logo
Majority Of Americans Fear Financial Insecurity In Retirement More Than Death, Study Finds

Majority Of Americans Fear Financial Insecurity In Retirement More Than Death, Study Finds

NDTV14-05-2025
Amid rising inflation, tax pressures, and uncertainty over Social Security benefits, most Americans fear financial ruin in retirement more than they fear death. As they grapple with the realities of longer life expectancies, a growing number say they would rather not live to 100.
According to a new study by the Nationwide Retirement Institute and the American College of Financial Services, only 29% of US adults wish to reach the century mark. The primary reasons behind this reluctance are fears of financial insecurity and declining health in old age. Alarmingly, nearly three out of four Americans worry they'll outlive their savings, the survey revealed.
According to a news release, the research, which explores the financial implications and consumer sentiment related to rising life expectancy, highlights just how fragile the equation can be. According to the college's research, extending a retirement by just 5 years from 30 to 35 years increases the risk of depleting savings by a striking 41%, based on historical market returns. And that risk only intensifies as lifespans continue to lengthen, particularly among healthy, higher-income retirees.
A companion consumer survey from the Nationwide Retirement Institute shows most Americans are underestimating both their chances of living to 100 and the financial demands that kind of longevity brings. In fact, only 29% of respondents said they want to live that long, citing concerns about declining health and deep financial anxieties. Roughly three in four fear they'll run out of money before they run out of time.
Today's volatile economic environment is raising the stakes even higher. According to the joint research, two out of five non-retired Americans (40%) now say they plan to delay retirement due to inflation. And the math is sobering when factoring in lower projected 10-year portfolio returns: Extending retirement by just five years increases the risk of running out of money by more than 300% according to the college's analysis.
These findings send a clear message - retirement planning needs a major reset. Both consumers and advisors must shift their mindset, prioritising longevity risk and placing a stronger emphasis on guaranteed income strategies that can weather uncertainty.
"Too many people underestimate how long they'll live - and that blind spot can seriously undermine their financial security," said Michael Finke, PhD, CFP, professor of wealth management, director of the Granum Centre for Financial Security at The American College of Financial Services and co-author of the study. "We consistently see that those who plan for longevity feel more confident about retirement. The key drivers of that confidence? Working with an advisor, having access to guaranteed income, and building a plan that's designed to last."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

To secure US trade deal, key ministries told to list what they can bring to talks table
To secure US trade deal, key ministries told to list what they can bring to talks table

Indian Express

time3 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

To secure US trade deal, key ministries told to list what they can bring to talks table

