
Najib's bankruptcy case adjourned to Sept 8 over disorganised submissions
Judicial commissioner Suhendran Sockanathan @ Saheran Abdullah also instructed Najib's lawyer Muhammad Farhan Shafee to refile a consolidated set of submissions after finding that key issues were either missing or scattered across documents.
Farhan had earlier argued that the Inland Revenue Board's (IRB) RM1.69 billion tax claim against Najib was tied to funds allegedly received from 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), which were still the subject of ongoing criminal and civil proceedings.
He submitted that there were unresolved legal issues surrounding whether the alleged proceeds of criminal activity could be taxed under Section 4 of the Income Tax Act 1967.
"The IRB has treated the sums received through the appellant's personal accounts, alleged to have originated from 1MDB, as income.
"These amounts do not fall within the scope of Section 4 of the Income Tax Act. Furthermore, provisions under the Anti-Money Laundering Act are also involved," he said during the proceeding today.
Farhan also told the court that these matters were pending before the Special Commissioners of Income Tax, and a final ruling had yet to be made.
He also raised the issue of potential double recovery by the government, saying there were attempts to penalise his client under both criminal and tax laws using the same facts.
However, the court pressed Farhan repeatedly for clarity, pointing out that these central arguments were either not included in the written submissions or only briefly referenced in affidavits.
"None of this is (arguments) in your submissions, you know?
"At the moment, you are all over the place.
"I do not want to have bits here and bits there... it is too cumbersome," Saheran said.
Farhan then suggested that the court grant a short date to allow his team to update and streamline their submissions.
He acknowledged that their arguments had not been presented in a structured manner and expressed his willingness to return to court with a more comprehensive and organised set of submissions.
Saheran: I think yes... Farhan, I think you need to focus a bit more.
Farhan: Sure.
Saheran: Update the submissions and get it to us... I do not want this to be sitting on my docket. For a long period of time. How long will it take?
Farhan: We can file it within the week.
Saheran: Take two weeks... but do it properly.
Senior federal counsel Norhisham Ahmad, who appeared for IRB, also supported the call for clearer submissions, adding that many of the appellant's arguments had not been raised in their original filings.
The court then fixed Sept 8 to hear the case.
Najib is appealing against two bankruptcy notices stemming from additional tax assessments amounting to RM1.46 billion, which have now ballooned with penalties and interest to RM1.69 billion.
The former prime minister maintains that the tax assessments are flawed and should not proceed while related matters are being litigated in other courts.
On June 25, 2019, the government, through IRB, filed the suit against Najib asking him to settle the unpaid tax with interest at five per cent, a year from the date of judgment, as well as costs and other relief deemed fit by the court.
The government claimed that Najib had failed to pay his income tax from 2011 to 2017 within the stipulated 30-day period after assessment notices were issued by the IRB.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysiakini
40 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
Vape bans: Slippery slope for legal governance
LETTER | In July 2024, the High Court ruled that the Kedah state government's move to ban gaming licences, effectively shutting down Sports Toto operations in the state, was unconstitutional. The court found that state authorities had overstepped their powers by refusing to renew licences issued under federal law, thereby infringing on the rights of a legally licensed business and violating the Federal Constitution. This landmark ruling is more than just a win for the gaming industry; it underscores a critical principle: state governments cannot override federal law at will. Yet just months later, we are seeing the same pattern emerge again, this time with the vape industry. Kedah has announced it will no longer renew licences for vape-related businesses, with the goal of a complete ban by 2026. Other states such as Pahang, Terengganu and Perlis are following suit. This trend raises urgent questions about the balance of power in our federal system. What started with gaming licences is now extending to vape. Tomorrow, will it be food and beverages? Or wellness and lifestyle services? If states are allowed to selectively shut down federally regulated sectors, Malaysia risks descending into legal fragmentation, where trade and commerce depend more on local politics than national law. Act 852: A necessary legal anchor Rather than allowing states to adopt unilateral bans, the federal government must focus on fully enforcing Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 (Act 852) across the country. Act 852 was passed after years of consultation and debate. It represents a balanced and structured approach to regulating smoking and vaping products, protecting youth, ensuring product safety, and reducing public