'We're ignoring him': GOP senators react to Musk's threat to primary supporters of Trump's 'beautiful' bill
"I'll take President Trump's endorsement over Elon's any day of the week back home," Kansas GOP Sen. Roger Marshall told Fox News Digital.
"Look, we need to pass this bill because it helps fulfill President Trump's agenda. His priorities were to secure the border, bring back prosperity and security. I think if we do those things, if we bring back the prosperity and the security, we're going to get re-elected. Elon's continuing his little spat, we are ignoring him. Let's get this bill across the finish line."
GOP Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama told Fox News Digital that the "bottom line" is that "51 of us are going to vote for this tonight."
"I saw some of the things he's upset over, the subsidies that we're cutting out of energy, you know, the wind and solar. He thinks that we need to do more with energy, and I agree with that, but we can't keep funding it through the federal government. We've got to go out there and do it the right way through private enterprise like he's done it."
Missouri GOP Sen. Schmitt praised Musk's work at DOGE, saying he has a "ton of respect" for the former DOGE chief and said he should be congratulated for the "incredible thing" he did for the country, finding waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government.
"Everybody's entitled to their opinions," Schmitt said.
GOP Tennessee Sen. Bill Hagerty told Fox News Digital that by the time primary elections come up in 2026, the country will "already be seeing the benefits of the bill."
"We're going to see more growth and more tax benefits, more revenue benefits, I should say, so, I don't think that the doom and gloom being predicted by many is actually going to manifest itself," Hagerty explained. "In fact, I think we're opening the door to a new golden era, as President Trump likes to say."
South Dakota GOP Sen. Jon Hoeven pushed back on the criticism that the bill would increase the deficit by arguing the deficit would be reduced via revenue growth and savings.
"I think people understand that he, you know, didn't like the one big, beautiful bill," Hoeven said. "So I don't know that people have paid, you know, nearly as much attention to it this time around."
Marshall, when asked if he thought Musk's primary threats would hurt Republicans in the midterms, said, "I haven't given it a second thought today."
"It would be a big speed bump in certain states, in Kansas, probably not so much. I think President Trump was wildly popular in most of these states. I think we need to find a way to get Elon back on board. He's a smart person, brings a lot to our economy. Let's figure out how to bring Elon back into the fold here."
Musk intensified his ongoing feud with Trump and his allies this week in a political warning to lawmakers that he would work to unseat them if they voted in support of Trump's bill.
"Anyone who campaigned on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING, but continues to vote on the BIGGEST DEBT ceiling increase in HISTORY will see their face on this poster in the primary next year," Musk posted to X Monday evening.
The message was accompanied by an image of Pinocchio sitting on fire and the caption, "LIAR Voted to increase America's DEBT by 5,000,000,000.00"
"Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," Musk declared in a post on X on Monday.
On Tuesday morning, as the bill was being debated in the Senate, Trump warned that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is a "monster that might have to go back and eat Elon."
"DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible?" Trump told the media Tuesday morning as he departed for a trip to the Florida Everglades to visit a new migrant detention center. "He gets a lot of subsidies. But, Elon was very upset that the EV mandate is going to be terminated."