FOLLOWING US President Donald Trump's tariff sledgehammer, the government has kicked off an exercise to thrash out concessions across sectors that can be offered in the tariff negotiations later this month. Key economic ministries have been asked to see what they can still afford to offer to sweeten New Delhi's deal when the US team is here on August 25. To reach an agreement, the Trump administration has been demanding much more than what the government has offered in its market access commitments, including lowering of tariffs across the board and removal of non-tariff trade barriers. As policymakers grapple with Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on goods from August 7, alongside an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for its defence and energy imports from Russia, economic ministries have started sending in sectoral tariff concessions in their jurisdictions. There are indications oil refiners have started reducing Russian oil purchases. Some of these concessions, if calibrated well, could ensure an opening up of the domestic economy, sources aware of discussions at the highest levels told The Indian Express. In fact, it was an external crisis that had forced the reforms of 1991. Most importantly, the sources said, an unnecessary show of bravado in countering some of Trump's assertions, however ridiculous they may be, should be avoided. India was one of the first countries the Trump administration had expected to sign a deal with, but slow progress has been a source of frustration for Washington DC. Like countries around the world scrambling to deal with Trump's tariff threats, India had largely adopted a principled, but non-confrontational, stance in an attempt to balance selective concessions with caution to safeguard its economic growth, and circumvent a backlash from domestic producers. Sources closely tracking the US talks with others said a majority of the countries that rushed to sign deals with the world's biggest economy ended up with lopsided agreements that effectively extracted more than what it gave. This includes the UK and Australia that have a trade deficit with the US. On talks with New Delhi, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC Thursday: 'Well, I don't know what's going to happen; it will be up to India. India came to the table early. They have been slow-rolling things, so I think that the President, the whole trade team is frustrated with them. And also, India has been a large buyer of sanctioned Russian oil, that they then resell as refined products. So, they have not been a great global actor'. The assumption in New Delhi has always been that Washington DC will maintain a differential of 10-20 per cent in tariffs between China and India; and that the Americans would be cognizant of India's traditional redlines that have endured for decades, including concerns over GM food crops and the need to safeguard the interest of the vast subsistence-level manufacturing base that has an oversized contribution to labour-intensive exports. The government is also keen to stay away from offering duty concessions on imports of agri items such as soybean, corn and dairy, in the interim deal. While the government has offered to cut tariffs on 55 per cent of US imports, this could be pushed up in the upcoming talks, given that in FTAs with Japan, Korea, and ASEAN, over 80 per cent of tariff lines were down to zero. Sources said the outer limit for a deal with the US, currently pegged at around October, could be brought forward, if fresh negotiations are positive. What complicates the equation for India is that the Chinese are at an advanced stage of negotiations towards a deal, which could have a favourable tariff rate and potential waivers on secondary tariffs, including possibly the tariff on account of Russian oil imports and the proposed 10 per cent BRICS tariff. China is currently faced with a 30 per cent tariff. From New Delhi's perspective, a deal needs to be clinched precisely for ensuring the gap in tariffs between India and China is maintained, even with a limited early-harvest type of deal. There is, however, greater receptiveness now within the policy circles to cut tariffs on some industrial goods, especially intermediate goods where there is the twin problem of high duties and an inverted duty structure (duty being higher on inputs than on final products). Alongside, there is a willingness to grant concessions in sectors such as public procurement and agri provided these are matched by the other side, like in the case of the UK deal. Also, India is willing to import more from the US, especially in three big-ticket sectors – defence equipment, fossil fuels and nuclear – to manage Trump's constant references to the trade gap, the sources said. Tariff rebalancing, if done right, could potentially offer an impetus to the economy, given that the biggest beneficiaries of tariff protection, especially the non-tariff barriers such as an increasing array of QCOs (quality control orders), are the big players. MSME units have been calling for these QCOs to be removed, especially in areas such as steel and textiles. Since 1991, New Delhi has gradually reduced its average tariff from nearly 79 per cent in 1990 to around 12 per cent in 2013, following which it has gone back up to 16-17 per cent by 2023. Sectors such as agriculture, dairy and automobiles, continue to be protected, even as the Ministry of Commerce and industry maintains that its trade measures are WTO compliant. Unlike its response during Trump's first term, where retaliatory tariffs were imposed, New Delhi has desisted from retaliating and is working on strategic concessions in sectors that the US is keen to target, while adhering to its own broad red lines. This involves areas symbolic of trade openness, including nuclear energy, fossil fuels and defence procurement. Think tanks such as Delhi-based Global Trade Research Initiative have said that by refusing to cross its red lines, particularly on agriculture, India has helped avoid 'the trap of a one-sided deal'. Once the official level discussions wrap up, there is a sense that a final call on the deal could come down to a conversation between the two leaders, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump. This is especially so since it is Trump who is the trade negotiator-in-chief. For India, the best-case scenario would be to get a deal of some sort now, and then build on that in the future negotiations that could run into 2026, experts said. With Trump announcing the tariffs and penalties on India, that phone call could come in sooner, they said. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More

Is a US recession imminent? A wake-up call as Trump's tariff shock meets collapsing job growth and Wall Street flashes crisis signals
Is a US recession imminent? A wake-up call as Trump's tariff shock meets collapsing job growth and Wall Street flashes crisis signals

Economic Times

time5 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Is a US recession imminent? A wake-up call as Trump's tariff shock meets collapsing job growth and Wall Street flashes crisis signals

