Smart glasses give deaf and hard of hearing people visual access to speech
He was diagnosed with hearing loss 10 years ago and has used bimodal hearing — wearing a cochlear implant in one ear and a hearing aid in the other — ever since. He said the procedure didn't meet his expectations. Smart glasses did.
'If I had to do [the cochlear implant] over again, I would not have gone through that,' Schechter said. 'But then I came upon XanderGlasses in 2023, and these are really a game-changer… I can just wear the glasses while maintaining eye contact and be able to read what people are saying.'
Though Schechter doesn't wear the glasses daily, using them at restaurants, community meetings and for conversations with his family has become an essential part of his life.
'[XanderGlasses] was a big advantage for me … just talking to my family members,' Schechter said. 'Instead of just texting, I'm now able to talk to people … my boys and other family members. It's just a huge advancement.'
The two primary types of smart glasses are augmented reality and artificial intelligence. The purpose of AR glasses is to merge the virtual world with the real world, enhancing surroundings by overlaying digital content. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence glasses focus on providing intelligent assistance, such as voice-based interactions, real-time information and hands-free communication.
According to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, approximately 15% of American adults report some difficulty hearing, with the majority falling between the ages of 60 and 69.
Marilyn Morgan Westner, co-founder of XanderGlasses, said their glasses are designed to be a standalone, reliable communication device that doesn't rely on smartphones or cloud services.
XanderGlasses had their technology built into their glasses to reduce the delay in real-time conversations. (Image courtesy of XanderGlasses)
XanderGlasses co-founder Alex Westner said XanderGlasses are for those with severe hearing loss who no longer benefit from hearing aids or are considering cochlear implants, as the glasses offer communication support rather than improved hearing.
'We always hope that our glasses give people the ability to stay connected and be part of their community and their family,' Westner said.
Smart glasses have a wide price range, from the XREAL Air 2 priced at $249 to the XanderGlasses priced at $5,000. Some glasses also include a subscription, such as TranscribeGlass, which prices the glasses at $377 with a $20 per month fee for captions. XanderGlasses said that while the cost for their glasses is high, they offer pathways to reduce the financial burden, such as a partnership with the Veterans Association where any veteran can get them for free.
'This is the most expensive it'll ever be, is what we like to say,' Morgan Westner said. 'When you have new technology, it's always more expensive until the prices come down for all the supplies and the technology, so all the prices will come down over time.'
While XanderGlasses can improve the quality of life for people with hearing loss, they are a new technology that's still being improved.
Schechter said that before an update improved the software, the XanderGlasses would reboot often, forcing them to reset the glasses, as it would fall behind the conversation. If people spoke quickly, the processing speed would lag and fall behind.
Schechter's difficulties reflect broader user experiences with other smart glasses technology.
David Uzzell and Bri Herold are a deaf and engaged couple who have tried three pairs of smart glasses — Hearview, TranscribeGlass and Engo. Uzzell is a chef, while Herold is a data engineer at the New York Times.
Herold said that while they appreciate the potential of smart glasses, they do have significant limitations. Most smart glasses function with only one-way communication, which allows a deaf person to understand what's being said, but does not assist them in communicating back.
'I would like more AR glasses that have an interpreter on the screen inside [the glasses display],' Herold said. 'It's like having an interpreter with me there. So that would be my ideal way of communicating.
Smart glasses were first developed in 1968 by Ivan Sutherland, with a head-mounted display that could theoretically simulate any type of display, including 2D monitors. As the years continued, Google released a discontinued product known as Google Glass in 2013. Recently, smart glasses have evolved into various companies, such as Vuzix, Xreal, Rokid and Halliday glasses.
Through this technology, smart glasses allow people to access information, take photos, translate languages, and navigate using voice commands and touch controls. However, while most smart glasses companies focus on supporting the general public, some specialize in making these glasses available for people with disabilities or accessibility challenges.