His response followed a question regarding whether he would deport Musk, who is originally from South Africa. Trump responded, "I don't know, we'll have to take a look."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
Dodgers DEI efforts subject of federal civil rights complaint filed by conservative legal group
A conservative legal group co-founded by White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has filed a federal civil rights complaint accusing the Los Angeles Dodgers of 'apparently engaging in unlawful discrimination under the guise of 'diversity, equity, and inclusion.'' The complaint was filed Monday with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission by America First Legal, less than two weeks after the Dodgers said they denied federal immigration authorities access to Dodger Stadium parking lots. Advertisement The Dodgers declined to comment Wednesday about the complaint, which also named their ownership group, Guggenheim Partners. The EEOC did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Miller is seen as the architect of Trump's immigration policy, which has involved the detaining and deporting of tens of thousands of immigrants and attempting to end birthright citizenship. While the civil rights complaint focuses on diversity efforts, America First Legal mentioned the situation between the Dodgers and federal immigration officials in its news release about the complaint. Los Angeles is one of several cities affected by the Trump administration's militarized immigration raids and protests over immigration policy. The Dodgers have faced criticism from some fans who have called on the team to do more to support immigrants in the wake of the crackdown. On June 19, the Dodgers said federal authorities showed up at Dodger Stadium's Gate A and requested access, which was denied. The Department of Homeland Security said in a statement at the time that the vehicles were there 'unrelated to any operation or enforcement' and that the activity 'had nothing to do with the Dodgers.' The next day, the team committed $1 million toward assistance for families affected by the immigration raids in the city. The Dodgers are the latest organization AFL has taken on for their diversity efforts, joining a group that includes universities and companies like IBM and Johnson & Johnson. The legal group has pursued an agenda aligned with the Trump Administration when it comes to seeking to end diversity efforts; in January, President Donald Trump signed an executive order targeting diversity efforts in the federal government. Opponents say the Trump administration's actions target crucial programs such as medical research and care for women or LGBTQ people. Advertisement AFL singled out a page of the Dodgers' website that includes a mission 'to create a culture where diverse voices and experiences are valued.' The site outlines efforts to recruit women and people of color, partner with community groups to support racial and social justice and promote heritage events for staff and fans. The complaint also names the Dodgers' professional groups for employees, such as the Black Action Network and Women's Opportunity Network. 'The DEI mission statement indicates that the Dodgers are incorporating DEI into its workplace in quantifiable ways with identifiable goals to achieve 'success,' which appears to entail engaging in unlawful discriminatory hiring, training, and recruitment,' AFL stated in its complaint. Conservatives have targeted diversity and equity efforts, arguing that they amount to discrimination, while proponents of such programs say that DEI seeks to lessen discrimination by supporting historically disadvantaged groups. Jared Rivera, chief of staff of Pico California, one of the organizing groups that called on the Dodgers to do more for immigrants, said the complaint amounts to retaliation. 'Stephen Miller's group is dressing up vengeance as legal action,' Rivera said. 'Retaliating against the Dodgers for their compassion shows Miller is threatened when the team and its fans stand up for what is moral and right.' The Athletic's Fabian Ardaya contributed to this report.
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
10 Ways of Making Sense of Zohran Mamdani's Win
Four years ago, when Eric Adams was elected mayor, New Yorkers were told that it marked the end of a progressive wave that had shaped national Democratic politics at least since the shock election of Donald Trump in 2016. Just five months ago, as Democrats reckoned with the meaning of a second loss to Trump, the refrain was similar: The party had been pulled too far left by its activist flank, which it needed to not just discipline but also perhaps disavow. At the time, Zohran Mamdani was registering just 1 percent support. Now he has won a decisive primary victory by bringing a remarkably novel electorate to the polls. And a lesson of his shock victory is one we probably should have learned several times over the past decade: Politics are fluid, even quicksilver, and the just-so stories we tell ourselves about what is possible and what is not are almost always simplistic and in many cases just plain wrong. New York is only one city, exceptional in many ways, and last week's was just one election — a primary at that, featuring a front-runner burdened by laziness and a toxic past. And there are obvious reasons to think that the Mamdani playbook now being debated so furiously both by its admirers and by its detractors would not work in other parts of the country — at least, not in all of them. But Mamdani's triumph is nevertheless, as I wrote a few weeks ago in anticipation, an extremely big deal, elevating an avowed leftist closer to a more consequential executive office than any has held in generations. And though Mamdani's ascension comes with meaningful risks, it also throws open a whole new horizon of political possibility. Mamdani's supporters are exhilarated by the fresh air. But the oxygen spent on him by his haters over the past week shows that they, too, think Mamdani's win is a major national event. Last month, I asked what stories we might tell about a Mamdani victory — for the left, for the city and indeed for the whole country. But election night delivered enough of an earthquake that a number of new and important story lines have emerged since — too many, I think, to organize in any way but as a grab bag of observations. Here are 10. 1. The American left has a new face, and New York City is now an extremely high-stakes progressive experiment. These days, with American politics more and more nationalized, every candidate everywhere is, to some extent, required to participate in national debates and be subjected to national scrutiny (on cable news and social media as well as offline). Perhaps in another era or another city an election like this could be cauterized from the national landscape, allowing an experiment in one city to play out on its own terms. Not now. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CBS News