health risks while allowing regulated access to adults. Its successful enforcement is not just a health issue; it is a legal imperative. If states are allowed to disregard it through political or moralistic motivations, the Act's legitimacy will be compromised. From a legal standpoint, only a consistent, centralised framework can ensure that public health regulations are enforced uniformly, fairly, and in accordance with constitutional principles. Legal uncertainty hurts rule of law, public confidence One of the hallmarks of a sound legal system is predictability. Businesses, consumers, and civil society should be able to rely on a stable set of laws and policies. When that stability is undermined by states choosing to selectively ban certain industries, it weakens the rule of law and opens the door for selective enforcement, politicisation of trade, and judicial overload from legal disputes. This also affects the very communities the bans claim to protect. Instead of driving behaviour change, bans often push products into illicit channels, where there is no age restriction, no safety oversight, and no taxation. This undermines the public health objectives of Act 852 and increases enforcement burdens. The way forward: Uphold the law, not politicise it The lesson from the Sports Toto ruling is clear: state governments do not have the authority to override federal laws with blanket bans. Vape should not be the next legal battleground. The federal government must assert the supremacy of laws passed by Parliament and ensure that public health policies are governed by national interest, not fragmented by state agendas. Act 852 provides the legal tools to regulate the vape industry effectively. What's needed now is not more bans but better enforcement. Malaysia must decide whether it wants to be governed by clear laws or discretionary bans. The answer will determine whether our legal system continues to uphold constitutional order or gives way to a patchwork of conflicting state policies. The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
EU urges Ukraine to uphold independent anti-corruption bodies
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said the bill could be adopted as early as next week. (EPA Images pic) BRUSSELS : European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen called on Sunday for president Volodymyr Zelensky to uphold independent anti-corruption bodies, with the Ukrainian leader signalling that supporting legislation could be adopted within days. 'Ukraine has already achieved a lot on its European path. It must build on these solid foundations and preserve independent anti-corruption bodies, which are cornerstones of Ukraine's rule of law,' von der Leyen said in a post on X after a call with Zelenskiy. After a rare outburst of public criticism, Zelensky on Thursday submitted draft legislation to restore the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies – reversing the course of an earlier bill aimed at stripping their autonomy. 'I thanked the European Commission for the provided expertise,' Zelenskiy said in a post on X after his Sunday call with von der Leyen. 'We share the same vision: it is important that the bill is adopted without delay, as early as next week.' Von der Leyen also promised continued support for Ukraine on its path to EU membership. 'Ukraine can count on our support to deliver progress on its European path,' she added.

Barnama
2 hours ago
- Barnama
TNB Shares Slip At Mid-morning After RM840.1 Mln IRB Tax Notice
BUSINESS KUALA LUMPUR, July 28 (Bernama) -- Tenaga Nasional Bhd's (TNB) shares slip at mid-morning trading after receiving a notice seeking an additional RM840.1 million in assessment for 2022 from the Inland Revenue Board (IRB). At 10.51 am, the counter fell 18 sen to RM13.42 with a total of 2.91 million shares traded. In a note today, CIMB Securities Bhd said the issue was due to the cumulative amount from notices seeking additional assessment for the years 2013–2021 of RM5.05 billion, net of remission of penalties and RM1.76 billion paid to IRB in December 2020, for 2016-2017, bringing the total to RM5.89 billion to date. 'We believe there is a risk that the IRB may also potentially issue a notice of additional assessment for 2023–2024. 'If TNB's 2023-2024 financial year capital expenditure provides any indication, we think the additional tax assessment for 2023–2024 could be around RM2 billion, which raises the total amount for 2013–2024 to nearly RM8 billion,' it said. The investment bank also said in light of the Federal Court's decision regarding a similar notice for 2018, TNB is currently evaluating its available legal options to address the issue. 'This evaluation takes into consideration that TNB has already applied for investment allowance (IA) under Schedule 7B of the Income Tax Act 1967 (including those for 2022) to the Finance Minister,' it said. Therefore, CIMB Securities has maintained a 'Buy' call on TNB with a target price of RM15.75 per share. On July 2, the Federal Court's final ruling allowed the IRB's appeal, overturning the decision by the High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had previously ruled in favour of TNB's judicial review application to set aside the notice of additional assessment amounting to RM1.25 billion for 2018.