According to a Pew Research study published in April, AI has become a concern for the public, especially in industries, as around 59% of the public and 55% of surveyed experts have little to no confidence that companies in the U.S. will develop and use AI responsibly.
Dan Scarfe is the CEO and founder of XRai, a free translator and transcriber app that's able to work on various devices, such as smart glasses. Scarfe said that he started this company in 2022 to support people with hearing loss through transcription and translation.
'My granddad lost his hearing, and I was back in the U.K. with him three Christmases ago,' Scarfe said. '[I] just watched him surrounded by his family, but unable to engage in the conversation and I kind of had this epiphany one day about combining smart glasses and real-time subtitles.'
Smart glasses display words directly in front of the eyes, allowing the wearer to read text while still seeing the surrounding environment through special glass or tiny screens. The brightness, clarity and position of the text can vary depending on the design, which affects how easy it is to read the captions without being distracted.
Achuta Kadambi, an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at UCLA, said smart glasses face a major display challenge, as manufacturers must balance the creation of high-quality displays with the development of comfortable, lightweight eyewear.
'I think one of the big challenges is how to make the optics and the display work? What can we do to make that more seamless?' Kadambi said. 'I think we're seeing advances on that, and I think a lot of it is going to come down to material science and fabrication in the coming years.'
Kadami also said to make these smart glasses more effective, companies should focus on reducing the latency, or inference time, which lessens delays in response on smart glasses, hindering smooth use.
'So the inference type problem is that if you do it on [on the device itself] … it just takes time,' Kadami said. 'So if I'm having a conversation, everything is a few seconds delayed. That's not really much of a conversation and prevents adoption.'
Despite these limitations, researchers and developers continue to focus on improving smart glasses, aiming for future versions to be more affordable, immersive and accessible, particularly for individuals with hearing loss.
'With the current technology…the glasses are like having my phone in my field of vision. It's a different perception,' Herold said. 'I like it, and at the same time, I don't have to pull up my phone all the time. I can just walk freely. That is really nice.'
As technology expands, Schechter hopes that medical technology will eventually find ways to improve hearing without hearing aids.
'It's amazing what's here now and what's coming in the future,' Schechter said. 'I'm excited about all the new technology. I just hope I'm here long enough to enjoy it and take advantage of it.' Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Journals
12 minutes ago
- Business Journals
The next normal in housing: 3 trends that will define real estate through 2028
Seismic shifts are changing the housing landscape. The AI boom is reshaping real estate workflows. Experience-driven living is emerging as a new standard for luxury buyers. And the largest wealth transfer in U.S. history is underway, altering who buys and what they value. These aren't passing trends, and Atlanta is poised to evolve with them. Here's how the market will look different in three years: 1. AI will be deeply embedded in both home design and transaction management. Artificial intelligence is rapidly restructuring how homes are bought, sold, built and lived in. For developers and brokerages, AI tools are optimizing everything from site selection to pricing and lead generation. For buyers, AI streamlines financing and forecasts long-term value. The result will be faster, more informed transactions in an increasingly competitive market, especially in the high-net-worth space. A study released by the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies noted, 'AI could also play a big role in improving home automation products and features, better managing home energy and predicting when major home components and systems are likely to fail.' 2. Generational shifts will redefine what 'home' means. As boomers downsize, millennials gain buying power and Generation X enters peak earning years, real estate preferences are poised to evolve in deeply personal ways. Once dubbed the 'renter generation,' millennials are actively purchasing homes but seeking things like smart technology, wellness-centric features and homes that double as personal sanctuaries. Meanwhile, Gen X buyers want homes that serve multigenerational needs, balancing aging parents and grown children under one roof. Many boomers are choosing to age in place or purchase second homes near their adult children, which keeps inventory tight in addition to reshaping what retirement looks like. According to the National Association of REALTORS, 17 percent of all homebuyers in 2023 purchased multigenerational homes (the highest since NAR began recording this in 2013). For Atlanta developers and agents, responding to this generational complexity will be key to capturing long-term demand. 