logo
Inside the battle over Microsoft's access to OpenAI's technology

Inside the battle over Microsoft's access to OpenAI's technology

The future of the most important partnership in technology depends on Microsoft 's access to the artificial intelligence powering ChatGPT.
When OpenAI first demoed a breakthrough feature in May 2024, allowing users to talk to its AI just like a person, it looked as if the company did so in lock-step with its partner and investor, Microsoft. Soon after OpenAI demoed this voice capability for its new GPT-4o model, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella included it in a keynote speech at the company's Build developer conference.
Behind the scenes, Microsoft had little knowledge of the feature until days before the demo, people involved in the matter told Business Insider.
While the agreement between the two companies gives Microsoft access to OpenAI's technology, exactly what OpenAI has to share — and when — is sometimes a gray area.
In this case, Microsoft had access to frequent updates of the core model at the time, but not the voice technology OpenAI built on top of it. Microsoft found out about the demo, and pressured OpenAI executives, including then-technology boss Mira Murati, to get access to the code so Microsoft could do its own announcement, the people said. The company did not want to appear flat-footed to investors, to whom the company has to justify its $13 billion investment in OpenAI, they said.
The example illustrates the ongoing complexity of Microsoft's relationship with OpenAI, and why access to the AI startup's technology is a core issue as the companies renegotiate their agreement.
OpenAI needs Microsoft's blessing for a corporate restructuring. To get that, OpenAI may need to convince Microsoft to change or give up some pretty sweet terms: Microsoft has access to much of OpenAI's technology, exclusive rights to sell it on Azure, first right of refusal to provide computing resources, and a revenue-sharing agreement worth billions of dollars.
Lots of thorny details about points of contention in the negotiations have made recent headlines — a looming, existential clause OpenAI could activate to cut off Microsoft's access, a "nuclear option" reportedly considered by OpenAI executives to accuse Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior, and a report that Microsoft was prepared to walk away from the renegotiations.
In response to those reports, Microsoft and OpenAI released a joint statement saying, "Talks are ongoing and we are optimistic we will continue to build together for years to come."
People close to Microsoft's side of the negotiating talks tell BI the software giant is unlikely to walk away because it is deeply reliant on OpenAI's intellectual property, and the negotiations are an opportunity to improve and expand its access to this technology.
It's all about IP
Microsoft has significantly benefited from its arrangement to access the rights to OpenAI's intellectual property, both by selling it to customers through the Azure OpenAI service and creating its own products using OpenAI's technology, like its AI assistant Copilot. There are limits, however, to what the companies consider "IP."
For example, Microsoft gets access to important aspects of OpenAI's models, like model weights that help determine AI outputs and inference codes that instruct the models on how to use data, the people said. Some things are excluded from what the companies consider IP, like product and user interface information, they said, and the point at which OpenAI must share any technology is up to interpretation.
One person with knowledge of OpenAI's operations said the company doesn't have to share what it's developing until it's finished, which can be subjective.
"You can make sure you share something with Microsoft as late as possible, so they can still simultaneously announce, but make it really difficult to build the same product on top of it," the person said.
Plus, having access to the IP isn't the same as knowing how to use it. This has been harder than expected, several people told BI. OpenAI has grown frustrated with Microsoft's request to spell out the technology to its employees, people with knowledge of both companies said. Sometimes, Microsoft doesn't know what questions to ask of OpenAI.
Microsoft formed a new AI organization two years ago and hired Mustafa Suleyman, the former Inflection CEO who cofounded the AI pioneer DeepMind, to run it. The hiring was meant as a hedge against OpenAI, after Nadella received pressure from Microsoft's board to diversify following instability at its partner startup and CEO Sam Altman's ouster. However, little has come of that in terms of replacing Microsoft's need for its partnership with OpenAI, the people said.
Suleyman has completely rebuilt Microsoft's Copilot app. That effort has yet to achieve much growth for Copilot. His team is focused on building smaller models and has seen success with post-training existing models for new purposes, one of the people said. Overall, Microsoft isn't trying to build frontier models like those that would compete with GPT, and is instead putting resources toward OpenAI, they said.
Microsoft is less worried about AGI, antitrust, Windsurf, or SoftBank
Other points of contention that have made recent headlines are of less concern to Microsoft, the people with knowledge of Microsoft's position said.
Included in the agreement is a clause that would allow OpenAI to declare what's called artificial general intelligence or "AGI," and cut off Microsoft's access to OpenAI's IP and profits. OpenAI defines AGI as "a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable works."
While OpenAI could declare AGI, the concept is so open to interpretation that Microsoft could sue and easily tie the company up in a legal battle for years, the people said. There's another version of the clause, "sufficient AGI," that OpenAI could declare when it builds a technology capable of achieving a certain level of profits, but Microsoft has to sign off on that.
Another apparent sticking point in the negotiations has centered on OpenAI's desire to acquire AI coding assistant startup Windsurf. Under the current agreement, that would give Microsoft access to Windsurf's technology. Microsoft has said it would agree to the acquisition, but Windsurf's CEO doesn't want the company's technology to be shared with Microsoft, one of the people said.
While GitHub Copilot faces increasing competition from other AI coding assistants, access to Windsurf's technology is not a big desire for Microsoft, and the company might consider a carve-out of Windsurf IP in a new deal, the person said.
OpenAI executives have reportedly considered accusing Microsoft of anticompetitive behavior. Microsoft is largely unconcerned about this, two of the people said. The existing deal was investigated by antitrust regulators, including the European Union and the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority.
OpenAI's desire to restructure is in part motivated by a deadline from investor SoftBank that risks a percentage of funding if OpenAI can't close such a deal by the end of the year. OpenAI has said it struggled to fundraise due to its peculiar structure. SoftBank has a reputation for taking risks with its funding, and its CEO is keen on OpenAI, so some observers doubt SoftBank will follow through on its deadline to revoke funding if a new deal isn't reached.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How AI Agents can transform banking operations: 3 principles for ‘endgame', not ‘game over'
How AI Agents can transform banking operations: 3 principles for ‘endgame', not ‘game over'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How AI Agents can transform banking operations: 3 principles for ‘endgame', not ‘game over'

