Nike stock soars 15% as company forecasts smaller sales, profit drops while tariff costs near $1 billion
Nike (NKE) stock soared on Friday after the sneaker giant said its profit and sales declines would narrow in the current quarter, while costs from tariffs are expected to approach $1 billion as the company makes additional moves to diversify its supply chain away from China.
Nike said Thursday it expects sales to be down by mid-single digits in the current quarter following a 12% drop in revenue during its fiscal fourth quarter ended May 31.
Gross margins fell by 440 basis points, or 4.4%, in its fourth quarter and are forecast to fall by 350-425 basis points in the current quarter.
Shares rose 15.2% on Friday, bringing Nike's year-to-date losses to less than 5%; in early April, Nike stock was down 30% in 2025 alone.
Read more about Nike's stock moves and today's market action.
On its conference call with investors late Thursday, Nike CFO Matthew Friend said newly implemented US tariffs "represent a new and meaningful cost headwind." Nike expects a 100 basis point negative impact on its gross margins as a result of tariffs.
Friend added the company sees a "gross incremental cost increase to Nike of approximately $1 billion," adding, "We intend to fully mitigate the impact of these headwinds over time."
On Thursday, Nike said it plans to cut its reliance on China for manufacturing the goods it sells in the US as part of this strategy.
Chinese suppliers currently account for about 16% of the shoes it imports into the US, and the company said on its earnings call that it expects to bring that down to "high single-digit range" by the end of this fiscal year. The company also announced plans for a "surgical price increase" in the US, which is set to begin this fall.
Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet
Nike has been challenged by the sweeping tariffs announced by President Trump earlier this year, with those impacts still uncertain given its global operational footprint and exposure both to China and Vietnam.
The company has been diversifying its manufacturing base since Trump's first term in office. In 2024, it produced 18% of its apparel and 16% of footwear in China, compared to 26% and 29%, respectively, in 2016.
Nike's struggles in China have also continued, with revenue falling 20% in the region last quarter, driven by a footwear and apparel sales decline of 20% and 19%, respectively.
For its fiscal fourth quarter, ended May 31, Nike reported revenue of $11.1 billion, a 12% decline that was lower than Wall Street forecasts for a nearly 15% decline to $10.72 billion, according to Bloomberg data. Adjusted earnings per share tallied $0.14, compared to the forecast $0.13 per share. That was far lower than the $1.01 per share in earnings it reported in the same quarter last year.
Same-store sales at Nike-owned stores ticked higher, rising 2% compared to the 2.6% decline analysts anticipated.
"While our financial results are in line with our expectations, they are not where we want them to be. Moving forward, we expect our business to improve as a result of the progress we're making," CEO Elliott Hill said in the release.
Alongside the tariffs headwinds, Nike is also facing deteriorating consumer confidence as it aims to get customers back in stores and competes with rivals like On (ONON) and Hoka (DECK).
Nike stock is still down over 6% this year with Friday's surge but has rebounded sharply from its April 8 lows, the day before President Trump paused his most dramatic tariffs announced on "Liberation Day."
The company is also banking on certain innovations like the launch of Vomero 18, Jordan Retros, A'One, and a collaboration with Kim Kardashian. Nike is also patching up its wholesale partnerships with the likes of Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS) and Macy's (M) after it decided to focus on its direct-to-consumer business.
Brooke DiPalma is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @BrookeDiPalma or email her at bdipalma@yahoofinance.com.