30 minutes ago
- CBS News
6 HELOC fees that could increase the cost of borrowing
We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms. There are several surprising (and often avoidable) fees that could drive up the cost of your HELOC if you aren't careful. Getty Images Rising home values over the last several years have created a windfall of equity for millions of American homeowners, making home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) an increasingly attractive option for financing everything from home renovations to debt consolidation. With the average homeowner now sitting on over $300,000 in tappable equity, and with average HELOC rates lower than many borrowing alternatives, tapping into this resource seems like an obvious move for those needing to borrow money. However, what appears straightforward on the surface often becomes complicated once you dig into the fine print. While HELOCs are marketed as flexible, low-cost borrowing options, and while they certainly can be, the reality is that there are a number of related fees that can significantly increase the total cost of this type of borrowing. These charges can range from predictable upfront costs to surprise fees that catch borrowers off guard years into their loan. The problem is that many borrowers focus solely on the advertised HELOC rate, overlooking the potential fees that can add to their borrowing costs over time. Those fees can turn what was once an affordable borrowing option into an expensive debt, so it's important to know what to watch for before you sign on the dotted line. Find out how affordable your home equity borrowing options are now. 6 HELOC fees that could increase the cost of borrowing If you're planning to open a HELOC soon, make sure to keep an eye out for the following: Application and processing fees Most lenders charge an application fee to process your HELOC request, which typically amounts to a few hundred dollars. This fee covers the cost of reviewing your application, pulling credit reports and the initial underwriting work. Some lenders waive this fee as a promotional offer, particularly for existing customers or those with strong credit profiles. To minimize this cost, shop around with multiple lenders and ask specifically about HELOC application fee waivers. Credit unions and community banks often have more flexibility in waiving fees for members or local customers. Online lenders may also offer competitive fee structures to attract borrowers away from traditional banks. Learn more about the home equity borrowing rates you could qualify for today. Appraisal and property valuation costs Before approving your HELOC, lenders need to determine your home's current market value. Professional appraisals typically cost between $300 and $400, though it depends on your location and property size. However, some lenders may accept automated valuation models (AVMs) or broker price opinions (BPOs) instead, which can reduce this cost. You can potentially avoid appraisal fees by working with lenders who offer appraisal waivers for borrowers with excellent credit and lower loan-to-value ratios. Some banks also provide free appraisals as part of promotional packages for new HELOC customers, which is part of why shopping around is so important. Annual maintenance and inactivity fees Many lenders charge annual fees simply for keeping your HELOC account open, regardless of whether you use it. But what's perhaps even more frustrating are the inactivity fees, which some lenders impose if you don't draw funds from your line of credit within a specified period (typically 12 months). These ongoing fees can make a HELOC expensive even when you're not actively borrowing. So, it can benefit you to look for lenders that don't charge annual fees or negotiate fee waivers as part of your loan terms. Some lenders waive these fees if you maintain other accounts with them or meet minimum usage requirements. Closing costs and title work Unlike some other forms of borrowing, HELOCs generally come with closing costs similar to those for a mortgage. These can include title searches, title insurance, recording fees and attorney fees, potentially adding a few thousand dollars to your upfront costs. The exact amount varies significantly by state and local requirements. Some lenders offer "no closing cost" HELOCs, but it's important to read the fine print carefully. These lenders may build the costs into a higher interest rate or require you to pay closing costs if you close the line of credit within a certain timeframe. Early termination penalties If you pay off and close your HELOC within the first few years, many lenders will impose early termination fees. This penalty exists because lenders need time to recoup their upfront costs in setting up your credit line. To avoid this fee, you should plan to keep your HELOC open for at least the minimum required period, even if you pay down the balance early. Some borrowers keep a small balance or make occasional small draws to avoid triggering inactivity fees while staying past the early termination penalty period. Transaction and access fees Some lenders charge fees for each time you access your funds, whether through checks, online transfers or ATM withdrawals. These transaction fees can add up quickly if you frequently access your line of credit in small amounts. To avoid this extra cost, be sure to choose lenders that offer free transactions or have minimal fees for your preferred access method. Many online lenders and credit unions offer fee-free HELOC transactions as a competitive advantage over traditional banks, so be sure to weigh what those lenders offer as part of your search. The bottom line While HELOCs can be valuable financial tools for accessing your home's equity, the various fees associated with these products can significantly impact their cost-effectiveness. With careful planning, though, you can minimize these fees and make the most of your home's equity. So, before committing to any HELOC, be sure to calculate the total cost of borrowing, including all fees, not just the interest rate. You should also take the time to compare offers from multiple lenders, negotiate fee waivers where possible and consider whether the convenience and flexibility of a HELOC justify the additional costs.