AI Agents – a sophisticated type of software capable of planning, reasoning, and executing tasks independently – are fast becoming a serious consideration for banks looking to streamline operations and boost resilience. With organisations like the World Economic Forum (WEF) touting the transformational potential of Agentic AI, banking leaders must focus not only on the technology itself but getting it used effectively. Will AI Agents on balance displace banking jobs, or will they become integral to a new hybrid human-machine operating model? In other words, is it 'game over' for bankers or is this simply the 'endgame'? In the banking sector, where the cost of error is high and regulatory obligations are extensive, finding the answer hinges on more than just technological capability. Instead, it requires a clear understanding of how AI fits into existing systems, how it learns, and most crucially, how it understands the organisation it's deployed in. For AI Agents to be meaningfully integrated into core business operations, they need more than a generalised grasp of the world (what we might call a 'Public World Model'). Agents also require a 'Private World Model', a real-time, contextual understanding of the specific business environment they serve. This Private World Model is what enables AI to move beyond basic task automation and operate with the discretion, safety, and strategic alignment necessary for use in high-stakes settings like risk, compliance, or customer operations. Building it takes more than data. It takes a structured approach that brings business context into every layer of AI deployment. Banks seeking to move from early experimentation to strategic, at-scale adoption should follow these three key principles: For AI Agents to deliver value, they must be embedded into the operating model, not bolted on as isolated tools. That means defining their purpose, boundaries, and how they interact with human teams from the outset. In practice, this requires cross-functional alignment. That means bringing together risk, compliance, technology, and business operations to ensure governance is embedded and responsibilities are clearly allocated. It's about answering the operational questions before the technical ones. For example: What will the agent do? What decisions can it make? How will performance be measured? How will human oversight work? In highly regulated banking environments, this level of discipline is essential. Poorly integrated AI risks duplication, degradation of service quality, or worse, regulatory breaches and reputational harm. Successful AI programmes treat these issues as first-order design considerations, not afterthoughts. The temptation to adopt AI Agents quickly across the enterprise is understandable, but rarely effective. A more sustainable approach begins with well-defined use cases that offer a high return with manageable risk. One clear example is JPMorgan Chase's COiN (Contract Intelligence) platform, which uses AI to review commercial agreements. It reportedly cut error rates by 80% and freed up 360,000 hours of legal review time annually. This isn't a theoretical impact. It's measurable operational efficiency, delivered through structured implementation and ongoing oversight. Banks should look for similarly contained, repeatable tasks that are essential but burdensome. These create ideal environments for AI Agents to demonstrate value while allowing teams to build institutional knowledge and governance muscle before expanding into more complex areas. AI deployment is not a one-off exercise. As business needs change and regulatory frameworks evolve, AI Agents must adapt in parallel. That means embedding feedback loops and performance monitoring from day one. Unlike static software, AI systems learn from data, and that data changes. Ensuring AI Agents remain aligned with business strategy requires structured retraining, robust monitoring, and clearly defined escalation routes when things go wrong. Change management for the human workforce is equally important. As tasks evolve, new skills and new ways of working are needed. Supporting employees through this transition is critical to building trust in AI, ensuring adoption, and maintaining operational integrity. Retail banks must act now to embrace AI Agents before they become the industry standard, rather than a competitive edge. The prize is substantial for those who are first adopters: greater efficiency, faster decision-making, more consistent compliance, and more responsive customer operations. But the route to get there is not through a single piece of technology. It's through a deliberate strategy grounded in business context and operational clarity. By focusing on integration, strategic implementation, and continuous learning, banks can shift from seeing AI as a bolt-on and start treating it as a vital core capability. Rather than triggering 'game over' for bankers, AI's real potential lies in shaping a more agile, resilient and scalable workforce where humans and machines complement one another. That's an endgame worth striving for. David Bholat is Professional and Financial Services Director at Faculty "How AI Agents can transform banking operations: 3 principles for 'endgame', not 'game over'" was originally created and published by Retail Banker International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.