Click here for all of the latest retail stock news and events to better inform your investing strategy
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
27 minutes ago
- Associated Press
ROSEN, RECOGNIZED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - June 27, 2025) - WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of common stock of DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DV) between November 10, 2023 and February 27, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'), of the important July 21, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased DoubleVerify common stock during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the DoubleVerify class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than July 21, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) DoubleVerify's customers were shifting their ad spending from open exchanges to closed platforms, where DoubleVerify's technological capabilities were limited and competed directly with native tools provided by platforms like Meta Platforms and Amazon; (2) DoubleVerify's ability to monetize on Activation Services, DoubleVerify's high-margin advertising optimization services segment, was limited because the development of its technology for closed platforms was significantly more expensive and time-consuming than disclosed to investors; (3) DoubleVerify's Activation Services in connection with certain closed platforms would take several years to monetize; (4) DoubleVerify's competitors were better positioned to incorporate AI into their offerings on closed platforms, which impaired DoubleVerify's ability to compete effectively and adversely impacted DoubleVerify's profits; (5) DoubleVerify systematically overbilled its customers for ad impressions served to declared bots operating out of known data center server farms; (6) DoubleVerify's risk disclosures were materially false and misleading because they characterized adverse facts that had already materialized as mere possibilities; and (7) as a result of the foregoing, defendants' positive statements about DoubleVerify's business, operations, and prospects were materially false and/or misleading or lacked a reasonable basis. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the DoubleVerify class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ------------------------------- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected] To view the source version of this press release, please visit
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Subaru Is Making a Huge Bet on the Forester to Navigate Trump Tariffs
Japanese automaker Subaru is resting on its bestseller, the Forester crossover SUV, to be its north star as it navigates the rough seas caused by the Trump administration's heavy automotive tariffs. According to a new report by Nikkei Asia, Subaru hopes the new Forester SUV will help cushion the blow from steep tariffs and keep its footing in its most important market. At the company's annual shareholder meeting in Tokyo this week, Subaru President Atsushi Osaki made it clear that Subaru will stay committed to its stateside customers. "We'll overcome this by maintaining the U.S. as our main market and balancing it with Japan and Canada," Subaru President Atsushi Osaki said at the automaker's annual shareholder meeting on June 25. To say that Subaru depends on the United States auto market to survive would be an understatement. According to its figures, more than 70% of Subaru's global sales are in the United States-far more than its Japanese automaking rivals like Honda and Toyota. In fiscal 2024, Subaru sold 662,000 vehicles in the U.S., or 71% of its total global sales of 936,000. Despite this, Subaru's manufacturing situation leaves it vulnerable to Trump's tariffs. Roughly half of Subarus sold in the States are Japanese imports, which means they're now subject to the 25% tariffs imposed by the Trump administration earlier this year. Subaru estimates those tariffs could cost the company $2.5 billion if they do not work proactively, making its $2.79 billion operating profit from the 2024-2025 fiscal year useless. However, the atmosphere around the shareholder meeting suggested that Subaru would heavily rely on the Forester as a savior for the marque. The latest version of the brand's most popular SUV first went on sale in the U.S. in 2024 with a purely gasoline version, followed by a Toyota-developed hybrid model released earlier this year. Demand is already strong. According to figures from Subaru of America, 15,434 Foresters moved off dealer lots and into the driveways of new owners in May 2025. As of last month, 84,629 Foresters had been sold since the start of this year, a 3.5% year-over-year increase. In addition, Osaki noted that strong Forester sales in Japan could reduce the impact of U.S. tariffs. "The new Forester is performing extremely well," Osaki said. He also added that the hybrid version was selling beyond its expectations. To help further cushion its tariff impact, Subaru plans to ramp up production in its U.S. factory in Indiana, its only overseas plant that makes finished cars. Starting this fall, Subaru will invest 40 billion yen (~$277 million) to begin producing the new Forester at the plant. The factory currently churns out around 340,000 to 350,000 vehicles annually, but Osaki said it could push past 400,000 with the new investment. Still, shifting more production away from Japan caused concern among shareholders. Subaru's domestic manufacturing operations are centered in Gunma prefecture, where many of its suppliers are also based. Osaki acknowledged the dilemma, noting that boosting U.S. output is impossible without its suppliers. "It's true that it would improve our ability to deal with the tariffs, but it would be would be difficult without cooperation from all of our suppliers," Osaki said in response to shareholder questions. "We need to think about this comprehensively." Subaru itself is in a precarious position. Last month, it informed dealers that price increases would add an additional $750 and $2,055 to the cost of vehicles, depending on the model and trim. Specifically, Forester buyers got a price hike between $1,075 and $1,600, depending on trim, while Crosstrek and Impreza buyers got hit by a $750 price bump. At the time, Subaru did not explicitly cite the tariffs as the reason behind the price bumps but noted that they are a response to "current market conditions." "The changes were made to offset increased costs while maintaining a solid value proposition for the customer. Subaru pricing is not based on the country of origin of its products," it said. Fast-forward to now, it seems that Subaru is proactive in recognizing what is working and what is not, though it is tough to tell what the tariff picture will be. According to a new report by Bloomberg, Japan's chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is on his way to Washington, D.C., to hold his seventh round of trade negotiations with his American counterparts. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