3. Heirs and high-earning early buyers will skip the 'starter' phase entirely. The largest wealth transfer in American history is already changing the face of real estate. Cerulli Associates estimates that millennials and Gen Xers will inherit somewhere in the neighborhood of $84 trillion by 2045. As these heirs enter the housing market, many of them are bypassing the traditional 'starter home' in favor of going straight to second homes, investment properties or branded residences. In Atlanta, where luxury real estate still offers comparative value versus coastal hubs, this generational wealth shift is likely to accelerate demand for properties that combine values with smart financial positioning. The new luxury market will be intentional, not just impressive. As these trends converge, opportunity will lie in anticipating demand; and capitalizing on it will require storytelling, intelligent positioning and elevated service. Atlanta's edge lies in its ability to evolve quickly with a growing luxury inventory, a pipeline of innovative builders and developers and a consumer base that spans generations and geographies. The next normal will belong to the most adaptable players, not just the biggest ones. Atlanta Fine Homes Sotheby's International Realty was founded in 2007 and serves as the exclusive Sotheby's International Realty affiliate in Metro Atlanta, building upon the 280-year foundation and heritage of Sotheby's auction house. The company has offices in Buckhead, Cobb, Intown and North Atlanta. As President and CEO of Atlanta Fine Homes Sotheby's International Realty, David Boehmig touches every aspect of the company. His 26 years of experience in residential real estate is complemented by 10 additional years in commercial banking where he focused on real estate and small business financing.
Time Magazine
13 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What Corp. for Public Broadcasting Shutdown Means For NPR, PBS
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced on Friday that it would begin winding down its operations after President Donald Trump rescinded $1.1 billion in funding for the nonprofit, which for decades has helped sustain NPR, PBS, and hundreds of local public media stations across the country. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison said in a statement. She added that the organization would work to support its partners during the transition 'with transparency and care.' The loss of federal support, enacted as part of a broader $9 billion rescissions package signed by Trump in July, will not bring an immediate end to national programming like PBS NewsHour or NPR's Morning Edition. But the decision is expected to pose serious challenges to the network of smaller, often rural public broadcasters that have long depended on CPB funding for their survival. The majority of the CPB's roughly 100 employees will be laid off when the federal fiscal year ends on September 30, according to a press release. A smaller team will remain through January to complete financial and legal obligations, including final disbursements and the expiration of system-wide music licenses. Harrison, who has led the CPB since 2005, called the decision to shut down 'difficult' but inevitable given the scale of the funding withdrawal. 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life,' she said in her statement, 'providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country.' Here's what to know about the funding cuts. What is the Corporation for Public Broadcasting? Founded in 1967 under the Public Broadcasting Act, CPB was created as a nonpartisan nonprofit to channel federal appropriations to public television and radio stations across the United States, including affiliates of PBS and NPR. While national organizations like NPR and PBS generate their own revenue and receive only a small share of direct federal funding, their local member stations rely heavily on CPB grants. In many smaller and rural markets, federal money accounts for 25% or more of a station's total budget. In addition to distributing funding, the CPB also helped stations remain in legal compliance and negotiated system-wide rights, such as royalties for music and content use. Why did Republicans push to eliminate CPB funding? Trump and his allies have long accused NPR and PBS of leaning left politically and argued that taxpayer dollars should not support news organizations they see as ideologically biased. 