Barclays attracts fresh anti-Israel protests at AGM
Dozens of protesters gathered outside the event in Westminster, central London, waving Palestine flags and holding banners that accused Barclays of 'arming Israel' and 'banking on genocide'.
Reuters saw at least one protester physically ejected from the building shortly before the event was due to begin. The activist was heard to shout 'Free Palestine' as he was escorted out by security.
Protesters also interrupted chairman Nigel Higgins as he tried to get the meeting underway. 'Barclays is a primary dealer in Israel government bonds', a protester standing on a chair shouted before being carried out by security staff.
Several others joined in, waving Palestine flags and shouting Free Palestine. 'You can all go', Higgins said, as the group was removed from the room.
Barclays has faced heavy criticism for its alleged relationships with defense firms that produce equipment used by the Israeli Defense Force.
Dozens of its branches have been defaced and vandalized by pro-Palestine activists in recent years and customers have been urged to boycott the bank.
Barclays has repeatedly said its role as a lender is to provide financial services to defense companies, including US, UK and European firms supplying products to NATO and other allies.
The bank has said it does not invest its own money in companies that supply weapons used by Israel in Gaza, and it only trades shares in such companies on behalf of clients.
Barclays did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday's protests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
More clashes and arrests at UK immigration protests
Demonstrators calling for mass 'remigration' gathered in central ManchesterIn central London, rival demonstrators converged outside a hotel housing asylum seekersMANCHESTER: Further scuffles broke out at anti-immigration protests in the UK on Saturday, with police making several calling for mass 'remigration' gathered in central Manchester, northwest England, for a march organized by the far-right 'Britain First' group, which was confronted by anti-racism in central London, rival demonstrators converged outside a hotel housing asylum seekers, following similar recent events that have occasionally turned Manchester, the two groups clashed briefly at the start of the protest before police split them up, according to an AFP journalist at the scene.'Send them back, don't let them in — just stop them coming in, we've got hotels full of immigrants and we've got our own homeless people in the streets begging for food but nowhere to live,' said protester Brendan O'Reilly, Judy, a 60-year-old retired nurse, told AFP she was there 'because I don't want to see people full of hate on the streets of Manchester.''Do they want them all to go back or is it just people with brown skin? I suspect it's just people with brown skin that they want to re-migrate,' she London, similar clashes erupted outside a hotel in the Barbican neighborhood before police Police wrote on X that officers had cleared a junction where counter-protesters had assembled in breach of the conditions in place.'There have been nine arrests so far, with seven for breaching Public Order Act conditions,' added the have been several flashpoints around the UK in recent weeks, most notably in the north-east London neighborhood of Epping.
Arab News
9 hours ago
- Arab News
Pro-Palestine online content in UK risks censorship, rights groups warn
LONDON: Pro-Palestine online content in the UK could be censored through the twin threat of the Online Safety Act and banning of Palestine Action, human rights groups have warned. Content in support of Palestinians published online could be misconstrued as supporting Palestine Action, a protest group that was proscribed under anti-terrorism laws on July 5, The Guardian reported on Saturday. Index on Censorship, Open Rights Group and other organizations have written to Ofcom, the UK's independent communications regulator, to request clarification on the matter. Signatories to the letter also warned that online content objecting to Palestine Action's banning could be misidentified as unlawful support for the group. Open Rights Group's Sara Chitseko, a pre-crime program manager, told The Guardian: 'Crucial public debate about Gaza is being threatened by vague, overly broad laws that could lead to content about Palestine being removed or hidden online. 'There's also a real danger that people will start self-censoring, worried they might be breaking the law just by sharing or liking posts related to Palestine and nonviolent direct action. 'This is a serious attack on freedom of expression and the right to protest in the UK. We need to ensure that people can share content about Palestine online without being afraid that they will be characterised as supportive of terrorism.' Major online social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok have been advised by Ofcom that they can avoid concerns about meeting the requirements of the Online Safety Act if they are more stringent with censoring content than is mandated by the act. The letter sent to Ofcom by the rights groups warned: 'This approach risks encouraging automated moderation that disproportionately affects political speech, particularly from marginalised communities, including Palestinian voices.' The UK, unlike the EU, lacks a mechanism through which users can appeal the censoring of their online content. Signatories to the letter — which was also sent to Meta, Alphabet, X and ByteDance, owners of the world's top social media platforms — called for the creation of a British dispute mechanism to discourage the censoring of lawful content. The letter added: 'We are concerned that the proscription of Palestine Action may result in an escalation of platforms removing content, using algorithms to hide Palestine solidarity posts and leave individuals and those reporting on events vulnerable to surveillance or even criminalisation for simply sharing or liking content that references nonviolent direct action. 'We are also concerned about what platforms understand by their legal duties regarding expressions of 'support' for Palestine Action.' An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'We have provided detailed guidance to platforms about how to identify the particular types of illegal and harmful material prohibited or restricted by the act, including how to determine whether content may have been posted by a proscribed organisation. 'There is no requirement on companies to restrict legal content for adult users. In fact, they must carefully consider how they protect users' rights to freedom of expression while keeping people safe.'
Arab News
11 hours ago
- Arab News
Anger over Gaza could unseat top UK ministers: Pollsters
LONDON: Pro-Palestine election candidates in the UK could unseat top government ministers at the next general election, leading pollsters have said. Figures including Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood will likely face major battles to keep their seats despite Prime Minister Keir Starmer's decision to potentially recognize a Palestinian state, The Independent reported on Saturday. At the last election in 2024, a pro-Palestine candidate unseated a key member of Starmer's team, Jonathan Ashworth. Streeting retained his seat but with a tiny majority of 528, down from 5,198 in 2019. Mounting public anger over Britain's response to the Gaza war could cause major embarrassment for the government at the next election, pollsters say. Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader and now independent MP, has announced a new party that could also take a chunk of votes from the government by highlighting the Gaza crisis. John Curtice, the country's top pollster, told The Independent that Starmer's pledge to recognize a Palestinian state in September — should Israel fail to meet key conditions — 'may not be sufficient' for voters. Both Streeting and Mahmood are in significant danger of losing their seats at the next election, while other ministers and MPs could also fall if anger continues to grow over Gaza. Starmer had also 'lost out' on votes in his own constituency last year because of concerns over Gaza, Curtice said. However, the prime minister's majority is substantially larger than some of his Cabinet ministers. 'Here is somebody (Starmer) who spent a great deal of time and effort trying to reconnect with the Jewish community, and now he's finding himself having to spend a great deal of effort trying to reconnect with the Muslim community. It is very difficult to keep himself on board with both groups at the moment,' Curtice said. When Corbyn launched his party last week, he said its members would campaign heavily on Palestine, as well as Britain's response to Israel's war on Gaza. Luke Tryl of polling firm More in Common said events in Gaza and government policy toward the war have revealed 'deeper' problems within the ruling Labour Party. 'When we have done focus groups with voters in Muslim areas, particularly some of those who backed or were thinking about backing pro-Gaza independent candidates, I compared it to speaking to voters in the red wall after Brexit,' he said. 'In the sense that Brexit was the thing which caused the split, but it actually brought to the fore much deeper resentments — that they have been taken from granted, ignored, left behind by Labour … I think we're going to see exactly the same thing with Muslim voters.'
