Democrat. Yet Trump was able to exploit this fact like no previous leader. His personal hold on the party means that his endorsement of a primary candidate all but ensures their success. Yet the thing about being at the pinnacle of your power is that everything is downhill from there. The passage of Trump's beautiful Bill may well lead to an ugly Republican defeat at the polls in 2026. Polling shows that only 29 per cent of Americans support it. It seems likely that Republicans will lose their slim majority in the House of Representatives. But it also seems possible that Democrats might re-take the Senate, even though they face a very challenging map there. Tillis, after voting against Trump's bill, announced that he would not seek re-election rather than face a primary challenge. The forced retirement of a popular incumbent increases the chances that Democrats can win his vacated seat in North Carolina. This bill is so extreme and irresponsible that it will enable Democrats to win back moderate voters in contested electoral districts. But perhaps more importantly it will enable them to make the case that Bernie Sanders and others have been pushing: that whatever they say, the Republicans are the party of the billionaires, and the Democrats can be the party of working Americans. Still, the massive federal deficit the Bill creates has planted a ticking time bomb for Democrats. If, and when, they do regain control of the federal government, they will be hampered in pursuing an ambitious agenda because they will be forced first to clean up the Republicans' mess. That, too, is part of a pattern in American politics evident since the Reagan era. How can Republicans retain popularity when their agenda so clearly favours the few at the expense of the many? As they have done since Reagan, they will double down on culture war politics to distract from their economic agenda. Expect to see ramped up assaults on trans rights and racialised attacks on migrants. Republicans will promote misinformation so that Americans don't realise what they're really doing. And, finally, if push comes to shove, Trump may employ authoritarian measures to retain his hold on power. Even so, the biggest legacy of Trump's big, beautiful Bill might be that it shatters Republicans' credibility as the party of working Americans.