'NO MORE FUNDING FOR NPR, A TOTAL SCAM!' Trump wrote on Truth Social on April 10, calling the organization 'A LIBERAL DISINFORMATION MACHINE.' After gaining unified control of Congress this year, Republicans pushed to eliminate CPB's funding through a process known as a rescission—a formal cancellation of previously approved federal spending. The Trump Administration proposed eliminating $1.1 billion that had already been appropriated for the CPB through fiscal year 2027. Congress approved the measure in July as part of a broader $9 billion package of rescinded funds, which also included cuts to foreign aid. Only four Republicans in both chambers of Congress broke with their party and voted with all Democrats against the package: Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Mike Turner of Ohio. 'If you don't like what's going on within NPR, you think that there's too much bias there, we can address that,' Sen. Murkowski said in a floor speech ahead of the vote. 'But you don't need to gut the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting.' In an op-ed for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, she warned that the loss of CPB's $12 million in funding for Alaska's public stations—which covers between 30 and 70% of each stations' budgets—would be 'devastating.' Sen. Collins expressed similar concerns: 'I share the frustration with the biased reporting by NPR, and I would support defunding it. Nevertheless, local TV and radio stations continue to provide important coverage. In Maine, this funding supports the emergency alert network, coverage of high school basketball championships, a locally produced high school quiz show, and classical music stations.' The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday advanced a bill that would eliminate future funding for CPB altogether—a move that Harrison said 'will cause irreparable harm, especially to small and rural public media stations.' 'The absence of future funding eliminates CPB's ability to fulfill our statutory mission—providing support to nearly 1,500 local public media stations and making needed investments that help stations serve their communities,' Harrison said before announcing the decision to wind down operations. Despite the push in Congress to eliminate funding for public broadcasting, most Americans still support public media. A Harris Poll conducted in July on behalf of NPR found that 66% of U.S. adults favor continued federal funding for public radio, including 58% of Republicans and 77% of Democrats. 66% of respondents said that federal funding for public radio is a good value for taxpayer dollars. What does this mean for NPR, PBS, and local stations? National programming like PBS NewsHour, All Things Considered, and children's shows will not disappear overnight. But the loss of CPB funding threatens the financial stability of the local stations that carry these shows—particularly those in rural or underserved regions that have long depended on federal support to stay on the air. Without CPB grants, some stations may be forced to reduce staff, cut programming, or shut down altogether. That could have a significant impact in smaller communities, where public media stations are often among the few remaining sources of local journalism. Researchers have classified many rural areas as 'news deserts' due to the decline of local newspapers and commercial outlets. Public broadcasters have filled that gap in many communities by providing access to local news coverage, educational content, and emergency alerts. Those stations may seek new funding from state governments or private donors, but these solutions are not likely to fully replace the funding CPB provided. The New York Times reported that roughly 120,000 new donors have contributed an estimated $20 million in annual value to public media over the last three months, according to the Contributor Development Partnership, a firm that analyzes fundraising data. Total donations this year are about $70 million ahead of last year's pace—a sharp uptick sparked in part by public concern over the loss of federal support. The day Congress approved the rescissions, member stations saw a spike in giving, the Times reported. Rocky Mountain Public Media in Colorado received more than 6,600 donations in one weekend, including a $500,000 gift. WUNC in North Carolina raised over $1 million. WMNF in Tampa brought in more than $280,000—unusually high numbers for both.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Please, Please, PLEASE Don't Show This Post About Trump's Economy To Your MAGA-Supporting Family (Unless You Want To Start A Fight)