General Mills (GIS) Slashes Revenue Forecast as Trump Tariffs Squeeze Margins
Of late, General Mills (GIS) can't catch a break. Despite this week's fiscal fourth quarter 2025 earnings report featuring a beat on earnings per share (EPS), its stock dropped due to concerns over the company's strategic reinvestments and the growing impact of U.S. trade policies. Indeed, the consumer food company expects flat-to-negative organic sales and a drop in adjusted operating profit for the upcoming fiscal year. As price data shows, investors have reacted negatively to this week's earnings news, causing GIS stock to decline by almost 6%. Confident Investing Starts Here: I believe that investors have every right to feel uneasy due to a combination of internal (volume loss in its key market) and external (Trump's tariffs) threats, making me cautiously Neutral on GIS stock. General Mills' Latest Financials In its fiscal fourth quarter, General Mills reported earnings per share of $0.74, surpassing analyst expectations of $0.71, while revenue met forecasts at $4.6 billion, a 3% year-over-year decline. Despite the earnings beat, shares of General Mills have declined and are now trading near 52-week lows. This reaction reflects a broader market trend: investor attention is typically more focused on forward-looking guidance than on backward-looking results, which is reasonable given that future performance carries more weight in valuation models. In that context, General Mills' cautious outlook for fiscal year 2026 has unsettled investors. The company expects organic sales growth to remain flat, with a range of -1% to 1%. However, the more significant concern was its guidance for adjusted operating profit, which is projected to decline by 10% to 15% in constant currency from the fiscal 2025 baseline of $3.4 billion. This anticipated drop is a result of a combination of internal and external challenges. Some of these pressures were already evident in the latest quarter. As TipRanks data shows, in its largest segment—North American Retail—net sales declined by 3%, despite volume remaining flat, indicating underlying pricing or mix issues that may persist. This dynamic signals a deliberate reduction in the average price per unit and aligns with the company's strategic focus on 'returning to volume growth.' However, slashing prices doesn't always translate into higher sales volumes, particularly when underlying brand challenges remain. To address this, General Mills is ramping up its advertising investments, a strategy that will likely support the company's upcoming expansion into the fresh pet food category under its Blue Buffalo brand. Trump Tariffs Stir Trouble for General Mills Increased Selling, General, & Administrative (SG&A) costs aren't alone to blame for General Mills' profitability woes. Donald Trump's infamous tariffs continue to be a significant external operating headwind for General Mills. In fact, much of the 10% to 15% operating profit can be associated with tariffs, given that many ingredients and packaging materials are imported from China, Canada, and Mexico. General Mills' Mitigation Strategy Founded in 1928, General Mills is well-equipped to navigate challenging environments and has several strategies in place to help manage current headwinds. One key initiative is its 'Holistic Margin Management' program, which targets cost savings of 4%–5% as a percentage of cost of goods sold (COGS). This effort could yield up to $100 million in savings by fiscal year 2026, helping to offset inflationary pressures on input costs. The company is also shifting focus toward higher-margin, higher-growth categories. A notable move in this direction is the recent divestiture of its yogurt brands, including Yoplait and Go-Gurt, to Lactalis and Sodiaal for $2.1 billion—a clear example of strategic portfolio realignment. This transaction not only simplifies operations but also provides additional capital to reinvest in innovation and brand development. As a result, the coming year is expected to emphasize product innovation and brand building, although these efforts may weigh on short-term profit margins. According to TipRanks data, GIS maintains a profit margin of ~13%. From a valuation perspective, General Mills' stock appears reasonably priced, trading at a forward P/E of 12.74 —approximately 32% below the Consumer Staples sector average. For comparison, The Hershey Company (HSY) trades at a P/E of 30.27, supported by more substantial EBITDA margins of 25.84% versus General Mills' 19.91%. Is GIS Stock Worth Buying? On Wall Street, General Mills carries a Hold consensus rating based on two Buy, nine Hold, and two Sell ratings over the past three months. GIS' average price target of $56 implies an 11% upside potential over the next twelve months. Earlier this month, Morgan Stanley analyst Megan Alexander assigned a Sell rating to GIS stock with a price target of $51. The analyst expressed caution due to the company's 'decelerating scanner data trends' and a 'decline in retail takeaway.' She also expects a 'high single-digit percentage decline in earnings per share (…), driven by several headwinds, including profit dilution from the yogurt divestiture, operating profit headwinds from resetting incentive compensation, and potential cost inflation impacts.' On the other side of the aisle, Bank of America Securities analyst Peter Galbo is more bullish on General Mills, issuing a Buy rating on its stock with a price target of $63. He highlighted operational improvements, including improved gross margins, and believes the company's guidance for FY26, which calls for a decline in operating profit and EPS, is 'manageable.' General Mills Faces Tough Choices with Strong Brands In conclusion, General Mills' strategy of prioritizing volume growth over near-term profitability has drawn mixed reactions, and with good reason. The company operates in a mature, highly competitive market, faces flat growth, and has limited flexibility in terms of margins. While its planned entry into the fresh pet food category is an encouraging step toward diversification, it's still unclear when—or if—the necessary investments to build and scale that brand will yield meaningful returns. Ultimately, this situation underscores a broader reality: even a legacy player like General Mills cannot rely solely on established brands. Continued relevance in the food industry requires ongoing innovation and investment. For income-focused investors, t he stock does offer a compelling 4.49% dividend yield. However, this alone may not justify the risk, particularly given that 10-Year Treasury Notes are offering comparable yields with far less volatility. At this point, General Mills' products may be more appealing on store shelves than its shares are in a portfolio.