Synopsis US recession fears are rising fast as President Donald Trump's new tariffs clash with shockingly weak job numbers, sparking fresh panic on Wall Street. The July jobs report missed badly, and Trump's sweeping tariff order on 60+ countries is shaking markets even more. With stocks sliding, inflation risks growing, and the labor market slowing, experts warn a perfect economic storm may already be forming. Americans now face rising prices, job insecurity, and falling investments—all at once. "US recession imminent"—this once-hypothetical phrase is now turning into a grim reality. A chilling combination of weak job numbers, aggressive new tariffs from President Donald Trump, and sharp market declines is sending shockwaves through the economy. Wall Street is flashing warning signs, economists are raising red flags, and everyday Americans are starting to feel the pressure in their wallets. As uncertainty builds and confidence crumbles, the country may be on the brink of what experts are calling a 'perfect economic storm.' US recession fears grow as Trump's new tariffs hit amid shocking job losses—Wall Street warns of a perfect economic storm- The phrase 'US recession imminent' is no longer just a headline—it's a growing reality both on Wall Street and in American households. President Donald Trump's sweeping new tariffs, combined with surprisingly weak job data and heightened market volatility, are creating what many economists now call a 'perfect economic storm.' From job losses to trade disruption and tumbling markets, the signals are flashing red—and the stakes couldn't be higher for your wallet, your job, and the future of the U.S. economy. The July jobs report landed like a bombshell. The U.S. added only 73,000 jobs, far short of projections. Adding to the concern, job gains from May and June were slashed by a combined 258,000—essentially erasing most of the perceived progress from earlier months. Crucially, this wasn't limited to one sector. Even typically stable areas like government hiring and services showed declines. With the unemployment rate rising to 4.2% and labor force participation dropping for the third month straight, economists now warn that these aren't seasonal trends—they may point to a long-term economic slowdown. Just hours after the job report, President Trump signed an executive order on July 31, triggering 'reciprocal tariffs' on imports from over 60 countries. New tariffs include: Canada: 35% India: 25% Switzerland: 39% Taiwan: 20% Rates are set to take effect within days, with the White House insisting the move will 'level the playing field.' But economists and trade experts warn that raising import costs right now could backfire—driving up prices for consumers and businesses, curbing investment, and deepening the downturn. Markets reacted swiftly to the double blow of the job data and tariffs: Dow Jones fell 1.2% S&P 500 dropped 1.6% Nasdaq plunged 2.2%—marking its worst day in over three months The VIX index, known as Wall Street's 'fear gauge,' spiked. Meanwhile, Treasury yields collapsed, with the 2-year yield dropping at its fastest pace since 2001—a clear signal of recession fears. Investors are now betting on the Federal Reserve slashing interest rates by September, suggesting the need for emergency intervention to prevent a full-scale economic downturn. In a dramatic twist, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), just hours after the jobs report was released. The White House claimed the numbers were 'manipulated' to damage the administration's image. This has sparked major concerns about the credibility of official economic data. Many fear this move could undermine public trust at a time when accurate, transparent reporting is more critical than ever. This isn't just about Wall Street. Everyday Americans are already feeling the pressure: Job prospects are weakening, especially in industries exposed to global trade are weakening, especially in industries exposed to global trade Prices are rising as tariffs take hold—from electronics to groceries as tariffs take hold—from electronics to groceries 401(k)s and retirement savings are vulnerable as markets wobble are vulnerable as markets wobble Mortgage rates might fall, but that may not offset the pain of job insecurity The mix of rising costs and falling job security is putting serious pressure on working families, even before any official recession is declared. Here's what could shape the coming weeks: August jobs report : Continued weakness could confirm that a recession is already underway : Continued weakness could confirm that a recession is already underway Federal Reserve response : Rate cut signals will be key market movers : Rate cut signals will be key market movers Tariff negotiations : Some countries may seek exemptions, but Trump warns it's 'too late' : Some countries may seek exemptions, but Trump warns it's 'too late' Consumer spending: A major pullback could tip the economy into full contraction Many experts believe we're no longer waiting for a recession—we may already be in the early stages of one. The combination of slowing job growth, trade tensions, falling market confidence, and policy uncertainty is creating a fragile and volatile environment. This so-called 'perfect economic storm' is no longer hypothetical—it's forming before our eyes. What happens next will depend on policy decisions from Washington, the strength of the U.S. consumer, and how the global economy reacts in the critical weeks ahead. Q: What caused the latest US recession fears? Trump's new tariffs and weak job data triggered rising concerns of a U.S. recession. Q: How do Trump's tariffs affect average Americans? They raise prices on imports, making everyday goods more expensive.

Trump Tariffs From Aug 1: From Coffee To Clothes, What Gets Expensive In US  Firstpost America
Trump Tariffs From Aug 1: From Coffee To Clothes, What Gets Expensive In US  Firstpost America

First Post

time6 hours ago

  • First Post

Trump Tariffs From Aug 1: From Coffee To Clothes, What Gets Expensive In US Firstpost America

Trump Tariffs From Aug 1: From Coffee To Clothes, What Gets Expensive In US | Firstpost America|N18G Americans are bracing for a wave of price hikes as President Trump's new tariffs take effect on August 1. From toothpaste and toilet paper to coffee and canned seafood, everyday essentials are about to get more expensive. Leading manufacturers such as Procter & Gamble are raising prices to offset higher import costs, while baby products, kitchen gadgets, and back-to-school clothes are also caught in the tariff net. As steel and aluminum tariffs ripple through supply chains, the costs of packaging, beer, and even baked goods are rising. With household budgets tightening, shoppers are increasingly turning to private-label alternatives, "dupes", and using AI tools to find better deals. See More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store