Want to know if Trump's economy is actually doing as well as he promised? Subscribe to the Economy Hate Watch newsletter and never miss our monthly update. Hi there, my name is Alexa, and for each month of Donald Trump's presidency, I'm tracking the real numbers achieved by his administration on BuzzFeed. (AKA the unemployment rate, cost of eggs, gas prices, inflation, the Dow Jones, whether citizens received a stimulus check, and Trump's overall approval rating.) Shockingly, it's not hyperbolic to say that last month, our biggest concern about Trump's impact on the economy centered around his meddling in a literal WAR after announcing US airstrikes on Iran. Related: Now we're faced with the repercussions of his One Big, Beautiful Bill — nicknamed the "Worst Bill in Modern American History" — being signed into law. Tasos Katopodis / Getty Images Among its many spooky factors, the bill is expected to add $3.4 TRILLION to the national debt. (Which the government would LOVE if you Venmo-ed them for. Ya know, like we're splitting a happy hour bill.) Twitter: @jackcorrbit So, with all this in mind, here's how the 79-year-old's June 2025 played out: Note: Data on inflation is released a few weeks after each month has ended, so our reports will look at the previous month's numbers. Unemployment has been teeter-tottering around 4–4.2% ever since Trump took office, and June is no different. This time, we're back at 4.1% according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Egg prices used to be the topic of dinner conversation, but now that the avian flu outbreak has become largely contained, supply is slowly coming back, and normal pricing comes with it. Related: However, when one barn door shuts, another barn door opens. Behind lucky door number two? Beef. In fact, the price per pound of beef has jumped about 12% since this time last year. And what's causing the jump? Unfortunately, it's not as simple as a virus. For the last 10 years, CNN reports that farmers have struggled with shrinking herd sizes, droughts throughout farming land in the US, lack of profitability, and an increase in imported beef prices. Now, everything seems to be catching up to us. Every time I report on gas prices, we get a flurry of comments from people saying they wish their receipts reflected the national average here. So I'm hesitant to inform that June's average was $3.276 per gallon. (Sorry, city dwellers. I know your gas station visits aren't nearly as that we're calling $3.276 low.) Related: In April, Trump claimed there was "virtually no inflation" in the US, and that remains just as false today as it did then. We do indeed have an inflation rate, and it's sitting at 2.7%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics — nearly as high as Biden's closing rate of 2.9%. The stock market being up is probably one of my favorite parts about this month's report. Why? Because of the irony. You see, it's amazing that our retirement accounts aren't screaming in as much pain as they were a few months ago when Trump first announced tariffs, and Wikipedia subsequently created a 2025 Stock Market Crash page. Which may make you consider: Hmmmmm, if pauses on tariffs are meant to end soon on Aug. 1, then why isn't the stock market reacting in the same way? One answer from economists? Because of Trump's new nickname: TACO (aka, Trump Always Chickens Out). Meaning, Trump's trade deals and tariff pauses have been an on-again-off-again affair that the market may have a hard time taking seriously now that it's meant to be on-again. The attitude seems to be, Why worry until we have to? That's good for citizens, at least, who saw a second month of gains. Nope, nope, nope. Not a benefit in sight. Everyone, let's slow clap together. Trump just reached a new milestone: The lowest approval rating of his second term so far. In June, Gallup reports the president had an approval rating of 40%. Breathtaking. Those are our stats for June. Now, let's look at comments we received on our last edition in a little section I like to call ✨Comment Corner✨. Related: Comment Corner #1: First, thank you! Second, I love this idea! Let's start our baseline before the One Big, Beautiful Bill was signed, which put individual Americans at about $7,000 per year on average for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act. (This number can change due to many factors, including age, tier plans, whether you're a smoker, etc.) And it's very possible this number may change in the future, as the OBBB makes healthcare coverage harder to secure. Comment Corner #2: Speaking of the OBBB, this commenter shared their opinion that, "Unemployment numbers are going to go up soon" in their industry due to "mass layoffs because of the OBBB." Unemployment will be an interesting figure to watch across multiple industries because of the bill. One I'm keeping a particular eye on is the healthcare industry amid Trump's major reductions in federal support to Medicaid. Not only will these reductions lead to about 12 million more people being without health insurance by 2034, but rural hospitals, doctors, nurses, and staff who rely on Medicaid taxes to stay in operation will also suffer. Comment Corner #3: Shoutout to my fellow economy hate-watchers who inspired us to turn these reports into a newsletter, delivered right to your inbox so you never miss a post. Your readership keeps our little corner of the internet going. 🥹 Want to know if Trump's economy is actually doing as well as he promised? Subscribe to the Economy Hate Watch newsletter and never miss our monthly update. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