Robinhood stock tops $100 to new record, roaring 30% since being snubbed from S&P 500
Robinhood stock tops $100 to new record, roaring 30% since being snubbed from S&P 500

CNBC

time36 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Robinhood stock tops $100 to new record, roaring 30% since being snubbed from S&P 500

CANNES — Robinhood stock hit the $100 mark for the first time, capping off a week of fresh all-time highs and renewed investor confidence. Shares are now tracking their best performance since April, up more than 30% since the trading app was snubbed from the S&P 500. The milestone follows a major strategic swing in Europe, where Robinhood unveiled its most ambitious crypto expansion to date — one aimed at re-engineering the financial infrastructure itself. At an event held in a Belle Époque mansion along the French Riviera, Robinhood executives laid out a vision to bring thousands of tokenized stocks, ETFs, and private equities fully on-chain. "This presentation and these products are dual-purpose," CEO Vlad Tenev told CNBC in Cannes. "The first purpose is obviously to deliver great products to users, but I think the second purpose is to just demonstrate very concretely how great it could be if crypto technology and traditional financial services could fully merge." To that end, Robinhood has started quietly building its own blockchain, using Ethereum scaling tech to support 24/5 trading. It also launched tokenized shares of OpenAI and SpaceX — companies not publicly listed — to European users, marking a shift in how and where retail investors can gain exposure to top tech names. "We thought we would just deliver," Tenev said. "We don't want to do much talking. We want to just put product in customers' hands." Robinhood Crypto general manager Johann Kerbrat echoed that sentiment, saying the company is just getting started. "In the future, we think we can expand this to thousands of tokens that represent different types of financial instruments — from U.S. stocks and international equities to private equity," he said. "What we showed today with SpaceX and OpenAI is just a glimpse of what we're planning — there's much more to come." Robinhood's revenue rose 50% year-over-year in Q1, and the company just this week launched staking in the U.S. — a feature that had previously been blocked by regulators.

Microsoft to slash 9,000 jobs in latest brutal cut amid AI push: report
Microsoft to slash 9,000 jobs in latest brutal cut amid AI push: report

New York Post

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Microsoft to slash 9,000 jobs in latest brutal cut amid AI push: report

Microsoft said Wednesday that it will lay off about 9,000 workers in the software giant's latest round of brutal cuts this year. The layoffs will impact less than 4% of Microsoft's global workforce, impacting workers across different teams with varying levels of experience, a source familiar with the matter told CNBC. Microsoft has already slashed thousands of positions this year as it focuses on cutting layers of management and shifting resources toward the artificial intelligence race. Advertisement Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella speaking at a conference in May. AFP via Getty Images Bloomberg reported last month that Microsoft was planning job cuts in its sales division. 'We continue to implement organizational changes necessary to best position the company and teams for success in a dynamic marketplace,' a Microsoft spokesperson told CNBC. Meanwhile, Microsoft reported nearly $26 billion in net income and $70 billion in revenue in the most recent quarter, far outperforming Wall Street estimates. Advertisement Microsoft did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment. Its most recent layoff round in May slashed more than 6,000 jobs, or about 3% of its global workforce, as it eradicates middle management roles. The layoffs announced Wednesday similarly seek to reduce the layers between individual contributors and top executives, a source familiar with the matter told CNBC. Advertisement Microsoft said it will lay off about 9,000 workers. AP In January, the software giant axed less than 1% of its workforce based on performance in an attempt to keep up with cutthroat tech rivals, mimicking Elon Musk's 'hardcore' approach. As of last summer, the company employed 228,000 workers. It cut 10,000 roles throughout 2023. Microsoft has led mammoth layoff rounds in the past, axing 18,000 roles in a single sweep in 2014 after acquiring Finnish telecommunications firm Nokia. Advertisement The company is projecting strong revenue growth of 14% year-over-year as it expands its Azure cloud business and corporate software subscriptions. Shares in Microsoft have risen more than 17% so far this year. Meanwhile, the company is reportedly weighing whether to abandon its breakthrough partnership with Sam Altman's OpenAI. It has considered pausing talks with the ChatGPT maker if the two parties are not able to agree on the size of Microsoft's future stake in OpenAI, the Financial Times reported last month. The company will rely on its existing contract with OpenAI through 2030, according to the report. Several other software companies have trimmed their workforces this year, including homework helper Chegg and CrowdStrike, which suffered a massive outage last year that disrupted airlines, banks and the hospitality industry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store